So, what cool stuff can I do on OS X?


Recommended Posts

I've noticed you can mostly do anything on a Mac that you can on Windows, and it usually feels good to use a Mac, if you can understand what I mean from that. The user experience is extremely good. Although there is less choice of applications to install, you'll usually find they are well-built for the operating system.

 

Unless you're wanting to play games, other than emulators, I would suggest getting one, and macOS Sierra is a great operating system that is extremely well-optimised.

I've noticed you can mostly do anything on a Mac that you can on Windows, and it usually feels good to use a Mac, if you can understand what I mean from that. The user experience is extremely good. Although there is less choice of applications to install, you'll usually find they are well-built for the operating system.
 
Unless you're wanting to play games, other than emulators, I would suggest getting one, and macOS Sierra is a great operating system that is extremely well-optimised.

Quite agreed but the issue I found on the Mac is to play Blu Ray. I installed a Blu Ray drive and Mac don't play Blu Ray videos without third party players and these are not at the same level of the Windows version. Kind of disappointed it but at least I can play the movie.

@macoman Oh, I wasn't aware of that, since I don't have an external disc drive fitted to my MacBook Air, and we don't tend to carry Blu-Ray, only DVD. That is a definite downside to a Mac, though, if you're into high-quality digital media.

normal stuff(to expand of my other comment)

 

Boot camp for windows

parallels

vlc

perian

office

adobe apps(Photoshop etc)

 

Boot camp is great as Microsoft project does not have a mac version and it runs great via parallels and it even feels like a native app and the users does not know any difference as they can email or print direct via the mac.

 

This how I set them up at work as I have mixed windows and osx in my environment.

 

Thanks everyone for all for all of their input.

 

I've been running the latest version of OS X Sierra on a VMware with nearly all of the software recommended to me here.

 

I'm torn because I love my SP4 and I must have something I can remove the keyboard from to use as a tablet for watching Netflix or YouTube when I'm not using it for work. I would like to try Parallels and see how it is running both OS's simultaneously and having access to a common share file folder. I don't see though that Apple has anything with a removable keyboard like the SP4, plus they are on the expensive side.

 

I guess maybe in 3-4 years when my SP4 wears out, I'll look at an Apple option then.

  • 3 weeks later...

Follow up question now that I've had OS X for a few weeks......

 

How is everyone keeping their individual applications up-to-date? Not "apps" from the store, but the actual applications.

 

On Windows I have tools like PatchMyPC. What is the equivalent for OS X?

 

Thanks!

On 4/27/2017 at 6:57 PM, anguilla1980 said:

Yup, I don't see a point in paying a penny until I know I'm going to use the OS. I have an owned full version of Office 2016 Pro on my PC.

You can always get LibreOffice (free/opensource) https://www.libreoffice.org/.

It's on par to Office 2003 without an e-mail client.

22 minutes ago, anguilla1980 said:

Follow up question now that I've had OS X for a few weeks......

 

How is everyone keeping their individual applications up-to-date? Not "apps" from the store, but the actual applications.

 

On Windows I have tools like PatchMyPC. What is the equivalent for OS X?

 

Thanks!

Depends, some apps like Firefox / Chrome will auto update (and can be manually tripped).

Other apps, you have to go in to the app, typically under "Help" and have check for update.

Other's you may have to just download a new version and replace the old one. 

6 minutes ago, Eternal Tempest said:

You can always get LibreOffice (free/opensource) https://www.libreoffice.org/.

It's on par to Office 2003 without an e-mail client.

Depends, some apps like Firefox / Chrome will auto update (and can be manually tripped).

Other apps, you have to go in to the app, typically under "Help" and have check for update.

Other's you may have to just download a new version and replace the old one. 

 

 

That's exactly why I'm looking for an app that will update everything for me lol, like on Windows.

 

Are you saying that type of thing doesn't exist yet for OS X?

 

3 minutes ago, anguilla1980 said:

 

That's exactly why I'm looking for an app that will update everything for me lol, like on Windows.

 

Are you saying that type of thing doesn't exist yet for OS X?

 

Not aware of any, however I'm primary a windows user and it could exist.

 

Other software to consider (free)

 

Gimp - (Photoshop Alternative) - https://www.gimp.org/

Audacity - (Simple audio recorder / editor) - http://www.audacityteam.org/

Krita - (Dawing / Painting software) - https://krita.org/en/

Flux - (Software to change the color of the screen based on the time of day) - https://justgetflux.com/news/pages/macquickstart/#download

Darktable (Adobe Lightroom alternative) - http://www.darktable.org/install/

On 4/28/2017 at 1:48 AM, T3X4S said:

Dude - office is $6.00 / mo.  seriously ?

$72 per year - $720 in ten years in today's dollars.

 

No thanks. 

 

Replacing fully licensed retail products with a subscription based service is one of biggest marketing scams ever.

24 minutes ago, Mirumir said:

$72 per year - $720 in ten years in today's dollars.

 

No thanks. 

 

Replacing fully licensed retail products with a subscription based service is one of biggest marketing scams ever.

Actually $699.90 if you buy 1 year subscriptions instead of paying monthly. The good thing is the one-time purchase option is very much available, but in 2027 you'll still be stuck with Office 2016 (that'll likely not be compatible with Windows 10 v2703), whereas an Office 365 user will always have the latest version. Some people do see the value in that and are willing to pay for it. Choice is good.

  • Like 1
4 minutes ago, Othello said:

Actually $699.90 if you buy 1 year subscriptions instead of paying monthly. The good thing is the one time purchase option is very much available, but in 2027 you'll still be stuck with Office 2016, whereas an Office 365 user will always have the latest version. Some people do see the value in hat and are willing to pay for it. Choice is good.

Reminds me of when the docx format first came out, but the previous version of Word couldn't handle it properly while only a few organizations upgraded to Office 2007.

 

Backwards compatibility is golden.

13 minutes ago, Mirumir said:

Reminds me of when the docx format first came out, but the previous version of Word couldn't handle it properly while only a few organizations upgraded to Office 2007.

 

Backwards compatibility is golden.

They released a Compatibility Pack soon enough and personally I never had any problem despite continued usage of Office 2K3 for a few years. Those who are concerned about long-term accessibility should have the sense not to use proprietary formats anyway. As a home user I can certainly see the advantage of the always updated subscription version (there's a 5 device/license multi-OS sub too), and <$6/month is far less than what I pay for many other services. Of course it all depends on your specific needs and usage patterns. Like I said, having both options available is good.

 

I think we should let this thread get back to cool OS X stuff now. :)

1 hour ago, Mirumir said:

$72 per year - $720 in ten years in today's dollars.

 

No thanks. 

 

Replacing fully licensed retail products with a subscription based service is one of biggest marketing scams ever.

Hold on.... you are "no thanks" to something that only cost you $720 over a decade of having the latest version?   LOL You really are in Russia, huh ?   Bread and Vodka lines are 4 hours long ?

Say hi to Gorby

 

24 minutes ago, T3X4S said:

Hold on.... you are "no thanks" to something that only cost you $720 over a decade of having the latest version?   LOL You really are in Russia, huh ?   Bread and Vodka lines are 4 hours long ?

Say hi to Gorby

That's gotta be the height of your imagination and knowledge of Russia, although you did forget to mention banya and balalaika.

 

Spoiler

 

Quote

having the latest version?

p.s. because the retail versions of MS products never get updated  and have a really short lifespan. /s

 

 

4 hours ago, Mirumir said:

That's gotta be the height of your imagination and knowledge of Russia, although you did forget to mention banya and balalaika.

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

p.s. because the retail versions of MS products never get updated  and have a really short lifespan. /s

 

 

I understand cost is relative - but $700 over a decade?

I dont know why you chose to make the update comment hidden, was that some kind of big reveal ?  Your shot across the bow ?

By update- I am talking about if you bought O365 in 2013, when 2016 came out, you can upgrade, then when the next version comes out, as long as you pay the tiny little payment - you get to stay on the latest version.

 

I think you knew this.  I get that everyone's spending habits are different - but the cost of O365 is great.  I have 2 computers, but have 6 licenses (1 is a Biz Premium, which is more expensive but I wanted it to mess with the Business apps for learning) - it was so cheap I actually used it as "gifts" for people when they were in need.  They think its an amazing gesture and it cost me next to nothing.  IMO its a great idea.

I personally don't like where the "Command" key is. I'm not used to copying and pasting like that so I installed Karabiner. I also have Slow Quit Apps so if you have a habit of closing your apps using Command-W and you accidentally hit Command-Q, it won't close your app right away. You will have to hold it to close the app.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
    • I'm not sure how old the school is, but they've been doing this since GTA 3. Back in those days we'd be lucky for game companies to release on the PC at all. And with the current state of Sony (or Microsoft) their gaming wing won't be getting a penny from me.
    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • If you look around on Amazon, some of these are available for $9
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      175
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!