Pc Crashing Everytime I Play a Game


Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, viniciusxis said:

This is my PSU: http://www.jonnyguru.com/modules.php?name=NDReviews&op=Story&reid=231

 

I think this is the sticker you mentioned?

DSCF3063.JPG

 

I will try and get a better psu to test it out from a friend and will let you know the results.

PS: Yesterday I was too tired to keep doing stuff so I just went to bed, but I lowered the memory thing you said on bios (it was 600something I lowered to 400), left dota open vs bots and went to bed.

Today I woke up with it working normaly and the game had finished, I played around 40minutes of dota as well and it didn't crash.

I will try it out more this afternoon, we'll see.

Thanks for all the help. I'll be sure to buy a new PSU anyways I think, cause if it doesn't fix the problem I'll probably just buy a new mobo/cpu...

 

And yeah, I'm in Brazil, prices are insane.

37.8A total power on the 12V rails, is that enough for that card? i didn't look it up.

2 hours ago, xendrome said:

37.8A total power on the 12V rails, is that enough for that card? i didn't look it up.

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-radeon-rx-470,4703-6.html

 

7.3 A on 6 Pin and 4.5 A from mobo video slot.

 

He had a 750 Ti running OK and then he added another 100 W of power requirement with the RX 470

 

I think he went from OK to "can't handle peak demands"

 

I think he needs a quality 600 W PSU

 

I think the guy from the link I sent had some testing done, maybe he has the real values (I didn't understand most things there so I just stopped reading).

Does the meomory thing I did on bios have anything to do with the PSU? Can you explain to me what that does?

AMD's websites list a TDP of 120W for the RX 470 and benchmarks show a power draw in the low 200W region during gaming at 1080p.

So personally I think the 450W PSU should be fine unless there are a bunch of HDDs and other stuff also connected to it.  If that's the case, unhook any extra stuff that isn't needed for testing purposes.   Though if the PSU is making a squealing sound during gaming, then you probably are straining it.

 

My other hunch is bad RAM.  I've seen that cause annoying issues and random crashes.  If you can take out your existing RAM and try different sticks, it's definitely worth trying, since it's quick and easy.

 

Otherwise you could disassemble the whole PC, take out every component, take out every cable, and reseat every component.  You never know if something wasn't seated straight or something was kinked.  Maybe seat the GPU in a different PCIe slot, if possible.  Try different RAM slots.  Make sure the motherboard plugs are all seated (probably 2 from the PSU), and make sure the correct GPU plug is seated (either a 6 or 8 pin, make sure it's correct).

 

Another idea could be to disable as much stuff as you can from Windows startup.  This one is probably a long shot, but you never know.

18 minutes ago, viniciusxis said:

I think the guy from the link I sent had some testing done, maybe he has the real values (I didn't understand most things there so I just stopped reading).

Does the meomory thing I did on bios have anything to do with the PSU? Can you explain to me what that does?

It is not clear what setting you changed.

 

If you slowed down the CPU then it would reduce power demands.

 

Otherwise memory settings won't have much effect on the PSU other than I am convinced the PSU is operating on the borderline edge of what it can do so small changes can help keep it going but power in a computer is not steady state - it has lots of peak demands and when you hit a peak, the PSU glitches and a-crashing-you-will-go...

 

It would also help if you put your ear right up to the case and identified the component that has become overly noisy. If you take the side off the case sometimes that will help to spot the noisy fan involved.

 

You could also open up the power supply case and look for bulging caps. I've seen that happen with cheapo over worked power supplies like you have. A degrading PSu will just make things progressively worse.

 

Your power supply used to have enough headroom to give you a stable system. Then you added a 100 W of extra load and now the PSU is on the edge. The specs on your power supply are for light duty at normal room temps and these things are mass produced cheaply  so everyone is adding up numbers that are essentially just fantasy in real world conditions.

 

There is nothing in the universe that prevents you from having two separate problems here so continuing to gather information and testing things out could certainly help.

 

 

 

3 hours ago, viniciusxis said:

Hey Dev, that one you sent has been sold out.

Is this one the same tier? https://www.kabum.com.br/cgi-local/site/produtos/descricao_ofertas.cgi?codigo=34217

Its a little cheaper but its on sale, it ends in about 4 days.

I looked around on that site from 550W to 750W and that Corsair CX750 is a great value compared to what else is available.

 

I have that exact power supply in one of my computers.

 

Both Corsair and EVGA are brands that source power supplies from various manufacturers in China. Depending on the price tier they are aiming at they will use different suppliers but what makes both of them a good brand is that they don't use any "junk" suppliers. Both Corsair and EVGA tend to use the Chinese "Superflower" power supplies for their top units but it is unlikely the CX750 is a Superflower. The Seasonic brand manufactures their own designs in Japan and is top quality at a top price. Those are my personal 3 preferred brands. There is also a very high quality manufacturer in China named "Zippy" but their power supplies are hard to find.

 

This lower tier EVGA 600 W at 271 would probably work fine:

 

https://www.kabum.com.br/produto/79112/fonte-evga-600w-80-plus-100-w1-0600-k

 

But the CX750 at 349 is a better value.

 

 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      455
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!