Recommended Posts

I've been an Insider for years and decided to switch back to the fast ring last night with the release of so many new features.

 

My computer reboots like normal and goes through the process to 26%.

 

After rebooting I get a quick flash saying "attempting to restore installation", then another reboot. After that reboot, I get a blue screen that says "inaccessible boot device". That is followed by one more reboot back into my original version of Windows. Anyone else have this problem?

 

EDIT: For anyone else with the issue, it is happening to others: https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/insider/forum/insider_wintp-insider_install/cant-update-to-windows-10-16215-inaccessible-boot/182f4e5d-98c1-4673-bce4-00ef23bb499d

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1333070-16215-fails-to-install/
Share on other sites

That's odd - no fails here; not even on the newest notebook in the trail - an ASUS X54C.  It has the most powerful CPU of all my Insider hardware - understandable, as it has the only Core-i anything in said arsenal (Core i3-2325 - SandyBridge).  However, it also has the second-worst GPU in the arsenal (one of only two non-DX11 GPUs among the notebooks) - only Big Pavilion - at DX9c - is worse; amusingly, it is Big Pavilion that it will replace when the Fall Creator's Update cycle ends.  The Intel HD3000 iGPU in the X54C supports DX10.1 features - not DX11.  For that reason, the X54C is more a productivity book than any other sort of notebook.

 

What CPU and GPU are in the hardware in question?  Also, how much RAM?  Is the HDD nearing capacity?  The X54C - like both HP Pavilions - has a 500GB SATA platter drive, 4GB of RAM, and a SATA DVD burner; also, like Baby Pavilion, it originally shipped with Windows 7.  (Big Pavilion came with Vista on board - hence the DX9c halt.)  Unlike Baby Pavilion, the X54C takes only a single DDR3L SODIMM (Baby Pavilion can swallow two); therefore, the ONLY upgrade in the X54C's cards is an SSD.  With so many notebooks hitting the wall, I'm having to look hard at replacing each notebook as it becomes un-updatable - and those certified/reconditioned Surfaces are looking real good as swap-ins - IF Pentagon City - the nearest Microsoft Store - keeps them in stock, as they tend to sell out rather quickly).  And I just checked - not so much as ONE in stock - at ANY Store within 120 miles; that is four states worth of Stores - VA, MD., DE, or PA.

I'm seeing this on both of my Insider PCs - one is an Intel machine, the other AMD. I haven't yet confirmed it's the same error on the Intel one, but the AMD one just goes to a GSOD (what used to be a BSOD) with INACCESSIBLE BOOT DEVICE shortly after the 30% reboot, before the percentage screen reappears. It does this twice, then restores the previous version (16199). The AMD machine has a 120GB SSD for the system drive with 36GB free on the C: drive (which is the only partition on that drive apart from recovery partitions etc), and it has 8GB of RAM. Neither machine is set up in UEFI mode - the Intel one is too old anyway, and the AMD one is set in Legacy mode. I've done the usual CHKDSK on the system drive, and SFC /SCANNOW, as well as deleting the $WINDOWS.~BT folder but after 5 or 6 tries it still does it. Something odd going on, as others are experiencing this.

 

I had the problem for two days it drove me crazy, tried every trick in the book, nothing fixed it EXCEPT uninstalling Samsung Magician + Acronis True Backup, rebooting, then trying the install again and it worked! reinstalled the same software later and running fine so far.

 

Others have fixed it by uninstalling third party Antivirus software like NOD32.

Edited by Tantawi
1 hour ago, Tantawi said:

I had the problem for two days it drove me crazy, tried every trick in the book, nothing fixed it EXCEPT uninstalling Samsung Magician + Acronis True Backup, rebooting, then trying the install again and it worked! reinstalled the same software later and running fine so far.

 

Others have fixed it by uninstalling third party Antivirus software like NOD32.

I don't have any third-party AV on any of my Insider hardware - in fact, I've stayed away from third-party AV since Windows 8.x (for the rather sane reason that Windows Defender has proved itself).  Given a choice between first-party software and third-party software, the ONLY reason to go third-party is if the first-party software fails - no ifs, ands, or buts.  Both Windows Defender AND DIsk Optimizer have proven themselves - unexpected in both cases; however, I can't fault either.

Just to update - I still have this problem on both machines. Neither of them has the Samsung software mentioned above. Indeed, one of them has no third-party software at all on it. I have however noticed noone seems to have mentioned they're using UEFI boot mode, and wondered if Legacy mode might be a common factor in this problem?

 

 

8 minutes ago, mfarmilo said:

Just to update - I still have this problem on both machines. Neither of them has the Samsung software mentioned above. Indeed, one of them has no third-party software at all on it. I have however noticed noone seems to have mentioned they're using UEFI boot mode, and wondered if Legacy mode might be a common factor in this problem?

 

 

I always used UEFI secure boot. Others have mentioned switching to legacy mode with no effect on the problem either. 

I'm having the same problem on my HP laptop. Doesn't have a Samsung SSD so no Magician software. I've tried to install build 16215 at least 5 times, and every time when the update hits 26% it reboots and says restoring previous version of Windows. Was hoping it was my Logitech wireless mouse transmitter but I just tried again without it and still having the same problem.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      455
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!