• 0

WordPress.com Ecommerce theme


Question

7 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  On 03/07/2017 at 10:47, Nefarious Trigger said:

Why would WordPress (a blogging framework) be a go-to option for an eCommerce store?

 

Curious, not trolling.

Expand  

Are you sure you're not trolling? Because WordPress is used far more than for blogging. Many large companies use WordPress for their sites. And WooCommerce is an easy to use, frequently updated plugin for it to start a store, with thousands of plugins just for WooCommerce. 

 

Something like 27% of the entire web runs off of WordPress. It is a fantastic framework for running business sites, and I really can't believe that you still think of it as a 'blogging framework'. 

http://www.wpbeginner.com/showcase/40-most-notable-big-name-brands-that-are-using-wordpress/

  • 0
  On 03/07/2017 at 10:54, episode said:

Are you sure you're not trolling?

Expand  

Yes, I'm very sure thanks.  

 

  On 03/07/2017 at 10:54, episode said:

Because WordPress is used far more than for blogging.

Expand  

I'm aware of this.

  On 03/07/2017 at 10:54, episode said:

Many large companies use WordPress for their sites.

Expand  

A site yes.  An eCommerce platform - I'm sure that many do and that wasn't my question.  My question was about it being a go-to option.

  On 03/07/2017 at 10:54, episode said:

WooCommerce is an easy to use, frequently updated plugin for it to start a store, with thousands of plugins just for WooCommerce

Expand  

So it extends the WordPress framework into an eCommerce platform.  That's great and you finally give an answer.  Marvellous - but again why would an extended blogging framework that has been extended via plugins be a go-to option over a dedicated eCommerce platform?

 

  On 03/07/2017 at 10:54, episode said:

Something like 27% of the entire web runs off of WordPress

Expand  

Cite?

  On 03/07/2017 at 10:54, episode said:

It is a fantastic framework for running business sites

Expand  

It sure is.  I know this.  That was never disputed. I've done so myself numerous times.

 

  On 03/07/2017 at 10:54, episode said:

I really can't believe that you still think of it as a 'blogging framework'

Expand  

Are you sure that you really can't believe it?  Of the % you noted before, how many are using it for their eCommerce platform?  The link you gave shows a lot of sites with news feeds being their predominant usage - one could argue you provided me with a list of blogs.  Google "WordPress" and the first result I get is "WordPress.com: Create a free website or blog" and then "Blog Tool, Publishing Platform, and CMS — WordPress".  A quick search of the first google results page for "WordPress" looking for the word "eCommerce" returns nothing - the same number returned by looking for "eCommerce" on the Wikipedia page about WordPress.  They return the word "blog" many times.

 

So yeah, I'm pretty sure that I'm not trolling, thank you for asking.  Was my response above combative?  Yes, damn right, as I have asked a genuine question and don't expect to be accused of trolling.  Did I know that WooCommerce extended WordPress into an eCommerce platform? Yes, thanks, I did - I've been developing against WordPress since 2005, so I kinda know what WordPress is and what it isn't.  Can it be extended into an eCommerce platform?  Yes.  Does it compete with other specifically written platforms? Depends upon audience and purpose.  So again, I will ask:

 

what makes it a GO-TO eCommerce platform over a dedicated eCommerce platform?

 

 

  • 0
  On 03/07/2017 at 11:06, Nefarious Trigger said:

what makes it a GO-TO eCommerce platform over a dedicated eCommerce platform?

Expand  

Because its easy to use? Because its easy to integrate a site and store together? Because there are thousands of plugins already made for WooCommerce, so you can do just about anything you want to with it? WooCommerce is just as full-function as any 'dedicated' platform, but you add the ability to run anything WordPress can run as well, integrated into the same site.

 

  Quote

Cite?

Expand  

http://www.techrepublic.com/article/wordpress-quietly-powers-27-percent-of-the-web/

 

  Quote

 

Are you sure that you really can't believe it?  Of the % you noted before, how many are using it for their eCommerce platform?  The link you gave shows a lot of sites with news feeds being their predominant usage - one could argue you provided me with a list of blogs.  Google "WordPress" and the first result I get is "WordPress.com: Create a free website or blog" and then "Blog Tool, Publishing Platform, and CMS — WordPress".  A quick search of the first google results page for "WordPress" looking for the word "eCommerce" returns nothing - the same number returned by looking for "eCommerce" on the Wikipedia page about WordPress.  They return the word "blog" many times.

 

So yeah, I'm pretty sure that I'm not trolling, thank you for asking.  Was my response above combative?  Yes, damn right, as I have asked a genuine question and don't expect to be accused of trolling.  Did I know that WooCommerce extended WordPress into an eCommerce platform? Yes, thanks, I did - I've been developing against WordPress since 2005, so I kinda know what WordPress is and what it isn't.  Can it be extended into an eCommerce platform?  Yes.  Does it compete with other specifically written platforms? Depends upon audience and purpose. 

 

Expand  

Usually when someone says 'I'm not trolling', they are. Why would you put that? It added nothing to your post. You could have just left that line out.

As far as your Google search, maybe you're just bad at Google. Why would you search for just 'WordPress' and expect ecommerce results? You should have searched for 'WordPress eCommerce' or 'WordPress Store' and you'd be in much better shape. The reason why you're not getting the results is because WordPress (the organization) doesn't make WooCommerce, its a third party. bbPress is also a very common WordPress plugin, but you don't get a result for that when you search for 'WordPress'. Does that mean WP shouldn't be used for forums either?

 

Edited by episode
  • 0
  On 03/07/2017 at 11:19, episode said:

Usually when someone says 'I'm not trolling', they are. Why would you put that? It added nothing to your post. You could have just left that line out.

Expand  

Because someone will pipe up about it being a troll question and then provide a long argument that doesn't actually answer the question.  I'd hate to be that guy, huh?

 

  On 03/07/2017 at 11:19, episode said:

Because its easy to use? Because its easy to integrate a site and store together? Because there are thousands of plugins already made for WooCommerce, so you can do just about anything you want to with it? WooCommerce is just as full-function as any 'dedicated' platform

Expand  

Still not an argument that puts it as a "GO-TO" above a dedicated platform (not sure on your use of quote marks there, do you need me to explain what "dedicated" means?).

 

  On 03/07/2017 at 11:19, episode said:

you add the ability to run anything WordPress can run as well, integrated into the same site

Expand  

Bingo, an answer.  Integration - so you argue that having WordPress run your eCommerce platform as well as your site and blog platforms is a reason.  That's fair, makes sense.

 

  On 03/07/2017 at 11:19, episode said:

As far as your Google search, maybe you're just bad at Google. Why would you search for just 'WordPress' and expect ecommerce results?

Expand  

Seeing as I come at it from a "blog" standpoint and you come at it from an "eCommerce" standpoint, the logic of my search should not have escaped you quite so easily.

 

  On 03/07/2017 at 11:19, episode said:

Does that mean WP shouldn't be used for forums either?

Expand  

Where did I state what WordPress should or shouldn't be used for?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • inception horn at max volume every time you copy.
    • Doesn't Windows have I build clipboard history? Win+V
    • Quantum computer does something for first time, creates "certified truly random" numbers by Sayan Sen Image by Ron Lach via Pexels A group of researchers from JPMorganChase, Quantinuum, Argonne National Laboratory, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and The University of Texas at Austin has reached a major milestone in quantum computing. In a new paper published in Nature, they describe how they used a 56-qubit quantum computer to generate random numbers and then proved those numbers were truly random using powerful classical supercomputers. This achievement, called "certified randomness," could be useful in areas like cryptography, privacy, and fairness. Certified randomness means the numbers are not just unpredictable, but also freshly created and mathematically verified. Classical computers can’t do this on their own. They usually rely on hardware random-number generators, which can be tampered with. But with this new method, even if someone tried to interfere with the quantum computer, they wouldn’t be able to fake the randomness and still pass the certification. The idea behind the protocol was first proposed by Scott Aaronson, a computer science professor at UT Austin. He worked with his former postdoctoral researcher, Shih-Han Hung, to support the experimental team. “When I first proposed my certified randomness protocol in 2018, I had no idea how long I’d need to wait to see an experimental demonstration of it,” Aaronson said. “Building upon the original protocol and realizing it is a first step toward using quantum computers to generate certified random bits for actual cryptographic applications.” To carry out the experiment, the team accessed Quantinuum’s System Model H2-1 quantum computer over the internet. They used a method called random circuit sampling (RCS), which is known to be extremely hard for classical computers to simulate. The process had two main steps. First, the researchers sent the quantum computer a series of challenge circuits created from a small seed of randomness. The quantum computer had to solve these challenges by picking one of many possible answers at random. Then, in the second step, classical supercomputers checked the results to confirm the randomness was real. The team used several supercomputers with a combined performance of 1.1 × 10¹⁸ floating-point operations per second (1.1 ExaFLOPS) to certify 71,313 bits of entropy. This means they proved that the random bits couldn’t have been generated by classical methods, at least not under realistic conditions and assumptions. “This work marks a major milestone in quantum computing, demonstrating a solution to a real-world challenge using a quantum computer beyond the capabilities of classical supercomputers today,” said Marco Pistoia, Head of Global Technology Applied Research at JPMorganChase. Quantinuum had upgraded its H2 system to 56 qubits in June 2024. Thanks to its high accuracy and ability for any qubit to connect with any other, the system was able to perform RCS far better than previous machines. This upgrade, combined with Aaronson’s protocol, made the breakthrough possible. “Today, we celebrate a pivotal milestone that brings quantum computing firmly into the realm of practical, real-world applications,” said Dr. Rajeeb Hazra, President and CEO of Quantinuum. “These results in quantum computing were enabled by the world-leading U.S. Department of Energy computing facilities at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Argonne National Laboratory and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory,” said Travis Humble, director of the Quantum Computing User Program at ORNL. While quantum computers have shown they can outperform classical ones in theory, turning that power into something useful has been a challenge. This experiment shows that quantum computers can now do something practical that classical computers simply can’t match. Source: University of Texas, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      EzraNougat earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      westDvina earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Community Regular
      Bern@rd went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • Week One Done
      Joey Solo earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Vicente C Alves earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      711
    2. 2
      +FloatingFatMan
      201
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      163
    4. 4
      Xenon
      130
    5. 5
      wakjak
      110
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!