[POLL] Best HD Brand


Which brand of HD is, in your opinion, the best ?  

226 members have voted

  1. 1. Which brand of HD is, in your opinion, the best ?

    • MAXTOR
      49
    • WESTERN DIGITAL
      111
    • IBM (HITACHI)
      14
    • FUJITSU
      1
    • SEAGATE
      51


Recommended Posts

Ugh, I have a POS quantum 6 GB that came in a Compaq in the Pentium 233 days

It's a 5?, it's slow (6 MB/s sustained) and it's noisy as hell. It has a louder whine and louder seeking than any drive I've ever heard, and I know it's sure as hell not even 5400 RPM.

But my seagate 4 gig is the same way...all hard drives were that way in that day!:rolleyes::

geez...still can't believe all these WD followers. Even my roommate who has 5 WD drives is saying "Well another one of my drives is dying, but who care's WD's are cheap pieces of crap and I knew it in the first place."

BTW: 3 of his 5 are dying...his brother has a raid 0 array and replaces the drives every 6 months when one breaks.

I've had Western Digital in the past and I was never pleased with them, so I switched to Maxtor, been using Maxtor for 3 years now, I own 12 of them all different sizes, 8 of them on my main computer that runs 24/7 unless there is a storm and power is down longer than 30 mins (battery backup works for 30 mins :D )

My sig would let you know some of my Maxtor HDs :p

to tell you the truth i voted seagate cause its the best hands down, but personaly i always buy WESTERN DIGITAL drives, brand loyality i guess, i donnno why but i always buy WESTERN DIGITAL even thou I would rather have a seagate sometimes :p lol

Why are seagates better? Their desktop drives are slow.

MATXOR,....Then Seagate or WD. Definately not Hitachi (IBM).

Definitely STAY AWAY from IBM drives, because Hitachi makes them. I bought the IBM drive because after working with IBM systems of all sizes for 14 years, I know IBM drives are quality; you don't get 98% system reliability from bad HDDs.

Anyway, the first IBM DeskStar 60GB used to make noise a few times a day like the heads were wiping the disks; three clicks. The replacement drive they sent me was a Hitachi Deskstar. It made the same noise, but only clicked once instead of three times. An improvement?

I now have a Maxtor IDE 60GB for the system drive.

one more for seagate... cool.. quiet and they have yet to fail on me. I think the reason why the WD are winning is because there is more brand awareness for them, like intel. Ask a person on the street if they know who intel and amd are... I would be very surpised fi they didnt go whos amd.

Definitely STAY AWAY from IBM drives, because Hitachi makes them. I bought the IBM drive because after working with IBM systems of all sizes for 14 years, I know IBM drives are quality; you don't get 98% system reliability from bad HDDs.

Anyway, the first IBM DeskStar 60GB used to make noise a few times a day like the heads were wiping the disks; three clicks. The replacement drive they sent me was a Hitachi Deskstar. It made the same noise, but only clicked once instead of three times. An improvement?

I now have a Maxtor IDE 60GB for the system drive.

yeah? 60GXP drives have quite a history of FAILURE.

to tell you the truth i voted seagate cause its the best hands down, but personaly i always buy WESTERN DIGITAL drives, brand loyality i guess, i donnno why but i always buy WESTERN DIGITAL even thou I would rather have a seagate sometimes :p lol

The only Seagates that I know are good besides Maxtor are Seagates Barracuda, those drives last a long time. :yes:

I worked for a telemarketing company as the system administrator for 5yrs (they had dumb terminals still :whistle: ). Before I left the company cause I got a better job, the drives started making the "click of death". I called the company in charge of the dialer, they sent 4. Replaced them and "walla", back to work.

:D

The only Seagates that I know are good besides Maxtor are Seagates Barracuda, those drives last a long time. :yes:

I worked for a telemarketing company as the system administrator for 5yrs (they had dumb terminals still :whistle: ). Before I left the company cause I got a better job, the drives started making the "click of death". I called the company in charge of the dialer, they sent 4. Replaced them and "walla", back to work.

:D

it's VOILA, not WALLA!!!!!!

I should make it my mission in life to assassinate who ever came up with that dumb walla crap.

it's VOILA, not WALLA!!!!!!

I should make it my mission in life to assassinate who ever came up with that dumb walla crap.

I will remember next time I have to type "WALLA" excuse me "VOILA" :rofl:

/edit (It is great to type a weird or a wrong word because it catches people attention)

Edited by EZRecovery
  • 4 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Turbo Pascal was my first real programming experience more than 30 years ago at university. I mostly taught myself from the included examples and help documentation, because the university only taught the basic syntax and philosophy of Pascal, without going deeply into Turbo Pascal’s advanced features. I still remember when I discovered that I could embed assembly language directly into Pascal code, call BIOS functions, manipulate screen memory, use mouse interrupts, and control peripherals from my programs. That opened huge doors for me. Programming back then felt really fun, direct, and close to the machine. What I loved about Pascal was its readability and the almost instant compile time. Turbo Pascal was an amazing environment, but unfortunately Turbo Pascal for Windows 3 did not feel like it fully carried that legacy forward. Later, Delphi got things back on the right track after the messy transition to TP for Windows. Sadly, Delphi suffered from years of uncertainty as it moved from Borland to CodeGear and then to Embarcadero. That instability made many developers lose confidence in it, even though Delphi itself remained a powerful and productive tool. I still work with Delphi from time to time, but I definitely miss the old days of Turbo Pascal.
    • I hope this encodes in to AV1 or AV2 as currently tiktok uses h265 and h264.
    • Qualcomm reportedly in talks to build custom video chips for TikTok parent ByteDance by Karthik Mudaliar Qualcomm is reportedly in advanced discussions to provide custom chip-design services to Chinese tech giant ByteDance, the same company behind TikTok. According to a report from Reuters, Qualcomm could be involved in designing custom silicon tailored for ByteDance's massive data-center workloads. If it goes through, the deal would make ByteDance one of Qualcomm's early anchor customers for its fastly growing custom chip-design division, For years, Qualcomm was the king of making smartphone processors and modems. The company has also been moving into the PC ecosystem and other formats such as on-device AI for Android XR headsets. However, this particular deal is about Qualcomm's custom Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs). For a platform like TikTok, ByteDance needs hardware that can help it ingest, process, and serve billions of short-form videos daily. Generalised hardware is no longer the most cost-effective and efficient route, which is why ByteDance is trying to develop custom Video Processing Units (VPUs). VPUs designed specifically for ByteDance’s algorithmic needs could drastically reduce data-center power consumption and improve encoding speeds at an unprecedented scale. The underlying tech behind these processors is actually from Qualcomm's recent acquisition of AlphaWave Semi, a high-speed connectivity specialist company. By combining AlphaWave’s high-bandwidth IP with Qualcomm’s architectural expertise, the company could begin mass production by the end of 2026, if the talks go through. All this also comes at a time when U.S.-China tech relations have dwindled. Escalating trade frictions between Washington and Beijing have severely impacted the export of high-end AI chips from U.S. firms like Nvidia, AMD, and Lam Research. Yet, the Qualcomm-ByteDance discussions show that U.S. tech companies are still actively seeking growth avenues and are open to doing business with China, where regulators still permit. Reuters notes that the outcome of this deal could be uncertain, and ByteDance might also seek partners other than Qualcomm. via Reuters | Image via DepositPhotos.com
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Almohandis earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      DaviKar went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      456
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      117
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Xenon
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!