Question

12 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
25 minutes ago, cork1958 said:

Personally, comparing those 2 products is down right idiotic!

 

I'll take Bitdefender any day and not even think twice about it!!

Why are you saying the OP is idiotic?

  • 0
52 minutes ago, cork1958 said:

Personally, comparing those 2 products is down right idiotic!

 

I'll take Bitdefender any day and not even think twice about it!!

Thank you very much for your kind words...can you explain why you choose Bitdefender?

 

  • 0
1 hour ago, cork1958 said:

Personally, comparing those 2 products is down right idiotic!

 

I'll take Bitdefender any day and not even think twice about it!!

I'll take Defender, Windows 10, and common sense any day of the week and spend the $50 on something else.

  • 0
5 minutes ago, dwLostCat said:

I'll take Defender, Windows 10, and common sense any day of the week and spend the $50 on something else.

I can get it for $25 from anti-virus4u store

But my question was from the perspective of ransomware security, have you watched the first video? it's scary:woot:  honestly never got any virus with windows defender, I'm just really worried from ransomware threats

  • 0

I would test this myself if I knew how to get the ransomware in question.  Anyone know a good way?

 

I question the validity of the sample in question and the way it was handled is already pretty shady.  For example, one wouldn't download an executable and have it immediately be "runnable" without it being already pre-approved by the user.  It's not sure what context the user in question is being run in (are they admin?) etc...

 

Also the Defender video already appears to lean toward anti-Microsoft -- the space saving comments are not the reaction to the virus, but just something the system does on occasion and was bad/strange timing.   I dislike random strange attack ads, where they truly didn't give you enough data.

 

Edit:  These videos also from the same vendor, so not really a comparison.  I really don't have a lot to say negative about Bitdefender, just that there have been comments made about how bad Microsoft Defender is, so I'd like to actually test it, and this thread is as good as any to ask - how can I get some viruses and malware for testing? :)

  • 0
2 minutes ago, Mlee1 said:

I can get it for $25 from anti-virus4u store

But my question was from the perspective of ransomware security, have you watched the first video? it's scary:woot:  honestly never got any virus with windows defender, I'm just really worried from ransomware threats

Bitdefender has definitely upped their trying to scare people game lately.  I'm sure they're convincing some people, but most experienced techies know what not to do.

  • 0
24 minutes ago, dwLostCat said:

Bitdefender has definitely upped their trying to scare people game lately.  I'm sure they're convincing some people, but most experienced techies know what not to do.

Test was by The PC Security Channel:

 

What about combination of windows defender and bitdefender free antiransomware tool?

Edited by Mlee1
  • 0
2 hours ago, Mlee1 said:

What about combination of windows defender and bitdefender free antiransomware tool?

That would be a good free combo... No matter what AV solution you pick (use just Windows Defender myself) you need to back it up with an ad-blocker while NOT opening unexpected email attachments.

  • 0

Adblocker. Most effective AV software EVER. Website owners hate it but tough that is how ransomware is spread these days. Not from opening INFECTME_exe.pdf anymore like its 2002. Hackers buy an ad and put it on a website and bots come to them. 

 

Windows Defender is nearly useless as virus and ransomware writters test it agains't it before releasing it into the wild. AV software is near useless. The only good it will do is in a corporate environment where users do not respect their work PCs liek their home as it is the I.T. guys problem and click everywhere. Corporate AV endpoints can be disabled by port with a CISCO router. But home users? Please waste of money.

  • 0

I wouldnt wipe my rear end with Defender, its better than nothing......just. Its a lot better than pre-W10, but not that much.

 

BitDefender is decent, as long as you pay for it, otherwise you have to remember to update your defs on the freetard version.

 

Free for home :- Sophos Home Free

paid for : Webroot.......end of discussion :) 

 

 

 

 

  • 0
15 hours ago, sinetheo said:

Adblocker. Most effective AV software EVER. Website owners hate it but tough that is how ransomware is spread these days. Not from opening INFECTME_exe.pdf anymore like its 2002. Hackers buy an ad and put it on a website and bots come to them. 

 

Windows Defender is nearly useless as virus and ransomware writters test it agains't it before releasing it into the wild. AV software is near useless. The only good it will do is in a corporate environment where users do not respect their work PCs liek their home as it is the I.T. guys problem and click everywhere. Corporate AV endpoints can be disabled by port with a CISCO router. But home users? Please waste of money.

Last night I installed Bitdefender together with Malwarebytes free Antimalware and Adblocker. So far, so good...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
    • Usually the bigger ones with many fixes/changes take a few, theyre an exception to the rule most likely
    • If you don’t get lucky with Valve’s Steam Machine reservation system, you can make your own Steam Machine instead. Valve says that “starting with the SteamOS 3.8 release, you can put together your own Steam Machine using whatever PC parts you want.” SteamOS 3.8.10 launched last week with a slew of updates, including “improved compatibility with recent Intel and AMD platforms.” Alongside that improved compatibility, Valve is giving gamers the green light to install SteamOS on their own desktops. In an interview with The Verge, Valve’s Pierre-Loup Griffais said Valve has been “rolling out improvements to [SteamOS] so it’s more compatible with desktop hardware,” including eventual support for Nvidia graphics. Griffais says Valve has “a growing team” working on Nvidia driver support for SteamOS, adding, “We’re collaborating with Nvidia very closely.” While he mentioned that Nvidia support might not come this year, Griffais emphasized that “it’s certainly something that we’re working on in the background.”     Subscription not needed: https://archive.fo/Tssfc Subscription needed: https://www.theverge.com/games/953411/valve-steamos-desktop-nvidia
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!