Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Been thinking about changing my PC for a while now and would appreciate some input on the rig I'm considering purchasing.

 

Any and all input welcome.

 

Current PC is 6 years old, i5 2500k, 16GB DDR3 RAM, XFX 6870 1GB.

Main use case will be development and gaming and media consumption.

 

Thanks.

 

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: AMD - Ryzen 7 1700 3.0GHz 8-Core Processor  (£256.74 @ Aria PC) 
Motherboard: MSI - X370 GAMING PLUS ATX AM4 Motherboard  (£111.97 @ Box Limited) 
Memory: G.Skill - Ripjaws V Series 32GB (4 x 8GB) DDR4-3200 Memory  (£307.06 @ Amazon UK) 
Storage: Samsung - 960 EVO 500GB M.2-2280 Solid State Drive  (£209.99 @ Aria PC) 
Storage: Seagate - Barracuda 3TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive  (£77.77 @ CCL Computers) 
Video Card: Zotac - GeForce GTX 1070 8GB AMP! Extreme Video Card  (£419.97 @ Ebuyer) 
Case: Corsair - 780T ATX Full Tower Case  (£149.99 @ Aria PC) 
Power Supply: Corsair - HX Platinum 750W 80+ Platinum Certified Fully-Modular ATX Power Supply  (£131.38 @ BT Shop) 
Total: £1664.87
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2017-09-15 21:34 BST+0100

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1342494-new-ryzen-build/
Share on other sites

Nice spec you got going there. Only thing *I* would change is to go for 2x16GB RAM rather than 4x8GBs. Reason being that if you decide to upgrade in future you just stick some more RAM in without having to throw anything away. Given the mobo maxes out at 64GB, if you go with 8s you'd have to throw them away to get there. So an extra £35-£90 now (depending on memory speed) could save you hundreds in the future.

  • Like 2
8 minutes ago, Slugsie said:

Nice spec you got going there. Only thing *I* would change is to go for 2x16GB RAM rather than 4x8GBs. Reason being that if you decide to upgrade in future you just stick some more RAM in without having to throw anything away. Given the mobo maxes out at 64GB, if you go with 8s you'd have to throw them away to get there. So an extra £35-£90 now (depending on memory speed) could save you hundreds in the future.

Switched out to 2x16GB and it worked out cheaper (couldnt get the sticks in red as before - only in black)

 

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: AMD - Ryzen 7 1700 3.0GHz 8-Core Processor  (£256.74 @ Aria PC) 
Motherboard: MSI - X370 GAMING PLUS ATX AM4 Motherboard  (£111.97 @ Box Limited) 
Memory: G.Skill - Ripjaws V Series 32GB (2 x 16GB) DDR4-3200 Memory  (£283.20 @ Amazon UK) 
Storage: Samsung - 960 EVO 500GB M.2-2280 Solid State Drive  (£209.99 @ Aria PC) 
Storage: Seagate - Barracuda 3TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive  (£77.77 @ CCL Computers) 
Video Card: Zotac - GeForce GTX 1070 8GB AMP! Extreme Video Card  (£419.97 @ Ebuyer) 
Case: Corsair - 780T ATX Full Tower Case  (£149.99 @ Aria PC) 
Power Supply: Corsair - HX Platinum 750W 80+ Platinum Certified Fully-Modular ATX Power Supply  (£131.38 @ BT Shop) 
Total: £1641.01
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2017-09-15 22:05 BST+0100

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: AMD - Ryzen 7 1700 3.0GHz 8-Core Processor  (£256.74 @ Aria PC) 
Motherboard: ASRock - AB350 Pro4 ATX AM4 Motherboard  (£84.47 @ Novatech) 
Memory: *Team - Vulcan 32GB (2 x 16GB) DDR4-3000 Memory  (£222.49 @ Overclockers.co.uk) 
Storage: *Western Digital - Blue 500GB M.2-2280 Solid State Drive  (£131.76 @ Ebuyer) 
Storage: *Toshiba - 3TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive  (£72.00 @ Aria PC) 
Video Card: *Zotac - GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB AMP Edition Video Card  (£566.73 @ Amazon UK) 
Case: Phanteks - Enthoo Pro ATX Full Tower Case  (£79.42 @ Box Limited) 
Power Supply: Corsair - CSM 650W 80+ Gold Certified Semi-Modular ATX Power Supply  (£70.47 @ Amazon UK) 
Total: £1484.08
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
*Lowest price parts chosen from parametric criteria
Generated by PCPartPicker 2017-09-15 22:20 BST+0100

Thanks @Mockingbirdfor the case and PSU suggestion.

 

I was able to swap those in and it got me a better GPU - the Zotac 1080 AMP! Extreme instead of the 1070.

Couldnt change the SSD though - the speed of the 960 EVO is just too much to ignore

 

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: AMD - Ryzen 7 1700 3.0GHz 8-Core Processor  (£256.74 @ Aria PC) 
Motherboard: MSI - X370 GAMING PLUS ATX AM4 Motherboard  (£111.97 @ Box Limited) 
Memory: G.Skill - Ripjaws V Series 32GB (2 x 16GB) DDR4-3200 Memory  (£283.20 @ Amazon UK) 
Storage: Samsung - 960 EVO 500GB M.2-2280 Solid State Drive  (£209.99 @ Aria PC) 
Storage: Seagate - Barracuda 3TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive  (£77.77 @ CCL Computers) 
Video Card: Zotac - GeForce GTX 1080 8GB AMP! Extreme Video Card  (£559.90 @ Alza) 
Case: Phanteks - Enthoo Pro ATX Full Tower Case  (£79.42 @ Box Limited) 
Power Supply: Corsair - RMx 650W 80+ Gold Certified Fully-Modular ATX Power Supply  (£88.24 @ Amazon UK) 
Total: £1667.23
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2017-09-15 23:22 BST+0100

1 hour ago, ramesees said:

Thanks @Mockingbirdfor the case and PSU suggestion.

 

I was able to swap those in and it got me a better GPU - the Zotac 1080 AMP! Extreme instead of the 1070.

Couldnt change the SSD though - the speed of the 960 EVO is just too much to ignore

 

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: AMD - Ryzen 7 1700 3.0GHz 8-Core Processor  (£256.74 @ Aria PC) 
Motherboard: MSI - X370 GAMING PLUS ATX AM4 Motherboard  (£111.97 @ Box Limited) 
Memory: G.Skill - Ripjaws V Series 32GB (2 x 16GB) DDR4-3200 Memory  (£283.20 @ Amazon UK) 
Storage: Samsung - 960 EVO 500GB M.2-2280 Solid State Drive  (£209.99 @ Aria PC) 
Storage: Seagate - Barracuda 3TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive  (£77.77 @ CCL Computers) 
Video Card: Zotac - GeForce GTX 1080 8GB AMP! Extreme Video Card  (£559.90 @ Alza) 
Case: Phanteks - Enthoo Pro ATX Full Tower Case  (£79.42 @ Box Limited) 
Power Supply: Corsair - RMx 650W 80+ Gold Certified Fully-Modular ATX Power Supply  (£88.24 @ Amazon UK) 
Total: £1667.23
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2017-09-15 23:22 BST+0100

The one I put is the Geforce GTX 1080 Ti.

 

I am not sure why you need an X370 motherboard nor a much more expensive memory kit.

 

Also, unless you are doing 4K video editing, you might not notice any differences between the SSDs at all.

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: AMD - Ryzen 7 1700 3.0GHz 8-Core Processor  (£256.74 @ Aria PC) 
Motherboard: ASRock - AB350 Pro4 ATX AM4 Motherboard  (£84.47 @ Novatech) 
Memory: *Team - Vulcan 32GB (2 x 16GB) DDR4-3000 Memory  (£222.49 @ Overclockers.co.uk) 
Storage: Samsung - 960 EVO 500GB M.2-2280 Solid State Drive  (£209.99 @ Aria PC) 
Storage: Seagate - Barracuda 3TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive  (£77.77 @ CCL Computers) 
Video Card: *Zotac - GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB AMP Edition Video Card  (£566.73 @ Amazon UK) 
Case: Phanteks - Enthoo Pro ATX Full Tower Case  (£79.42 @ Box Limited) 
Power Supply: Corsair - RMx 650W 80+ Gold Certified Fully-Modular ATX Power Supply  (£87.17 @ Ebuyer) 
Total: £1584.78
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
*Lowest price parts chosen from parametric criteria
Generated by PCPartPicker 2017-09-16 01:25 BST+0100

3 hours ago, Elliot B. said:

You said you'll be using it to game.

 

Even an older i7-6700K kills all Ryzen CPUs (maybe not the Threadrippers) in gaming.

 

Of cause, that would be assuming that he don't care about anything else but gaming.

 

I am willing to trade a few FPS.

3 hours ago, Elliot B. said:

You said you'll be using it to game.

 

Even an older i7-6700K kills all Ryzen CPUs (maybe not the Threadrippers) in gaming.

I think you should look at this test comparison with multiple games of i7-7700K to Ryzen 5 1600. Updated drivers, and game optimizations, make quite a difference. https://www.techspot.com/review/1490-ryzen-vs-core-i7-vega-64-geforce-1080/

  • Like 1
1 hour ago, seeprime said:

I think you should look at this test comparison with multiple games of i7-7700K to Ryzen 5 1600. Updated drivers, and game optimizations, make quite a difference. https://www.techspot.com/review/1490-ryzen-vs-core-i7-vega-64-geforce-1080/

Older games definitely need to be patched for Ryzen.

 

For example, Rise of the Tomb Raider got 31% FPS increase in a single patch.

On 16/09/2017 at 1:52 AM, Elliot B. said:

You said you'll be using it to game.

 

Even an older i7-6700K kills all Ryzen CPUs (maybe not the Threadrippers) in gaming.

It hardly "kills" Ryzen parts in gaming, in fact unless the gamer is in the 1% of people that play above 100HZ, they aren't going to notice a shred of difference. I upgraded from a 2700K to a 1700X and it handles my gaming needs just fine.

  • Like 1
On 9/15/2017 at 10:49 PM, Mockingbird said:

Older games definitely need to be patched for Ryzen.

 

For example, Rise of the Tomb Raider got 31% FPS increase in a single patch.

Patched or not patched i would still take an intel cpu over amd. AMD products always require a patch to catch up to performance, or patches at a later date to show the full potential. Theyve done it for years with their GPUs and now with Ryzen. So do we wait on the game developer to spend time and resources to patch the game or will AMD include said patches in their drivers?

1 hour ago, Circaflex said:

Patched or not patched i would still take an intel cpu over amd. AMD products always require a patch to catch up to performance, or patches at a later date to show the full potential. Theyve done it for years with their GPUs and now with Ryzen. So do we wait on the game developer to spend time and resources to patch the game or will AMD include said patches in their drivers?

That makes no sense.

 

Since when were there drivers for processors?

Most new CPU architectures need software to catch up with them, it took a fair amount of time for it to catch up with quads. Intel have been made to look good by the fact that it's been years since they had any real competition, but they haven't actually produced anything innovative since the release of Sandy Bridge.

Ryzen CPUs are far from slow, the only real issue was that because the launch schedule was somewhat compressed motherboards came out of the box a bit immature, and the platform's support for non-standard memory setups (above 2666) was a bit lacking, the CPUs were never "slow". The issues in gaming simply stem from the 2 core complex design, the latency penalty of migrating a process from one core complex to the other is bound to have a bigger impact on games, but anything coded to take advantage of NUMA processors will perform just fine on Ryzen. And the same goes for Intel, if they drastically re-arcitecture their processors software would have to be updated to take advantage as well. Even out of the box gaming performance was fine, games are simply being updated to take even better advantage of the raw CPU power on offer.

The CPU I have was a steal at £390. It's not a slow gaming CPU by any means, and its heavy lifting performance is incredible.

On 15/09/2017 at 8:52 PM, Elliot B. said:

You said you'll be using it to game.

 

Even an older i7-6700K kills all Ryzen CPUs (maybe not the Threadrippers) in gaming.

These days when it comes to cpu there no such thing as kill. Unless you consider having 200 fps at 1080p in an old games instead of 150 relevant. Or maybe if you aim for 4k at a rock solid 60 fps it might help you push the necessary last frame or two but you'll likely by gpu limited at this resolution. Outside of those use cases any of the new Ryzen5 or Core i5 cpus will do the job.

 

Even my old Core i5 750 can still play new games at 1080p medium settings (and it looks just as good as Xbox one or PS4). To be honest my old core i5 performs  better in games than applications these days. It's slower while browsing the web without adblock than while playing games. Yeah you read it right adds on the web slow down my core i5 750 more than gaming at 1080p. Games are made with console in mind and consoles have weak cpus. GPU is the name of the game these days.

 

I'll upgrade my core i5 750 soon not because i can't game on it, I'll upgrade it cause it's slow as hell for anything else than gaming like compiling big projects or working with big image or video files. Or browsing the web ... Ryzen cpus are very good option right now if you do anything else than gaming with your computer. They are great and cheap workstation cpus and more than good enough for some casual gaming 5-10 hours a week.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • So size is the ONLY selling point????? People have been plugging in PC's to TV's in living rooms for 20+ years. I would take a bigger box for more peformance. Also lot and lots of SFF/Mini ITX build guides out there.
    • My point is, if you buying this instead of a console for TV purposes, that you need to understand that you will not be able to play the most popular MP games with Steam OS. Now if you are not into those games, and into some of the perputual alpha/beta games on Steam then this is an option. I would argue a gaming PC would be the better route, more expensive but take the 1k -1.4k you are about to spend on this thing and build a better one. Because it is running Linux you can overide its 1080p settings. However The Verge complained about its 1080p cap and how you would have to get around it at the CLI, so someone buying this instead of a PS5 or Xbox might have a challege on their hands.
    • A review of Synology's BeeCamera software for the BeeStation Plus by Christopher White Synology is leaning into the BeeStation and the BeeStation Plus, and it's easy to understand why. While power users will want something more customizable, the BeeStation and its more powerful sibling, the BeeStation Plus, are great for those who want a device they can simply plug in, click a few buttons, and have it work as their own personal cloud. Until recently, the device was mostly used for the storage of files, photos, and videos, and with the Plus model, you could install and stream media through Plex. Synology recently released a new free application for the BeeStation Plus called BeeCamera, which is basically a stripped-down version of Surveillance Station. First, let's get the confusing naming out of the way. While you might initially think that BeeCamera is a physical device, perhaps a camera that Synology created specifically for the BeeStation Plus, that would be incorrect. BeeCamera is simply the name for the application that runs on the NAS and on your mobile device. I think the marketing team missed the mark here, but it does fit the other naming on the device, like BeePhotos and BeeFiles, I guess. Camera Support As of right now, only Synology-branded cameras are supported, which many will see as a callback to the drive locking the company implemented and then backtracked on. That said, while I 100% disagree on drive locking, I agree that camera locking for a device made to simply plug and play is the right decision. The whole point of the BeeStation line is simplicity. There are currently three camera model lines available, a wireless device for indoor use, and two PoE models for external use. CC400W (Wi-Fi): Plug it into power using the included power adapter, and connect it to your wireless network. This camera is rated only for indoor use and is the one I was provided to review the BeeCamera. $198.36, in line with the Unifi G6 Compact. BC510 (PoE): A bullet-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. TC510 (PoE): A dome-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. Although this isn't a review of the actual Synology camera, I did want to note that a positive for the Synology CC400W is that it uses a magnetic base. This means you can mount it on any magnetic surface, which is pretty handy. However, a downside to the camera is that it's powered by a built-in USB cable that's about six and a half feet (two meters) long. This means that the cable will probably be either too long or too short, but more importantly, if the cable is damaged at all, you'll likely need to buy an entirely new camera because there doesn't appear to be a way to replace it, unlike many competitors, like the Unifi G6 Instant. Hopefully, this is something Synology addresses in a future revision of the hardware. The BeeStation Plus supports up to four cameras. Setup The setup of BeeCamera is, like everything in the BeeStation family, very straightforward. Simply make sure you're on at least version 1.5 of the BeeStation OS, and BeeCamera is automatically installed on the device. BeeCamera Setup Screenshots Setting up the CC400W was just as easy. Plug it in, open up the BeeCamera app, and follow the on-screen steps to add the camera. During this process, you'll configure the camera name and how many days of retention you want to keep. The system will also automatically update the firmware for you. The whole thing took only a couple of minutes, excluding the time it took for the camera to update the firmware. Once the camera is connected to the BeeStation Plus, you can manage the various camera settings within the app, although there aren't many to choose from. You're able to configure whether the microphone will record audio (some privacy laws may preclude you from recording it), select what codec to use (H.264 or H.265), configure the color and exposure of the camera, and determine what data you want to overlay onto the video. Finally, you can set up AI detections so that BeeCamera will alert you if it sees certain things. These are all of the common detections you would expect in a camera system, such as people, pets, and vehicles. Under people and vehicles, you can also add extra monitoring for lingering and congestion detection, although pets are currently in "Lab" and therefore have no extra features yet. Recording in 4K using H.265 for 30 days will take roughly 300 GB of storage, which is very reasonable for most regular households, as the BeeStation Plus has 8TB of native storage. If you want to set up detection zones, you can. These are areas that BeeCamera will look at for the various detections, and are helpful if, for example, there's a tree in your frame and you don't want to be notified each time the wind makes the branches move around in the frame. Finally, you can also schedule when the camera should and should not be recording, which is a very useful feature. For example, you may want to record only at night when you're sleeping, but not during the day when you're up and about the house, so you can easily shut the camera off between 8 am and 10 pm. Each hour of each day can be configured to record continuously, only upon a detection event, or disabled completely. You can't fine-tune to record at a specific time, though, only hourly blocks on the hour. Daily Use The best part of BeeCamera is that it's easy and just works. If you only care about being notified when things happen, the mobile app sends those notifications and lets you click the button to bring up the video and see what's going on. For example, when I went out of town and had the camera pointed at the cat tower in our hallway, it was nice to be able to drop in and check that my furry friends were doing okay without me. Initiating the remote connection to the BeeStation Plus through the app is very responsive, but this will heavily depend on your ISP. In my case, using Xfinity, I'm able to go from starting the app to seeing live video in roughly three seconds, which is about the same amount of time it takes to connect to my Unifi UNVR system that costs much more. If you want to see footage from a specific day and time, you can do so using the calendar icon. You can also scroll through the timeline, looking for detections that are labeled in blue (vs. the normal gray when there's nothing of interest). There are buttons that let you go to the last/next detection on the timeline, which is helpful if you missed the notification on your mobile device. That's where the ease of use stops, though. While you can download clips that are flagged by detection, there's apparently no way to select generic time frames you're interested in, and the only place to download is to your phone. In addition, sharing a video shares the actual video, not just a link back to your BeeStation Plus. While that's good from a security and privacy perspective, it's a little awkward for sharing large videos. Limitations While the ease of implementation is great, there are some things that are lacking from BeeCamera. The most obvious is that there is no way to view the footage on the desktop. You can log in to the BeeStation Plus to see how much storage BeeCamera is using, but unlike BeePhotos and BeeFiles, there is no BeeCamera on the web console to manage or view footage. This means you'll be viewing all of your security footage on your mobile device, which is pretty limiting. In addition, there's no way to download the video to your PC without first using your phone as the intermediary. The one exception to this is that you can use BeeFiles to see the raw MP4 files. They're saved in 5-minute increments, and it's just raw data with no detection information or any other way to identify what any of them are. The lack of a way to interact with BeeCamera on the desktop also makes configuration of the cameras more difficult. For example, trying to set up detection zones using a tiny screen and your finger to draw boxes is more cumbersome than it needs to be. This reinforces the idea that BeeCamera is not made for power users. It's also missing some of the more advanced functionality of Surveillance Station. For example, I couldn't find a way to say, "Alert me if the thing in this zone is no longer there." Another major deficiency with BeeCamera, and a feature I suspect may come out in the future, is that while it can detect generic people, there is no specific facial recognition yet. This is an interesting omission, given the fact that other Synology tools can detect specific individuals, and competitors such as Unifi Protect also do it. This is probably a software limitation, so we will have to wait and see if this feature is added in the future. Conclusion If you need a security guard to monitor surveillance cameras to make sure your property is secure, then BeeCamera is not the solution for you. That said, you probably wouldn't be using a BeeStation Plus as the brains behind the system either. BeeCamera (and BeeStation in general) is clearly aimed at households that want to avoid sending personal data to Google and Amazon, and now want to add some cameras to keep an eye on their home and their pets while they're away. BeeCamera excels at doing this. The target market isn't interested in creating cases, tying multiple views together in a single pane of glass, or the like, and for the intended use case, the system works great. Where it starts to fall apart a bit is with more advanced features. Not being able to use a desktop app is a major compromise in my opinion, and having to do all of the configuration on a mobile device is annoying, but not impossible. If you don't want to have a full-fledged NAS device in your home, but still want control over your data (or maybe want an easy way to backup your data for World Backup Day), and want to add a couple of cameras to keep an eye on your house and your pets, this is a great, cheap, and easy way to go, and I suspect more functionality will come over time. If Synology releases a desktop app or at least a way to configure cameras and view footage on a desktop browser, this would be a near-perfect solution for a general home user. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I forgot to add on my comment that when robots will take physical jobs, it's when they become more cheaper to manufacture and sell. That will be the starting point of the end to lanscaping, trash pickup, factory jobs, etc.
    • How many people can actually use a 2.5gig ethernet port? Most people do not have more than a 1gig internet connection, heck most have less than that. Most people at home do not have a switch that has multiple 2.5gig ports either.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      neufuse
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!