Recommended Posts

I've built myself a Ryzen PC several months ago and had a unexpected hang while I was browsing/watching youtube. The image had suddenly disappeared with the leds on the GPU flashing on and off, and error code 00 on the motherboard. After rebooting, I was greeted with the options to start normally or to repair Windows (just instructions on how to run repair from a Windows disc). Selected start normally and ended with a BSOD soon after.

 

After that, I tried to boot several Windows images without success from both USB and optical. For Windows 7 it would stop as the Windows colours were coming together (ending in black screen, staying stuck or BSOD) and for Windows 10, after staying at the blue logo for a short while, it would BSOD.

 

Next step was hardware troubleshooting: Removed the HDD power connectors from the PSU, reset CMOS, removed RAM and tried 1 stick at a time in different slots, used a different GPU (Nvidia 7300GS), however nothing changed.

I will try a different PSU soon (no-name brand) that I've used in troubleshooting before. Unfortunately, this PSU does not have enough connectors to test with my main card.

 

The system was never overclocked and had been running stable for 1-2 weeks at a time, while playing games and rendering various things without issue. This was the first time that it had crashed.

 

00 Please check if the CPU is installed correctly and then clear CMOS.

BSOD - if it occurs, it's usually "page fault in nonpaged area"

 

Specs:

Ryzen 1700

Asrock X370 Taichi - UEFI P2.30

Gigabyte R390

Crucial 2*8GB 2400Mhz

Seasonic X-560

Windows 7

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1343462-unable-to-boot-into-windows/
Share on other sites

ive expressed my disdain for Asrock motherboards many times in the past. i wouldnt at all be surprised if it's a failing motherboard. as you mentioned already, though, try another PSU first. That Seasonic seems pretty old (circa 2010?) and may not be powerful enough. Otherwise, if that doesnt fix it, all fingers point to the motherboard.

The Seasonic X-560 is an excellent power supply. Very low ripple, constant correct voltage, all at gold level efficiency. I doubt the PSU is the problem unless it has completely failed. Now, I am not 100% up to date with power requirements for Ryzen, I guess it could be possible 560 watts is not enough but I can't comment for sure.

 

My advice would be to remove everything from the case, rebuild the unit on a cardboard box and use the bare minimum to see if it POSTs. It also wouldn't hurt to re-seat the CPU during this time.

10 minutes ago, Jason S. said:

ive expressed my disdain for Asrock motherboards many times in the past. i wouldnt at all be surprised if it's a failing motherboard. as you mentioned already, though, try another PSU first. That Seasonic seems pretty old (circa 2010?) and may not be powerful enough. Otherwise, if that doesnt fix it, all fingers point to the motherboard.

It would be my second Asrock board, and while they were the cheap brand for a long time, they've built a nice reputation in recent years.

1 minute ago, Circaflex said:

The Seasonic X-560 is an excellent power supply. Very low ripple, constant correct voltage, all at gold level efficiency. I doubt the PSU is the problem unless it has completely failed. Now, I am not 100% up to date with power requirements for Ryzen, I guess it could be possible 560 watts is not enough but I can't comment for sure.

The PSU is 3 months over its 5 year warranty unfortunately. While my setup is potentially power hungry due to the GPU and several hard drives, failing at low load sounds rather odd. Anyway, I'll try the other PSU in a short while.

 

If that fails, I guess I'll reinstall the CPU.

The first thing I would suspect would be the power supply.

 

BTW, Gigabyte recommends a 600W PSU for your system.

 

The second would be the video card.

 

52 minutes ago, Jason S. said:

ive expressed my disdain for Asrock motherboards many times in the past. i wouldnt at all be surprised if it's a failing motherboard. as you mentioned already, though, try another PSU first. That Seasonic seems pretty old (circa 2010?) and may not be powerful enough. Otherwise, if that doesnt fix it, all fingers point to the motherboard.

AsRock has been making big strides and has been releasing some of the best motherboards lately.

 

I wanted the AsRock X370 Taichi, but it was constantly out-of-stock due to high demand.

  • Like 2
5 minutes ago, Mockingbird said:

The first thing I would suspect would be the power supply.

 

BTW, Gigabyte recommends a 600W PSU for your system.

 

The second would be the video card.

 

AsRock has been making big strides and has been releasing some of the best motherboards lately.

 

I wanted the AsRock X370 Taichi, but it was constantly out-of-stock.

Video card manufacturers often inflate the power requirements because some users run lower quality power supplies. Considering OP has a rather good PSU, 560 should be plenty. I tried a few different power supply calculators and this system probably wont use over 500Ws of power.

Well, with the different PSU if behaves almost the same. Trying to run W10 from USB the displays the ASRock logo instead of the Windows one until the image turns off or it BSODs. BSODs messages vary from "memory management" to "irql_not_less_or_equal". I'm swapping memory sticks around at this point, just to be sure.

 

Windows 7 from the DVD drive behaves as with the Seasonic.

2 minutes ago, Circaflex said:

Video card manufacturers often inflate the power requirements because some users run lower quality power supplies. Considering OP has a rather good PSU, 560 should be plenty. I tried a few different power supply calculators and this system probably wont use over 500Ws of power.

That's true, but power supply are not efficient at or near its maximum output.

 

Using power supply near or at its maximum output causes the power supply to degrade.

8 minutes ago, Mockingbird said:

That's true, but power supply are not efficient at or near its maximum output.

 

Using power supply near or at its maximum output causes the power supply to degrade.

Except in this case, this power supply is still gold efficient when fully loaded; http://www.jonnyguru.com/modules.php?name=NDReviews&op=Story3&reid=202.

 

And also, I would believe your last statement to be incorrect. A high quality PSU will have no such issue when running at 100% rated output for extended periods of time (that is why they are rated), and who runs their PSU full load anyways, you will be OK as long as you aren't running your PC in an oven. Heat is a bigger factor than load. As long as temps are kept within specification, stated by the manufacture, you won't have any problems running it at full load.

Actually you should try to isolate the memory slots with one stick in the board. Leave the one stick closest to the CPU in, power down and then restart. I've had memory sticks go bad often in asrock boards so you may get off easy and isolate which stick is bad or if the slot went bad one stick at a time. Then I would look at the power supply. I usually get an antec from staples and test and take back if I don't have any other use for it. Next would be the graphics card which do go bad just not as often. Last I would mess with the CPU as I only had one go bad in 20 years that wasn't overclocked. Main reason is most cpus are programed to slow down before burning out......

51 minutes ago, Mockingbird said:

That's true, but power supply are not efficient at or near its maximum output.

 

Using power supply near or at its maximum output causes the power supply to degrade.

I believe the PSU can be ruled out, as the same thing happens with the second one.

27 minutes ago, shoemakerpom2010 said:

Actually you should try to isolate the memory slots with one stick in the board. Leave the one stick closest to the CPU in, power down and then restart. I've had memory sticks go bad often in asrock boards so you may get off easy and isolate which stick is bad or if the slot went bad one stick at a time. Then I would look at the power supply. I usually get an antec from staples and test and take back if I don't have any other use for it. Next would be the graphics card which do go bad just not as often. Last I would mess with the CPU as I only had one go bad in 20 years that wasn't overclocked. Main reason is most cpus are programed to slow down before burning out......

While I haven't tried each stick with each slot, I did try all slots. PSU and GPU are also out as I'm using different ones and the symptoms are similar. That leaves the CPU and the motherboard, for which I don't have a direct swap.

 

I'll reinstall the CPU tomorrow and then call the shops. Unfortunately, they were bought from different places, and, while one owns the other, they operate separately.

Do you have the latest BIOS update (3.20) released a couple of weeks ago? Have all the settings in the BIOS set to auto?  Is the system stable before Windows (as in will it stay in the BIOS w/o crashing)?  Memtest just for laughs (and without crashing).

 

Have you tried a "live" Linux ... just to see what happens? 

1 minute ago, Jim K said:

Do you have the latest BIOS update (3.20) released a couple of weeks ago? Have all the settings in the BIOS set to auto?  Is the system stable before Windows (as in will it stay in the BIOS w/o crashing)?  Memtest just for laughs (and without crashing).

 

Have you tried a "live" Linux ... just to see what happens? 

No to latest bios. I guess I'll update that over the network.

Settings have been reset several times to defaults. Even removed the battery and put it back.

No crashes before, but I haven't staid in there for very long.

 

I'll give memtest and live Linux a shot.

Try the memory first like I told you since you already ruled out the GPU and PSU. Only leave one stick in (closest to the cpu) and reboot. If it acts up after boot shut down and move to the next slot and repeat. If that does not work swap sticks to rule out the other stick. Trust me I was in the same boat about a month ago on an asrock mini gaming board that was stable as a rock till one of my corsair sticks went bad. Its almost unheard of with corsair but it happens. shops will more then likely want to swap the board since that's the quickest method then chasing your tail and charging by the hour to do it. As an Admin I have seen everything that could wrong with an Asrock and usually they are super stable. Ram on the other hand is not especially with boards that allow tweaking of the timings or overclock of the ram..... 

38 minutes ago, shoemakerpom2010 said:

Try the memory first like I told you since you already ruled out the GPU and PSU. Only leave one stick in (closest to the cpu) and reboot. If it acts up after boot shut down and move to the next slot and repeat. If that does not work swap sticks to rule out the other stick. Trust me I was in the same boat about a month ago on an asrock mini gaming board that was stable as a rock till one of my corsair sticks went bad. Its almost unheard of with corsair but it happens. shops will more then likely want to swap the board since that's the quickest method then chasing your tail and charging by the hour to do it. As an Admin I have seen everything that could wrong with an Asrock and usually they are super stable. Ram on the other hand is not especially with boards that allow tweaking of the timings or overclock of the ram..... 

Tried each stick in each slot with the W7 disk and there was no difference, either the image freezes or the screen goes blank during the logo animation. When it goes blank, 00 also flashes on and off on the motherboard.

 

Also, UEFI was update to 3.20 before I started swapping.

15 hours ago, Jim K said:

Have you tried a "live" Linux ... just to see what happens? 

After reading around the web, tried various UEFI settings, like disabling C6 state, onboard Audio, switch from AHCI to RAID, even disabled the SATA controller at one point, but nothing has changed.

 

Tried Linux Mint (both normal and compatibility mode) and after 1-2 seconds, the screen goes blank and 00 starts flashing on the motherboard.

10 minutes ago, Luc2k said:

After reading around the web, tried various UEFI settings, like disabling C6 state, onboard Audio, switch from AHCI to RAID, even disabled the SATA controller at one point, but nothing has changed.

 

Tried Linux Mint (both normal and compatibility mode) and after 1-2 seconds, the screen goes blank and 00 starts flashing on the motherboard.

Yea, looks like you've tried just about everything (if you've also done the memory thing like shoemaker suggested).  If reseating the CPU doesn't work, maybe testing it outside the case ... I would return the motherboard as it may have failed.

20 minutes ago, Luc2k said:

After reading around the web, tried various UEFI settings, like disabling C6 state, onboard Audio, switch from AHCI to RAID, even disabled the SATA controller at one point, but nothing has changed.

 

Tried Linux Mint (both normal and compatibility mode) and after 1-2 seconds, the screen goes blank and 00 starts flashing on the motherboard.

what does the motherboard book state about 00 error?

  • Like 1
12 hours ago, The Evil Overlord said:

At the risk of asking a silly question... Are there any legacy, or legacy boot settings on your hardware?

(If you've tried everything else)

Legacy options are on by default. If needed, I'll go into more details once I have time for another troubleshooting session.

12 hours ago, Jim K said:

Yea, looks like you've tried just about everything (if you've also done the memory thing like shoemaker suggested).  If reseating the CPU doesn't work, maybe testing it outside the case ... I would return the motherboard as it may have failed.

It will be a pain, but I'm almost out of options. I've done everything suggested up to this point, apart from reseating the CPU and running memtest.

5 hours ago, Mando said:

there we have it then, Bios codes are there for a reason :) reseat cpu, readd HS and retry.

I will, but in the meantime I'm wondering why now, after a considerable uptime (>75% since built). At any rate, I hope I'll have time this weekend.

  • Like 1
3 minutes ago, Luc2k said:

I will, but in the meantime I'm wondering why now, after a considerable uptime (>75% since built). At any rate, I hope I'll have time this weekend.

Electronics ...  :)

 

Sometimes they give up the ghost.

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Nudge me when they bring back hardware audio acceleration so I can get my EAX 5 back. We've evolved graphics to real-time path tracing, but regressed audio some 15 years back in time with this stupid software audio stack.
    • Ocenaudio 3.19.4 by Razvan Serea  Ocenaudio is a full featured, fast and easy to use audio and music editor. It is the ideal software for people who need to edit and analyze audio files without complications. Ocenaudio also has powerful features that will please more advanced users. To assist ocenaudio development, a powerful toolset of audio editing, analysis and manipulation called Ocen Framework was created. ocenaudio is also based on Qt framework, a well known library for cross-platform development. Cross-platform support ocenaudio is available for all major operating systems: Microsoft Windows, Mac OS X and Linux. Native applications are generated for each platform from a common source, in order to achieve excelent performance and seamless integration with the operating system. All versions of ocenaudio have a uniform set of features and the same graphical interface, so the skills you learn in one platform can be used in the others. VST plugins support Ocenaudio supports VST (Virtual Studio Technology) plugins, giving its users access to numerous effects. Like the native effects, VST effects can use real-time preview to aide configuration. Real-time preview of effects Applying effects such as EQ, gain and filtering is an important part of audio editing. However, it is very tricky to get the desired result by adjusting the controls configuration alone: you must listen the processed audio. To ease the configuration of audio effects, ocenaudio has a real time preview feature: you hear the processed signal while adjusting the controls. The effect configuration window also includes a miniature view of the selected audio signal. You can navigate on this miniature view in the same way as you do on the main interface, selecting parts that interest you and listening to the effect result in real time. Multiselection for delicate editions To speed up complex audio files editing, ocenaudio includes multi-selection. With this amazing tool, you can simultaneously select different portions of an audio file and listen, edit or even apply an effect to them. For example, if you want to normalize only the excerpts of an interview where the interviewee is talking, just select them and apply the effect. Eficient edition of large files With ocenaudio, there is no limit to the length or the quantity of the audio files you can edit. Using an advanced memory management system, the application keeps your files open without wasting any of your computer's memory. Even in files several hours long, common editing operations such as copy, cut or paste happen almost instantly. Fully featured spectrogram Besides offering an incredible waveform view of your audio files, ocenaudio has a powerful and complete spectrogram view. In this view, you can analyze the spectral content of your audio signal with maximum clarity. Advanced users will be surprised to find that the spectrogram settings are applied in real time. The display is updated immediately when altering features such as the number of frequency bands, window type and size and dynamic range of the display. Ocenaudio 3.19.4 changelog: Adds fallback fonts so every language and symbol displays correctly Improves autosave and session recovery stability Improves region navigation and display Fixes a crash when the level meter is used on displays with a scaling greater than 200% Fixes memory corruption when using the silence selection tools Fixes crashes when closing a file while effects are still being processed Fixes a freeze when applying effects to many files at once (macOS) Fixes crashes related to audio devices on Windows Fixes invalid file names when exporting regions whose label is used as the file name Other bug fixes and improvements Download: Ocenaudio 64-bit | Portable | ~40.0 MB (Freeware) Download: Ocenaudio for Linux and Mac OS View: Ocenaudio Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 by Razvan Serea Hasleo Disk Clone is a free and all-in-one disk cloning software for Windows 11/10/8/7/Vista and Windows Server that can help you migrate Windows OS to another disk, clone one disk to another disk or clone one partition to another location quickly and efficiently. Completely Free Windows Migration and Disk/Partition Cloning Software Migrate Windows from one disk to another without reinstalling Windows, apps. Clone one disk to another and makes the data on 2 disks are exactly the same. Clone a partition to another location without losing any data. Easily adjust the size and location of the destination partition. Convert MBR to GPT or convert GPT to MBR by cloning. Creation of Windows PE emergency disk. Extremely fast cloning speed and multi-language support. Supported OS: Windows Vista/Server 2008 or later, fully compatible with GPT and UEFI. Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 changelog: Fixed an issue that caused disk enumeration to fail Fixed an issue where WinPE created under Windows ARM64 26H1 did not work properly Download: Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 | 32.3 MB (Freeware) Link: Hasleo Disk Clone Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      553
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      78
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!