Recommended Posts

On 01/10/2017 at 9:06 PM, Jason S. said:

so what's the latest? im dying to know if it was the motherboard at fault after all

Long time since the last update because I kind of neglected the desktop.

 

Anyway, reseating the CPU + clearing CMOS didn't do anything to fix the issue. I was almost ready to send the motherboard in, even contacted the seller, but then I went "what the hell" and ordered a cheap mobo (resealed with a B350 chipset). Lo and behold, the same thing happened with that one, so I went to the showroom, returned it and sent the CPU for service. A replacement was sent back.

 

PC was stuck in a reboot loop initially if both memory sticks were plugged in. Reset CMOS, reseated the RAM and then it booted into UEFI, where I checked if everything is detected. Rebooted, and, for the first time in a long while, it went past the damn OS boot animation.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
On 9/26/2017 at 1:14 PM, Luc2k said:

 

The system was never overclocked and had been running stable for 1-2 weeks at a time, while playing games and rendering various things without issue. This was the first time that it had crashed.

 

Solid thread. 10/10 would read again.

20 minutes ago, Luc2k said:

Long time since the last update because I kind of neglected the desktop.

 

Anyway, reseating the CPU + clearing CMOS didn't do anything to fix the issue. I was almost ready to send the motherboard in, even contacted the seller, but then I went "what the hell" and ordered a cheap mobo (resealed with a B350 chipset). Lo and behold, the same thing happened with that one, so I went to the showroom, returned it and sent the CPU for service. A replacement was sent back.

 

PC was stuck in a reboot loop initially if both memory sticks were plugged in. Reset CMOS, reseated the RAM and then it booted into UEFI, where I checked if everything is detected. Rebooted, and, for the first time in a long while, it went past the damn OS boot animation.

Glad to hear it, hope your feeling pretty chuffed :) you nailed it fellah!

1 hour ago, Luc2k said:

Long time since the last update because I kind of neglected the desktop.

 

Anyway, reseating the CPU + clearing CMOS didn't do anything to fix the issue. I was almost ready to send the motherboard in, even contacted the seller, but then I went "what the hell" and ordered a cheap mobo (resealed with a B350 chipset). Lo and behold, the same thing happened with that one, so I went to the showroom, returned it and sent the CPU for service. A replacement was sent back.

 

PC was stuck in a reboot loop initially if both memory sticks were plugged in. Reset CMOS, reseated the RAM and then it booted into UEFI, where I checked if everything is detected. Rebooted, and, for the first time in a long while, it went past the damn OS boot animation.

So, in the end it was the CPU?  Interesting.  Were any of the pins bent?

On 2017-09-26 at 1:22 PM, Jason S. said:

ive expressed my disdain for Asrock motherboards many times in the past. i wouldnt at all be surprised if it's a failing motherboard. as you mentioned already, though, try another PSU first. That Seasonic seems pretty old (circa 2010?) and may not be powerful enough. Otherwise, if that doesnt fix it, all fingers point to the motherboard.

I had one many years ago. I'll never have another one again. They are on my short list of do not buy ever again.

3 minutes ago, Jim K said:

So, in the end it was the CPU?  Interesting.  Were any of the pins bent?

No, and when I first removed it, I checked each row at eye level. It was the only thing the guy receiving warranty claims/returns actually checked and it would have been an easy refusal motive.

1 minute ago, LaP said:

I had one many years ago. I'll never have another one again. They are on my short list of do not buy ever again.

ASRock has really improved in the last few years... They used to be a low quality company, but are really stepping up to the big boys.

15 hours ago, Mindovermaster said:

ASRock has really improved in the last few years... They used to be a low quality company, but are really stepping up to the big boys.

i just feel that there are so many other choices out there that there's no reason to buy Asrock. ive had MSI and Asus motherboards in the past, and theyve always been rock solid.

3 minutes ago, Jason S. said:

i just feel that there are so many other choices out there that there's no reason to buy Asrock. ive had MSI and Asus motherboards in the past, and theyve always been rock solid.

I had an MSI motherboard, had to RMA it 3 times. And it never got fixed. Why I never use MSI. Been on ASUS or Gigabyte.

5 minutes ago, Mindovermaster said:

I had an MSI motherboard, had to RMA it 3 times. And it never got fixed. Why I never use MSI. Been on ASUS or Gigabyte.

I personally swear by Asus boards, tried all vendors and Asus have been best performing and most reliable over the decades for me . Id like to go EVGA mobo next time, but they are very pricey in the UK.

1 hour ago, Mindovermaster said:

I had an MSI motherboard, had to RMA it 3 times. And it never got fixed. Why I never use MSI. Been on ASUS or Gigabyte.

Pretty much always go with Asus for motherboards personally. Had lot of success with them in the past. Bought DFI and ASRock once but had compatibility problems and support was not great. I just built myself a new PC and went with an ASUS Crosshair Hero VI (black friday sale). So far so good.

1 hour ago, Jason S. said:

i just feel that there are so many other choices out there that there's no reason to buy Asrock. ive had MSI and Asus motherboards in the past, and theyve always been rock solid.

There aren't really as I wanted as many SATA ports as possible and nobody else offers 10 on AM4. That plus the Taichi itself being one of the highest rated boards on the platform made it a rather easy choice. Availability was the only real issue.

 

The thing I noticed about ASUS is that their boards, consistently, have fewer features than the competition at a given price point (unless you're looking at top-end stuff) and I can never justify paying for any brand name. Fun fact: ASRock's "cheap" reputation is from the time when they were a ASUS spin-off.

Edited by Luc2k
1 minute ago, Luc2k said:

There isn't really as I wanted as many SATA ports as possible and nobody else offers 10 on AM4. That plus the the Taichi itself being one of the highest rated boards on the platform made a rather easy choice. Availability was the only real issue.

 

The thing I noticed about ASUS is that their boards, consistently, have fewer features than the competition at a given price point (unless you're looking at top-end stuff) and I can never justify paying for any brand name. Fun fact: ASRock's "cheap" reputation is from the time when they were a ASUS spin-off.

i'd say your requirement of that many SATA ports is pretty niche, then. The vast majority of people wouldnt need 10 SATA ports. Asrock burned me in the past as well as other people i know. even if their quality has vastly improved over the years, i wouldnt go back to them now. it's the same as me being a former Ford owner. i'd never buy another Ford in my lifetime even if their 2017 cars are vastly improved.

1 hour ago, Jason S. said:

i'd say your requirement of that many SATA ports is pretty niche, then. The vast majority of people wouldnt need 10 SATA ports. Asrock burned me in the past as well as other people i know. even if their quality has vastly improved over the years, i wouldnt go back to them now. it's the same as me being a former Ford owner. i'd never buy another Ford in my lifetime even if their 2017 cars are vastly improved.

Yeah, I do suppose it is niche, but I would've settled for 8 which is the max that the chipset itself supports. In the end, I guess valued the 16 phase VRM design, the 2 extra ports along with the glowing reviews over something like ASUS's Prime X370 Pro.

 

Personal experience does play a big part I suppose. In my case, the first ASRock board was a cheap one (60-70$ in 2010) as I was strapped for cash. It wasn't all sunshine, but, I think, most of my problems were from crappy RAM, because the same Windows install became more stable as I upgraded kits. The biggest positive for me on that board was that it unlocked all 4 cores on my Athlon II X3 with no need for extra voltage.

 

I don't completely understand refusing to buy any future products from a company, under any circumstance, due to bad experiences in the past, unless it is something severe like a family member dying due to a faulty car, your house burning down due to a faulty motherboard or Intel affecting a particular market due to anticompetitive practices. It's everyone's choice in the end however (good luck trying to avoid Foxconn).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      561
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      78
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!