New Laptop


Recommended Posts

I don't want ANYONE to say, "you're wasting your money" "gaming isn't for laptops" "you'll get better performance/upgradability with a desktop"

 

I am sure on this, have read several reviews, and this sounds like the right thing for me.

 

I do not game that much, but when I do, it's like CS:GO or other similar low graphical pre-10 series games.

 

I was initially looking at the System76 Oryx Pro

 

I also was looking into the Alienware 13

 

Both are well-matched. 1060, i7 7700, etc. I just noticed the Alienware doesn't have as many USB ports. OOTB.

 

Is there another laptop or desktop replacement that has almost/all these things, at the same price point?

 

I run Linux Mint 18.2, to be specific. I won't be set back if it doesn't come with Linux.

 

Edit: Budget is, as you can see in links, around $1Kish...

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1350186-new-laptop/
Share on other sites

I am curious, what exactly are you looking for? I have noticed, there have been three recent threads or so from you regarding a desktop replacement. Lets get that out of the way.

 

Are you looking to downsize the amount of space your current rig is taking up?

Do you need to be mobile? Is that why you are looking into a laptop?

 

The last thread was closed at your request, so I am curious what it is you are looking for.

 

You mentioned gaming, albeit CS:GO, but is that it? I guess it comes down to space, and how much of it you can use. To be frank, you don't need "gaming" laptops, see bright lights, giant cases, heavier than a bag of bricks, anymore if you don't need to be mobile with it. You can get a nice laptop with a Thunderbolt 3 port, and use an eGPU when you want to game. However, this is another small box on your desk. I guess my question is, with the rig you currently have, are you looking to upgrade that, replace it with something smaller, or do you want a laptop so you can take it with you somewhere, ie being mobile? Without knowing much of your plan, it would be hard to give you a proper answer.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1350186-new-laptop/#findComment-598124086
Share on other sites

Well, I already have a small system. With a Mini-ITX.

 

I do not need a "gaming" laptop, but I want something that can play it, if I ever choose to. And most ultra-books come with integrated video.

 

Mobile isn't really my plan. I just want to downsize.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1350186-new-laptop/#findComment-598124308
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Mindovermaster said:

Well, I already have a small system. With a Mini-ITX.

 

I do not need a "gaming" laptop, but I want something that can play it, if I ever choose to. And most ultra-books come with integrated video.

 

Mobile isn't really my plan. I just want to downsize.

It sounds like the Intel/AMD co-op project would meed your needs. It will be so nice once they're available to the public. Just think, reasonably priced laptops with Intel CPU and integrated AMD graphics :)

 

https://www.neowin.net/news/hell-has-frozen-over-intel-and-amd-team-up-on-pc-laptop-chip

 

unfortunately it will be quite some time before we see general availability of this yet :/

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1350186-new-laptop/#findComment-598124340
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Mindovermaster said:

And most ultra-books come with integrated video.

Which isn't a problem, now that you can easily use an eGPU via Thunderbolt 3. However, if you don't want the additional caddie on the desk or hidden below, a gaming laptop sounds like your best option.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1350186-new-laptop/#findComment-598124354
Share on other sites

@Brandon H- AMD graphics are bad for Linux, if you didn't know.

 

@Circaflex- AFAIK, eGPUs do not play well with Linux. This still true? And like I said above, I am sure on this.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1350186-new-laptop/#findComment-598124380
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mindovermaster said:

@Brandon H- AMD graphics are bad for Linux, if you didn't know.

 

@Circaflex- AFAIK, eGPUs do not play well with Linux. This still true? And like I said above, I am sure on this.

AMD hasn't improved any on Linux front? that's a shame to hear. I used to have a laptop with a 4xxx series AMD graphics and it was rock solid on Linux; that was one of the last AMD series to actually play nice on linux saddly.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1350186-new-laptop/#findComment-598124392
Share on other sites

 

3 minutes ago, Brandon H said:

AMD hasn't improved any on Linux front? that's a shame to hear. I used to have a laptop with a 4xxx series AMD graphics and it was rock solid on Linux; that was one of the last AMD series to actually play nice on linux.

 

After I got my Gigabyte 750Ti, I was much happier. I recently had a 7850.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1350186-new-laptop/#findComment-598124402
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mindovermaster said:

 

 

After I got my Gigabyte 750Ti, I was much happier. I recently had a 7850.

oh god yeah I remember hearing the 7xxx series was one of the worst on Linux, no wonder you had issues

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1350186-new-laptop/#findComment-598124404
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Brandon H said:

oh god yeah I remember hearing the 7xxx series was one of the worst on Linux, no wonder you had issues

Yeah, NVIDIA has much better support.... Though I haven't tried AMD graphics in quite a while.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1350186-new-laptop/#findComment-598124410
Share on other sites

When you make up your mind to proceed with a purchase, and you also communicate that very clearly, then there are lots of people here that will find you a deal.

 

For me the best deal is good hardware that lasts a few years so I would rather spend a bit more.

 

My Dell XPS 9550 has a 4K amazing LCD, a 960M GPU, a 6700HQ CPU, 16 gig RAM, Samsung 512g NVMe M.2 and Thunderbolt 3. That is a few years old and there is not a single item that leaves me wanting a new laptop. It cost around 2K but maybe you could find one on ebay these days for a lot less.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1350186-new-laptop/#findComment-598132010
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, DevTech said:

When you make up your mind to proceed with a purchase, and you also communicate that very clearly, then there are lots of people here that will find you a deal.

 

As I said in my OP, if there is anything better, I am willing to look into it.

 

And there's always the chance Linux won't like something. I have to weigh out the goods and bads.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1350186-new-laptop/#findComment-598132024
Share on other sites

I know it is a little less powered than what you asked - but I just saw this, and a friend bought one for their son:

Dell Inspiron 15 Gaming: $750

 

Like I said, I know its not quite what you asked - but with the lower price point - you could get some other things as well.

This one is a little healthier - & comes in just a tad over $1000

 

https://www.bestbuy.com/site/dell-inspiron-15-6-laptop-intel-core-i7-16gb-memory-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1050ti-1tb-hard-drive-128gb-ssd-black/5744108.p?skuId=5744108


 

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1350186-new-laptop/#findComment-598132524
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mindovermaster said:

Surprised you didn't recommend any Lenovo's, @T3X4S :rofl:

A friend just bought on the of i5 versions for their kid, and gave it to me to clean up & prep for XMAS.

I actually know nothing and TBH - wouldnt recommend anything from Dell that isnt a Latitude :p

In short - dont listen to me.  

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1350186-new-laptop/#findComment-598132686
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

Lenovo has a couple of models in its Legion Y Series line of gaming laptops that you might be interested in.  The Y520 starts at $700, so you could get that and add some upgrades and still be under your $1,000 budget, or the  Y720 starts at $1,050, which is slightly above your stated budget, but not too far off.  I'm not very familiar with the gaming laptop space (what little gaming I do seems to work just fine on my ThinkPad P50) but I suspect either would do well with the current crop of games, and there's always the possibility of a ThunderPort-connected eGPU if you decide the 1060 isn't cutting it anymore.

 

On an anecdotal note, I was in San Diego last month and stopped by a LAN party to drop off some stuff for an acquaintance.  Most of the people there seemed to be on desktops, but I did see a few with gaming laptops, and from my very brief and cursory inspection, they didn't seem to be enjoying themselves any less due to their choice of form-factor.

 

Regards,


Aryeh Goretsky

 

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1350186-new-laptop/#findComment-598132698
Share on other sites

On 12/14/2017 at 9:50 PM, goretsky said:

Hello,

 

Lenovo has a couple of models in its Legion Y Series line of gaming laptops that you might be interested in.  The Y520 starts at $700, so you could get that and add some upgrades and still be under your $1,000 budget, or the  Y720 starts at $1,050, which is slightly above your stated budget, but not too far off.  I'm not very familiar with the gaming laptop space (what little gaming I do seems to work just fine on my ThinkPad P50) but I suspect either would do well with the current crop of games, and there's always the possibility of a ThunderPort-connected eGPU if you decide the 1060 isn't cutting it anymore.

 

On an anecdotal note, I was in San Diego last month and stopped by a LAN party to drop off some stuff for an acquaintance.  Most of the people there seemed to be on desktops, but I did see a few with gaming laptops, and from my very brief and cursory inspection, they didn't seem to be enjoying themselves any less due to their choice of form-factor.

 

Regards,


Aryeh Goretsky

 

The main thing to watch out for on laptops and gaming other than the obvious fact you are stuck with your GPU choice for life is the size and quality of the Power Supply Brick. Many manufacturers are going small and cheap on those to save money and look less bulky on the assumption that users will rarely hit 100% duty cycle.

 

For gaming, that assumption does not hold and a power brick that is too small will cycle the on-board battery constantly and overload itself as well. A frequent gamer can end up with a seriously degraded battery and power supply within 6 months.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1350186-new-laptop/#findComment-598134348
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, DevTech said:

The main thing to watch out for on laptops and gaming other than the obvious fact you are stuck with your GPU choice for life

 

That's not true anymore with Thunderbolt.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1350186-new-laptop/#findComment-598134730
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mindovermaster said:

 

That's not true anymore with Thunderbolt.

No, but you won't see full performance through Thunderbolt. Its not as bad if you send to an external monitor, but feeding it back to the built in display has a huge performance hit.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1350186-new-laptop/#findComment-598134734
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, adrynalyne said:

No, but you won't see full performance through Thunderbolt. Its not as bad if you send to an external monitor, but feeding it back to the built in display has a huge performance hit.

Still better than nothing, though :yes:

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1350186-new-laptop/#findComment-598134740
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!