Recommended Posts

I got a Dell laptop there recently and whilst putting in an SSD I noticed only one RAM slot is filled. Am I right in thinking that ideally both slots should be filled? Or does really make much difference?

 

Performance wise the one stick of 8GB DDR4 is seems fine for what I need for now, but for future reference would it be OK to just buy one stick of compatible 8gb RAM from say Crucial, or should I be matching the both sticks down to manufacturer?

 

Thanks!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1351086-laptop-with-single-channel-ram/
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Lamp0 said:

I got a Dell laptop there recently and whilst putting in an SSD I noticed only one RAM slot is filled. Am I right in thinking that ideally both slots should be filled? Or does really make much difference?

 

Performance wise the one stick of 8GB DDR4 is seems fine for what I need for now, but for future reference would it be OK to just buy one stick of compatible 8gb RAM from say Crucial, or should I be matching the both sticks down to manufacturer?

 

Thanks!

More RAM beats fast RAM any day.  When the time comes, add a 16 gig DDR4 module of any decent brand such as G. Skill

 

The laptop BIOS will set the RAM speed to the slower of the two modules so it doesn't matter what you buy as long as it isn't junk.

 

2 hours ago, eddman said:

Surely you meant to say "add an 8 GB module", right? An 8 + 16 setup would be asymmetrical.

To quote myself: "More RAM beats fast RAM any day"

 

It's a laptop, only one empty slot so next time he opens it up might as well maxx the socket.

 

CPU's operate so very much faster than RAM so everything works because of large CPU-speed Cache on the chip. Once you are off the CPU silicon, might as well max out the RAM however you can to let the O/S figure out how to give whatever performance it can. That will yield far more noticeable real world speed and less stuttering compared to Benchmarks On A Web Page showing matched identical RAM gives you 1% extra or whatever is RAM Marketing Flavor Of The Month.

 

- More RAM beats faster RAM

- Faster CPU beats faster RAM

 

You would have to tweak and optimize many aspects of a computer and once everything possible is upgraded (CPU - GPU - Amount of RAM - Samsung 960 Pro - etc) and you have money you don't want to better spend on the latest Star Wars movie, then and only then does a matched pair of premium RAM make any technological sense. But some of them can sure look pretty with RGB lights and stuff.

56 minutes ago, DevTech said:

To quote myself: "More RAM beats fast RAM any day"

 

It's a laptop, only one empty slot so next time he opens it up might as well maxx the socket.

 

CPU's operate so very much faster than RAM so everything works because of large CPU-speed Cache on the chip. Once you are off the CPU silicon, might as well max out the RAM however you can to let the O/S figure out how to give whatever performance it can. That will yield far more noticeable real world speed and less stuttering compared to Benchmarks On A Web Page showing matched identical RAM gives you 1% extra or whatever is RAM Marketing Flavor Of The Month.

 

- More RAM beats faster RAM

- Faster CPU beats faster RAM

 

You would have to tweak and optimize many aspects of a computer and once everything possible is upgraded (CPU - GPU - Amount of RAM - Samsung 960 Pro - etc) and you have money you don't want to better spend on the latest Star Wars movie, then and only then does a matched pair of premium RAM make any technological sense. But some of them can sure look pretty with RGB lights and stuff.

There are workloads that benefit from more RAM bandwidth. Also depends on the budget and 16 GB is quite enough. If 16 GB is not enough and there is no budget for 32 GB, then yes, 24 GB would be the logical choice and is fast enough for regular use cases. Don't see what a movie and those useless lights have to do with all this though.

Edited by eddman
13 minutes ago, eddman said:

There are workloads that benefit from more RAM bandwidth. Also depends on the budget and 16 GB is quite enough. If 16 GB is not enough and there is no budget for 32 GB, then yes, 24 GB would be the logical choice. Don't see what a movie and those useless lights have to do with all this though.

Because in almost all cases it makes more sense to go to the movies than spend money on increasing RAM speed.

 

The lights refer to the people that seem to have a fascination with super fast overclocked RAM and if it lights up it must be faster. The lights could save the cost of a Xmas Tree perhaps...

 

 

20 minutes ago, Lamp0 said:

I think the total memory supported on this machine is 16GB.

If it uses DDR4 and it has two slots, then total RAM will be 32 gigs.

26 minutes ago, Lamp0 said:

I think the total memory supported on this machine is 16GB.

If that is the case (hard to know since you didn't list the model of the notebook) ... slap another 8GB in there.  With regards to single/dual channel ... it really doesn't matter for mainstream users (though building/upgrading a system from scratch...dual is the obvious choice).  You'll see a difference on synthetic benchmarks or CFD/parametric analysis and marginal advantages with video editing/rendering (depending on software).  Gaming, watching YouTube, browsing the web, using Office ... not so much.  As DevTech said ... more RAM is better than faster RAM.

53 minutes ago, PGHammer said:

Also, some portables have only one module that is replaceable - my ASUS X54C is of that sort.

The X54 has soldered in memory as well as one user upgradeable slot instead of the usual no onboard with two removable slots. I hate soldered in RAM! If the soldered RAM goes bad it's either vacuum reflow some new chips, or get a new mainboard :(

2 hours ago, PGHammer said:

Also, some portables have only one module that is replaceable - my ASUS X54C is of that sort.

This laptop has 2 slots, 1 populated with an 8GB and a second free for another 8GB. Dell says max spec ram is 16GB, some people online saying it'll work with 32GB

10 minutes ago, xendrome said:

This laptop has 2 slots, 1 populated with an 8GB and a second free for another 8GB. Dell says max spec ram is 16GB, some people online saying it'll work with 32GB

It's worth checking if there's a new BIOS for it, these can sometimes fix max memory capacity. Always try to find the newest revisions of user manuals and the service manuals from Dell themselves for the most up to date info.

I have last year's Alienware 15 R3*, it has DDR4 in dual channel, as it can only take a maximum of 32GB of RAM, there's currently 16GB in it, although I did see something in passing that said 64GB of RAM, but I'll have to wait till someone comes out with a 32GB SODIMM.

 

 

* I bought it used early last month.

40 minutes ago, branfont said:

I have last year's Alienware 15 R3*, it has DDR4 in dual channel, as it can only take a maximum of 32GB of RAM, there's currently 16GB in it, although I did see something in passing that said 64GB of RAM, but I'll have to wait till someone comes out with a 32GB SODIMM.

 

 

* I bought it used early last month.

Book them, and they will come... :p

6 hours ago, xendrome said:

This laptop has 2 slots, 1 populated with an 8GB and a second free for another 8GB. Dell says max spec ram is 16GB, some people online saying it'll work with 32GB

I have been saying here it will work with 2 x 16 gig if it is DDR4 and there is no other RAM soldered on to the motherboard.

 

The CPU is providing the RAM interface so Dell would have to intentionally disable >16 gig in the BIOS by refusing to boot the device for nothing other than marketing reasons.

 

It is a cheap unit with a crappy GPU and a crappy TN LCD panel so they obviously don't want to damage the positioning of their Alienware line-up. I suspect 32 gigs will work no problem but Dell does not want to actually say that and therefore miss the exact demographic the product line is targeting. i.e. "if you want 32 gig, buy the Alienware" is probably their reply if anyone asks.

 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • No, size is not the only selling point. I did not even remotely say that. Your claim was that "building your own will be faster and cheaper". This is false. You cannot build something close to that form factor with off-the-shelf parts. You can build a Mini-ITX PC and pay more, or something larger and pay less. But these are different market segments. It's apples and oranges.
    • There is a default resolution setting in Settings > Display that can be changed with a click. You can also change the settings on a per-game basis. No CLI needed. Also, Steam has countless games that are not "[perpetual] alpha/beta games", so no need for the straw man. Plus you can use other stores as well. And console games (e.g. PS5) cost a fortune, which itself more than negates the price subsidy on the system, unless you plan on exclusively playing 1 or 2 games. It's true that you shouldn't buy a system that doesn't support the game(s) you want to play, but I think that's kinda obvious, and applies to every console as well as PC. I don't game in the living room and have no need of a Steam Machine, but there is a clear market segment that would find it useful.
    • RSS Guard 5.2.0 by Razvan Serea RSS Guard is a simple (yet powerful) feed reader. It is able to fetch the most known feed formats, including RSS/RDF and ATOM. It's free, it's open-source. RSS Guard currently supports Czech, Dutch, English, French, German, Italian. RSS Guard will never depend on other services - this includes online news aggregators like Feedly, The Old Reader and others. RSS Guard is developed on top of the Qt library and it supports these operating systems: Windows GNU/Linux OS/2 (eComStation) Mac OS X xBSD (possibly) Android (possibly) other platforms supported by Qt The core features of RSS Guard are: support for online feed synchronization via plugins, Tiny Tiny RSS (from RSS Guard 3.0.0). multiplatform, support for all feed formats, simplicity, import/export of feeds to/from OPML 2.0, downloader with own tab and support for up to 6 parallel downloads, message filter with regular expressions, feed metadata fetching including icons, simple Adblock functionality, customized popup notifications, Google-based auto-completion for internal web browser location bar, ability to cleanup internal message database with various options, enhanced feed auto-updating with separate time intervals, multiple data backend support, SQLite (in-memory DBs too), MySQL. is able to specify target database by its name (MySQL backend), “portable” mode support with clever auto-detection, feed categorization, drap-n-drop for feed list, automatic checking for updates, ability to discover existing feeds on websites, full support of podcasts (both RSS & ATOM), ability to backup/restore database or settings, fully-featured recycle bin, printing of messages and any web pages, can be fully controlled via keyboard, feed authentication (Digest-MD5, BASIC, NTLM-2), handles tons of messages & feeds, sweet look & feel, fully adjustable toolbars (changeable buttons and style), ability to check for updates on all platforms + self-updating on Windows, hideable main menu, toolbars and list headers, KFeanza-based default icon theme + ability to create your own icon themes, fully skinnable user interface + ability to create your own skins, “newspaper” view, plenty of skins, support for "feed://" URI scheme, ability to hide list of feeds/categories, open-source development model based on GNU GPL license, version 3, tabbed interface, integrated web browser with adjustable behavior + external browser support, internal web browser mouse gestures support, desktop integration via tray icon, localizations to some languages, Qt library is the only dependency, open-source development model and friendly author waiting for your feedback, no ads, no hidden costs. RSS Guard 5.2.0 changelog: Added: Feed auto-fetch can now also be delayed while Feral GameMode is active on Linux and startup auto-fetch is skipped when GameMode is already active. (#2265) WebEngine builds can now use RSS Guard generated proxy auto-config (PAC) rules so article/web browsing follows per-account and per-feed proxy settings more closely. (#2273) Generated PAC rules now also cover related subdomains and use Public Suffix List data, so feeds such as feeds.bbc.co.uk can also proxy resources from images.bbc.co.uk. (#2273) Standard feeds can now define extra proxy domains, useful when article images, stylesheets or other page resources are loaded from a CDN or another domain that should use the same feed proxy. (#2273) RSS Guard now asks for proxy credentials when a WebEngine page needs proxy authentication and can fill credentials from the current feed proxy when available. (#2273) Network settings again include an option to ignore all cookies, which clears stored cookies and prevents new cookies from being accepted. Standard RSS/ATOM feeds can now individually ignore cookies while downloading feed data. Stored cookies can now be deleted from the Tools menu. Custom skin colors can now override the feed list article count color separately from feed titles, including a separate highlighted color. (#2275) Settings dialog can now search across available settings and highlight matching controls. (#1754) Standard RSS/ATOM feeds can now optionally be reported as broken when they are valid but contain no articles. (#2039) Standard RSS/ATOM feeds can now override the application-wide feed connection timeout per feed. (#1023) Tray icon can now use a custom background color and unread-count text color, with an option to reuse the generated icon as the application icon. (#1973) Support for more benevolent parsing of Gemlog entries (#2295). Article list can now show when an article was received by RSS Guard. (#947) Feed deep discovery now actually scrapes all links found in the website and checks if they are feeds or not. This greatly enhances usability of the deep discovery mode and discovers many more feeds than before. (#2306) Search boxes now show a small dot when the feed or article list is hiding some items because of active filtering. (#873) Articles now have a shortcut-assignable action to open the homepage of the feed they belong to. (#2060) Fixed: Parallel feed updates no longer crash when multiple update results are processed at the same time. (64cf521) Links in WebEngine articles opened from feeds such as Kill the Newsletter now open correctly instead of being swallowed by the embedded page. (#2272) Relative article URLs resolution was kinda broken. (#2282) Clicking article URL did not work when the URL had "fragment" set. (#2293) The default proxy setting now uses Qt/system default proxy behavior instead of forcing no proxy. (e0263ad) WebEngine article loading now keeps the current feed context, so feed-specific proxy credentials remain available while the article page loads. (fdd0f00) Download: RSS Guard 5.2.0 (64-bit) | Portable | ~ 130.0 MB (Open Source) Link: RSS Guard Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • This is gonna separate the creeps from the rest of the crowd.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      DaviKar went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      110
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!