• 0

Definitive Best FREE Antivirus 2018


Definitive Best FREE Antivirus 2018  

109 members have voted

  1. 1. Which do you choose?

    • 360 Total Security
      1
    • Ad-Aware
      0
    • Avast!
      8
    • AVG AntiVirus
      5
    • Avira
      4
    • Baidu Antivirus
      0
    • BitDefender
      9
    • ClamWin/ClamAV
      1
    • Comodo Anti-Virus/Internet Security
      3
    • Dr. Web Cureit!
      0
    • Panda Cloud Antivirus
      0
    • Malwarebytes
      6
    • Microsoft Security Essentials/Windows Defender
      26
    • SecureAPlus
      1
    • Sophos Virus Removal Tool
      1
    • Tencent PC Manager
      0
    • ZoneAlarm Free
      0
    • Kaspersky Free
      8
    • Other (please specify below)
      0


Question

It's a new year, and so we have a new poll for Definitive Best Free Antivirus.
 
The 2017 thread can be found here.
 
This is a poll for best FREE antivirus software. There is a separate thread for PAID antivirus software here.
 
If your choice of free antivirus software is not listed, please choose Other and specify in the comments.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1352256-definitive-best-free-antivirus-2018/
Share on other sites

12 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

If it runs Windows, it runs Defender - and the only hardware that does NOT run Defender is my phone because the phone runs Android.

  • 0
14 hours ago, PGHammer said:

If it runs Windows, it runs Defender - and the only hardware that does NOT run Defender is my phone because the phone runs Android.

tbh on W10, Defenders better than pretty much all Free Av (and a lot o paid for to boot)

  • 0
35 minutes ago, DConnell said:

Windows Defender as the the real-time protection, Malwarebytes Antimalware as the second opinion.

tbh never been a fan of malware bytes products for my own use.

 

Webroot SA and Ransom Free  https://ransomfree.cybereason.com/ FTW!

  • 0
Just now, Mando said:

tbh never been a fan of malware bytes products for my own use.

 

Webroot SA and Ransom Free  https://ransomfree.cybereason.com/ FTW!

Looks like I have a new security tool to evaluate!

  • 0
4 minutes ago, DConnell said:

Looks like I have a new security tool to evaluate!

its very good to run monitoring SANS etc from your endpoint client, supports NFS vols & CIFs. Its also free for commercial use.

 

say what you like, but some of the best security companies and security products are pouring out of Israel currently ;) Big fan of Checkpoint UTMS and their Blade firewalls.

 

lays honeytrap directories/files on root of the Os drive and also monitors shares.

 

https://www.cybereason.com/how-it-works?utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cybereason.com%2F%3Futm_source%3Dcybereason%26utm_medium%3Dabout-us-page%26utm_campaign%3Dransomware-tool

  • 0

AV software has become so intrusive and generally creepy over the last couple years so I just use Windows Defender these days (again) with an ad-blocker and no Java or standalone Flash installed. I have used Malwarebytes as a second opinion/standalone scanner in the past but... I just reinstalled Windows 10 on my PC so will be watching this thread for maybe a different solution for that.

  • 0
17 hours ago, PGHammer said:

If it runs Windows, it runs Defender - and the only hardware that does NOT run Defender is my phone because the phone runs Android.

Since closing down the computer store over 3 years ago, Malwarebytes is still the go-to solution that I use now for computer cleaning needs for friends and family who get into trouble. I also must add the machines that malwarevytes has to go clean all have windows defneder, and/or norton, avg, avast, 360TS, etc... When people see how much the other guys let through, they stop using them on the very same day.  I just don't know why everyone just doesn't Malwarebytes. After I service their machine, they do. :) 

Edited by Rippleman
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Guess it's one of those things best used by devs to thoroughly test stuff.
    • is it all upside down there? traffic lights reverted too?
    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!