Recommended Posts

After upgrading my CPU, motherboard, and RAM, I am getting poor video performance on my secondary display when running intensive applications such as games on my primary. This makes watching videos and streaming content hard to watch while playing games.

 

My system:

Windows 10 Home 64bit

Nvidia Geforce 1070 8GB

Intel Core i7-8700K 3.7Ghz (was i7-3750K 4Ghz)

Asrock Z370 Extreme4 (was mid-range Asus Z270)

32GB DDR4 RAM (was 24GB DDR3)

240GB SSD (OS and games installed here)

2x3TB HDD (RAID1)

27" 1440p Dell 60hz Primary (DisplayPort)

24" 1200p Dell 60hz Secondary (DisplayPort)

 

Performance is otherwise good and benchmarks are as expected. Games are better than they were, videos remain perfect - except when using both at once. Before the upgrade, the most intensive video (1080p60) would cause game performance to crash (Cities Skylines would go from 25 FPS to 10 FPS) with the CPU causing the bottleneck. Now game performance is only slightly affected but video is laggy (slow-motion) or jumpy (freezes for couple of seconds) even for less intensive content like 720p60 or 1080p30. Standard definition content is fine, except that it's standard definition.

 

Increasing the browser's CPU priorities seem to help a bit. I've tried changing where the monitors are plugged into, using DVI and plugging the secondary monitor into the on-board graphics port; no difference. Graphics drivers are updated, the confusing bundle of software and drivers I got from Asrock's site seem to be installed and up to date. This problem happens across different browsers (Chrome and Firefox) and with video from different sources. Live streams are worse than videos. It happens with different games too, but CPU intensive ones seem to affect video most.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1353334-laggy-video-after-upgrade/
Share on other sites

I had this exact thing a while ago.

 

My system specs should have been fine but i had the laggy video on the second screen.

I did manage to fix it by basically turning off Hardware Acceleration in whichever application you're watching video, be it a browser or VLC or something.

In Chrome, you should be able to find it easily just by searching Hardware in the settings (same in most browsers).

 

I think the issue lies with either Windows or your GPU drivers (especially as it seems to be linked to updating your drivers) as now mine's back to working as expected but the above should sort you out in the meantime!

Thanks Rieka. I have not reinstalled Windows since the upgrade, so if all else fails I'll try that.

 

I'm running Cities Skylines while trying to stream 720p video now and the problem is occurring. According to OpenHardwareMonitor and Windows Resource Monitor, my CPU is running at about 25%, spread reasonably well across all 12 virtual cores (none are maxed out). I'm using 75% of my RAM, about 75% of my GPU power and 90% of my video RAM.

 

I have been getting some VRAM related slowdowns in CSL; poor performance when looking at a new area. It's the same graphics card as before the upgrade, so I don't think this relevant but maybe it is.

4 hours ago, Quboid said:

After upgrading my CPU, motherboard, and RAM, I am getting poor video performance on my secondary display when running intensive applications such as games on my primary. This makes watching videos and streaming content hard to watch while playing games.

 

My system:

Windows 10 Home 64bit

Nvidia Geforce 1070 8GB

Intel Core i7-8700K 3.7Ghz (was i7-3750K 4Ghz)

Asrock Z370 Extreme4 (was mid-range Asus Z270)

32GB DDR4 RAM (was 24GB DDR3)

240GB SSD (OS and games installed here)

2x3TB HDD (RAID1)

27" 1440p Dell 60hz Primary (DisplayPort)

24" 1200p Dell 60hz Secondary (DisplayPort)

 

Performance is otherwise good and benchmarks are as expected. Games are better than they were, videos remain perfect - except when using both at once. Before the upgrade, the most intensive video (1080p60) would cause game performance to crash (Cities Skylines would go from 25 FPS to 10 FPS) with the CPU causing the bottleneck. Now game performance is only slightly affected but video is laggy (slow-motion) or jumpy (freezes for couple of seconds) even for less intensive content like 720p60 or 1080p30. Standard definition content is fine, except that it's standard definition.

 

Increasing the browser's CPU priorities seem to help a bit. I've tried changing where the monitors are plugged into, using DVI and plugging the secondary monitor into the on-board graphics port; no difference. Graphics drivers are updated, the confusing bundle of software and drivers I got from Asrock's site seem to be installed and up to date. This problem happens across different browsers (Chrome and Firefox) and with video from different sources. Live streams are worse than videos. It happens with different games too, but CPU intensive ones seem to affect video most.

Your problem is ridiculous with that hardware and also your previous hardware is pretty much equally powerful.

 

There is a fundamental configuration issue with your Windows setup.

 

1. Make sure you are using latest NVIDIA driver from GeForce.com

 

2. Make sure you are not using the Intel graphics - i.e. both monitors plugged into the 1070.

 

3. Download and install K-lite Mega Codec pack to eliminate codec issues. Use the default install settings.

 

(Using the PatchMyPc.com installer is the fastest way to get it going by just clicking a single check box)

 

4. Make sure your Anti-Virus is NOT scanning videos! 

 

5. You might have weird stuff happening with your SSD so check for firmware upgrades on that and provide brand and model number.

 

 

Keep in mind that you have so much performance in your computer that you don't have to do anything tricky to expect a game and a video to run at the same time. You literally have something configured hugely WRONG to be in this situation. So don't stop until you find it. 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2

I'd just wipe and install windows, install browser and nVidia drivers and test

if after that you have issues, look at what you may have installed after the original test

 

A windows 10 install on a new SSD with no data should be completed and at your desktop in under 30 mins, likely less, been a while since I did it on my system with an older cheap SSD

  • Like 3

What power supply do you have, and what model 1070 do you have?

Typically the PSU makers recommend running individual cables to each of the GPU power connectors. So if the GPU has a 6 pin and 8 pin connector, run separate cables to the PSU.

 

Not sure if any of that is related, but it will ensure you aren't straining the power supply under load.

I think the PSU is an 800W Enermax but I'd have to be at my PC to check. The card is a Gainward Phoenix Golden Sample 1070 with a single power connector, and both monitors are plugged into it. The website for K-lite Mega Codec suggested switching my graphics card's Power Management Mode to Adaptive, so I'll try that later when I install the Codec, and do more tests.

 

Performance is worst with Cities Skylines and to be honest, CSL is an absolute dog when it comes to performance. I have thousands of additional assets installed, it sometimes uses over 20GB RAM, I presume VRAM is fully used (and it reports around 90% because there's always data being transferred to and fro), and I don't get the impression it's particularly well optimised. I'm not surprised that performance is significantly hit, but I am sure it shouldn't be this bad in specific situation - and definitely not worse than it was on slower hardware.

1 hour ago, Quboid said:

I think the PSU is an 800W Enermax but I'd have to be at my PC to check. The card is a Gainward Phoenix Golden Sample 1070 with a single power connector, and both monitors are plugged into it. The website for K-lite Mega Codec suggested switching my graphics card's Power Management Mode to Adaptive, so I'll try that later when I install the Codec, and do more tests.

 

Performance is worst with Cities Skylines and to be honest, CSL is an absolute dog when it comes to performance. I have thousands of additional assets installed, it sometimes uses over 20GB RAM, I presume VRAM is fully used (and it reports around 90% because there's always data being transferred to and fro), and I don't get the impression it's particularly well optimised. I'm not surprised that performance is significantly hit, but I am sure it shouldn't be this bad in specific situation - and definitely not worse than it was on slower hardware.

6. Go through the confusing bundle and replace the Asrock driver in every instance you can identify with the lastest driver from the manufacture's website

" the confusing bundle of software and drivers I got from Asrock's site seem to be installed and up to date"

 

7. As a test, run the game in a low res such as 720p

 

8. As a test, select low quality textures in the game settings

 

9. Run task manager when the game and browser are running and set CPU Affinity so that CPU 0 is not available to either and after that the game has one other CPU (real core probably CPU 2 or 3) and the browser is CPU 4 etc

 

 

 

 

Not much luck. Changing the affinities seems to help a little bit, like increasing the priority. Lowering graphics settings also helps but even with Chrome at high priority, and with separate virtual cores assigned (0 for neither, 1-3 for Chrome, 4-11 for games) and graphics setting lower, video performance isn't good.

 

I might wipe the SSD and do a fresh install, or get an M.2 drive.

On 1/17/2018 at 2:36 AM, Quboid said:

Not much luck. Changing the affinities seems to help a little bit, like increasing the priority. Lowering graphics settings also helps but even with Chrome at high priority, and with separate virtual cores assigned (0 for neither, 1-3 for Chrome, 4-11 for games) and graphics setting lower, video performance isn't good.

 

I might wipe the SSD and do a fresh install, or get an M.2 drive.

The cores are not really virtual.

 

For that test, 0 and 1 are both the first core.

 

You could also test by turning off HyperThreading

 

Make sure you have latest chipset drivers from Intel.com

 

  • 1 month later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I don’t get why if I bought the game on the last get I needed to pay $40 to upgrade to the new version in the first place and people who love the game and play a lot would have upgraded already so this is just PR and a chance to grab new players who forgot the game long time ago I think
    • The term "use" is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that headline. "Use" can mean opening ChatGPT occasionally to ask for the definition of a word or information about a specific topic. If you frame the question around how many people use it as a daily driver in their work or personal lives, that number is a lot smaller. Those are the people who pay for AI. Nearly everyone else is happy to use it for free, but doesn't see enough value in it to pay for it.
    • No support for Windows Hello!
    • I think you meant the "ntfs3" driver, but yes there have been a lot of fixes for it in this release and previous releases, not 100% sure if the issue you mentioned is fixed though. In any case, the new "ntfs" driver in 7.1 doesn't have that issue (at least, no reports of such have come thru), but your kernel needs to explicitly enable support for the new driver first (like how CachyOS kernel has it), and you need to edit your mount points in /etc/fstab to use "ntfs" instead of the other drivers.
    • Epic Games says Unreal Engine 6 will help developers "build content faster" using AI models by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Epic Games is rolling out the latest major update to Unreal Engine 5 today, and at the same time, the company also dropped some information on the next-generation version of the product, Unreal Engine 6. This was already revealed a few weeks ago alongside the new Rocket League upgrade reveal. The company says it is combining the features of Unreal Engine and Unreal Editor for Fortnite to create this new version of its popular media creation tool. On top of creating entire games, the new engine will also focus on letting developers operate large-scale live service titles more easily, whether by shipping content into their own ecosystems or into Fortnite. The use of large language models is also mentioned here, with Epic saying it will be a core part of the engine. "We see LLMs, generative AI models, and tools like Claude and Codex playing a central role in helping you build content faster while maintaining the creative control you need," adds the company. Here is the rundown of what's new about version 6 of Unreal Engine: With all these changes to the programming model, portability upgrades, and generative AI integration, Epic says the new version of the engine will "change a lot about how games are made." The company aims to ship Unreal Engine 6 into early access in late 2027, with a full release planned for 12-18 months later. Epic Games also dropped a lengthy blog post about the new Unreal Engine 5.8 update for game developers over here. The release is focused on delivering better performance, customization, and streamlined workflows for development teams. This will be the final major update for this version of the engine before Epic switches to focus fully on Unreal Engine 6's early access launch.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      502
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      67
    5. 5
      neufuse
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!