Recommended Posts

After upgrading my CPU, motherboard, and RAM, I am getting poor video performance on my secondary display when running intensive applications such as games on my primary. This makes watching videos and streaming content hard to watch while playing games.

 

My system:

Windows 10 Home 64bit

Nvidia Geforce 1070 8GB

Intel Core i7-8700K 3.7Ghz (was i7-3750K 4Ghz)

Asrock Z370 Extreme4 (was mid-range Asus Z270)

32GB DDR4 RAM (was 24GB DDR3)

240GB SSD (OS and games installed here)

2x3TB HDD (RAID1)

27" 1440p Dell 60hz Primary (DisplayPort)

24" 1200p Dell 60hz Secondary (DisplayPort)

 

Performance is otherwise good and benchmarks are as expected. Games are better than they were, videos remain perfect - except when using both at once. Before the upgrade, the most intensive video (1080p60) would cause game performance to crash (Cities Skylines would go from 25 FPS to 10 FPS) with the CPU causing the bottleneck. Now game performance is only slightly affected but video is laggy (slow-motion) or jumpy (freezes for couple of seconds) even for less intensive content like 720p60 or 1080p30. Standard definition content is fine, except that it's standard definition.

 

Increasing the browser's CPU priorities seem to help a bit. I've tried changing where the monitors are plugged into, using DVI and plugging the secondary monitor into the on-board graphics port; no difference. Graphics drivers are updated, the confusing bundle of software and drivers I got from Asrock's site seem to be installed and up to date. This problem happens across different browsers (Chrome and Firefox) and with video from different sources. Live streams are worse than videos. It happens with different games too, but CPU intensive ones seem to affect video most.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1353334-laggy-video-after-upgrade/
Share on other sites

I had this exact thing a while ago.

 

My system specs should have been fine but i had the laggy video on the second screen.

I did manage to fix it by basically turning off Hardware Acceleration in whichever application you're watching video, be it a browser or VLC or something.

In Chrome, you should be able to find it easily just by searching Hardware in the settings (same in most browsers).

 

I think the issue lies with either Windows or your GPU drivers (especially as it seems to be linked to updating your drivers) as now mine's back to working as expected but the above should sort you out in the meantime!

Thanks Rieka. I have not reinstalled Windows since the upgrade, so if all else fails I'll try that.

 

I'm running Cities Skylines while trying to stream 720p video now and the problem is occurring. According to OpenHardwareMonitor and Windows Resource Monitor, my CPU is running at about 25%, spread reasonably well across all 12 virtual cores (none are maxed out). I'm using 75% of my RAM, about 75% of my GPU power and 90% of my video RAM.

 

I have been getting some VRAM related slowdowns in CSL; poor performance when looking at a new area. It's the same graphics card as before the upgrade, so I don't think this relevant but maybe it is.

4 hours ago, Quboid said:

After upgrading my CPU, motherboard, and RAM, I am getting poor video performance on my secondary display when running intensive applications such as games on my primary. This makes watching videos and streaming content hard to watch while playing games.

 

My system:

Windows 10 Home 64bit

Nvidia Geforce 1070 8GB

Intel Core i7-8700K 3.7Ghz (was i7-3750K 4Ghz)

Asrock Z370 Extreme4 (was mid-range Asus Z270)

32GB DDR4 RAM (was 24GB DDR3)

240GB SSD (OS and games installed here)

2x3TB HDD (RAID1)

27" 1440p Dell 60hz Primary (DisplayPort)

24" 1200p Dell 60hz Secondary (DisplayPort)

 

Performance is otherwise good and benchmarks are as expected. Games are better than they were, videos remain perfect - except when using both at once. Before the upgrade, the most intensive video (1080p60) would cause game performance to crash (Cities Skylines would go from 25 FPS to 10 FPS) with the CPU causing the bottleneck. Now game performance is only slightly affected but video is laggy (slow-motion) or jumpy (freezes for couple of seconds) even for less intensive content like 720p60 or 1080p30. Standard definition content is fine, except that it's standard definition.

 

Increasing the browser's CPU priorities seem to help a bit. I've tried changing where the monitors are plugged into, using DVI and plugging the secondary monitor into the on-board graphics port; no difference. Graphics drivers are updated, the confusing bundle of software and drivers I got from Asrock's site seem to be installed and up to date. This problem happens across different browsers (Chrome and Firefox) and with video from different sources. Live streams are worse than videos. It happens with different games too, but CPU intensive ones seem to affect video most.

Your problem is ridiculous with that hardware and also your previous hardware is pretty much equally powerful.

 

There is a fundamental configuration issue with your Windows setup.

 

1. Make sure you are using latest NVIDIA driver from GeForce.com

 

2. Make sure you are not using the Intel graphics - i.e. both monitors plugged into the 1070.

 

3. Download and install K-lite Mega Codec pack to eliminate codec issues. Use the default install settings.

 

(Using the PatchMyPc.com installer is the fastest way to get it going by just clicking a single check box)

 

4. Make sure your Anti-Virus is NOT scanning videos! 

 

5. You might have weird stuff happening with your SSD so check for firmware upgrades on that and provide brand and model number.

 

 

Keep in mind that you have so much performance in your computer that you don't have to do anything tricky to expect a game and a video to run at the same time. You literally have something configured hugely WRONG to be in this situation. So don't stop until you find it. 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2

I'd just wipe and install windows, install browser and nVidia drivers and test

if after that you have issues, look at what you may have installed after the original test

 

A windows 10 install on a new SSD with no data should be completed and at your desktop in under 30 mins, likely less, been a while since I did it on my system with an older cheap SSD

  • Like 3

What power supply do you have, and what model 1070 do you have?

Typically the PSU makers recommend running individual cables to each of the GPU power connectors. So if the GPU has a 6 pin and 8 pin connector, run separate cables to the PSU.

 

Not sure if any of that is related, but it will ensure you aren't straining the power supply under load.

I think the PSU is an 800W Enermax but I'd have to be at my PC to check. The card is a Gainward Phoenix Golden Sample 1070 with a single power connector, and both monitors are plugged into it. The website for K-lite Mega Codec suggested switching my graphics card's Power Management Mode to Adaptive, so I'll try that later when I install the Codec, and do more tests.

 

Performance is worst with Cities Skylines and to be honest, CSL is an absolute dog when it comes to performance. I have thousands of additional assets installed, it sometimes uses over 20GB RAM, I presume VRAM is fully used (and it reports around 90% because there's always data being transferred to and fro), and I don't get the impression it's particularly well optimised. I'm not surprised that performance is significantly hit, but I am sure it shouldn't be this bad in specific situation - and definitely not worse than it was on slower hardware.

1 hour ago, Quboid said:

I think the PSU is an 800W Enermax but I'd have to be at my PC to check. The card is a Gainward Phoenix Golden Sample 1070 with a single power connector, and both monitors are plugged into it. The website for K-lite Mega Codec suggested switching my graphics card's Power Management Mode to Adaptive, so I'll try that later when I install the Codec, and do more tests.

 

Performance is worst with Cities Skylines and to be honest, CSL is an absolute dog when it comes to performance. I have thousands of additional assets installed, it sometimes uses over 20GB RAM, I presume VRAM is fully used (and it reports around 90% because there's always data being transferred to and fro), and I don't get the impression it's particularly well optimised. I'm not surprised that performance is significantly hit, but I am sure it shouldn't be this bad in specific situation - and definitely not worse than it was on slower hardware.

6. Go through the confusing bundle and replace the Asrock driver in every instance you can identify with the lastest driver from the manufacture's website

" the confusing bundle of software and drivers I got from Asrock's site seem to be installed and up to date"

 

7. As a test, run the game in a low res such as 720p

 

8. As a test, select low quality textures in the game settings

 

9. Run task manager when the game and browser are running and set CPU Affinity so that CPU 0 is not available to either and after that the game has one other CPU (real core probably CPU 2 or 3) and the browser is CPU 4 etc

 

 

 

 

Not much luck. Changing the affinities seems to help a little bit, like increasing the priority. Lowering graphics settings also helps but even with Chrome at high priority, and with separate virtual cores assigned (0 for neither, 1-3 for Chrome, 4-11 for games) and graphics setting lower, video performance isn't good.

 

I might wipe the SSD and do a fresh install, or get an M.2 drive.

On 1/17/2018 at 2:36 AM, Quboid said:

Not much luck. Changing the affinities seems to help a little bit, like increasing the priority. Lowering graphics settings also helps but even with Chrome at high priority, and with separate virtual cores assigned (0 for neither, 1-3 for Chrome, 4-11 for games) and graphics setting lower, video performance isn't good.

 

I might wipe the SSD and do a fresh install, or get an M.2 drive.

The cores are not really virtual.

 

For that test, 0 and 1 are both the first core.

 

You could also test by turning off HyperThreading

 

Make sure you have latest chipset drivers from Intel.com

 

  • 1 month later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
    • Windows 11 gets new audio improvements in the latest builds by Taras Buria Today's Experimental builds (26H1 and Future Platforms, formerly Canary) pack several audio-related improvements. If your device is enrolled in the Experimental Channel (26H1), you can download build 28120.2315, while those in the Future Platforms version have build 29613.1000 to try. Here is what is new in build 29613.1000: [Audio] Following up on our previous improvements, we’re making some more adjustments to Settings > System > Sounds based on your feedback. Namely, we’ve updated the “All sound devices” page so: You now have the ability to change default devices from this page. Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. We’ve adjusted the page design slightly so now you can filter whether you’re viewing input or output devices. We’ve added toggles so you can choose if you want to hide or show disabled, disconnected, and unplugged devices on this page. We’ve also updated the input and output audio properties page for devices in Settings to now include jack information for those that need it. And here is the changelog for build 28120.2315: This update includes a small number of minor bug fixes and improvements. [Accessibility] This update improves caption style responsiveness by redrawing captions immediately for caption style changes. If no current caption is visible, a sample caption string is displayed. [Audio] This update improves the reliability of the inbox HD Audio driver. You can find the official release notes for build 28120.2315 here and for build 29613.1000 here.
    • I agree with what I think you are saying, just not in the way you are saying it. Like any tool, the amount it represents your work is perorational to the effort you put into it. It is similar to why 2nd grade math students learning to add and subtract are not allowed to use calculators, but a high-school calculous student is. For the 2nd grader, that tool would completely replace the work they are doing, for the calculous student the same tool allows them to work far more effectively while in no way replacing their effort or knowable. If you spend 30 seconds writing a prompt, then the image that comes out is no more "yours" than if you found the same image with a Google Image search. However, many of these generative tools also support highly iterative processes that allow back and forth, and merging generated images with photos or human created images. I am sure you would agree that a human spending hours of time working on a project, even if AI was involved in the process, still reflects that human's work.
    • Windows 11 version 26H2 is now available for testing in the latest preview build by Taras Buria Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. There are no new features, but Microsoft is officially moving the Experimental Channel to version 26H2. In addition, Microsoft is improving the copy dialog in File Explorer, the Start menu reliability, and fixing virtualization issues. Here is the changelog: [General] With today’s build, Windows Insiders in the Experimental channel will see the versioning updated under Settings > System > About (and winver) to version 26H2. For more information, see the Windows Insiders blog. [File Explorer] We’ve improved the visual consistency and reliability of the Copy dialog in Dark mode, including its launch experience and the expanded progress view. [Start menu] - Also available in Beta Improved reliability of Start menu reflecting newly installed or removed apps without requiring sign-out or restart. [Taskbar] Fixed an issue for Insiders using the new smaller taskbar option, where the system tray might get cut off or pushed off screen. [Settings] - Also available in Beta Improved reliability of Settings > Apps > Startup. [Virtualization] - Also available in Beta This update addresses an issue that could result in bugchecks citing HYPERVISOR_ERROR (0x20001) and KMODE_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED (0x1E) errors after installing the latest flights on some devices during system restarts, virtual machine operations, or while running some gaming applications. You can find the official changelog for the Experimental build here and for the Beta build here.
    • I've always preferred this possibility. There is something that feels good about the idea that all matter in the universe will eventually come back together and maybe even result in another big bang. The idea that the universe would fizzle out over the eons and forever drift apart is a little depressing. I realize it is not logical to let a basic human desire for life to have a grand everlasting meaning change the way I feel about a scientific theory, but I am human, so that is how I feel :-).
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      577
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      76
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!