Want to Buy an ND Filter


Recommended Posts

I took some photos of the moon last night but when I went to take some of the stars to get that streaky look, the moon blasted all the light so ended up with a white photo.

Granted, it was the Super Moon but it got me thinking.

 

My knowledge of photography isn't that great but I understand to stop as much light getting through the lens, I need an ND filter?

 

I see prices are all over the place, but would something like this: https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/112684893080 be good to get me started in the technique?

 

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1354968-want-to-buy-an-nd-filter/
Share on other sites

Sorry to be the one to say "don't skimp on filters"

 

I goes by the "are you really putting $5 glass in front of a $200 lens?"   I did... the amount of ghosting and flarring ended up with the filters working as cup holders. They are a nice starting point, but you start regreting it once you get to its limitations (Which is pretty fast once you see the above)

  • Like 1
17 minutes ago, Mando said:

isnt doing nighttime astral photography more about ISO speed and long exposure times? I can ask a collegeue for you, she does loads of it with her DSLR.

ahh good on you, the shutterbug gets me everytime...

 

3 hours ago, Sir Topham Hatt said:

I took some photos of the moon last night but when I went to take some of the stars to get that streaky look, the moon blasted all the light so ended up with a white photo.

Granted, it was the Super Moon but it got me thinking.

 

I think this is more down to technique rather than the lack of ND filter.

Post the photo and exif info so we can help:

8 minutes ago, Sir Topham Hatt said:

I think this is the photo:

 

 

 

 

Details:

Untitled.thumb.png.1efc110ea4e60057844930fde52bb897.png

 

13 minute exposure! at those sort of exposures any light (even a cellphone) Can cause a blowout, where you in a pitch black area?

 

Why don't you give it a try at 60s, then double, etc. so you can control the results .   Also, ISO should be at the lowest value.

yeah your ISO is way too high and exposure time is way to high for night time photography to give you good results, and you want to focus on infinity if you want to get a clear star shot

 

HDR is another idea... then you can bracket photos and merge them into one shot to get detail other exposure ranges may leave out

Don't get a ND to shoot the moon.  It's not that bright.  Your aperture is to fast.  F/4.5.  Shoot at a high aperture, F/11 for example.  That will let in less light just like an ND filter would.  

 

Though if you're just interested in shooting the moon you don't need to do a long exposure.  A full moon provides you with more than enough light.  

  • Like 1

I'm not too knowledgeable about the camera aspect, but the moon orbits around the Earth at a pretty high pace, so a long exposure time is likely to be a big blur unless you have some sort of motorized tripod that tracks it.  When I'm looking through my telescope at something, I have to lock the object in it's orbital speed, otherwise it swoops out of lens frame really quickly. 

 

I would think that even a 60 second exposure would be long enough to make stars look like streaks. The moon will be way worse. There's so much light coming from the moon that I would think that a super short exposure would be fine.  Contrast would be tough on a full moon, so you might have to do some sort of HDR method and stack multiple photos.

  • Like 1
  • 3 weeks later...

Hi

 

Sorry, we're confusing the two issues or star trail shots and moon shots :p

 

I accidentally got a nice star trail shot before and left the exposure on for at least 10 mins.  The difference is that I was camping, and there was no super moon.

 

I can't find the photo now but I guess there was a fair bit different with the F settings and ISO.

 

I seem to have lost a good number of photos recently :(

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If you have a TV in your living room, chances are you can probably just use the Steam Link app and play your huge PC in big picture mode, effectively giving you the Steam Machine experience to see if you'd actually like it. The good news is the Steam Machine can have it's drives upgraded. It has a USB-C 10Gbs port as well, so the 512GB drive could be quickly moved to an external enclosure and repurposed.
    • This machine could very well be a second gaming PC for their living room as a console experience. So we would have to assume their main PC exists as well; With that said, I have 10gb home network with a 2.5gigabit internet connection here so we tend to have more than enough speed to download games. However, we can't make use of the 10gb LAN using Steam's built in transfer tool because it always compresses transfers and that slows the transfer down to well below a standard gigabit port speeds, sometimes as slow as 200-300Mb/s transfers. While that's probably still faster than most internet connections anyway, if they'd fix the LAN transfer issue it'd be upto x5 faster even on a gigabit LAN, than simply dropping a 2.5gbe port on there with hopes of a few people having fast internet connections. There are solutions, work arounds, like using LANCache if you run a NAS... or simply copying the files over manually using a network share.
    • Samsung announces ultra-fast UFS 5.0 storage to supercharge mobile AI by Paul Hill Local AI models tend to run a lot more slowly than cloud services like Claude and Gemini; however, Samsung has just announced that it has developed its UFS 5.0 solution, which increases data transfer to speeds of 10.8GB/s, enabling faster storage and processing in mobile memory that has the potential to provide more optimal local AI experiences. Commenting on this development, Jangseok Choi, head of Memory Product Planning at Samsung Electronics, said: If you’ve tried local AI, you’ll know it can be quite slow, especially if using the larger parameter models. By developing this new solution, Samsung says that storage is evolving from just storing data to a core piece of infrastructure that supports AI computation, too. The Korean company said that UFS 5.0 integrates the latest embedded memory interface standard from JEDEC and achieves up to 10.8 gigabytes per second (GB/s) transfer speeds. Regarding write speeds, Samsung UFS 5.0 can reach 9.5 GB/s. Both the read and write speeds are twice as fast as those of the previous UFS 4.1 standard. Aside from being ideal for local AI, Samsung’s UFS 5.0 is more power efficient by 40% compared to UFS 4.1. Samsung achieved this by implementing innovations such as clock gating and multi-voltage technologies. UFS 5.0 is also ultra-compact at just 7.5mm x 13mm x 0.9mm; that is 16.7% smaller than UFS 4.1. The company said it will be bringing it to multiple devices in the future, including mobile, wearable, and extended reality.
    • A bit like the steamdeck, this probably isn't for you.
    • Gamers Nexus already did their review, and building your own will be faster and cheaper, so not very convincing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      496
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      209
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      99
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      86
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!