Want to Buy an ND Filter


Recommended Posts

I took some photos of the moon last night but when I went to take some of the stars to get that streaky look, the moon blasted all the light so ended up with a white photo.

Granted, it was the Super Moon but it got me thinking.

 

My knowledge of photography isn't that great but I understand to stop as much light getting through the lens, I need an ND filter?

 

I see prices are all over the place, but would something like this: https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/112684893080 be good to get me started in the technique?

 

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1354968-want-to-buy-an-nd-filter/
Share on other sites

Sorry to be the one to say "don't skimp on filters"

 

I goes by the "are you really putting $5 glass in front of a $200 lens?"   I did... the amount of ghosting and flarring ended up with the filters working as cup holders. They are a nice starting point, but you start regreting it once you get to its limitations (Which is pretty fast once you see the above)

  • Like 1
17 minutes ago, Mando said:

isnt doing nighttime astral photography more about ISO speed and long exposure times? I can ask a collegeue for you, she does loads of it with her DSLR.

ahh good on you, the shutterbug gets me everytime...

 

3 hours ago, Sir Topham Hatt said:

I took some photos of the moon last night but when I went to take some of the stars to get that streaky look, the moon blasted all the light so ended up with a white photo.

Granted, it was the Super Moon but it got me thinking.

 

I think this is more down to technique rather than the lack of ND filter.

Post the photo and exif info so we can help:

8 minutes ago, Sir Topham Hatt said:

I think this is the photo:

 

 

 

 

Details:

Untitled.thumb.png.1efc110ea4e60057844930fde52bb897.png

 

13 minute exposure! at those sort of exposures any light (even a cellphone) Can cause a blowout, where you in a pitch black area?

 

Why don't you give it a try at 60s, then double, etc. so you can control the results .   Also, ISO should be at the lowest value.

yeah your ISO is way too high and exposure time is way to high for night time photography to give you good results, and you want to focus on infinity if you want to get a clear star shot

 

HDR is another idea... then you can bracket photos and merge them into one shot to get detail other exposure ranges may leave out

Don't get a ND to shoot the moon.  It's not that bright.  Your aperture is to fast.  F/4.5.  Shoot at a high aperture, F/11 for example.  That will let in less light just like an ND filter would.  

 

Though if you're just interested in shooting the moon you don't need to do a long exposure.  A full moon provides you with more than enough light.  

  • Like 1

I'm not too knowledgeable about the camera aspect, but the moon orbits around the Earth at a pretty high pace, so a long exposure time is likely to be a big blur unless you have some sort of motorized tripod that tracks it.  When I'm looking through my telescope at something, I have to lock the object in it's orbital speed, otherwise it swoops out of lens frame really quickly. 

 

I would think that even a 60 second exposure would be long enough to make stars look like streaks. The moon will be way worse. There's so much light coming from the moon that I would think that a super short exposure would be fine.  Contrast would be tough on a full moon, so you might have to do some sort of HDR method and stack multiple photos.

  • Like 1
  • 3 weeks later...

Hi

 

Sorry, we're confusing the two issues or star trail shots and moon shots :p

 

I accidentally got a nice star trail shot before and left the exposure on for at least 10 mins.  The difference is that I was camping, and there was no super moon.

 

I can't find the photo now but I guess there was a fair bit different with the F settings and ISO.

 

I seem to have lost a good number of photos recently :(

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 27 is out.
    • My ice blue precision 3550 laptop
    • A coalition of publishers sued OpenAI and Microsoft over scraping content without consent by Hamid Ganji Image via Depositphotos.com AI companies often rely on readily available internet content to train their chatbots and provide users with instant answers. This method of AI training is fast and relatively inexpensive, but using a website’s content without permission or compensation is not something publishers like to see, and this is exactly why Microsoft and OpenAI are now being sued. As reported by Bloomberg, a group of publishers that collectively own nearly 400 newspapers has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. The coalition argues that the two companies scraped their content to build AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Copilot without paying any compensation. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, argues that while AI products have generated billions of dollars in market value using publishers’ work, none of that value has been shared with the publishers. The plaintiffs are seeking statutory damages and injunctive relief for alleged copyright infringement and violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. “Defendants systematically and secretly crawled the Publishers’ websites—including content behind paywalls and other access restrictions—and copied the Publishers’ articles, stories, and other original works onto their own servers without authorization,” the complaint states. The publishers also described the AI boom as a “death knell for local journalism” if AI companies that scrape content for free are not held accountable. Former New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin and his law firm, Platkin LLP, are representing the publishers. “Our models empower innovation, are trained on publicly available data, and are grounded in fair use,” OpenAI spokesperson Drew Pusateri told Bloomberg. This is not the first lawsuit involving the unauthorized use of publishers’ content by AI firms, but it is one of the largest coalitions ever formed against the free use of content by AI chatbots. In 2024, OpenAI and Microsoft also faced a similar lawsuit from eight newspapers that claimed AI products were benefiting from their content without permission.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      445
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      173
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!