Recommended Posts

My usual name here is tompkin, but I was having signon problems so I created a new user name. I posted this on another thread but then realized it needed it's own. Below is what I said.
**********************************************************

Nick H., thank you for your work here. Maybe Budman can help too because someone mentioned his name earlier in this regard.

Here is my situation. As far as I know I have never done anything wrong on the internet since 1993. Nor do I intend to do anything wrong now.
 
I know I can be "tracked". My goal is to make it as hard to break my security even if it can be broken. Here is why.

Due to all this political ###### going on in D.C., my employee benefits have either already been reduced or soon might be. While this is certainly a financial matter for me (without question), it is also a health matter. It is potentially  a serious health problem. The idea for all this political ###### is to lower taxes. My goal is to make it as expensive as possible for them to deal with me. Thus, the extra security. I have tried to contact my federal representatives (I live in a red state), but they won't even answer me. I have a laptop and a OneDrive. If I have to, I'll wipe the Onedrive. Yes, they probably have backups but that will be one more thing (time is expense) that it will take. My question is this. What is the best VPN (commercial that is not enterprise grade (cost). Is Bitlocker good enough (I'm on Windows 10). I'm eventually going to boot straight off a clean USB drive. I'm going to do my damndest to prevent malware even though I'm never totally protected. I'm going to encrypt all my passwords. The are all unique, they are all strong.
I'
People will think this is foolish. I will tell you how foolish I am. I assume this forum is being monitored. I posted this anyway. I'm no fool.

Question; what would be a suggested VPN and is Bitlocker good enough. thanks so much for taking the time to listen to MY ######. 

I.E. My goal is to be the most royal pain in the ass I can. at the end of the day, i've done nothing illegal but I'm a pain. I will change my security so it won't be static.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1358892-security-strategy-question/
Share on other sites

Then for fun throw in a few Veracrypt containers. Also, only connect to a VPN to watch cat videos. They will think you are up to no good and capture and store gigabytes of random gibberish of you watching cat videos.

Huh?

 

So your worried about the black helicopters coming to get all the info off your laptop?

 

You secured you passwords so well you can not even log into your previous account?

 

You do understand bitlocker is as strong as your password - which they can just beat you with a rubber hose until you give it to them..

 

Hello,

It is not exactly clear to me what you are trying to protect the computer against?  Are you trying to make sure the hard disk drive cannot be removed and read in another computer?  Are you trying to set up your network connection so that only your VPN provider can see what sites you are visiting, as opposed to your ISP?  That your elected representatives respond to your email?  Or something else?

 

IF you could explain in more detail exactly what you are trying to protect the integrity of, secure from compromise, or maintain availability of, then I'm sure some of the forum members will be better able to assist you in that task, or at least make some recommendations about where to go for further assistance if it something specialized.

Regards,
 

Aryeh Goretsky

 

Yes, it's hard to understand. In a way, I would be stupid to be posting it on this forum if I truly wanted to be "secret".  
Most people who use this type of software are trying to "hide" something. You have to remember, the only thing that I've ever used is one package or another of a commercial malware package. 

So why now? I'm not breaking any laws, so why would I now?

To raise flags.

EDIT: I should really make my self clear on this.  The reason why I'm trying to raise a flag is because I have no federal Representative in congress that will give me the time of day  and I have to have my  government health insurance to live. it's just that simple.

 

Edited by Tompkin62
On 3/20/2018 at 4:16 AM, BudMan said:

Huh?

 

So your worried about the black helicopters coming to get all the info off your laptop?

 

You secured you passwords so well you can not even log into your previous account?

 

You do understand bitlocker is as strong as your password - which they can just beat you with a rubber hose until you give it to them..

 

You didn't have to be so sarcastic. Condescending. i'm sorry I didn't explain why I wanted all this. (see my post above).

14 minutes ago, Tompkin62 said:

EDIT: I should really make my self clear on this.  The reason why I'm trying to raise a flag is because I have no federal Representative in congress that will give me the time of day  and I have to have my  government health insurance to live. it's just that simple.
 

5

That was clear as mud. I'm totally lost.

1 minute ago, warwagon said:

That was clear as mud. I'm totally lost.

It's like in the IRS. When you send in an IRS tax form, the computers are programmed to look for certain patterns that are ways that people usually cheat. When it sees that pattern a flag is thrown and someone takes a look at it. A flag doesn't necessarily mean that someone broke the law, it just means that it's something to look at.
I'm trying to purposefully throw a flag, I want someone to hear me because no one on capital hill will and my life is at stake. Putting it another way, "I'm using the system." I have been on the web for many years and done nothing. All of a sudden all of this. It could raise a flag. that's what I'm hoping for so I can get help with my insurance. If you think I'm naive, then I would think that you are.  (not referring to you warwagon. Hey, I see you got a new phone!! we used to both have a G3. I still have mine.)  

17 minutes ago, Tompkin62 said:

It's like in the IRS. When you send in an IRS tax form, the computers are programmed to look for certain patterns that are ways that people usually cheat. When it sees that pattern a flag is thrown and someone takes a look at it. A flag doesn't necessarily mean that someone broke the law, it just means that it's something to look at.
I'm trying to purposefully throw a flag, I want someone to hear me because no one on capital hill will and my life is at stake. Putting it another way, "I'm using the system." I have been on the web for many years and done nothing. All of a sudden all of this. It could raise a flag. that's what I'm hoping for so I can get help with my insurance. If you think I'm naive, then I would think that you are.  (not referring to you warwagon. Hey, I see you got a new phone!! we used to both have a G3. I still have mine.)  

 While I now understand what you are trying to do, not sure how well it will work, but best of luck to you!

 

I see one of 2 things happening

 

1) You never set off a big enough flag to get noticed

2) You set off a big enough flag to get a knock on the door, at which point they don't really care about your health care issues they just want to sort the flag out.

 

Unfortunately, those are the only 2 ways I see this going down. But hey, you may prove me wrong and succeed.

Hello,

Obviously, I'm not working with a full set of facts here, but it seems to me that "going dark" is not the optimal strategy when you should instead be attempting to gain maximum PR/media exposure.  Write letters to the editor of the local newspaper, call the tip line at the local TV news station.  Make an appointment to see your Congress-critter.  At all times, be polite and have copies of whatever legal/business/medical/military records relevant to your issue available so you can share them.  In my experience, journalists love covering these man-versus-monolith type stories.  If you have a good one, you'll get some media coverage which will result in a positive chain of events leading towards your desired outcome.

 

At least that might be possible, assuming I'm reading the situation correctly.

 

Regards,

 

Aryeh Goretsky

 

Yeah, as Warwagon said I don't see this being the way to go about things. You're trying to hide all information about yourself so that someone somewhere will say, "hey, what's this guy hiding?"

 

If it's as important as you say then I would be sending multiple letters every day to one representative, or speaking to the media about the lack of response from people who are supposed to be representing you and helping you get answers.

 

I don't know how it works in the US, but doesn't Government insurance get paid out through a third party rather than directly from the Government? If I type in "US Government insurance" I get taken to healthcare.gov, which when I go to the contact information redirects me to a different site which promises I will get to speak to an agent within 30 minutes (during business hours).

 

You've been quite obscure on the whole topic, so trying to help is like doing so with one arm tied behind our back. Maybe you have already done the above and not made any progress.

Thats ok. I was just wondering about technical programs. I have tried "going public". Where I live there isn't anyone to go to. The town, state government, are all Tea Party. My senators won't give me the time of day. (try getting sympathy from Tom Cotton.) There is too much "noise" to be herd in the newspaper. It just gets into an arguing match in the editorial section anyway.

But that's ok. I'll be fine. Thank you.

...and to think, on top of all the other waste and corruption our government blows money on, this is what my tax dollars are paying for, trying to break into YOUR data?   Good googa mooga, I hope not. 

 

Look, I'm truly sorry you are in need of subsidized healthcare (your claim) but what you are doing will amount to less than nothing. You come here just to promote some personal stunt and in the processes blame the federal government. In all of this, you say nothing about your state or local government. I've been to Arkansas many times and I couldn't wait to get out of there, it's kind of a hole.  That said, we know nothing about your needs or condition. We don't know if you are disabled or lazy, nothing.  You want to raise suspicion of yourself (but not actually do anything) so that the feds will waste their time digging around your data. That nut Cruz that shot up that school in Florida was certifiably nuts AND on the radar and they still didn't dig in until it was too late so without making some unbelievably grand threats, nah, not seeing them caring one iota about you or your data.  

 

But, lets play alone. Assuming they decide to come after you, they can access nearly all of your data for essentially nothing. In the grand scheme of a multi-trillion budget your little escapade costs pennies. In the end, you've not really cost the taxpayers much and just inconvenienced yourself, hiding, encoding, encrypting and otherwise obfuscated your data.   

 

Also I'm going to make an assumption here that your taxable income is low enough to not actually pay taxes (pretty fair guess since about half of all people that files taxes have no tax obligation), that means that I (and the rest of us that DO pay taxes) am paying for your exercise. You do realize that the government doesn't have any money of their own right? Every cent they spend comes either from taxes (individual, business, tariffs etc.) or they borrow it (and that costs even more money). This means the few bucks they spend investigating you is money that I and others gave them to hopefully do other more important things - but then again, that's exactly why you are doing this, to 'stick it to the man'.  In the end, you aren't hurting anyone in Washington, you are hurting your neighbor, or your boss or brother-in-law and ultimately yourself. If our government  always spent wisely and not just on whatever (and that includes breaking into your data) there would be money to do all the good things, to take care of people, to build roads and bridges. The fact that they waste money on junk (including your plan) is why we all can't have good things.

 

    

  • Like 3

Can not wait to see his response to yours.. Since mine was considered Condescending...  Since his posts have been pretty much gibberish..

 

If you want to talk security - lets do that.  Layout a scenario you want to try and mitigate or reduce risk on and we can talk about options.   So far all I can make out is someone that can not even remember their password is worried about blocking the gov from getting to their stuff?  Maybe hey has proof that we faked the moon landing on his laptop?  No clue why if they will not pay for his medical they would be so interested in whatever it is on his laptop?

 

Are you worried about the ninja's coming in through the skylight while you sleep and copy off the data on your hard disk, or is the NSA going to just hack in remotely? ;)

  • Like 1

Well I think I finally deciphered his thoughts

 

  • He relies on public assisted healthcare
  • In the interest of tax cuts, the Government is likely cutting is subsidy
  • He feels he has no voice with his Senator or Representatives (this is pretty much true for all of us not having 7 figure bank accounts)
  • Wants to 'get back at them' by overly securing his data and raising suspicion to the 'government' that he is up to something nefarious in the hopes they will spend money trying to crack his data only to find he's hoodwinked them.
  • He doesn't grasp the idea that the government doesn't really have any money in the first place.

 

Not sure how this accomplishes anything other make sure his healthcare has even less funding but whatever. 

 

 

I will admit that it sounds like gibberish. The poster who came closest to what I'm saying was warwagon, wednesday at 10:30pm.

What you say warwagon, may be true as far as my effectiveness. But at least it won't take me long explaining what I'm doing. :)

Thank you all for helping. You actually did help me. I guess it's best to go to the next topic that someone has. :)

1 hour ago, tompkin said:

The poster who came closest to what I'm saying was warwagon

On 3/21/2018 at 10:11 PM, warwagon said:

That was clear as mud. I'm totally lost.

Yup agree as well ;)

 

2 hours ago, tompkin said:

I will admit that it sounds like gibberish. The poster who came closest to what I'm saying was warwagon, wednesday at 10:30pm.

What you say warwagon, may be true as far as my effectiveness. But at least it won't take me long explaining what I'm doing. :)

Thank you all for helping. You actually did help me. I guess it's best to go to the next topic that someone has. :)

Hey tompkin is that .. or should I say tompkin62 ... you created another user account.... tisk tisk

I'm not going to bite on the gibberish stuff. I sent Stephen a message awhile back about my password problem at that time I wasn't sure what it was. He said he would combine the accounts. Unfortunately, I still kept on having the problem. It turned out I had changed browsers and there was a "cookie" problem.

I have been on this board at least two years. In my view, at most I would have gotten a warning. Your opinion is yours. No better and no worse than mine. I asked that we move on but I see others want to drag things out.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • So size is the ONLY selling point????? People have been plugging in PC's to TV's in living rooms for 20+ years. I would take a bigger box for more peformance. Also lot and lots of SFF/Mini ITX build guides out there.
    • My point is, if you buying this instead of a console for TV purposes, that you need to understand that you will not be able to play the most popular MP games with Steam OS. Now if you are not into those games, and into some of the perputual alpha/beta games on Steam then this is an option. I would argue a gaming PC would be the better route, more expensive but take the 1k -1.4k you are about to spend on this thing and build a better one. Because it is running Linux you can overide its 1080p settings. However The Verge complained about its 1080p cap and how you would have to get around it at the CLI, so someone buying this instead of a PS5 or Xbox might have a challege on their hands.
    • A review of Synology's BeeCamera software for the BeeStation Plus by Christopher White Synology is leaning into the BeeStation and the BeeStation Plus, and it's easy to understand why. While power users will want something more customizable, the BeeStation and its more powerful sibling, the BeeStation Plus, are great for those who want a device they can simply plug in, click a few buttons, and have it work as their own personal cloud. Until recently, the device was mostly used for the storage of files, photos, and videos, and with the Plus model, you could install and stream media through Plex. Synology recently released a new free application for the BeeStation Plus called BeeCamera, which is basically a stripped-down version of Surveillance Station. First, let's get the confusing naming out of the way. While you might initially think that BeeCamera is a physical device, perhaps a camera that Synology created specifically for the BeeStation Plus, that would be incorrect. BeeCamera is simply the name for the application that runs on the NAS and on your mobile device. I think the marketing team missed the mark here, but it does fit the other naming on the device, like BeePhotos and BeeFiles, I guess. Camera Support As of right now, only Synology-branded cameras are supported, which many will see as a callback to the drive locking the company implemented and then backtracked on. That said, while I 100% disagree on drive locking, I agree that camera locking for a device made to simply plug and play is the right decision. The whole point of the BeeStation line is simplicity. There are currently three camera model lines available, a wireless device for indoor use, and two PoE models for external use. CC400W (Wi-Fi): Plug it into power using the included power adapter, and connect it to your wireless network. This camera is rated only for indoor use and is the one I was provided to review the BeeCamera. $198.36, in line with the Unifi G6 Compact. BC510 (PoE): A bullet-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. TC510 (PoE): A dome-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. Although this isn't a review of the actual Synology camera, I did want to note that a positive for the Synology CC400W is that it uses a magnetic base. This means you can mount it on any magnetic surface, which is pretty handy. However, a downside to the camera is that it's powered by a built-in USB cable that's about six and a half feet (two meters) long. This means that the cable will probably be either too long or too short, but more importantly, if the cable is damaged at all, you'll likely need to buy an entirely new camera because there doesn't appear to be a way to replace it, unlike many competitors, like the Unifi G6 Instant. Hopefully, this is something Synology addresses in a future revision of the hardware. The BeeStation Plus supports up to four cameras. Setup The setup of BeeCamera is, like everything in the BeeStation family, very straightforward. Simply make sure you're on at least version 1.5 of the BeeStation OS, and BeeCamera is automatically installed on the device. BeeCamera Setup Screenshots Setting up the CC400W was just as easy. Plug it in, open up the BeeCamera app, and follow the on-screen steps to add the camera. During this process, you'll configure the camera name and how many days of retention you want to keep. The system will also automatically update the firmware for you. The whole thing took only a couple of minutes, excluding the time it took for the camera to update the firmware. Once the camera is connected to the BeeStation Plus, you can manage the various camera settings within the app, although there aren't many to choose from. You're able to configure whether the microphone will record audio (some privacy laws may preclude you from recording it), select what codec to use (H.264 or H.265), configure the color and exposure of the camera, and determine what data you want to overlay onto the video. Finally, you can set up AI detections so that BeeCamera will alert you if it sees certain things. These are all of the common detections you would expect in a camera system, such as people, pets, and vehicles. Under people and vehicles, you can also add extra monitoring for lingering and congestion detection, although pets are currently in "Lab" and therefore have no extra features yet. Recording in 4K using H.265 for 30 days will take roughly 300 GB of storage, which is very reasonable for most regular households, as the BeeStation Plus has 8TB of native storage. If you want to set up detection zones, you can. These are areas that BeeCamera will look at for the various detections, and are helpful if, for example, there's a tree in your frame and you don't want to be notified each time the wind makes the branches move around in the frame. Finally, you can also schedule when the camera should and should not be recording, which is a very useful feature. For example, you may want to record only at night when you're sleeping, but not during the day when you're up and about the house, so you can easily shut the camera off between 8 am and 10 pm. Each hour of each day can be configured to record continuously, only upon a detection event, or disabled completely. You can't fine-tune to record at a specific time, though, only hourly blocks on the hour. Daily Use The best part of BeeCamera is that it's easy and just works. If you only care about being notified when things happen, the mobile app sends those notifications and lets you click the button to bring up the video and see what's going on. For example, when I went out of town and had the camera pointed at the cat tower in our hallway, it was nice to be able to drop in and check that my furry friends were doing okay without me. Initiating the remote connection to the BeeStation Plus through the app is very responsive, but this will heavily depend on your ISP. In my case, using Xfinity, I'm able to go from starting the app to seeing live video in roughly three seconds, which is about the same amount of time it takes to connect to my Unifi UNVR system that costs much more. If you want to see footage from a specific day and time, you can do so using the calendar icon. You can also scroll through the timeline, looking for detections that are labeled in blue (vs. the normal gray when there's nothing of interest). There are buttons that let you go to the last/next detection on the timeline, which is helpful if you missed the notification on your mobile device. That's where the ease of use stops, though. While you can download clips that are flagged by detection, there's apparently no way to select generic time frames you're interested in, and the only place to download is to your phone. In addition, sharing a video shares the actual video, not just a link back to your BeeStation Plus. While that's good from a security and privacy perspective, it's a little awkward for sharing large videos. Limitations While the ease of implementation is great, there are some things that are lacking from BeeCamera. The most obvious is that there is no way to view the footage on the desktop. You can log in to the BeeStation Plus to see how much storage BeeCamera is using, but unlike BeePhotos and BeeFiles, there is no BeeCamera on the web console to manage or view footage. This means you'll be viewing all of your security footage on your mobile device, which is pretty limiting. In addition, there's no way to download the video to your PC without first using your phone as the intermediary. The one exception to this is that you can use BeeFiles to see the raw MP4 files. They're saved in 5-minute increments, and it's just raw data with no detection information or any other way to identify what any of them are. The lack of a way to interact with BeeCamera on the desktop also makes configuration of the cameras more difficult. For example, trying to set up detection zones using a tiny screen and your finger to draw boxes is more cumbersome than it needs to be. This reinforces the idea that BeeCamera is not made for power users. It's also missing some of the more advanced functionality of Surveillance Station. For example, I couldn't find a way to say, "Alert me if the thing in this zone is no longer there." Another major deficiency with BeeCamera, and a feature I suspect may come out in the future, is that while it can detect generic people, there is no specific facial recognition yet. This is an interesting omission, given the fact that other Synology tools can detect specific individuals, and competitors such as Unifi Protect also do it. This is probably a software limitation, so we will have to wait and see if this feature is added in the future. Conclusion If you need a security guard to monitor surveillance cameras to make sure your property is secure, then BeeCamera is not the solution for you. That said, you probably wouldn't be using a BeeStation Plus as the brains behind the system either. BeeCamera (and BeeStation in general) is clearly aimed at households that want to avoid sending personal data to Google and Amazon, and now want to add some cameras to keep an eye on their home and their pets while they're away. BeeCamera excels at doing this. The target market isn't interested in creating cases, tying multiple views together in a single pane of glass, or the like, and for the intended use case, the system works great. Where it starts to fall apart a bit is with more advanced features. Not being able to use a desktop app is a major compromise in my opinion, and having to do all of the configuration on a mobile device is annoying, but not impossible. If you don't want to have a full-fledged NAS device in your home, but still want control over your data (or maybe want an easy way to backup your data for World Backup Day), and want to add a couple of cameras to keep an eye on your house and your pets, this is a great, cheap, and easy way to go, and I suspect more functionality will come over time. If Synology releases a desktop app or at least a way to configure cameras and view footage on a desktop browser, this would be a near-perfect solution for a general home user. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I forgot to add on my comment that when robots will take physical jobs, it's when they become more cheaper to manufacture and sell. That will be the starting point of the end to lanscaping, trash pickup, factory jobs, etc.
    • How many people can actually use a 2.5gig ethernet port? Most people do not have more than a 1gig internet connection, heck most have less than that. Most people at home do not have a switch that has multiple 2.5gig ports either.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      neufuse
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!