Does Windows Server 2016 use less resources than Windows 10?


Recommended Posts

I have bought a used Dell Precision T1600, consisting of:

 

  • Intel Xeon E3-1270 (4 core, 8 thread)
  • 8 GB DDR3 RAM
  • AMD FirePro 2270 (512 MB)
  • Western Digital Green SSD for boot drive
  • 2x 5 TB SATA3 3.5" HDDs

 

I'll be using it as a basic Plex Media Server.

 

  1. Do you think I'll have any benefits of using Windows Server 2016 over Windows 10? I'm thinking less Universal Apps pre-installed, for one.
  2. Does it use less resources? Perhaps uses less unnecessary background services?
  3. Is there something in Windows 10 (perhaps some kind of media foundation that may help with Plex) that doesn't exist in Windows Server 2016?
Edited by Elliot B.
  On 30/03/2018 at 12:58, Elliot B. said:

I have bought a used Dell Precision T1600, consisting of:

 

  • Intel Xeon E3-1270 (4 core, 8 thread)
  • 8 GB DDR3 RAM
  • AMD FirePro 2270 (512 MB)
  • Western Digital Green SSD for boot drive
  • 2x 5 TB SATA3 3.5" HDDs

 

I'll be using it as a basic Plex Media Server.

 

Do you think I'll have any benefits of using Windows Server 2016 over Windows 10? Does it use less resources?

Expand  

For that kind of workload, I don't think so no. Let's say we put the cost of 2016 out of the equation, Server 2016 is basically Windows 10 at this point with some optimizations and business-oriented features. 

 

For a plesk server, you probably would have a better experience running Linux though, as lightweight as possible. 

  On 30/03/2018 at 13:01, Farchord said:

For that kind of workload, I don't think so no. Let's say we put the cost of 2016 out of the equation, Server 2016 is basically Windows 10 at this point with some optimizations and business-oriented features. 

 

For a plesk server, you probably would have a better experience running Linux though, as lightweight as possible. 

Expand  

I intend to disable a lot of background services etc., no matter which system I choose.

 

I may even give NTLite a go, to strip some rubbish out.

in your case, it wouldnt be worth the huge mark-up to buy Server 2016. in my experience, servers always have a ton of more features to load when windows starts anyway so you'd have a lot more processes running requiring more RAM.

 

that said, if you need certain Server-only features...

I would recommend against this, if you're using this just for a Plex server, there is no good reason why you'd need the extra expense of Windows Server 2016. Also bear in mind that Windows 2016 and Windows 10 are not at the same level, 2016 is similar to Windows 10 1607. If you want 1709 you'd have to settle for Server Core which probably is not what you're looking for on that machine. 

 

Also you'd have to buy CALS. 

 

I would recommend a standard Windows 10 Pro installation for that machine. Remove anything you don't want, turn off background apps if you're not bothered about store apps. Set the updates to Semi-Annual & defer for 365 days. Perhaps adjust performance to background services rather than programs. 

i see no reason at all to use a server os for desktop use, its overkill and pointless.

 

The only plus i could see is no 10 concurrent connections limit, but in a normal household thats not going to be an issue ever, plus buying Cals for any more than 5 concurrents makes buying server OS against any SKU of W10 for this project a waste of time and money.

 

what it doesnt have that window 10 has, it has more server oriented services and features, negating any improvement. 

  On 30/03/2018 at 13:02, Elliot B. said:

I intend to disable a lot of background services etc., no matter which system I choose.

 

I may even give NTLite a go, to strip some rubbish out.

Expand  

 

There is absolutely no reason to do this anymore. We are no longer running machines with single core processors and 1gb of memory. There is no reason to disable/remove services and do the "extreme" tweaks we did with XP. It causes more harm than good down the road. If this were my machine and it was only going to serve as a Plex server, I would run an instance of Linux on it and be done with it. If you want to use the machine for other purposes, along with Plex, I would throw an extra copy of 7 or 10 on it. You will not see a performance difference in your use case between 10 and server, if your only reasoning to use Server was because the performance would be better, you can scratch that off your list.

  • Like 3

How about FreeBSD or Linux? If you're just using it as a server...Plex has server installation packages for them. Or at least try it (unless you already have a couple of Windows licenses laying around)...

 

As pointed out, Server 2016 would be overkill.

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Ashes of the Singularity II announced promising even larger battles, new faction, and more by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe A sequel for the 2016-released Ashes of the Singularity has officially been confirmed, and the original developer and publisher duo, Oxide Games and Stardock Entertainment, are back for this release too. Check out the debut trailer above. Ashes of the Singularity II is under development with a significantly expanded team compared to the original, according to today's announcement. It will be adding in a range of fresh units and gameplay systems for real-time strategy fans to dive into. More options for strategic gameplay, more intricate base building, and better enemy AI are listed as features for the new game as well. "Ten years ago, we set a new, literal benchmark for RTS games with massive battles and groundbreaking technology," said Brad Wardell, CEO of Stardock Entertainment. "With Ashes of the Singularity II, we’re raising the bar even higher, delivering strategic gameplay depth that RTS fans have always dreamed of.” The storyline of Ashes of the Singularity II will take place in 2031, with a complete single-player campaign, as well as cooperative and competitive multiplayer modes, being confirmed as features today. Moreover, a third faction is joining the fray this time, with Humans joining the fight alongside the original games' Post-Human Coalition and the Substrate. "Obviously, in the first game, the number one request was to have a human faction," adds Wardell. “Back then, we just couldn’t support having thousands of organic, walking, squishy people in the world and thus had to design in favor of machines. We’re really excited to bring the humans into the war and watch how they fare against the massive mechanical armies of the Substrate and PHC.” Ashes of the Singularity II is targeting a broad 2026 release window, with the team hoping to launch the title as the original celebrates its 10th anniversary. Its Steam store page is already up for wishlisting over here. Disclaimer: Neowin's relationship to Stardock
    • How exactly is a FREE image generation model a... Ponzi scheme?!?! I don't love all of these Gen-AI things flooding the market but there's nothing "ponzi" about it.
    • I can't decide if this is tacky or a really fun move for more casual players like myself to enjoy. I'll be curious to see how we are to fly to fictional land masses on a real globe.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      SamZrize earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      SamZrize earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      SamZrize earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      barracuda earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      barracuda earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      725
    2. 2
      +FloatingFatMan
      189
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      180
    4. 4
      Xenon
      113
    5. 5
      neufuse
      109
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!