Recommended Posts

There’s no denying that retro gaming, for whatever reason, is making a comeback in a big way. Atari recently launched its VCS console which raised over $2M in 2 days and the Nintendo Classic Editions were constantly out of stock

 

I was lucky and managed to get both Nintendo Classic consoles from Nintendo and both now sit proudly in my living room. This re-ignited my interest in retro gaming and I went on the hunt for my old handhelds. I managed to dig up my old Game Boy Colour, SP and Advance, which I can now enjoy on my commutes to work. 

 

Neowin posted an article earlier this year about PocketSprite, the tiny retro console and it was something that I had to buy. Check out the article above if you want more information, but I’m going to dive straight into a brief review and my initial thoughts on the device.

 

I opted for “Hacker” edition, as it involved some self assembly that I was looking forward, but mainly because it was the cheapest :p The device and its pieces came in a neat little box which you can see below. I’m not going to lie, the device was difficult to put together. I had no idea that some of the buttons would be so small and there were some hairy moments when I dropped some of the tiny buttons

 

IMG_20180426_175519.thumb.png.0bef5b1889c88180160a7f69c77a9588.png

 

IMG_20180426_175545.thumb.jpg.6a636845691021967148a7fb5e02ffe7.jpg

 

IMG_20180426_175835.thumb.jpg.e86ad6befa120338c2d47f6cd360604d.jpg

 

But here's one that I built earlier ;)

IMG_20180426_180437.thumb.jpg.61fef0aa56a57586b59088cb3c5c9f59.jpg

 

The device was a little confusing to use, there were minimal instructions in the box and as I was one of the first people to get my hands on it, there was limited information online. I managed to figure out how to do most things eventually, but a better set of instructions would have been welcomed.

 

The little handheld has a few games preloaded: Datastorm, Geometrix and 2048 and others can be acquired. Currently the device supports the following emulators – Game Boy and Game Boy Colour, Sega Master System and Game Gear and they recently added a NES emulator, which is enough to give you your retro fix.

 

Software updates and game uploads are really simply and simply involve connecting to the devices WiFi and navigating to the devices address. Then it’s a simply case of selecting the files and hitting upload. The platform is completely open source so expect some cool things once developers get their hands on it.

 

Playing games, is tricky. The battery lasts a few hours, but I think that that’s all that my hands could take. I don’t have large hands but even I struggled a few times to hit the right button, which can make playing games like Mario, where timing can be important, difficult. I’ve got a few images below of Geometrix and Super Maria Bros. The sound is very good, and given the slightly tinny nature of the speaker, it definitely feeds into the whole retro thing. I haven’t spent too much time playing a number of different games, but the ones that I have played, I was pleasantly surprised. The games (mostly) ran with no issues and I was able to save and change games really quickly and simply.

 

Getting pictures/videos with the game actually running is a tad difficult using a mobile phone, but I've done my best!

 

IMG_20180608_153100.thumb.jpg.f85f4af8be9417e98a4541d7021d3c2d.jpg

 

IMG_20180608_153302.thumb.jpg.e5f10c3f7beb4d9fcac8371dc3b90c4c.jpg

 

A few final thoughts, it’s probably not a device that I would use every day, it's too tiny and I feel like I'm straining my eyes way too much to make out the detail. It's definitely a conversation piece and something you can use occasionally. For something, more every day, I'd prefer something larger with a bigger screen and more important easier controls. 

 

If you fancy one yourself, head over here and pre-order one. If there's anything that you want to see, leave a post here and I'll do my best to post updates. 

 

Also my first time writing an article like this so constructive feedback is welcome! :)

  • 1 month later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!