Recommended Posts

Hello!

 

I have a Proliant DL360 G7 with 176 GB of ECC RAM and 2 CPU's (2 physical 24 logical cores) with Intel PCI-E 4 port Gig NIC as well AND also 4 onboard 100MB ports + 1 iLO. I don't know what to do with this server for my home lab as I also have a DL380 G7 with 228 GB of ECC RAM and 8 TB of storage plus an attached HP StorageWorks MSA50 running via external SAS cable. The DL380 is hosting my home 'domain' as well as other VM's. I've always wanted to play around with pfSense and doing some Google searches and watching Youtube videos it looks like it's fairly easy to install / setup and definitely a better investment. I was originally going to run it in a VM however, I've heard more cons vs pros on that, so now I'm deciding if I should bite the bullet and just dedicate the DL360 as my pfSense box and I know it's complete OVERKILL!!!! Thoughts?

 

Thank you!

I mean I am assuming that since you listed out the specs of your server you know it's a bit overpowered for a router. Not just that but power consumption, etc etc. 

 

If I were in your shoes and just trying to learn pfSense I would just go the VM route because that seems like the path of least resistance.

20 hours ago, IbSta said:

I've heard more cons vs pros on that

Like what?  I ran pfsense on esxi for years!!  Zero downside other than any reboot of the esxi host took down your internet connection.  The only reason I went with hardware was the VM on OLD hardware could not keep up with new fast internet 500/50..  And it was more cost effective to buy router hardware (sg4860 netgate) vs the new esxi host I "wanted" ;) that would of been able to handle my internet speeds.

 

That box is WAY Over powered for a router - using it just for a router would be complete waste, and not very efficient in power use, etc. etc..

I'm running pfSense in a VM with 512mb ram and 1x CPU core, I can't get anywhere near to pushing that to it's limit on my home network with a 200 / 12 connection.

 

I've never personally had any issues with running pfSense as a VM, I update it as / when and it runs until the next pfSense update without a reboot. My VM is probably a couple of years old now.

 

Pros: None

 

Cons: Electricity bill and unnecessary impact on the environment?

Thanks for the response guys!

Quote
9 hours ago, BudMan said:

Like what?  I ran pfsense on esxi for years!!  Zero downside other than any reboot of the esxi host took down your internet connection.  The only reason I went with hardware was the VM on OLD hardware could not keep up with new fast internet 500/50..  And it was more cost effective to buy router hardware (sg4860 netgate) vs the new esxi host I "wanted" ;) that would of been able to handle my internet speeds.

 

That box is WAY Over powered for a router - using it just for a router would be complete waste, and not very efficient in power use, etc. etc..

 

Reading and watching a bunch of Youtube videos people were saying that leaving the ESXI expose to the internet was already defeating the purpose of setting up a firewall. See link:

 

https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/705889-should-you-virtualise-your-router-pfsense

 

They are IDIOTS!!!~  No you wouldn't expose the the freaking vmkern to the internet..  DUHHHHHH!

 

The only thing exposed to the internet would be the pfsense WAN IP... On its own NIC, on its own vswitch with no other portgroups even on this vswitch.. Your vmkern, and access to esxi would be only on your local lan only, normally a administration only network..

 

The stupid is so freaking bad it BURNS!!!  I would follow your link - but the stupid there would prob give me cancer or something.

 

The one thing I would suggest is if your nics support intel ME is updated or disabled, etc. etc.. I wouldn't expose those nics to the public internet.

It's a complete waste of resources.  pfSense runs well enough on a Goldmont based SoC, with very little RAM (2GB) and storage space (16GB or so if I remember correctly).

There are no major cons to running it as a VM.  Like @BudMan  I did it for quite some time without any problem.  I ran it as a VM on a HP Microserver G7 running ESXi.

 

Virtualise it.  Or buy cheap and low power hardware for it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Ocenaudio 3.19.4 by Razvan Serea  Ocenaudio is a full featured, fast and easy to use audio and music editor. It is the ideal software for people who need to edit and analyze audio files without complications. Ocenaudio also has powerful features that will please more advanced users. To assist ocenaudio development, a powerful toolset of audio editing, analysis and manipulation called Ocen Framework was created. ocenaudio is also based on Qt framework, a well known library for cross-platform development. Cross-platform support ocenaudio is available for all major operating systems: Microsoft Windows, Mac OS X and Linux. Native applications are generated for each platform from a common source, in order to achieve excelent performance and seamless integration with the operating system. All versions of ocenaudio have a uniform set of features and the same graphical interface, so the skills you learn in one platform can be used in the others. VST plugins support Ocenaudio supports VST (Virtual Studio Technology) plugins, giving its users access to numerous effects. Like the native effects, VST effects can use real-time preview to aide configuration. Real-time preview of effects Applying effects such as EQ, gain and filtering is an important part of audio editing. However, it is very tricky to get the desired result by adjusting the controls configuration alone: you must listen the processed audio. To ease the configuration of audio effects, ocenaudio has a real time preview feature: you hear the processed signal while adjusting the controls. The effect configuration window also includes a miniature view of the selected audio signal. You can navigate on this miniature view in the same way as you do on the main interface, selecting parts that interest you and listening to the effect result in real time. Multiselection for delicate editions To speed up complex audio files editing, ocenaudio includes multi-selection. With this amazing tool, you can simultaneously select different portions of an audio file and listen, edit or even apply an effect to them. For example, if you want to normalize only the excerpts of an interview where the interviewee is talking, just select them and apply the effect. Eficient edition of large files With ocenaudio, there is no limit to the length or the quantity of the audio files you can edit. Using an advanced memory management system, the application keeps your files open without wasting any of your computer's memory. Even in files several hours long, common editing operations such as copy, cut or paste happen almost instantly. Fully featured spectrogram Besides offering an incredible waveform view of your audio files, ocenaudio has a powerful and complete spectrogram view. In this view, you can analyze the spectral content of your audio signal with maximum clarity. Advanced users will be surprised to find that the spectrogram settings are applied in real time. The display is updated immediately when altering features such as the number of frequency bands, window type and size and dynamic range of the display. Ocenaudio 3.19.4 changelog: Adds fallback fonts so every language and symbol displays correctly Improves autosave and session recovery stability Improves region navigation and display Fixes a crash when the level meter is used on displays with a scaling greater than 200% Fixes memory corruption when using the silence selection tools Fixes crashes when closing a file while effects are still being processed Fixes a freeze when applying effects to many files at once (macOS) Fixes crashes related to audio devices on Windows Fixes invalid file names when exporting regions whose label is used as the file name Other bug fixes and improvements Download: Ocenaudio 64-bit | Portable | ~40.0 MB (Freeware) Download: Ocenaudio for Linux and Mac OS View: Ocenaudio Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 by Razvan Serea Hasleo Disk Clone is a free and all-in-one disk cloning software for Windows 11/10/8/7/Vista and Windows Server that can help you migrate Windows OS to another disk, clone one disk to another disk or clone one partition to another location quickly and efficiently. Completely Free Windows Migration and Disk/Partition Cloning Software Migrate Windows from one disk to another without reinstalling Windows, apps. Clone one disk to another and makes the data on 2 disks are exactly the same. Clone a partition to another location without losing any data. Easily adjust the size and location of the destination partition. Convert MBR to GPT or convert GPT to MBR by cloning. Creation of Windows PE emergency disk. Extremely fast cloning speed and multi-language support. Supported OS: Windows Vista/Server 2008 or later, fully compatible with GPT and UEFI. Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 changelog: Fixed an issue that caused disk enumeration to fail Fixed an issue where WinPE created under Windows ARM64 26H1 did not work properly Download: Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 | 32.3 MB (Freeware) Link: Hasleo Disk Clone Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      554
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      78
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!