Recommended Posts

I notice more and more sites are asking to send text messages for identity verification. The problem is I'm physically disabled & don't have a cellphone or cell service. Is there any service, free or paid, that will enable me to get a phone number to receive these text messages on pc? I know there are sites with free public numbers to get a text but those numbers don't usually work in these verification situations.

 

I usually ask someone to get the texts for me in these situations but I'd rather not bother anyone & just do it myself. 

 

Is there any safe, legit site or service out there that will work everywhere. Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1367810-text-verification-with-no-phone/
Share on other sites

  On 11/07/2018 at 16:45, Zathras5 said:

I notice more and more sites are asking to send text messages for identity verification. The problem is I'm physically disabled & don't have a cellphone or cell service. Is there any service, free or paid, that will enable me to get a phone number to receive these text messages on pc? I know there are sites with free public numbers to get a text but those numbers don't usually work in these verification situations.

 

I usually ask someone to get the texts for me in these situations but I'd rather not bother anyone & just do it myself. 

 

Is there any safe, legit site or service out there that will work everywhere. Thanks

Expand  

Google Voice.  Used it for years.  Free number and can use it for voicemail, calling, text...I use my Google Voice number for those who I do not want to give my real number to.   I also use it for verification like from MS, Google, and other sites.

 

https://voice.google.com/u/0/signup

  • Like 2

Ok, I set up a Google Voice number but it's the same problem... it doesn't work for these identity verification things. At least it didn't work at Swagbucks. I'll see if I can try somewhere else.

 

Any other ideas are welcome.

 

Edit: Tried 2 other sites, neither excepted the gv number.

Edited by Zathras5

If you wee a company wanting to "verify" a user is Billy Sixpack... No you would not accept some GV number since any buddy can get one of those.  Prob want to know the phone number is from carrier that has the users info that is tied to the phone #, etc..

 

What does being disabled have to do not having a cell phone?  Seems like a non sequitur to me..

  On 11/07/2018 at 19:00, BudMan said:

If you wee a company wanting to "verify" a user is Billy Sixpack... No you would not accept some GV number since any buddy can get one of those.  Prob want to know the phone number is from carrier that has the users info that is tied to the phone #, etc..

 

What does being disabled have to do not having a cell phone?  Seems like a non sequitur to me..

Expand  

can't afford the additional expense on a fixed disability income? duno just a wild guess

  On 11/07/2018 at 19:00, BudMan said:

What does being disabled have to do not having a cell phone?  Seems like a non sequitur to me..

Expand  

I have to ask this as well. I am disabled myself, and I use a cell phone just fine. If you can type on a keyboard, you can use a phone.

 

If you can't afford it, there are free cell services that give you so many minutes and data per month.

  On 11/07/2018 at 17:59, Zathras5 said:

Thanks, but I thought google voice forwards to another number. Can I use it without that happening? I don't quite understand how this google voice works.... I don't want anything that will disrupt my regular home phone in anyway.

Expand  

for voice calls yes. for text you can text directly from the site/app

 

used to do this all the time back when i had a non-smart phone that had texting blocked.

  On 11/07/2018 at 20:07, Brandon H said:

 

used to do this all the time back when i had a non-smart phone that had texting blocked.

Expand  

That's known as a dumb-phone. (my Mom uses one...)

I have no use of my hands. I'm using a joystick with my mouth and eye gaze software to operate my pc. I suppose there is some way to adapt a cellphone so someone like me could use one but I'm not going to bother with all that for this 1 purpose... I have no use for a cell otherwise...

 

So if there is someway to get around these verification things with some online service that would be ideal. But I gather there aren't any other options?

  On 11/07/2018 at 20:07, Brandon H said:

for voice calls yes. for text you can text directly from the site/app

Expand  

Thanks, yeah, I figured that out.

  On 11/07/2018 at 20:59, Mindovermaster said:

You can write like that with no hands? Sounds a little far fetched to me... But, try the suggested above.

Expand  

this tech has been around for a while now.  and with predictive/suggestive text, makes it even easier/quicker.  I  Plenty of info online.

  On 11/07/2018 at 21:02, techbeck said:

Never had an issue using a Google number for verification.  Has always worked.  A lot of times, sites have more than one method to verify who you are.  Like an email address.  So I would check that as well.

Expand  

That's what I usually do but lately I've been running into a lot of sites requiring sms.

 

I wonder if it matters what type of phone line you associate your Google number with. I used my home phone which is a VoIP based line... I assume you used your cell number?

  On 11/07/2018 at 20:13, Zathras5 said:

I have no use of my hands. I'm using a joystick with my mouth and eye gaze software to operate my pc. I suppose there is some way to adapt a cellphone so someone like me could use one but I'm not going to bother with all that for this 1 purpose... I have no use for a cell otherwise...

 

So if there is someway to get around these verification things with some online service that would be ideal. But I gather there aren't any other options?

Thanks, yeah, I figured that out.

Expand  

There's a few US services you can look into here https://tech-vise.com/get-a-usa-phone-number-easily-with-these-services/ 

 

Line2 https://www.line2.com/plans might have what you need, but ultimately you will need a paid service to get around the blocks most companies put on "free" online call/text services.

 

I do feel your pain at having to jump though more and more hoops to be verified online, all thanks to idiots, trolls and hackers!!

  On 11/07/2018 at 21:07, techbeck said:

this tech has been around for a while now.  and with predictive/suggestive text, makes it even easier/quicker.  I  Plenty of info online.

Expand  

Hm, guess I never looked into it. Just my ignorance, I guess...

  On 11/07/2018 at 20:59, Mindovermaster said:

You can write like that with no hands? Sounds a little far fetched to me... But, try the suggested above.

Expand  

Not at all. I had a user that had a motorcycle accident, completely quadriplegic. We were able to provide him with the necessary equipment to allow him to work. It was kinda cool to see, if it weren't for the fact that he originally had the use of all his limbs. :/

 

Unfortunately I wasn't involved with looking in to the software, and the software involved didn't involve the two-factor authentication. Do they not offer an option that doesn't involve a phone? Most seem to offer a separate email address these days.

  On 11/07/2018 at 21:21, Zathras5 said:

That's what I usually do but lately I've been running into a lot of sites requiring sms.

 

I wonder if it matters what type of phone line you associate your Google number with. I used my home phone which is a VoIP based line... I assume you used your cell number?

Expand  

google voice assigns you a new phone number (that you choose from a list of available numbers)

it's its own thing/service

  On 11/07/2018 at 23:10, Brandon H said:

google voice assigns you a new phone number (that you choose from a list of available numbers)

it's its own thing/service

Expand  

Yes but you still have to verify & associate the google account with a different phone number. You don't have to forward anything to that different number but it still needs to be in there.

  On 11/07/2018 at 23:23, Zathras5 said:

Yes but you still have to verify & associate the google account with a different phone number. You don't have to forward anything to that different number but it still needs to be in there.

Expand  

Google normally asks if you want to do two-factor authentication through a mobile number or a separate email address?

  On 13/07/2018 at 22:10, Nick H. said:

Google normally asks if you want to do two-factor authentication through a mobile number or a separate email address?

Expand  

You're right, just not for Google Voice... that requires a number.

 

 

I've given up on all this... Someday I guess we'll all be logging in with our bio-chips anyways.?

  On 13/07/2018 at 23:12, Zathras5 said:

You're right, just not for Google Voice... that requires a number.

 

 

I've given up on all this... Someday I guess we'll all be logging in with our bio-chips anyways.?

Expand  

After a quick look, you can use a trusted computer for the two-factor authentication. Do you have a second device that you can log in with? If you don't then you'll have the same problem using a "new" device that the service doesn't recognise...

 

There has to be an option available for people without a phone. Google can't have got this far without thinking about this...I'm not giving up yet, I'll keep looking.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have always wondered if there is any difference between .BAT and .CMD files!
    • I will confirm the Vista hate was ridiculous. They had a point before SP1 and too many didn't use newer components at launch, misleading some to believe it was bad. It really wasn't (after SP1.) The jump from 98/ME to XP didn't get a bad reaction at all from what I remember. 8 was awful. 10 for the most part ran pretty well but people disliked the telemetry and standard MS shenanigans, but 11 is definitely worse in some ways.
    • What I can confirm to not be exaggerations or misinformation is the slowness of the standard right click menus and the Task Manager in Windows 11, even on brand spanking new bare installs.
    • Linux 6.16-rc2: Smaller than usual, but with notable network and bcachefs tweaks by Paul Hill Linus Torvalds, the creator of the Linux kernel, has just released the second release candidate of Linux 6.16. Following the release of Linux 6.15, developers submitted their new features to be merged with Linux 6.16. These release candidates are focused on polishing the kernel before release, following the merging of new features. In his weekly mailing list post, Torvalds noticed that things were pretty quiet this week and that this could be due to developers taking a summer vacation or just taking a break following a large merge window a few weeks ago. This isn’t uncommon at this point in the cycle and Torvalds expects more activity next week. Networking and bcachefs dominate changes The second release candidate, despite being small, still brings some notable changes, namely network drivers, Bluetooth drivers, and bcachefs, a copy-on-write filesystem for Linux. The improvements to network drivers have a direct impact on end users, it means that newer networking hardware works out of the box when you install Linux and existing problematic drivers get fixed. There were also improvements made to the Rust infrastructure and core networking changes. Implementing Rust in the kernel is good for users as it has memory safety built in, leaving hackers less to attack in Linux systems. Rust has received backlash by some opinionated Linux developers who don’t want to learn a new language, but it doesn’t look like it’s going anywhere. Under the hood: specific fixes This week, a diverse set of developers have contributed fixes to the kernel that improve kernel stability, Bluetooth connectivity, file sharing over SMB, and virtualization performance. Some specific changes this week include: Fixes for CPU burning, firmware stats, and use-after-free (UAF) issues with the ath11k and ath12k Wi-Fi drivers. Various fixes for UAF, NULL pointer differences and advertising issues in Bluetooth drivers. Improvements to Server Message Block (SMB) related to directory cache reuse and a fix for performance regression with deferred closes. In KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine), there are fixes for SEV-SNP support, memory pre-faulting, and ARM64 selftests. The SMB fixes are notable because it's an important protocol in networked Windows environments. It helps with file sharing, printer sharing, and Active Directory integration. By improving Linux’s support for this protocol, readers using SMB in Linux to talk to Windows machines will have a smoother experience. Ongoing development Linux 6.16 is due to get seven or eight release candidates over the cycle so there are now five or six weeks until the stable version arrives. Even when it is out, most people’s first use of this kernel will be when distributions decide to ship it, as they can be tricky to install manually. Stay tuned each week as we bring you all the new changes which each new release candidate.
    • Just checked my B650 Motherboard again, nothing there as yet, Guess 800 series getting it first, which i can understand as that's newer series, and chipset. I'll check again in a few days or a week depending on how busy i am
  • Recent Achievements

    • Explorer
      Legend20 went up a rank
      Explorer
    • One Month Later
      jezzzy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      CSpera earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      MIR JOHNNY BLAZE earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Apprentice
      Wireless wookie went up a rank
      Apprentice
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      624
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      276
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      178
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      152
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      115
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!