Recommended Posts

I have a Synology NAS on my LAN. It is running fine and has been accessible to all of the other computers on the LAN for many years now. However, on one of the LAN computers I recently ran some Windows 7 update stuff (I don't remember what the updates were, it had been a while since I last updated) and now I when I try to access the Synology share from this particular computer it gives me a "network path not found" error (error code 0x80070035). I can see the share fine in the network view in explorer, and it's enumerated when I run nbtstat -c and net view. It's just when I actually try to access it (double-click on the icon share, or use the UNC or LAN IP in file explorer) that I get the error. Other Windows 7 computers on the LAN can access the NAS the same as before, so I'm quite confident that the problem lies with this particular computer rather than anything on the Synology side.

 

I've tried a lot of the common fixes like disabling Windows firewall, ensuring NetBIOS is enabled for my network adapter (it already was), removing redundant 6to4 adapters in device manager (I had none to remove), and ensuring that various network services were running (they already were). Nothing has worked. Any ideas of what else to try?

 

By the way, I know I could just reinstall Windows but doing so would be a real pain for this computer, so I'd rather not unless I absolutely have to. Also, I can access the NAS by navigating to the LAN IP in my web browser and logging in through the web interface, it's just that I can't access the share in explorer/dopus to do file operations.

If I had to GUESS... Your windows update removed smb1 - which should of been turned off years ago... And you don't have your nas set to use smb2 or 3..

 

Your other clients prob still using smbv1.. What does your nas show for your smb setting?

 

Here is off my synology

 

nassmbsettings.thumb.png.1eb4428437ee4b1fa64cf420123cea2c.png

I have an older Synology (110j) so it only has the maximum SMB protocol option; it was set to 1 so I set it to 3 but it made no difference.

 

Also, to test whether the Synology is the issue I created another share on a different Win7 computer. Unfortunately I get the same problem: I can see the share in network view but I get the "network path not found" error when I try to access it. I used to have more shares on that computer and could access them from this one without problems, so I'm pretty sure it's something to do with the Windows 7 settings on this particular computer. Anyway, thanks for your help!

What version of DSM are you running?

 

A sniff of the traffic when you try and access the share should be able to point to where the problem is..  But getting error 53 when you trying access just the view via \\ipaddress "could" be version protocol problem... A sniff could for sure help figure out the root problem.

 

Grab wireshark... Run it and then try and access your shares.. Post up the sniff.

 

When doing this make sure all your other applications are turned off, etc.  Have had people post up a sniff to troubleshoot something they were streaming a movie at the same time ;)  Don't be doing anything on the machine other than trying to access your shares.  Only apps that should be running is wireshark and your file access..

 

Do you have ipv6 enabled or disabled?  If your dsm is older prob doesn't even support ipv6 anyway.  And wouldn't come into play if you doing \\IPv4address

 

You didn't disable file and print sharing all together did you?

Well be much easier if could actually open that in my wireshark to read what is in the response of the smb negotiation you see the request and response.

 

the RST is being sent by the client.. Not a very friendly way to end the conversation.. Normally you do a fin, ack  But then it tries again to neg..  My guess is they can not agree on what version of smb to use.. You never even ask for shares, or any sort of auth.. Its just the protocol neg part.

 

edit:

 

Here is like a normal conversation start you see the syn and syn,ack then the neg

 

normalconversation.thumb.png.09997316466668530ae6ae291ffad538.png

 

Client is .100 and server is .9 in this conversation.

 

Client sends out what versions it can talk.. and then the server responds back with lets talk this..  So you see the 0x0311 from the client side, since this is a windows 10 client it can talk that version... But the server its talking to is running 2012r2 best could be the 302 version

 

2.0.2 Windows Vista, Server 2008

2.1.0 Windows 7, Server 2008 R2

3.0.0 Windows 8, Server 2012

3.0.2 Windows 8.1, Server 2012 R2

3.1.0 Windows 10, Server 2016

 

So what exactly did you client send and what did it get back in that neg part?  Since right after that is sends a RST... Which is saying this conversation is DONE!!!

 

Could be signing required or something.. Be helpful to actually be able to open that in my wireshark and look at the request and response, etc.

Well your client is saying it can talk some really OLD ######!!!

 

clientrequest.thumb.png.bec7ef2634e4e494aeaaeda6660edb0d.png

 

Your server answers back with 0x02ff which should match, and sends back 0x0210 which you would think would match 2.??/ as well - but not sure match but then your client says F off with the RST..

 

not sure why your client is sending back RST.. Is your workstation service running?

 

 

I will check with my wifes laptop when I get a chance.. Its still running windows 7..  But you shouldn't be sending all of those dialects.. lanman???   You got something major wrong with that thing... Thought one of the more recent updates was to kill off smbv1.. I don't see how your running all of those old before smbv1 dialects..   This was back in 2017 they announced that.

 

You sure and the hell should have it disabled after wannacry, etc.  So yeah something is not right with that box sending all those OLD dialects..

  • 1 year later...

This is an old post, but I see people are still having the problem and the solution is undoubtedly obscure.  Google search may still bring people to this old post.

Go to your Synology control panel and select File Services/Advanced

Then unselect "WS-Discovery", apply the change, then select "WS-Discovery" again and apply the change again.

12 minutes ago, Tay Ruong said:

This is an old post, but I see people are still having the problem and the solution is undoubtedly obscure.  Google search may still bring people to this old post.

Go to your Synology control panel and select File Services/Advanced

Then unselect "WS-Discovery", apply the change, then select "WS-Discovery" again and apply the change again.

Won't matter after January... :rolleyes:

MS has backed off yet again on killing off W7.. As long as you pay you can still get support ;) And the price will go up every year...

 

BTW ws-discovery has nothing to do with the dialect of smb offered or asked for.

 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • But building your own.. what? You can't build anything like the Steam Machine yourself. Even trying to get close costs a good deal more. Even just the CPU cooler in their price comparison is as big as the entire Steam Machine. If you want a regular gaming PC, then by all means, build that. If you want a a small console-like PC for the living room that is good for gaming, I'm not sure what else is a better deal. In the GN review, they only mentioned a small form factor Dell, which is like twice the size and hundreds of dollars more expensive.
    • Those are some popular multiplayer games. But hardly "all". Just those that don't work on Linux currently due to specific anti-cheat implementations. I think it's also fair to point out the literally thousands of games that don't work on the PS5. And it's not locked at 1080p. That's the default, which you can change.
    • Ubuntu Livepatch arrives on Arm64 to eliminate system reboots for kernel updates by Paul Hill Canonical has just announced that its Livepatch service now supports computers with Arm64 processors. For those who are not familiar, Livepatch allows users to apply important kernel updates without any service interruption or rebooting. While home users will benefit from this, it’s even more important for critical machines that absolutely should not be going offline at all. The feature is available as part of Ubuntu Core 26 for Arm64 and Ubuntu Core 20 and onwards for AMD64. According to Canonical, this will improve the security of systems that aren’t security-maintained daily or weekly, and it helps organizations work towards Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) compliance. If you are familiar with Ubuntu, you probably know that most packages can be updated without having to restart the system. There is one big exception to this, and that’s the kernel; it typically requires you to reload the system to boot into the new kernel. With Livepatch, Canonical has done something so that you don’t need to restart to begin using the new kernel. Aside from Ubuntu Core 26, users with Arm64 chips running Ubuntu 26.04 LTS can also use Livepatch. If you want to learn more about Livepatch, check out its product page. There, you can also find a button to join Ubuntu Pro (it’s free for several home devices) so that you can enable Livepatch. By linking your computer to Ubuntu Pro, you will also extend the life of your Ubuntu install from five years to ten years. If you are running Ubuntu, let us know in the comments if you have been looking forward to this feature on your ARM-based computer. If you’ve had a compatible AMD64 machine for a while and never used this feature, let us know why in the comments!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      500
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      206
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      97
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      89
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!