Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, bguy_1986 said:

I assume they are going to try and land this on land?  Or will they go for a water landing/hover first?

 

Land, but I'm assuming they'll do a divert like they do with RTLS Falcon 9 boosters.

 

In a divert the unpowered impact point is in the drink. If the engines fire it diverts to the landing pad, if not it takes a swim.

 

SN-07.1 blew the upper dome

 

  • Thanks 1
1 hour ago, IsItPluggedIn said:

Will 15km be high enough to test the belly flop landing, or will it just be higher hop?

 

It'll be a full-up test of the belly flop landing - aka skydiver.

 

Subsequent flights will go higher and eventually hypersonic to test the heat shields; high angle of attack re-entry, etc.

 

Best prepare some popcorn and a brew.

Edited by DocM

Do they have a landing pad that isn't quite so close to where they've previously been doing tests? Given the high chance of a new crater in Boca Chica It scares the hell out of me that this thing could end up spiralling into one of the newly built high bays.

1 hour ago, Skiver said:

Do they have a landing pad that isn't quite so close to where they've previously been doing tests? Given the high chance of a new crater in Boca Chica It scares the hell out of me that this thing could end up spiralling into one of the newly built high bays.

Like Falcon 9 landings, they'll likely use a divert maneuver. The trajectory will nudge out over the water, so if the engines don't light it goes in the drink. If they do fire it'll steer back to the pad. They also have considerable property south of the launch site full of nothing but sand & wild grass. 

 

Edited by DocM
13 minutes ago, DocM said:

Like Falcon 9 landings, they'll likely use a divert maneuver. The trajectory will nudge out over the water, so if the engines don't light it goes in the drink. If they do fire it'll steer back to the pad. 

I assumed that, but the pad they land Falcon 9s at seem to be in the open quite a bit, I've not seen anything at the BC site that is as open as those pads.

 

Although, just looking for some aerial photos I stumbled on the below, I forget just how far the high bays are compared to the launch pads (top of the picture) so I think this helps me understand. For some reason I had it in my head that the launch pad was to the bottom right of the site.

 

EiI2QIjWoAAhC0t?format=jpg&name=4096x409

  • Like 1
4 hours ago, Skiver said:

I assumed that, but the pad they land Falcon 9s at seem to be in the open quite a bit, I've not seen anything at the BC site that is as open as those pads.

 

Although, just looking for some aerial photos I stumbled on the below, I forget just how far the high bays are compared to the launch pads (top of the picture) so I think this helps me understand. For some reason I had it in my head that the launch pad was to the bottom right of the site.

 

EiI2QIjWoAAhC0t?format=jpg&name=4096x409

 

Old photo. Looking East towords the Gulf, the red square is roughly where the landing pad and new launch table are.

1846021401_BClandingpad2.jpg.761ae390ce3fcbc67efba81104276910.jpg

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Windows 95 offered the ability to add and edit the right click menus, on a per file type basis. This feature seems to be missing in the new file explorer. Are they bringing it back as a "new" feature?
    • It's nearly time to replace my aging Founders Edition 3080, it doesn't OC as nicely as it used to and it's running around 10c warmer than it did when I first bought it.  I don't have budget for much more than what I spent on the 3080 and locally, that means the best GPU I can manage is a 9070XT. On this basis I have a few questions: 1. At present I don't use ray tracing, if this was to change, would this GPU be an issue? 2. How does it compare on a performance basis? 3. Are the drivers worse or better than those for nVidia? 4. Linux support, is it there? 5. Anything else I should be aware of if I were to make this change? 6. Is it a good idea or shall I try and keep the 3080 a little longer.
    • What OS is that? It looks a bit like Mac OS but the command line suggests it isn't, either way I like it!
    • Outlook classic is inherently better than new outlook, for a number of reasons. That said, if the only reason people need office is to read email, they should just use thunderbird.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      73
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      69
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!