Recommended Posts

On 12/02/2024 at 13:43, bguy_1986 said:

Any guesses why they keep working on Ship 26?

My guess is they are going to test using it as a tanker/fuel ship.

That or they'll use it as a mock-up for HLS. Or both.

You can never tell with SpaceXers, just when you think you got something figured they pull a 6-ft rabbit out of the hat. 

On 12/02/2024 at 13:43, bguy_1986 said:

Any guesses why they keep working on Ship 26?

My guess is they are going to test using it as a tanker/fuel ship.

People hate ship 26. But that is part of the plan.

Ship 26 is actually being equipped with anti gravity drives and a quantum computer with a AI named Judy. 

It is the true future of spaceflight. 

Leave ship 26 alone! 

  • Haha 2
On 12/02/2024 at 15:06, Xenon said:

People hate ship 26. But that is part of the plan.

Ship 26 is actually being equipped with anti gravity drives and a quantum computer with a AI named Judy. 

It is the true future of spaceflight. 

Leave ship 26 alone! 

It's actually called Caroline.

  • Haha 2

It keeps insisting on calling the methane "neuro-toxin" and tries to release it sometimes on unsuspecting pad techs. We are installing the morality core soon, the avionics team say it should clear that up.

1) Flight 3 looking like 3 weeks

2) SpaceX is seeking a waiver to launch up to 9  times this year.

https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/02/spacex-seeks-to-launch-starship-at-least-nine-times-this-year/

  • Like 2

FAA official talks about launch cadence

 

Quote

Coleman said that when he joined the Commercial Space Transportation arm of the FAA in 1996, the organization had 40 employees. A decade ago, there were 73. Now there are 143,; and the organization is "aggressively" seeking to grow to 157 staffers in Florida, California, Texas, and Washington, DC.

"Right now, we're at about 140 people, and they're pedaling as fast as they can," he said. "We're working on the  weekends. We're working late into the night. We do need a additional staff."

 

 

Clearing another milestone...

https://www.nasa.gov/image-article/nasa-spacex-test-starship-lunar-lander-docking-system/

Quote

NASA, SpaceX Test Starship Lunar Lander Docking System


Lee Mohon
FEB 28, 2024

As part of NASA’s Artemis campaign that will establish the foundation for long-term scientific exploration at the Moon, crew will need to move between different spacecraft to carry out lunar landings. NASA and SpaceX recently performed qualification testing for the docking system that will help make that possible.

For the Artemis III mission, astronauts will ride the Orion spacecraft from Earth to lunar orbit, and then once the two spacecraft are docked, move to the lander, the Starship Human Landing System (HLS) that will bring them to the surface. After surface activities are complete, Starship will return the astronauts to Orion waiting in lunar orbit. During later missions, astronauts will transfer from Orion to Starship via the Gateway lunar space station. Based on SpaceX’s flight-proven Dragon 2 docking system used on missions to the International Space Station, the Starship docking system can be configured to connect the lander to Orion or Gateway.
>

>

++++++++++

SpaceX and NASA recently performed full-scale qualification testing of the docking system that will connect SpaceX’s Starship Human Landing System (HLS) with Orion and later Gateway in lunar orbit during future crewed Artemis missions. Based on the flight-proven Dragon 2 active docking system, the Starship HLS docking system will be able to act as an active or passive system during docking.
SpaceX's 

IMG_5470.thumb.jpeg.78de2587fab3d5023a720024c869f853.jpeg

 

On 12/02/2024 at 13:43, bguy_1986 said:

Any guesses why they keep working on Ship 26?

My guess is they are going to test using it as a tanker/fuel ship.

 

Or they're playing around with stuff for HLS. The spy cam watching McGregor seems to have caught some smaller engine tests over the last several months, could be landing thrusters.

 

Starship for Flight 4 rolling out for tests

 

 

  • Thanks 1

SpaceX is adding extra tests to Starship Flight 3

https://spacenews.com/spacex-adds-tests-to-next-starship-flight/

 

Quote

SpaceX adds tests to next Starship flight

>

The profile for the third flight projects a splashdown in the Indian Ocean nearly 65 minutes after liftoff. [...] A firing of a Raptor engine while in space, which SpaceX has noticed attempted, is one of the new elements added to the upcoming launch. Another in-flight test added to the mission is opening and closing a payload bay door that would be used for future launches that deploy Starlink satellites.

SpaceX also confirmed it will perform a propellant transfer test on the flight, moving propellant from one tank to another within Starship. That test, supported by a NASA Tipping Point technology

>

 

 

  • Like 1

01:04:39 flight time, so no full orbit but several important tests.

Here are the countdown and flight timelines.

https://www.spacex.com/launches/mission/?missionId=starship-flight-3

 

Summary

Quote

The third flight test aims to build on what we’ve learned from previous flights while attempting a number of ambitious objectives, including the successful ascent burn of both stages, opening and closing Starship’s payload door, a propellant transfer demonstration during the upper stage’s coast phase, the first ever re-light of a Raptor engine while in space, and a controlled reentry of Starship. It will also fly a new trajectory, with Starship targeted to splashdown in the Indian Ocean. This new flight path enables us to attempt new techniques like in-space engine burns while maximizing public safety.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, mucking around with settings, maybe shoot some calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
    • Getting further away from the artistic study of mental disease that was the first game... (which never needed any sequels to begin with) But I get it, a company has to make money. And the second was at least visually impressive, if not in any other way.
    • If its the devs fault you would think Unreal would help M$ take full advantage of Unreal and work with them to fix the performance issues. Otherwise they are catching unwarranted bad press.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!