Recommended Posts

On 28/06/2024 at 16:31, bguy_1986 said:

I just watched NSF's "This week in Spaceflight".  Maybe this was the wrong thread for the Deorbit vehicle.  I assumed it has something to do with Starship, but it may not.

Most likely a Dragon-derived vehicle, I'm betting on Dragon XL - the cargo supply ship for the Lunar Gateway. Much more propellant.

On 28/06/2024 at 17:34, DocM said:

Most likely a Dragon-derived vehicle, I'm betting on Dragon XL - the cargo supply ship for the Lunar Gateway. Much more propellant.

I had always assumed that all other Dragon variants were dead since Starship was coming along.

On 02/07/2024 at 09:03, bguy_1986 said:

I had always assumed that all other Dragon variants were dead since Starship was coming along.

 

Nope, too many commercial customers, and the Dragons can carry external cargo. One of Dragon XL's early cargos will be the Canadian robotic arm for Gateway. 

Once ISS is gone Dragon will probably serve the commercial stations, along with Dream Chaser 100 (cargo) & 200 (crew).

There may be another commercial crew vehicle from Blue Origin, but who knows how long it will take them.

And we can't count out the Indians, they are preparing to launch their Gaganyaan crew vehicle in the next couple of years. There is also a new cooperative agreement between the US and India on spaceflight, so they may end up being a commercial space station partner, replacing Russia.

Edited by DocM
  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...

Very interesting... Can't help but think the DoD is involved.

https://www.reuters.com/technology/space/spacex-talks-land-recover-starship-rocket-off-australias-coast-2024-07-29/

Exclusive: SpaceX in talks to land and recover Starship rocket off Australia's coast

WASHINGTON, July 29 (Reuters) - SpaceX is in talks with U.S. and Australian officials to land and recover one of its Starship rockets off Australia's coast, a possible first step toward a bigger presence for Elon Musk's company in the region as the two countries bolster security ties, according to three people familiar with the plans.

>

The plan would be to launch Starship from a SpaceX facility in Texas, land it in the sea off Australia's coast and recover it on Australian territory. Getting permission to do so would require loosening U.S. export controls on sophisticated space technologies bound for Australia, according to the sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

President Joe Biden's administration already has sought to ease similar restrictions within the AUKUS security alliance, opens new tab, a grouping of the United States, Australia and Britain aimed at countering China.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

>

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 5 weeks later...
On 25/09/2024 at 09:04, bguy_1986 said:

I don't like the fighting.  What SpaceX is doing is too important.

 

 

 

There are a few things that play here, 

1) Whitaker is a lawyer, not an aerospace engineer. He's a political appointee. When he went to Congress it was for something else, and he got pulled into this hearing with no briefing. He winged it and said things that were not true, probably by mistake. Give him a bit of a MacGuffin. He does not deserve a second one after all the hell this one caused.

2) there are legal issues here, 

a) FAA proposed some new rules known as Part 450. This changed how licensing and permitting are done. Part of the problem is that many of these  rules have not been fully  circulated to the aerospace companies, but FAA is trying to apply them. This has ticked off a lot of people, not just SpaceX. Now FAA says they're going to go back and look at Part 450, which knowing them could take a year.

b) this summer the Supreme Court came down with the Loper Bright v. Raimondo decision, which overturned the Chevron doctrine.

The Chevron doctrine gave agencies the right to make rules which did not appear in the enabling legislation, essentially pulling rules out of their backside without Congressional authorization.

Loper Bright took away this power, and it is going to impact FAAs Part 450. Many of the things FAA thinks they can do, and are doing to SpaceX and others, won't pass muster in court. 

3) FAA has serious manpower issues, not enough people to do the work. This and the political confusion causes the delays.

Almost the entire space industry is up in arms over all this, as is Congress. Both parties, both the House and the Senate. It's one of the few things they can agree on because it has not only economic but strategic blowback.

Maybe we need to take it away from FAA and give it back to Commerce, or create a FSA - Federal Space Administration. Or, give it to the US Space Force.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
  • 4 weeks later...

Starship Flight 6: pre-flight testing

Some are estimating Flight 6 by the end of November, others the end of  December. This will be the last Block 1 Starship.

The first Block 2 is almost completed for Flight 7. Revamped front fins, located more to the leeward side to keep their hinges out of the re-entry plasma, many upgrades, slightly longer. 

Starship Block 3 will be much larger and have other major changes. 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2
  • 2 weeks later...

OK, got time to flesh this out...

Better stock up on popcorn for 2025

SpaceFlightNow interview with NASA HLS* Deputy Program Manager Dr Kent  Chojnacki at Huntsville, AL

* Human Landing System

------

• LOTS of HLS work going on 

• SpaceX meets with astronauts monthly to work on the HLS design

• 27 milestones to be met

• There are HLS crew cabins, control cabin, sleeping quarters, elevator, and lab mockups at Starbase

• Starship design update in November, CDR (critical design review) in 2025, followed by the DCR (design certification review)

• propellant transfer campaign begins March 2025

• Target & Chaser propellant transfer test summer 2025. Chaser = tanker, Target = ship to be refuelled

• NASA plans a cadence ramp to bi-weekly at Starbase (2 pads), then pad LC-39A at Cape Canaveral FL comes online

• Targeting September 2026 for the crewed lunar landing; 6.5 day stay, with an uncrewed test landing before then

 

Screenshot_2024-10-31-22-43-56-063.jpeg.03d48ac5f2e4b754635c98b16da08a1d.jpeg

 

 

 

More from Space News

https://spacenews.com/spacex-plans-next-starship-flight-for-mid-november/

 

• many upgrades, including TPS and the new fins & their leeward placement.

• Booster return #2

• in-space re-start (1 engine)

• higher AoA* during re-entry

• water landing (getting data before a Ship catch)

* Angle of Attack

  • Like 1

Full text 

"Starship is now more than twice as powerful as the Saturn V Moon rocket and, in a year or so, it will be three times as powerful at 10,000 metric tons of thrust.

More importantly, it is designed to be fully reusable, burning ~80% liquid oxygen and ~20% liquid methane (very low cost propellant). 

This enables cost per ton to orbital space to be ~10,000% lower than Saturn V. 

Starship is the difference between being a multiplanet or single planet civilization. 

Building a new world on Mars is now possible."

  • Like 1
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
On 17/01/2025 at 10:21, FloatingFatMan said:

What a great mission Flight 7 was.  I especially enjoyed the flawless re-entry! :rofl:

image.png.1ec93029c4e92046260d658f703eef2b.png

 

Believe it or not, this is what they want to happen.  With rapid R&D, you want it to blow up occasionally and return the data.  SpaceX immediately knew what caused the issue and will improve the design moving forward.  Falcon 9 started that way and now they're launching and landing those every 2 days.
It's a big difference than Blue Origin who spent 10 years developing New Glenn in a simulated environment and only launched when the rocket was basically "final".  The orbital stage worked, but if they can't get the first stage to land, a redesign is going to set them back years.

  • Like 2
On 17/01/2025 at 20:17, Astra.Xtreme said:

Believe it or not, this is what they want to happen.  With rapid R&D, you want it to blow up occasionally and return the data.  SpaceX immediately knew what caused the issue and will improve the design moving forward.  Falcon 9 started that way and now they're launching and landing those every 2 days.

You DO realise that it's YOUR MONEY that's funding Musk, right?  That 300 million dollar explosion? That was aaaaalllll yours... :rofl:   Take away the government funding and subsidies, and SpaceX hasn't made a single red cent in profit.

 

On 17/01/2025 at 20:17, Astra.Xtreme said:

It's a big difference than Blue Origin who spent 10 years developing New Glenn in a simulated environment and only launched when the rocket was basically "final".  The orbital stage worked, but if they can't get the first stage to land, a redesign is going to set them back years.

And guess what? They don't go around blowing (literally) 300 million bucks every time they launch something, unlike Musk, who can't even read a NASA engineering manual... 

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!