Recommended Posts

On 22/01/2025 at 10:38, bguy_1986 said:

Then I'm sure it will show up in a FAA report or SpaceX's report. 

What did they do when the shuttle exploded across the states?  They attempted to fix it and continued on, which is what they will do with Starship whether debris landed where it was supposed to or wasn't supposed to.

I fully agree with your statements.

On 22/01/2025 at 10:38, bguy_1986 said:

For the Government shut Musk/SpaceX down?

Of course not, launches must continue, but only on condition that the cause of the explosion is clearly identified and corrected. In fact, I think I read that the cause has already been identified, now it's just a matter of applying the corrective measures.

I may not like Elon Musk, but I'm not against the SpaceX program.

  • Like 2
On 22/01/2025 at 07:33, snowy owl said:

This is perfectly normal since it's part of every rocket launch 🤪!

Included because you didn't sound like you knew about it.

 

On 22/01/2025 at 07:33, snowy owl said:

I have consulted several media of different sizes, and they are unanimous on the results, and falling debris area from this explosion.

But of course, stay in front of your TV and watch Fox News! Which is nothing but disinformation!

 

Don't watch Fox News, but go ahead and have your fantasy. You clearly don't follow the space forums and sites very well.

 

On 22/01/2025 at 07:33, snowy owl said:

Even if the launches are interrupted for the duration of the investigation, there's nothing to stop them being ready for the next launch 🤷🏻‍♂️!

Just to finish painting the clear picture, FAA also ordering an investigation of the New Glenn  flight because of the landing failure.

NG-1 (New Glenn) concerns me much more as it appears not to have the structural margins to survive reentry. Starship's problem appears to be much simpler.

On 22/01/2025 at 11:02, snowy owl said:

Of course not, launches must continue, but only on condition that the cause of the explosion is clearly identified and corrected. In fact, I think I read that the cause has already been identified, now it's just a matter of applying the corrective measures.

The explosion is easy to explain, the flight termination system did its job and disintegrated the Ship.

The why is also easy;

as the on-screen telemetry showed, engines started shutting down until Ship could no longer control its flight path. The FTS automatically triggers under these conditions.

Engine shutdowns usually occur because of trouble in the propellant system, which SpaceX and Musk X posts have clarified. 

 

On 22/01/2025 at 11:02, snowy owl said:

I may not like Elon Musk, but I'm not against the SpaceX program.

Then why don't you just keep your snark out of it? Your posts ooze it.

So I must be an Elon Musk fan to come to this thread and comment. That's how you see it, sorry to disappoint you because to me SpaceX's various programs are far more important than being in Elon Musk's fan club.

What prompted my first comment was Elon Musk's attitude following the explosion, and I quote: "Success is uncertain, but entertainment is guaranteed!". Such comments show his immaturity, and that for him space adventure is just one big playground, no matter what the consequences of his experiments. That's what's so irritating!

Space adventure is a very serious thing, and I've followed it all my life. When I was a teenager, the Apollo missions were still active. Skylab was orbiting above our heads, then came the space shuttles, and so on. No NASA executive or mission manager would ever have said such stupid things, as Musk did.

It's interesting that you bring facts that are relevant, and I appreciate that, but your last line showing pettiness was unnecessary! @bguy_1986 and I, we had a cordial exchange, and despite our political differences came to a common agreement concerning the SpaceX program, whereas yours is that I don't have to comment because I'm not a fan of Elon Musk... congratulations!

Not long ago, I sent a PM to someone saying how nice it was that this thread hadn't yet been infested. It was nice while it lasted.

On 23/01/2025 at 12:12, Warwagon said:

Not long ago, I sent a PM to someone saying how nice it was that this thread hadn't yet been infested. It was nice while it lasted.

Someone on another thread said you were braindead... I guess he wasn't so wrong!

Learn to read a little, and you'll see that I was mentioning facts, my personal opinion of Musk is very clear, as is the fact that SpaceX programs are a priority in my books!

Such a snowflake!

  • Like 1
On 23/01/2025 at 13:07, snowy owl said:

Someone on another thread said you were braindead... I guess he wasn't so wrong!

Learn to read a little, and you'll see that I was mentioning facts, my personal opinion of Musk is very clear, as is the fact that SpaceX programs are a priority in my books!

Such a snowflake!

Didn't take you long to lose all credibility...  You started out fine with civil conversation and now you've let your true deranged colors show...  Nice job.
Whining about sarcastic X posts not meeting your professional approval is rather humorous.  It doesn't take much these days to upset you guys, does it?  Clearly you've forgotten that previous space programs were littered with blown up rockets and human deaths...  Modern rocketry and the inherent failure investigations are significantly better and less dangerous compared to back then. Try those facts...

  • Like 1
  • Love 1
On 23/01/2025 at 14:56, Astra.Xtreme said:

Clearly you've forgotten that previous space programs were littered with blown up rockets and human deaths...  Modern rocketry and the inherent failure investigations are significantly better and less dangerous compared to back then.

I've forgotten nothing about those terrible accidents, and I agree with you that today's investigations are much more efficient. And there's plenty of space junk still in orbit, posing a constant threat to the various satellites in orbit. And I mentioned very well in a previous post that I was very impressed with what SpaceX had accomplished so far. But for someone to give me a hard time because I said I didn't like Elon Musk is another matter entirely, especially when I say again that SpaceX's various programs are more important to me than the owner.

 

On 23/01/2025 at 14:56, Astra.Xtreme said:

Whining about sarcastic X posts not meeting your professional approval is rather humorous

As I've said before, these launches are serious business in my eyes, so if I didn't find his post on X amusing, that's my perception, that's all!

As you can see for yourself, I'm perfectly capable of replying to you with civility, despite the spikes you've sent me. And what's more, I don't take offense at your political stance.

What interests me here is the progression of these missions!

On 23/01/2025 at 18:12, Warwagon said:

Not long ago, I sent a PM to someone saying how nice it was that this thread hadn't yet been infested. It was nice while it lasted.

Lol yes that was me, I thought I'd just ignore the drama this round... Oh well, here we go:
It's amazingly strange to celebrate every mistake SpaceX makes.

I'm not the biggest fan of Elon Musk these days, but that doesn't really matter. SpaceX is doing amazing work, and the hiccups are part of the process. If you try to make everything perfect for the first launch you have to go at the pace of NASA or at least Blue Origin, ending up with a product that is longer in coming and worse in execution.

Everyone is scrambling to catch up with the Falcon 9, and SpaceX will end up deprecating that rocket before anyone is even ready to compete.
Fan of the hardware rich development methodology or not, you must admit that it is currently the strategy that is winning, and it's not even close.

As for tax payer money, SpaceX is probably the best place to put space money. Who would you choose that could do the missions cheaper? SLS? BO?

 

With regard to Elon Musk, I'm willing to cut him a lot of slack for dragging society into the future, that was otherwise canceled after the Apollo program ended. He can eat a baby every once in a while if that is needed to keep the process going, and he can pretend to be a pro gamer if that makes him happy.
 

@+Warwagon sorry for never answering your message 😅, but lets hope for this drama to blow over again soon, so we can get back to just enjoying the amazing progress in space travel.

Rambling over... for now.

On 24/01/2025 at 03:47, SALSN said:

@+Warwagon sorry for never answering your message 😅, but lets hope for this drama to blow over again soon, so we can get back to just enjoying the amazing progress in space travel.

Rambling over... for now.

Oh, then I guess I sent it to more than one person 🤣

  • 3 weeks later...

Falcon 9 won't be going anywhere, even if Starship succeeds. They just built a brand new Crew Dragon, increasing the fleet to 5. Given the number of times they can be refurbished that's enough for over 70 crew missions and Crew 10 is coming up. ALSO, they are planning on almost 190 Falcon 9 flights next year. 

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

The self-destruct didn't activate again.  That's one of the things FAA griped about.

According to Elon Musk, he's supposed to fire all the SpaceX people. 

On 07/03/2025 at 08:16, Som said:

This is what happens when, instead of hiring the best people, you hire the people who will say yes to you.

If it were NASA doing this, they'd be losing their minds and throwing all kinds of accusations of incompetence at them, but because it's Musk, it's fine.  Bunch of anti-science hypocrites IMO.

On 07/03/2025 at 14:10, FloatingFatMan said:

Kinda funny that the usual voices are silent, eh? :p 

Honestly, I can understand why and likely shouldn't even engage myself. Nothing anyone says at this point will change anyone's mind here.

It's pretty sad that it is ok to celebrate the failure of and throw shade at a large group of talented and dedicated people trying to make a huge technological leap because you don't like or agree with the person at the top. I am not a fan of Jeff Bezos but was certainly cheering on Blue Origin during their New Glenn launch. I don't really have an opinion on Richard Branson but was very sad to see Virgin Orbit not make it. I don't really think SLS is on the right track anymore but still absolutely applaud the achievements it has accomplished to date and watched Artimis I launch with absolute glee. I don't even know (or care) who is running Firefly but getting up a 2am to watch Blue Ghost land on the moon and cheering them on the whole time was great. Peter Beck, on the other hand, is just awesome as is Rocket Lab. 😀

I, like most of my coworkers, watched and cheered as Ship 34 did cartwheels with some amazing back-lighting. Would we have much preferred that not have happened? Of course! Does it really suck that similar failures happened twice in a row? You bet. Is this a massive setback the spells the doom and incompetence of SpaceX? No, not really. The iterative approach we are trying with Starship will have many failures, we learn from them and move forward while ensuring that everyone stays safe.

My personal speculation right now is around hot staging. Ship 34 and its engines went through a pretty robust ATP at Massy's and had no issues. it is great that we now have the capability to run the full duration burns on the ground like we do for Falcon at McGregor so get a lot of runtime on the engines in their flight configuration. Only a few keys things can't be tested easily on the ground though. The two big ones are operating in a vacuum and hot staging. Perhaps the overpressure of hot staging is causing a leak to form that in an area that Ship v2 or Raptor v3 design introduced a regression to? Clarifying once again that this is just my speculation based solely on the publicly available video (which is honestly not much different than the internal video since someone in the control room had it full frame on their console monitor in view of the webcast 😆). I am just an IT guy and not a rocket scientist.

Also, the booster catch was awesome and the improvements we made to the tower after the failed catch on flight 6 (which I was directly involved with) worked well which is really exciting to see.

 

Sorry for the wall of text. I share a lot of the same misgivings and frustration with the current political situation, but I felt the need to hop on this thread to reiterate what should already be obvious: the Starship program is very unlike many previous rocket development programs. If taking cheap shots at it to "stick it to the man" who's name is all over it, then ok, I guess.

  • Love 3
On 08/03/2025 at 01:29, rdlenk said:

Sorry for the wall of text. I share a lot of the same misgivings and frustration with the current political situation, but I felt the need to hop on this thread to reiterate what should already be obvious: the Starship program is very unlike many previous rocket development programs. If taking cheap shots at it to "stick it to the man" who's name is all over it, then ok, I guess.

As much as I dislike Musk, he's not the whole reason for my viewpoint on SpaceX, it's the methodology they use for their ship development.  It used to be they were careful in their development, but lately it seems they're just sloppy and are only iterating changes through failure instead of careful design and simulation, and the really dumb way the SpaceX fans burst into applause even when here's a catastrophic failure.  It's just stupid, and it's not safe.

There's also the problem of Musk's constant ridiculous over-exaggeration and outright lies of SpaceX's capabilities and that people just lap it up without even trying to engage their brains for even a tiny bit of critical thinking. Starship's very design makes the claims about it completely impossible  It will NEVER be able to haul the loads Musk claims it can, it will never hold the amount of passengers Musk claims it can, it will never be a viable transit vehicle to Mars, and we will not be building an outpost on Mars within the next couple of decades (which I note, Musk said we'd have one 5 years ago...)

Perhaps we should focus on having more than 1 flimsy station in low Earth orbit first, then maybe a base on the moon; those targets are difficult enough as it is, before we try something that will merely waste money and probably, lives.

 

I have to say since the new administration has taken over in the USA, my view of Musk has turned upside down, what happened to him?

For now I'm still rooting for SpaceX, their approach has worked so far, two failures in a row is disappointing, but not necessarily a problem. They have a (very) hardware rich development approach, and they have never claimed otherwise.

Regarding Musk, I hope they can somehow get rid of him, he has clearly lost his mind, I hope SpaceX has the momentum to carry on!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Hello, Hope all is well. I am in UK.  
    • I'm not happy with myself for it, but I've gone and got hold of it. Just another 45 minutes and I'll be Bond, James Bond. In my defence, IO's Hitman series is awesome, and I'm a sucker for 007. So while it might seem a bit simplified compared to Hitman, I'm sure I'll be right at home.
    • Or just check the script yourself ^^. I hate having a Microsoft account tied to my windows install.
    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      75
    4. 4
      Skyfrog
      74
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!