Rooting of a Android Phone


Recommended Posts

Thanks Brendon.

 

Was a long shot. Sold a mobile on eBay, 2 month old and has never been rooted, Buyer has come back saying it's not as described wanting a refund claiming the device has been rooted.

1 hour ago, johnporter29 said:

Thanks Brendon.

 

Was a long shot. Sold a mobile on eBay, 2 month old and has never been rooted, Buyer has come back saying it's not as described wanting a refund claiming the device has been rooted.

nah he's trying to scam you; even if it WAS rooted when he got it he could do a factory reset and the root would be gone.

 

what person DOESN'T perform a factory reset of a bought USED device anyway :blink: never know what could be left over from the previous owner, even if claimed wiped.

  • Like 1

Yes I am aware of this, but he's played a blinder and won I'm afraid.

 

I factory reset the phone before placing it sale as I always do. He's made a claim through PayPal claiming the phone isn't as described due to it been rooted. I replied denying it and asked for proof. He sent a picture which to me just looked like a disclaimer saying the app developer is not liable if you run this on a rooted device. I asked him to run a app to check the phone has been rooted and send over another screenshot of the output from the app. 

 

He's sent over a picture, not of what I have asked for but another app saying it's not safe to run on a rooted device, he's now escalated the claim to PayPal, and they have decided that he's in the right and is fully entitled to a refund.

 

I believe he's bought the phone in error or changed his mind, and has rooted it and then claimed the item is not as described ... and the worst part is I cannot prove that it wasn't rooted before sale.

 

Anyway, I am now awaiting for the phone to arrive back.

 

Thanks for your help Brandon, much appreciated.

 

 

26 minutes ago, johnporter29 said:

Yes I am aware of this, but he's played a blinder and won I'm afraid.

 

I factory reset the phone before placing it sale as I always do. He's made a claim through PayPal claiming the phone isn't as described due to it been rooted. I replied denying it and asked for proof. He sent a picture which to me just looked like a disclaimer saying the app developer is not liable if you run this on a rooted device. I asked him to run a app to check the phone has been rooted and send over another screenshot of the output from the app. 

 

He's sent over a picture, not of what I have asked for but another app saying it's not safe to run on a rooted device, he's now escalated the claim to PayPal, and they have decided that he's in the right and is fully entitled to a refund.

 

I believe he's bought the phone in error or changed his mind, and has rooted it and then claimed the item is not as described ... and the worst part is I cannot prove that it wasn't rooted before sale.

 

Anyway, I am now awaiting for the phone to arrive back.

 

Thanks for your help Brandon, much appreciated.

 

 

at least the device is getting returned to you so you're not just out that money :)

 

tis the risk you take with ebay and the like anymore unfortunately; most people are pretty good but you do occasionally run into that unhonest person

5 minutes ago, Brandon H said:

at least the device is getting returned to you so you're not just out that money :)

 

tis the risk you take with ebay and the like anymore unfortunately; most people are pretty good but you do occasionally run into that unhonest person

I was going to say the same thing, hopefully things like the eBay fees are returned to you and the item itself. It's a shame, because eBay and PayPal will usually back the buyer in these circumstances. My wife has been getting rid of a few things and she's come across people like this and it ruins the great experience she's had up until now.

1 hour ago, dipsylalapo said:

I was going to say the same thing, hopefully things like the eBay fees are returned to you and the item itself. It's a shame, because eBay and PayPal will usually back the buyer in these circumstances. My wife has been getting rid of a few things and she's come across people like this and it ruins the great experience she's had up until now.

They have backed the buyer in this instance. :( But as Brandon has said, at least I'm getting the phone back.

 

And yes your right, it does ruin the experience, have 100% feedback and have sold a number of mobiles without any hitch in past.

 

Anyay guys, I got the answer I was looking and would like to thank you for all your help and comments, think this has run it's course now,

Hello,

If and when the phone comes back, be sure to do a full wipe and re-flash of the firmware using the manufacturer's diagnostic tools, just in case it is returned with unwanted software on it.

 

Regards,

 

Aryeh Goretsky

 

  • Like 1

Right, well things are getting a little interesting now. I have the phone back in my possession. Cosmetically the phone is as I sold it, in good condition, however it would appear that the buyer has indeed installed a custom rom the phone.

 

I purchased the phone sim free from a well known UK high street retailer, and that's how the phone was sold and obviously it wasn't rooted. Now when I switched the phone on, I noticed that the apps that are pre-installed on a phone purchased from Virgin Mobile was present on the phone, no problems I thought, I'll do a factory reset and these should be removed. Wrong! They are still present even after a factory reset and there is no option to remove them either. 

 

I've now gone back to PayPal and advised them that the item returned is significantly different to one I sold. I have been told that they'll review the case and if they need more evidence they will contact me for it.

 

Now, I'm getting emails through eBay from the buyer asking me to process the refund now he's returned the item, his second email is hinting at negative feedback if I don't process the refund shortly.

 

Now if I could ask for some advise, this is the first dispute I've had to encounter so I am a little unsure.

 

I don't want to get into an unnecessary war of words with the buyer, do I respond to the buyer and inform that PayPal are again reviewing the case or do I ignore the buyer and await the outcome of PayPal's review?

 

I don't expect to win and all this maybe futile, but I feel that I ought to try and do something rather than just rolling over and giving in, if buyer has done this to me, they could have done it to others too and may be will do again in the future.

 

On 11/29/2018 at 7:39 AM, Brandon H said:

nah he's trying to scam you; even if it WAS rooted when he got it he could do a factory reset and the root would be gone.

 

what person DOESN'T perform a factory reset of a bought USED device anyway :blink: never know what could be left over from the previous owner, even if claimed wiped.

Unless things have changed since I was in the game, rooting doesn’t go away with a factory reset. 

7 hours ago, johnporter29 said:

Right, well things are getting a little interesting now. I have the phone back in my possession. Cosmetically the phone is as I sold it, in good condition, however it would appear that the buyer has indeed installed a custom rom the phone.

 

I purchased the phone sim free from a well known UK high street retailer, and that's how the phone was sold and obviously it wasn't rooted. Now when I switched the phone on, I noticed that the apps that are pre-installed on a phone purchased from Virgin Mobile was present on the phone, no problems I thought, I'll do a factory reset and these should be removed. Wrong! They are still present even after a factory reset and there is no option to remove them either. 

 

I've now gone back to PayPal and advised them that the item returned is significantly different to one I sold. I have been told that they'll review the case and if they need more evidence they will contact me for it.

 

Now, I'm getting emails through eBay from the buyer asking me to process the refund now he's returned the item, his second email is hinting at negative feedback if I don't process the refund shortly.

 

Now if I could ask for some advise, this is the first dispute I've had to encounter so I am a little unsure.

 

I don't want to get into an unnecessary war of words with the buyer, do I respond to the buyer and inform that PayPal are again reviewing the case or do I ignore the buyer and await the outcome of PayPal's review?

 

I don't expect to win and all this maybe futile, but I feel that I ought to try and do something rather than just rolling over and giving in, if buyer has done this to me, they could have done it to others too and may be will do again in the future.

 

Did you take screenshots on the about phone screen showing the android and kernel version prior to selling it?

Just to bring this thread to closure, PayPal has decided to rule in favor of the buyer despite me telling them that the device I received back was either a different phone or the original phone that had been tampered with and that I had more evidence to submit to the case. After been told that I would be given the opportunity to submit this evidence, it appears PayPal has decided it was irrelevant anyway.

 

It is my believe that the buyer knew exactly how to play the system and has done this before. I know it pointless but feeling very frustrated with PayPal right now.

 

All I have for me efforts to make a stand against this behavior is negative feedback on eBay from a scammer!.

I deeply suspect the phone I got back isn't the one I sold to the buyer or if it is, he's tampered with it.

 

The one I sold was sim free and didn't have pre-loaded apps from the network carrier, the phone that the buyer has sent me has pre-loaded apps from Virgin Mobile installed.  I can't re-sell this to anyone and I don't feel safe in using it or passing it down to another family member because I have no idea what else has been done to it.

 

For the first time I didn't make note of the phone's IMEI number before dispatch and I've been caught out, but looking at how the buyer has played this, don't think it would have mattered anyway.

 

Think a hammer will be getting some action later today ....

 

Thanks to everyone who replied and your help.

 

  • Sad 1
  • 2 months later...

A long shot but it might be worth seeing if the shop where you bought it has a record of the IEMI.

Then just report the phone stolen.

Have you disclosed to the buyer you don't have the IEMI?

You could always try an "letter before action" letter, suggesting you'll be taking the seller to a small claims court as the IEMI of the phone is different.

 

It might be a case that the buyer bought a phone that was locked to Virgin, but wanted a sim free version.

 

Always take a note of the IEMI number before sending.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google reshuffles its AI coding team as it struggles to catch Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is already reorganizing the AI coding “strike team” it created roughly two months ago, as it attempts to find ways to close the gap with Anthropic in one of generative AI’s most commercially important areas. According to The Information, Google DeepMind is expanding the team’s focus to include “midtraining,” rather than concentrating only on coding tools and agents. Midtraining takes place after a model’s broad initial training but before the final stages that prepare it to follow instructions and perform specific tasks. In simple terms, it gives developers another opportunity to expose a model to carefully selected data before it is polished for release. That could help Google improve Gemini’s underlying coding abilities instead of relying only on better prompts, interfaces, or post-training. Previous research has found that midtraining can be particularly effective for code and mathematics, where models must move from general language knowledge to more structured tasks. Google reportedly created the original strike team in April. It was led by Google DeepMind research engineer Sebastian Borgeaud, who previously worked on model pretraining, and focused on complex, long-running programming jobs. Google co-founder Sergey Brin and Google DeepMind chief technology officer Koray Kavukcuoglu were also reportedly involved in the effort. DeepMind researchers were said to believe that Anthropic’s coding tools were outperforming Google’s Gemini models, prompting the company to give the project more attention. Anthropic has made coding a central part of its AI strategy through Claude Code and its Claude model family. The company has continued improving that area, with Claude Opus 4.8 offering upgrades for coding and other agentic tasks, along with the now-unavailable Mythos and Fable models. The reshuffle also comes at a time when Google faces increased competition for AI researchers. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer recently announced that he was leaving Google for OpenAI, while two other researchers who contributed to Gemini and DeepMind projects are reportedly preparing to join Anthropic. It remains unclear whether the reorganized team will produce a new public Gemini model or developer product. No release date, team size, or specific performance target has been disclosed. Source: The Information
    • Just remember - Microsoft is a trillion dollar company. They didn't have to raise the price this high. They chose to.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      413
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      168
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      132
    4. 4
      Xenon
      73
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!