The WWI Conspiracy

[nagokod]

 

 

 

[nagokod]

Part One: To Start A War

What was World War One about? How did it start? Who won? And what did they win? Now, 100 years after those final shots rang out, these questions still puzzle historians and laymen alike. But as we shall see, this confusion is not a happenstance of history, but the wool that has been pulled over our eyes to stop us from seeing what WWI really was. This is the story of WWI that you didn't read in the history books. This is The WWI Conspiracy.

 

Part Two: The American Front

Difficult as it had been for the Round Table to maneuver the British Empire into the war with Germany, it would be that much harder for their American fellow travelers to coax the United States out of its neutrality and into World War One. The cabal was going to have to leverage its control of the press and key governmental positions to begin to shape public perception and instill pro-war sentiment. And once again, the full resources of these motivated co-conspirators were brought to bear on the task.

 

Part Three: A New World Order

In the first two parts of this series we have seen how the WWI conspiracy came to be. But more important by far is the question of why it happened. For what purpose was such carnage released upon the world? What did the First World War mean?

[nagokod]

Quote

Richard Grove of TragedyAndHope.com joins The Corbett Report to discuss his research into the Rothschild dynasty and how it intersects with the story of WWI.

 

 

[nagokod]

Quote

Gerry Docherty, co-author of Hidden History: The Secret Origins of the First World War, joins us for an in-depth discussion about the real origins of WWI. In this wide-ranging discussion, Docherty reveals the machinations of the Secret Elite that ensnared Europe, and, ultimately, the world, in war. We also talk about the teaching of history and who controls the historical narrative on key global events.

 

 

[+Nik Louch Subscriber²]

More utter ######! Sorry but WW1 has been documented to death and the supposed questions these articles seek to answer aren’t even real questions.

[nagokod]

Quote

Who gets to write the history textbooks? Where do the history teachers learn about history? What documents are allowed into the historical record, and what documents are excluded? These are not merely academic questions, they go right to the heart of the question of history itself. Join James Corbett for today's edition of The Corbett Report and an in-depth exploration of the formation of the historical record about World War One.

[Jim K Global Moderator]

What rubbish.  You can't really expect people to watch 2.5 hours of videos (not including the 1.25 hour "History is written by winners") without providing some cliff notes version in text...to start a discussion.  How do you start a discussion without starting a discussion?  Video descriptions do not count.  

 

What is the conspiracy?  You have historical records from all sides of WW1, not just the "winners" ... but from all sides.  There is no conspiracy unless Aliens fired the first shots or maybe it was the Illuminati.

 

Corbett Report 🤣

[nagokod]

10 minutes ago, Jim K said:

What rubbish.  You can't really expect people to watch 2.5 hours of videos (not including the 1 hour "History is written by winners") without providing some cliff notes version in text...to start a discussion.  How do you start a discussion without starting a discussion?  Video descriptions do not count.  

 

What is the conspiracy?  You have historical records from all sides of WW1, not just the "winners" ... but from all sides.  There is no conspiracy unless Aliens fired the first shots or maybe it was the Illuminati.

 

Corbett Report 🤣

Well, hear the part where Norman Dodd is speaking: https://youtu.be/yOrJiYcqwsQ?t=974

 

And read a bit of this

 

And here's more if you get exited :)

Fake History 1: Controlling Our Future By Controlling Our Past

Fake History 2 : The Rise Of The Money Power Control

Fake History 3: From Burning Correspondence To Permanently Removing The Evidence (this was recommended)

Fake History 4: Concealment Of British War-time Documents

Fake History 5: The Peer Review Process

Fake History 6 : The Failure Of Primary Source Evidence

[adrynalyne]

This is the stupidest thing I have ever heard of.

[Jim K Global Moderator]

19 minutes ago, nagokod said:

Well, hear the part where Norman Dodd is speaking: https://youtu.be/yOrJiYcqwsQ?t=974

 

And read a bit of this

 

And here's more if you get exited

Fake History 1: Controlling Our Future By Controlling Our Past

Fake History 2 : The Rise Of The Money Power Control

Fake History 3: From Burning Correspondence To Permanently Removing The Evidence (this was recommended)

Fake History 4: Concealment Of British War-time Documents

Fake History 5: The Peer Review Process

Fake History 6 : The Failure Of Primary Source Evidence

No, what is the conspiracy?  Can you type it out ... can you start the discussion?  What is your viewpoint of this "WW1 Conspiracy" ?  Do you agree with it .. what parts do you buy into?  I mean ... what is your opinion and/or stance on whatever this conspiracy is?  I see Britain in one of those links ... was it that they incurred large sums of debt and suffered economical from the war (because that isn't a conspiracy).

[nagokod]

11 hours ago, Jim K said:

No, what is the conspiracy?  Can you type it out ... can you start the discussion?  What is your viewpoint of this "WW1 Conspiracy" ?  Do you agree with it .. what parts do you buy into?  I mean ... what is your opinion and/or stance on whatever this conspiracy is?  I see Britain in one of those links ... was it that they incurred large sums of debt and suffered economical from the war (because that isn't a conspiracy).

 

The conspiracy is to build global dictatorship - a world government:

Quote

Control of the economy. Control of populations. Control of territory. Control of information. World War One was a boon for all of those who wanted to consolidate control of the many in the hands of the few. This was the vision that united all those participants in the conspiracies that led to the war itself. Beyond Cecil Rhodes and his secret society, there was a broader vision of global control for the would-be rulers of society who were seeking what tyrants had lusted after since the dawn of civilization: control of the world.

Quote

Over two decades after Cecil Rhodes launched the secret society that would engineer this so-called “Great War,” the likes of Alfred Milner and Walter Rothschild were still at it, conspiring to use the war they had brought about to further their own geopolitical agenda. But by the time of the Armistice in November 1918, that group of conspirators had greatly expanded, and the scale of their agenda had grown along with it. This was no small circle of friends who had embroiled the world in the first truly global war, but a loosely knit network of overlapping interests separated by oceans and united in a shared vision for a new world order.

 

Cecil Rhodes said it himself (source)

Quote

"I contend that we are the finest race in the world, and that the more of the world we inhabit the better it is for the human race. Just fancy those parts that are at present inhabited by the most despicable specimen of human being, what an alteration there would be in them if they were brought under Anglo-Saxon influence... Look again at the extra employment a new country added to our dominions gives. I contend that every acre added to our territory means in the future birth to some more of the English race who otherwise would not be brought into existence... Why should we not form a secret society with but one object; the furtherance of the British Empire and the bringing of the whole uncivilised world under British rule, for the recovery of the United States, for making the Anglo-Saxon race but one Empire?"

 

We've been warned: (source)

Quote

This is the deep state that outgoing President Eisenhower warned of when he spoke of the "acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military industrial complex" in 1961, and which John Kennedy fought against when he fired CIA director John Foster Dulles and threatened to "splinter into a thousand pieces and scatter to the winds". It is what Ronald Reagan contended with when he attempted to break the world out of the Cold War by working with Russia and other nations on Beam defense in 1983. It is this structure that owned Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller's entire career, from his 1980s railroading of Lyndon LaRouche into prison, to his cover up of the Anglo-Saudi role in 9/11 as CIA Director, to his efforts to impeach President Donald Trump today.

 

[Jim K Global Moderator]

ok...LOL.  A global dictatorship ... as if that happened.  Conspiracy debunked (that was easy)!

[+Nik Louch Subscriber²]

Please, don't let the door hit you on the way out.

 

You post all this as if it's something new, as if you are introducing us to something we didn't all read about as teens.  And then dismiss as about 5% truth and 95% hokum.  You keep bringing this to the forum like you have discovered something that people here aren't already aware of.  Get a grip - it may be new to you, but the thoughts and ideas are not new to most, we've simply looked, understood and debunked.

 

It amuses me how conspiracy theorists are so eager to call other people "sheep" and yet so happy to blindly flock to any source they find online by someone with dubious credentials.

 

You're making yourself not only look daft, but also easily lead without a mind of your own.

Edited January 15, 2019 by Human.Online

[mijaxo]

On 1/14/2019 at 1:33 PM, Jim K said:

ok...LOL.  A global dictatorship ... as if that happened.  Conspiracy debunked (that was easy)!

"We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest." --James Warburg, while speaking before the United States Senate, February 17, 1950 (source)

 

[Jim K Global Moderator]

19 minutes ago, mijaxo said:

"We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest." --James Warburg, while speaking before the United States Senate, February 17, 1950 (source)

 

And.... what became of that (or how does it relate to the current topic considering 1950 was well after this rubbish WW1 "conspiracy")?