I am considering an Android One phone


Recommended Posts

I have been reading about the Android One phones and they seem to be better (and cheaper) then the Pixel line of phones. My only question is which one do I get? I am going to set a budget of $200, and on Amazon there are quite a few that fit into that guideline. My real question is what brand(s) are more trusted (or better overall), I see Huawei, Motorola, Xiamoi, and Nokia, which would be the better one to look into buying?

 

As I stated before, I went ahead and bought the Motorola X4, so I am going to close this topic now.

24 minutes ago, jnelsoninjax said:

Please explain your answer, I am really curious what you mean.

It depends on what you're looking for? Sure, Android One is great for staying consistent with updates, but you're truly getting what you pay for. The pixel blows away any of the One Phones you mentioned in hardware specs... 845, amazing camera, good hardware (although it is marked up a bit).

 

Nokia is probably the best bet for an Android One phone, you get decent hardware at a good price and their support is solid. I've learnt from experience that specs matter with Android much more than they do with Apple. If you want to use the phone for multitasking/power user don't skimp out on the RAM and processor, unless you want to wait for the apps to load up in memory again and bog down the proc if you are running more than a few. Snapdragon 630 is the lowest I'd go.  Xiamoi is probably the only other Android One I'd consider. Motorola hardware is lousy. Don't know much about Huawei, but I would avoid just from privacy concerns alone.

Edited by shockz
  • Like 2

to expand on what shockz said. In my experience on current android versions it's good to aim for a phone with at least 3GB of ram; weird lag tends to start happening in Android when you get lower than 300mb of free ram I've noticed in a lot of devices (phones and HTPC boxes).

 

As for brands I agree Nokia will give you the best bang for your buck. My 2nd choice would be Huawei/Honor though it's getting harder to find models with the US LTE frequencies now thanks to the US trying to ban them ...

Xiamoi I don't know much about.

Motorola I also agree they don't have the best hardware; I'd rate their hardware quality a step below LGs (which in fairness LG has been improving but Motorola doesn't seem to be)

If you are looking at Nokia my only advise would be that Android One on Nokia doesn't equal no bloatware and the hardware quality is debatable.

Research the faults of a model prior on the official Nokia forums or Reddit.

 

HMD outsources software development to FIH / Foxconn. They handle bug fixes, write the services, bootloaders and internal hardware layouts for some models - the exact same resources are also shared with other brands such as Sharp.

They also create the Asian non Android One roms for HK/China/etc.

 

Part of what FIH does is write the evenwell services for the roms which act as non native Power Saver, Telemetry services, Camera software (at least the initial revisions).

These services are also included in the World Wide Android One releases. 

A lot of people have been complaining since the first gen HMD Android phones about performance issues, telemetry being sent to China, apps not recovering from sleep because of these services.

These can be uninstalled via adb.

 

Also watch out for known hardware issues such as failing USB-C ports because of design issues by HMD. These fail gradually after time for quite a few users spanning across a couple model lines.

I can recommend the Xiaomi Mi A2. Myself and my brother got my Mum a Mi A2 for Christmas, she has been very impressed with the phone having used it for a few months now.

  • The 5.99 inch screen has been great for her, she can see it perfectly. The much smaller screen on her old Moto G was becoming increasingly hard for her to see.
  • With 4gb of ram and a Snapdragon 660 the phone is very snappy, everything loads pretty much instantly. Apps have no problem staying in memory when multitasking.
  • Both cameras use a Sony sensor and take some great quality photos, these look great printed out and are fine for social media.
  • The Mi A2 had the Android Pi update by Christmas day.
  • The phone has no notch, which to me is a nice bonus.
  • On average she can go three days without charging the phone, even with heavy use i suspect it would last a day no problems.

With a phone like the Mi A2 you are getting a good all round phone, sure it's not the best of the best, however it will do what most people what to on a phone really well, without breaking the bank. For myself personally the only thing it's lacking is NFC, so you wouldn't be able to make contactless payments.

 

For some context the 64gb 6” Pixel 2 XL is £799 here in the UK, in comparison the 64gb 5.9" Mi A2 is £200. So you could buy the Mi A2 four times before you get to the cost of one Pixel 2 XL. The general every day apps most of us use would work great on either device, the right corners are cut to end up with a nice all around device.

 

I'd recommend you have a read of the Android Central Xiaomi Mi A2 review.

  • Like 2
1 minute ago, jnelsoninjax said:

OK, I just had a look at the Xiaomi listing on Amazon, but they all appear to be international versions, I am not sure how this translates to for US use, anyone have any input?

You just need to verify the bands on the phone, IE whichever carrier you use youll want to make sure the phone supports those bands.

5 minutes ago, jnelsoninjax said:

OK, I just had a look at the Xiaomi listing on Amazon, but they all appear to be international versions, I am not sure how this translates to for US use, anyone have any input?

yeah that's the problem with Xiaomi and Huawei; neither has much of a presence in the US right now

It looks like it will work but it doesn't have ALL the US LTE bands so you could have occasional dropout depending on which band is active on the towers near you.

 

here's a comparison for you using AT&T:
AT&T bands – https://forums.att.com/t5/Phone-Device-Upgrades/What-are-AT-amp-T-s-4G-LTE-bands-in-2018/td-p/5359265

Mi A2 bands – https://www.frequencycheck.com/models/OMKZD/xiaomi-mi-a2-dual-sim-global-td-lte-64gb-m1804d2sg-xiaomi-wayne

8 minutes ago, Brandon H said:

yeah that's the problem with Xiaomi and Huawei; neither has much of a presence in the US right now

It looks like it will work but it doesn't have ALL the US LTE bands so you could have occasional dropout depending on which band is active on the towers near you.

 

here's a comparison for you using AT&T:
AT&T bands – https://forums.att.com/t5/Phone-Device-Upgrades/What-are-AT-amp-T-s-4G-LTE-bands-in-2018/td-p/5359265

Mi A2 bands – https://www.frequencycheck.com/models/OMKZD/xiaomi-mi-a2-dual-sim-global-td-lte-64gb-m1804d2sg-xiaomi-wayne

So I might not be understanding this completely, but it appears that Xiamoi only supports about 50% of the US bands (info) is that what I am understanding?

8 minutes ago, jnelsoninjax said:

So I might not be understanding this completely, but it appears that Xiamoi only supports about 50% of the US bands (info) is that what I am understanding?

yep; that's the problem with most 'International' variants of phones; they're more meant for the eastern part of the world since countries are smaller & easier to travel between.

 

they'll 'work' in the US but will often drop down to 3G or lower if the towers you're near don't happen to be broadcasting one of the supported frequencies

5 minutes ago, Brandon H said:

yep; that's the problem with most 'International' variants of phones; they're more meant for the eastern part of the world since countries are smaller & easier to travel between.

 

they'll 'work' in the US but will often drop down to 3G or lower if the towers you're near don't happen to be broadcasting one of the supported frequencies

So would I be better off buying a Motorola or Nokia?

  • Like 2

Hello,

 

I am using a Motorola moto x⁴ (4GB RAM, 64GB storage) with Android One and Google Fi and a 200GB Micro SDXC card to hold my music collection.  I'm using it on another carrier, but the model I purchased is for the US market, so it supports all the US LTE bands.  Here are the specs for the device: https://www.gsmarena.com/motorola_moto_x4-8634.php.  It seems to run all the apps I need without any issues or lag.  Here are some pictures I took inside and outside with the camera, to give you an idea of how well it works.

 

This phone replaces my Microsoft Lumia 900, which worked fine--and still works, it just received an OS update yesterday--but with the inevitable cessation of that platform I wanted to get a new device.  


Regards,

 

Aryeh Goretsky

 

 

I've recently got my hands on Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 after using my LG G6. The phone itself is very solid. Built on glass and a front facing camera slidiing mechanism. However there is downside is no headphone jack nor expandable storage. But 128GB version should be enough of a storage. It has wireless charging and face unlocking as well (only available if you switch the region to Taiwan or HongKong to be able to use face unlock). And running Android 9 as of now and security updates are separate from main update. As for the bands:

Screenshot_2019-03-20-14-46-56-928_com.yandex.browser.png

I ended up buying the moto x4. But now my question is can I update it to the newest android without having to download and install the security updates first? I have been updating for about 3 hours now and am only up to the September security patch

13 hours ago, jnelsoninjax said:

I ended up buying the moto x4. But now my question is can I update it to the newest android without having to download and install the security updates first? I have been updating for about 3 hours now and am only up to the September security patch

Here is the thing that most people miss about android one. You get two major android updates and then a year of minor updates after that. Since X4 launched with 7.0, version 9.0 is the last one it gets.

 

If you want to have long time support, you should try to get a phone with the latest android.

 

I, personally, am using a nokia 6.1 and the only relative downsides are the aggressive battery and memory management, although it's not really that big of a thing. Everything else about the phone is good. It shipped with andoird 8.0 and is projected to get 10.0 (Q).

Edited by eddman
  • 2 weeks later...
  • jnelsoninjax locked, unlocked and locked this topic
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!