Recommended Posts

I am unable to ping just this one device on the local network.

Ping returns "Destination host unreachable", but it also says : sent 4 received 4, 0% loss.

I understand this to mean the device is receiving the packets, but is not acknowledging this?

 

All other devices work fine.

 

I f I use the FING app on my phone, I can ping the device successfully.

 

The device is a biometric fingerprint time clock. The time and attendance software returns "Unable to connect device" error.

I tried it on another LAN and it works fine.

 

The LAN is a very simple one, set up in a small office, and consists of ISP fibre router/modem, one PC, two wireless printers, and the time clock, which is hard wired to the router LAN port.

 

Believe me, I have been trawling the Internet for days, with no luck. I would deeply appreciate any help.

 

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1381086-unable-to-ping-single-device-on-lan/
Share on other sites

  On 23/03/2019 at 02:27, Ice_Blue said:

I understand this to mean the device is receiving the packets, but is not acknowledging this?

Expand  

Where did you get that from?

 

First thing you need to validate is that the mac is correct.

 

So when you ping the IP.. lets say its 192.168.9.10 for example since going to use that as example.

 

So try and ping it.. After it fails, or you can stop the ping look in your arp table.. arp -a, do you see it listed?

 

Interface: 192.168.9.100 --- 0x1f
  Internet Address      Physical Address      Type
  192.168.9.9           00-1f-29-54-17-15     dynamic
  192.168.9.10          00-11-32-7b-29-7d     dynamic
  192.168.9.11          00-11-32-7b-29-7e     dynamic

So you see for me 9.10 is 00-11-32-7b-29-7d, validate that is actually the mac of the device!!! By looking on the device, etc..  If you say your fing can ping it - what does your fing report as the mac for the IP your pinging?

 

Now ping something that doesn't actually even exist..

 

$ ping 192.168.9.52

Pinging 192.168.9.52 with 32 bytes of data:
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.

Ping statistics for 192.168.9.52:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss),

So your saying that since sent, the device got the pings but didn't answer?  How could that be - there is NO device with that IP on the network!!

 

if you look in the arp table you will not see any mac, or you will see an invalid entry, etc. etc.

 

So is where your pinging from both wired, or wired and wireless, or wireless and wireless?

 

  On 24/03/2019 at 14:28, BudMan said:

Where did you get that from? 

Expand  

That the ping results say 0% loss.

 

arp -a from the PC connected to the same router does not show the device.

  On 24/03/2019 at 14:28, BudMan said:

So your saying that since sent, the device got the pings but didn't answer?  How could that be - there is NO device with that IP on the network!! 

Expand  

But there is.

Device is set to DHCP, and acquired an IP address immediately.
Like I said, I can successfully ping the device from my phone.

Also, like I said, the device is connected directly to an Ethernet port on the router.

 

Thanks for your response.

So lets see the arp table of your device then right after you ping it.

 

Also lets make sure your device has the correct mask, your device got its IP from dhcp as well?  Your pinger device is also wired?

1) set static IP on clock device

2) or Wireshark it, get correct IP>login>set static IP

3) profit

are you sure your computer and your time clocks are on the same "lan" or have a route to communicate to each other.  If it were one of my networks, they would not be on the same network as a computer network and they would not communicate to any of the office networks.    Your phone may exist on the same outside network as the time clock and also not be accessible either via a computer on the office network.

 

these devices are considered unsecure as IT has no way to secure them.

 

 

have you spoken to your network admins? It's not uncommon practice to disable pinging on a business network

 

edit: you don't need to open up any ports on the router the time clock is on do you?

  On 25/03/2019 at 16:08, Brandon H said:

have you spoken to your network admins? It's not uncommon practice to disable pinging on a business network

 

edit: you don't need to open up any ports on the router the time clock is on do you?

Expand  

time clocks generally talk out, outbound communication is rarely blocked.

"arp -a from the PC connected to the same router does not show the device."

 

Then NO Your never going to be able to ping it! period end of story... Unless as mentioned this device is on a different L2?  But your OP sounds like your just connected to soho wireless routers lan ports.

 

But if your saying wireless can ping it, but your wired device can not.. And you can not arp for it.. ie its not in your arp table after you attempt to ping then your boxes are not in the same L2..  Or there is something else wrong like your PC cable, or connection in general - but take it this pc yoru trying to ping from can get elsewhere, internet etc..

 

If your on a different L2 then you would have to be able to route to get to it L3..

 

What is the specific make and model of the "router" your connecting too?  And when you look on this pc.. Its windows?  if you do a ipconfig /all from cmd line it shows you in network what?

IP 192.168.x.x

mask 255.255.255.0

gateway 192.168.x.x

 

And this all matches up with the device your trying to ping as far as numbers and mask?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • True they were Inspiron models and Dell's SupportAssist has a long history of security vulnerabilities. I also had problems with Dell System Detect and the Dell Software Update utility program. It was all way too much trouble. So I just removed all of them and manually did updates from their website but that was also a pain. Overall, the Inspiron's were decent enough until one became unusable for Windows after a malware attack. I Installed Ubuntu on it and used it with Ubuntu for several months before giving it away.
    • You can now turn 2D images into 3D objects with Copilot's new feature by Taras Buria Copilot Labs, a section with various experimental features in Microsoft's AI assistant, received a new feature called Copilot 3D. With this feature, Copilot lets you transform 2D images into usable 3D objects. Microsoft wants to simplify the process of creating 3D models, giving users a useful tool that has no steep learning curves and does not require installing complicated software. With Copilot 3D, users can transform images into 3D models for later use in game development, animations, 3D printing, design, AR or VR content, art projects, and more. Additionally, users can browse a library of various 3D objects and scenes for inspiration, which sounds awfully familiar to the now-deceased Paint 3D and its content marketplace. Copilot 3D is a one-click solution. All you need is to upload a picture (PNG or JPG, less than 10MB) and wait for Copilot to do its job. Unfortunately, Copilot cannot generate 3D objects from text prompts, at least for now, as Microsoft says in the announcement article. Copilot 3D is available for free globally to a subset of Copilot users, but you need a Microsoft Account to access it from the browser. Once your object is generated, you can download it in GLB format so that you can later modify it in any compatible 3D viewer, editor, or game engine. Microsoft also adds that all creations are stored for 28 days, and the company does not use the uploaded images for model training or personalization. In case you missed it, Microsoft recently introduced another Copilot Labs feature, which gives the assistant a physical appearance with physical expressions and emotions for a more natural conversation in Voice Mode. Also, Microsoft launched Gaming Copilot in Game Bar so that AI can see what is going on on the screen and give you tips, suggestions, and other useful information.
    • Shou Zi Chew was Xiaomi's CFO for five years and was with them when they were blacklisted by the first Trump administration. Xiaomi was subsequently removed from the blacklist by the Biden administration. Sen. Cotton was also a Senator when Xiaomi was blacklisted though I don't recall if he was influential in bringing about the blacklisting.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Jaclidio hoy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Yawdee earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      eugwalker earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Ben Gross earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      chiptuning earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      634
    2. 2
      +FloatingFatMan
      174
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      139
    4. 4
      Xenon
      118
    5. 5
      wakjak
      108
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!