Looking to replace my monitor soon, are BenQ's good?


Recommended Posts

I am looking to replace my aging 4K display with a newer one, and I see the BenQ brand is fairly reasonable in pricing. Are they decent monitors, or would I be better off buying a well known brand like LG, etc?

1 minute ago, Mindovermaster said:

What is your display now? I never used a BenQ, but I heard they are quite good.

Yamakasi, I paid like $200 for it, almost 4 years ago, and it is showing signs of failing (brightness issues)

7 minutes ago, jnelsoninjax said:

Yamakasi, I paid like $200 for it, almost 4 years ago, and it is showing signs of failing (brightness issues)

You ever look at Dell monitors? I have 2 of these:

 

https://www.amazon.com/Dell-U2415-24-Inch-1920-Monitor/dp/B00NZTKOQI/ref=sr_1_1?crid=TWACNFJ8D2NT&keywords=dell+ultrasharp+24&qid=1556059282&s=gateway&sprefix=dell+ultrashap%2Caps%2C156&sr=8-1

Just now, Mindovermaster said:

Going from 4k probably 27 to 32 inch to a 24 inch 1920x1200 is not going to work for anyone who is used to it. But Dell monitors are really good, 27 inch 1440 or 4k would prob be his minimum

1 minute ago, xendrome said:

Going from 4k probably 27 to 32 inch to a 24 inch 1920x1200 is not going to work for anyone who is used to it. But Dell monitors are really good, 27 inch 1440 or 4k would prob be his minimum

Was just posting as an example, I am sure Dell does 4K monitors as well. I do not know the quality of them.

33 minutes ago, jnelsoninjax said:

I am looking to replace my aging 4K display with a newer one, and I see the BenQ brand is fairly reasonable in pricing. Are they decent monitors, or would I be better off buying a well known brand like LG, etc?

This kind of thing has been discussed before.

 

The cost of mass producing a modern LCD Panel has resulted in a consolidation to just a tiny number of plants on Planet Earth.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_flat_panel_display_manufacturers  - the list needs a bit of updating to remove the obsolete stuff, but your new monitor's Panel is coming from one of those!

 

Since the quality of the Panel is like 95% of the quality you will experience, ALL brands will be drawing from the same well there.

 

EVERY brand sells low cost junk, business class junk, mid-range consumer (and same thing in "gamer" plastic/colors) , mid-range business, premium gamer and premium designer.

 

There is also a bottom-feeding low volume market in "end of line/manufacturing defect rejects/etc" as typified by your Yamakasi.

 

Some Brands also provide premium customer support as part of their branding, a "feature" which can change overnight so I tend to discard it but Logitech for example has worked hard in that area over the years...

 

Dell is particularly good at making it clear which "category" their product model in once you know their "lingo" - If you want some of the best monitors available, you wait for a sale on a Dell UltraSharp with Premium Panel (for Dell, the "Premium Panel" designator is a sneaky way of leveraging their reputation to make more profit off of people who don't notice at time of order that they forgot to specify that option)

 

HP monitors with the "DreamColor" designation are also first rate.

 

ASUS uses the "ProArt" designation to indicate top of the line LCD Panels.

 

BenQ used to call their good monitors "DesignVue" but now the designation is "PD Series"

 

https://www.benqdirect.com/pd3200u.html

 

Ultimately, to understand ANY monitor purchase, you need to know exactly what model of LCD Panel you are buying and that can usually be found in various forums where people discuss monitors. Unfortunately, some Brands will substitute panels over a model's lifetime and often they start high to get good reviews and often save a few pennies as sales progress but sometimes it goes the other way so always TRACK THAT.

 

 

ETC.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
47 minutes ago, Mindovermaster said:

Was just posting as an example, I am sure Dell does 4K monitors as well. I do not know the quality of them.

Per my post above, quality varies with the monitor's product category.

 

For Dell, any monitor that is "UltraSharp with Premium Panel" is as good as anything on the planet and very highly recommended!

 

Any other model will be various trade-offs all the way down to low-end like HP, Lenovo and everyone else. Since there is a lot of tech issues to consider, the general INSANELY HIGH level of lazy in almost every I.T. dept, means that I get to see CRAP MONITORS EVERYWHERE in the business world. 

 

Branding is NO rescue from this problem, just makes it worse actually by giving lazy people an excuse to not spend proper due diligence doing their tech research!

 

 

 

12 minutes ago, DevTech said:

Per my post above, quality varies with the monitor's product category.

 

For Dell, any monitor that is "UltraSharp with Premium Panel" is as good as anything on the planet and very highly recommended!

 

Any other model will be various trade-offs all the way down to low-end like HP, Lenovo and everyone else. Since there is a lot of tech issues to consider, the general INSANELY HIGH level of lazy in almost every I.T. dept, means that I get to see CRAP MONITORS EVERYWHERE in the business world. 

 

Branding is NO rescue from this problem, just makes it worse actually by giving lazy people an excuse to not spend proper due diligence doing their tech research!

 

 

 

Never saw your post above, bro. ;)

 

But I have never heard anything bad from BenQ. Except the crapilistic ones at WalMart...

1 hour ago, Mindovermaster said:

Never saw your post above, bro. ;)

 

But I have never heard anything bad from BenQ. Except the crapilistic ones at WalMart...

They source from a limited list of

panel suppliers like everyone else so due diligence should be done with research on the panel and see if you can get it in another brand monitor for a better price before just going with them.  That goes for any brand. 

  • Like 2
3 minutes ago, adrynalyne said:

They source from a limited list of

panel suppliers like everyone else so due diligence should be done with research on the panel and see if you can get it in another brand monitor for a better price before just going with them.  That goes for any brand. 

Oh, OK. So it's the panel, not the maker...

 

@DevTech, noted.

58 minutes ago, Mindovermaster said:

Never saw your post above, bro. ;)

 

But I have never heard anything bad from BenQ. Except the crapilistic ones at WalMart...

"Per my post above" is just "business-speak" shorthand for "Read my post if you want more information"

 

" never heard anything bad from BenQ" is exactly the kind of logic/thinking I am trying to explain as belonging with the Dinosaurs! Maybe back in some long lost time, a person could say that sort of definitive blanket statement about a "brand" i.e. "Rolls Royce makes well built cars" and you would not have to dig into specific models and market categories.

 

In 2019, across most of human commerce and certainly with computer tech, EVERY BRAND makes low cost junk and most brands also make wonderful premium products.

 

BenQ makes junk. BenQ also make premium monitors. No surprise there at all! It is the TASK of tech people to sort each model into the right category and not to default to some ancient invalid and very lazy meme...

 

 

3 minutes ago, Mindovermaster said:

Oh, OK. So it's the panel, not the maker...

When it comes to the visual portion, you betcha. Features can differ between brands of course. 

  • Like 1
17 minutes ago, adrynalyne said:

They source from a limited list of

panel suppliers like everyone else so due diligence should be done with research on the panel and see if you can get it in another brand monitor for a better price before just going with them.  That goes for any brand. 

As always, you are great asset to Neowin tech areas, and have provided the concise and clear explanation that completely eluded me in this case...

Benq are decent monitors.  Similar to acer. Not usually high end.  We would order this brand or acer for offices we would put in (100s of them deployed over the years 02-08). We never had a warranty claim on them or had to go out to replace. 

1 hour ago, sc302 said:

Benq are decent monitors.  Similar to acer. Not usually high end.  We would order this brand or acer for offices we would put in (100s of them deployed over the years 02-08). We never had a warranty claim on them or had to go out to replace. 

The BenQ PD Series is first class stuff, similar to ASUS ProArt and Dell UltraSharp...

 

https://www.benqdirect.com/pd3200u.html

 

 

Even acer has high end XG series monitors.  I don’t understand your point.  A lot of brands have high rated high end monitors.  Many brands have low end monitors.  I don’t consider either brand a premium brand. 

With most brands you get what you pay for these days. Dell have some really good high end monitors, however that's not to say Dell don't also offer a lot of entry level monitors also.

 

I'd decide on any must have features and a price range, then look at some reviews to find out what's recommended in that price range.

 

If you want a recommendation i've been very happy with the LG 27UD59P. You could pay a lot more for a 4K monitor, however i'd say this is a nice all round 4K monitor with an IPS panel. It also supports It's HDCP 2.2 if you have any desire to playback 4K Netflix / UHD Blu-ray on it, in addition to FreeSync.

4 hours ago, sc302 said:

Even acer has high end XG series monitors.  I don’t understand your point.  A lot of brands have high rated high end monitors.  Many brands have low end monitors.  I don’t consider either brand a premium brand. 

"I don’t consider either brand a premium brand" - You have described my point. 

 

 

1. Just about every brand has high quality monitors

 

2. Just about every brand has junk monitors

 

 

Hence, as I have tried to explain in a few posts in this thread, there is NO "premium brand" other than a fantasy in the mind of the beholder...

 

A tech-aware buyer (i.e. people in this forum) just needs to find out what Display Panel a monitor is using inside it and then he knows what is going on. The Panel might be made by BOE or by TCL or by LG Display (three state of the art 4K Panel Manufacturers) and the particular model number of the Panel being used will determine the quality.

 

TCL (Shenzhen China Star Optoelectronics Technology (CSOT)) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TCL_Corporation

LG Display https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LG_Display

BOE Technology Group https://www.boe.com/en/  (you would never tell from their website that 1/4 of all LCD Panels on Planet Earth comes from BOE)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_flat_panel_display_manufacturers

 

The Logo Decal glued to the plastic frame on the outside of the monitor is just a game of "dress up" - the incredibly complex tech and quality level of a modern LCD Panel will NOT be determined by that eye-catching little chunk of a plastic logo known as BRAND.

 

 

 

5 hours ago, jnelsoninjax said:

@DevTech, what would you personally recommend? I would like it to around the 27 inch size. Ideally it would be GSync as well, but I know that adds allot to the price.

I know from experience that you are very careful with money. But, part of any value equation is the benefit derived from the financial investment both in longevity and more importantly in day to day use.

 

There are 3 main things that everyone directly uses to interact with a computer - Mouse, Keyboard and Monitor. My philosophy takes that simple observation and demands that extra funds be allocated for the 3 items that impact you the most. Your approach might be very different!

 

Then there are specific features like GSYNC that can add to the complexity of the choice. For me, it would be a Thunderbolt 3 interface...

 

Your Eyeballs are asking you to put Panel quality first. In that light, (pun intended) the BenQ PD3200U looks good, also ASUS PA27AC, ASUS PA329Q, ASUS PA32UC, DELL UltraSharp UP2716D, DELL UltraSharp UP2718Q, DELL UltraSharp UP3216Q, HP DreamColor Z27xG2, HP DreamColor Z31x, LG 31MU97-B, LG 32MU99-W, LG UltraFine 32UL950-W, LG 34WK95U-W, LG 27UL850-W

 

Special Runner-Up mention to LG 27UL500-W at the current LG promotional retail price of $280 which is great value for a 4K LG monitor with maybe a 10 bit Panel?

 

https://www.lg.com/us/monitors/lg-27UL500-W-4k-uhd-led-monitor

 

And the LG 34WK95U-W really stands out at ultra-wide 5K and Thunderbolt 3 interface...

 

https://www.lg.com/us/monitors/lg-34WK95U-W-ultrawide-monitor?returnFlag=Y

 

34wk95u-w.thumb.jpg.495a0995a75f69689070463b0f97cd90.jpg

 

 

I'm not entirely sure but I think Samsung got rid of their FAB leaving LG as the only maker of monitors with a direct line to their own LCD PANEL FAB, which is probably why there is a bewildering variety of LG monitors.

 

Too tired at this point to review the Samsung product line....

 

(I don't see how Samsung could have sold a Panel FAB since they have a unique LCD process with their PMA panels... Need to dig that out for the tiny bit it is worth referencing...)

 

 

Thanks for the list @DevTech I really like the LG, and for the price it seems like a good choice, I am torn between the LG 27UL500 and the BenQ, obviously the price difference between the LG and BenQ is a fair amount, but I agree with you about the monitor being a worthy investment!

36 minutes ago, jnelsoninjax said:

So I was about to order the LG, and I found an Asus VP28UQG 28" for $300, and it checks all the boxes I need, and on top of everything else it will be here tomorrow!

Sweet, dude! Well, if you don't like it, you can always refund it :)

 

3 hours ago, jnelsoninjax said:

So I was about to order the LG, and I found an Asus VP28UQG 28" for $300, and it checks all the boxes I need, and on top of everything else it will be here tomorrow!

"What is Dead, may never Die..."

 

It appears in 2019 as if TN Panels can still leach out a life on the borders and shadows like a Zombie existence for digital garbage...

 

I don't know why you bothered to ask for advice and then turn around and buy a piece of junk. That is an obsolete monitor with a TN panel! TN Panels should have died in the previous millennium, but manufacturers keep resurrecting them from the dead to save a few pennies to sell product to the ignorant, the clueless, and the undead?

 

Apparently in trying to take many posts and with the help of @adrenilineto explain to @Mindovermasterhow the LCD Panel inside determines just about everything about the monitor's quality and the Brand on the outside says almost nothing about the quality, this seemingly simple tech factoid is still not understandable by the readers of this thread!

 

 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 by Razvan Serea Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) is a utility for completely removing AMD/NVIDIA/INTEL graphics drivers and related packages from your system, attempting to eliminate all leftovers (including registry entries, folders and files, driver store). Though AMD/NVIDIA/INTEL drivers can usually be removed via the Windows Control Panel, this uninstaller tool was created for situations where standard uninstall fails, or when you need to fully remove NVIDIA or ATI graphics card drivers. After using this driver cleaner, your system will behave as though it’s the first time you’re installing a new driver—similar to a fresh Windows installation. As with all such tools, we recommend creating a restore point beforehand, allowing you to undo changes if issues arise. If you're having trouble installing an older or newer driver, try it—there are reports that it resolves such problems. Recommended usage: The tool can be used in Normal mode but for absolute stability when using DDU, Safemode is always the best. Make a backup or a system restore (but it should normally be pretty safe). It is best to exclude the DDU folder completely from any security software to avoid issues. You do NOT need to uninstall the driver prior using DDU. Requirements: .NET Framework 4.8 Compatible with Windows 7, 8, 8.1, 10, and 11 (32-bit or 64-bit) Note: Using on Insider Preview builds is at your own risk. Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 changelog: Added 'Reset to recommended' button for the Options. General fixes and improvements. Download: Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 | 1.7 MB (Freeware) Download: DDU Portable | 1.2 MB Links: Display Driver Uninstaller Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview by Razvan Serea WACUP (WinAmp Community Update Project) is a modern, enhanced version of the classic Winamp music player, designed for better stability, performance, and compatibility. Built for Windows, WACUP retains the familiar Winamp interface while adding 64-bit support, bug fixes, and new features like improved audio format support, customizable skins, and optimized playlist management. Unlike bloated alternatives, WACUP focuses on lightweight performance and regular updates, making it the best choice for fans of the classic Winamp experience. Basically, if you miss the good old days of Winamp and want a modern upgrade that doesn’t mess things up, WACUP is for you! WACUP key features: Classic Winamp Feel – Keeps the familiar interface and functionality. Bug Fixes & Stability – Fixes old Winamp issues and improves performance. 64-Bit Support – Works better on modern systems. More Formats & Plugins – Supports additional audio formats and third-party plugins. Customizable UI – Skins and tweaks for a personalized look. Better Library Management – Improved playlists, media organization, and search. No Bloat – Focuses on performance without unnecessary extras. Regular Updates – Community-driven development with new features and fixes. WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview changelog: Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when doing some of the drag + drop actions within the media library window Fixed a loading crash seen related to a problem with some of the artwork cache image files being restored which should now be better handled allowing for the bad image to be removed without it failing Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when the internal metadata cache clearing is triggered which could block the main ui thread for too long with this now being moved to a background thread Fixed some performance issues with some of the methods related to determining artwork support which mainly affected the local library import / refresh (this is still slower for some compared to other players because there's more data & artwork aspects being checked for which means doing more processing on a single file despite the best of attempts to reduce duplicate / heavy processing where possible) Fixed a crash with the JTFE based missing files hotkey which no one seems to have used for an age for this to appear (maybe it's time to seriously consider stripping out features that aren't being used) Fixed how some of the file types which use extra information to reference their sub-songs is handled which was preventing some from being correctly resolved back to their base file (noticed fixing above) Fixed an issue with the handling of files with underscores in their filepath which wasn't being correctly handled causing some of the filename to be lost when shown as the title if title reading is delayed Fixed a few things that might be behind NotSoDirect not being stable for some setups though am still not certain that the changes done for this are going to fully resolve the problem from the crash reports Fixed the OS toast handling when there's no prior shortcut in the OS start menu to now create the shortcut (needed to allow the yes/no buttons for the new build / post-release toast) to be done as a hidden one so it's less likely to cause annoyance for those not wanting to see it whilst still allowing this less than ideal OS api implementation requirement to be met to avoid toasts without the needed buttons Fixed a regression when moving from taglib1 to taglib2 which broke some of the handling in place to allow for external programs to still access files when wacup has a held open cached instance of the file Everything else Updated cppwinrt (gen_win10shell.dll) to 3.0.260520.1 (26 May 2026) Updated libcurl (libcurl.dll) to 8.2.1 (24 Jun 2026) Updated Monkey's Audio (in_ape.dll) to 13.15 (28 Jun 2026) Updated mpg123 (mpg123.dll) to 1.33.6 (6 Jun 2026) Updated OpenSSL (libcurl.dll) to 3.5.7 (9 Jun 2026) Updated pugixml to 1.16 (16 Jun 2026) Updated taglib (tag2.dll) to 2.3.0 (11 May 2026) Updated vgmstream (in_vgmstream.dll) to the latest Git commit from 28 Jun 2026 Download: WACUP 64-bit | 9.6 MB (Freeware) Download: WACUP 32-bit View: WACUP Website | Screenshots Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • "over a thousand engineering hours" and started selling it but could not take a couple of minuets to send an AI email to ask permission. What an expensive lesson.
    • just tested it yesterday, a simple page with autoloading ADS takes 60mb....just 1 page for 60 megabytes.   poor people with a limited internet never will visit neolose
    • Tor Browser 15.0.17 by Razvan Serea Protect your privacy. Defend yourself against network surveillance and traffic analysis. Tor is a network of virtual tunnels that allows people and groups to improve their privacy and security on the Internet. The Tor software protects you by bouncing your communications around a distributed network of relays run by volunteers all around the world: it prevents somebody from watching your Internet connection and learning what sites you visit, it prevents the sites you visit from learning your physical location, and it lets you access sites which are blocked. The Tor Browser Bundle lets you use Tor on Windows, Mac OS X, or Linux without needing to install any software. It can run off a USB flash drive, comes with a pre-configured web browser to protect your anonymity, and is self-contained. Tor Browser 15.0.17 changelog: All Platforms Updated Tor to 0.4.9.11 Updated NoScript to 13.6.25.1984 Build System / All Platforms Bug tor-browser-build#41821: Update gpg subkeys for boklm Bug tor-browser-build#41827: Update morgan's keychain with renewed key Download: Tor Browser (64-bit) | Tor Browser (32-bit) | 109.0 MB (Open Source) View: Tor Browser Website | Other Operating Systems Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      Wakeen1966 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      530
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      55
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!