Looking to replace my monitor soon, are BenQ's good?


Recommended Posts

I am looking to replace my aging 4K display with a newer one, and I see the BenQ brand is fairly reasonable in pricing. Are they decent monitors, or would I be better off buying a well known brand like LG, etc?

1 minute ago, Mindovermaster said:

What is your display now? I never used a BenQ, but I heard they are quite good.

Yamakasi, I paid like $200 for it, almost 4 years ago, and it is showing signs of failing (brightness issues)

7 minutes ago, jnelsoninjax said:

Yamakasi, I paid like $200 for it, almost 4 years ago, and it is showing signs of failing (brightness issues)

You ever look at Dell monitors? I have 2 of these:

 

https://www.amazon.com/Dell-U2415-24-Inch-1920-Monitor/dp/B00NZTKOQI/ref=sr_1_1?crid=TWACNFJ8D2NT&keywords=dell+ultrasharp+24&qid=1556059282&s=gateway&sprefix=dell+ultrashap%2Caps%2C156&sr=8-1

Just now, Mindovermaster said:

Going from 4k probably 27 to 32 inch to a 24 inch 1920x1200 is not going to work for anyone who is used to it. But Dell monitors are really good, 27 inch 1440 or 4k would prob be his minimum

1 minute ago, xendrome said:

Going from 4k probably 27 to 32 inch to a 24 inch 1920x1200 is not going to work for anyone who is used to it. But Dell monitors are really good, 27 inch 1440 or 4k would prob be his minimum

Was just posting as an example, I am sure Dell does 4K monitors as well. I do not know the quality of them.

33 minutes ago, jnelsoninjax said:

I am looking to replace my aging 4K display with a newer one, and I see the BenQ brand is fairly reasonable in pricing. Are they decent monitors, or would I be better off buying a well known brand like LG, etc?

This kind of thing has been discussed before.

 

The cost of mass producing a modern LCD Panel has resulted in a consolidation to just a tiny number of plants on Planet Earth.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_flat_panel_display_manufacturers  - the list needs a bit of updating to remove the obsolete stuff, but your new monitor's Panel is coming from one of those!

 

Since the quality of the Panel is like 95% of the quality you will experience, ALL brands will be drawing from the same well there.

 

EVERY brand sells low cost junk, business class junk, mid-range consumer (and same thing in "gamer" plastic/colors) , mid-range business, premium gamer and premium designer.

 

There is also a bottom-feeding low volume market in "end of line/manufacturing defect rejects/etc" as typified by your Yamakasi.

 

Some Brands also provide premium customer support as part of their branding, a "feature" which can change overnight so I tend to discard it but Logitech for example has worked hard in that area over the years...

 

Dell is particularly good at making it clear which "category" their product model in once you know their "lingo" - If you want some of the best monitors available, you wait for a sale on a Dell UltraSharp with Premium Panel (for Dell, the "Premium Panel" designator is a sneaky way of leveraging their reputation to make more profit off of people who don't notice at time of order that they forgot to specify that option)

 

HP monitors with the "DreamColor" designation are also first rate.

 

ASUS uses the "ProArt" designation to indicate top of the line LCD Panels.

 

BenQ used to call their good monitors "DesignVue" but now the designation is "PD Series"

 

https://www.benqdirect.com/pd3200u.html

 

Ultimately, to understand ANY monitor purchase, you need to know exactly what model of LCD Panel you are buying and that can usually be found in various forums where people discuss monitors. Unfortunately, some Brands will substitute panels over a model's lifetime and often they start high to get good reviews and often save a few pennies as sales progress but sometimes it goes the other way so always TRACK THAT.

 

 

ETC.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
47 minutes ago, Mindovermaster said:

Was just posting as an example, I am sure Dell does 4K monitors as well. I do not know the quality of them.

Per my post above, quality varies with the monitor's product category.

 

For Dell, any monitor that is "UltraSharp with Premium Panel" is as good as anything on the planet and very highly recommended!

 

Any other model will be various trade-offs all the way down to low-end like HP, Lenovo and everyone else. Since there is a lot of tech issues to consider, the general INSANELY HIGH level of lazy in almost every I.T. dept, means that I get to see CRAP MONITORS EVERYWHERE in the business world. 

 

Branding is NO rescue from this problem, just makes it worse actually by giving lazy people an excuse to not spend proper due diligence doing their tech research!

 

 

 

12 minutes ago, DevTech said:

Per my post above, quality varies with the monitor's product category.

 

For Dell, any monitor that is "UltraSharp with Premium Panel" is as good as anything on the planet and very highly recommended!

 

Any other model will be various trade-offs all the way down to low-end like HP, Lenovo and everyone else. Since there is a lot of tech issues to consider, the general INSANELY HIGH level of lazy in almost every I.T. dept, means that I get to see CRAP MONITORS EVERYWHERE in the business world. 

 

Branding is NO rescue from this problem, just makes it worse actually by giving lazy people an excuse to not spend proper due diligence doing their tech research!

 

 

 

Never saw your post above, bro. ;)

 

But I have never heard anything bad from BenQ. Except the crapilistic ones at WalMart...

1 hour ago, Mindovermaster said:

Never saw your post above, bro. ;)

 

But I have never heard anything bad from BenQ. Except the crapilistic ones at WalMart...

They source from a limited list of

panel suppliers like everyone else so due diligence should be done with research on the panel and see if you can get it in another brand monitor for a better price before just going with them.  That goes for any brand. 

  • Like 2
3 minutes ago, adrynalyne said:

They source from a limited list of

panel suppliers like everyone else so due diligence should be done with research on the panel and see if you can get it in another brand monitor for a better price before just going with them.  That goes for any brand. 

Oh, OK. So it's the panel, not the maker...

 

@DevTech, noted.

58 minutes ago, Mindovermaster said:

Never saw your post above, bro. ;)

 

But I have never heard anything bad from BenQ. Except the crapilistic ones at WalMart...

"Per my post above" is just "business-speak" shorthand for "Read my post if you want more information"

 

" never heard anything bad from BenQ" is exactly the kind of logic/thinking I am trying to explain as belonging with the Dinosaurs! Maybe back in some long lost time, a person could say that sort of definitive blanket statement about a "brand" i.e. "Rolls Royce makes well built cars" and you would not have to dig into specific models and market categories.

 

In 2019, across most of human commerce and certainly with computer tech, EVERY BRAND makes low cost junk and most brands also make wonderful premium products.

 

BenQ makes junk. BenQ also make premium monitors. No surprise there at all! It is the TASK of tech people to sort each model into the right category and not to default to some ancient invalid and very lazy meme...

 

 

3 minutes ago, Mindovermaster said:

Oh, OK. So it's the panel, not the maker...

When it comes to the visual portion, you betcha. Features can differ between brands of course. 

  • Like 1
17 minutes ago, adrynalyne said:

They source from a limited list of

panel suppliers like everyone else so due diligence should be done with research on the panel and see if you can get it in another brand monitor for a better price before just going with them.  That goes for any brand. 

As always, you are great asset to Neowin tech areas, and have provided the concise and clear explanation that completely eluded me in this case...

Benq are decent monitors.  Similar to acer. Not usually high end.  We would order this brand or acer for offices we would put in (100s of them deployed over the years 02-08). We never had a warranty claim on them or had to go out to replace. 

1 hour ago, sc302 said:

Benq are decent monitors.  Similar to acer. Not usually high end.  We would order this brand or acer for offices we would put in (100s of them deployed over the years 02-08). We never had a warranty claim on them or had to go out to replace. 

The BenQ PD Series is first class stuff, similar to ASUS ProArt and Dell UltraSharp...

 

https://www.benqdirect.com/pd3200u.html

 

 

Even acer has high end XG series monitors.  I don’t understand your point.  A lot of brands have high rated high end monitors.  Many brands have low end monitors.  I don’t consider either brand a premium brand. 

With most brands you get what you pay for these days. Dell have some really good high end monitors, however that's not to say Dell don't also offer a lot of entry level monitors also.

 

I'd decide on any must have features and a price range, then look at some reviews to find out what's recommended in that price range.

 

If you want a recommendation i've been very happy with the LG 27UD59P. You could pay a lot more for a 4K monitor, however i'd say this is a nice all round 4K monitor with an IPS panel. It also supports It's HDCP 2.2 if you have any desire to playback 4K Netflix / UHD Blu-ray on it, in addition to FreeSync.

4 hours ago, sc302 said:

Even acer has high end XG series monitors.  I don’t understand your point.  A lot of brands have high rated high end monitors.  Many brands have low end monitors.  I don’t consider either brand a premium brand. 

"I don’t consider either brand a premium brand" - You have described my point. 

 

 

1. Just about every brand has high quality monitors

 

2. Just about every brand has junk monitors

 

 

Hence, as I have tried to explain in a few posts in this thread, there is NO "premium brand" other than a fantasy in the mind of the beholder...

 

A tech-aware buyer (i.e. people in this forum) just needs to find out what Display Panel a monitor is using inside it and then he knows what is going on. The Panel might be made by BOE or by TCL or by LG Display (three state of the art 4K Panel Manufacturers) and the particular model number of the Panel being used will determine the quality.

 

TCL (Shenzhen China Star Optoelectronics Technology (CSOT)) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TCL_Corporation

LG Display https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LG_Display

BOE Technology Group https://www.boe.com/en/  (you would never tell from their website that 1/4 of all LCD Panels on Planet Earth comes from BOE)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_flat_panel_display_manufacturers

 

The Logo Decal glued to the plastic frame on the outside of the monitor is just a game of "dress up" - the incredibly complex tech and quality level of a modern LCD Panel will NOT be determined by that eye-catching little chunk of a plastic logo known as BRAND.

 

 

 

5 hours ago, jnelsoninjax said:

@DevTech, what would you personally recommend? I would like it to around the 27 inch size. Ideally it would be GSync as well, but I know that adds allot to the price.

I know from experience that you are very careful with money. But, part of any value equation is the benefit derived from the financial investment both in longevity and more importantly in day to day use.

 

There are 3 main things that everyone directly uses to interact with a computer - Mouse, Keyboard and Monitor. My philosophy takes that simple observation and demands that extra funds be allocated for the 3 items that impact you the most. Your approach might be very different!

 

Then there are specific features like GSYNC that can add to the complexity of the choice. For me, it would be a Thunderbolt 3 interface...

 

Your Eyeballs are asking you to put Panel quality first. In that light, (pun intended) the BenQ PD3200U looks good, also ASUS PA27AC, ASUS PA329Q, ASUS PA32UC, DELL UltraSharp UP2716D, DELL UltraSharp UP2718Q, DELL UltraSharp UP3216Q, HP DreamColor Z27xG2, HP DreamColor Z31x, LG 31MU97-B, LG 32MU99-W, LG UltraFine 32UL950-W, LG 34WK95U-W, LG 27UL850-W

 

Special Runner-Up mention to LG 27UL500-W at the current LG promotional retail price of $280 which is great value for a 4K LG monitor with maybe a 10 bit Panel?

 

https://www.lg.com/us/monitors/lg-27UL500-W-4k-uhd-led-monitor

 

And the LG 34WK95U-W really stands out at ultra-wide 5K and Thunderbolt 3 interface...

 

https://www.lg.com/us/monitors/lg-34WK95U-W-ultrawide-monitor?returnFlag=Y

 

34wk95u-w.thumb.jpg.495a0995a75f69689070463b0f97cd90.jpg

 

 

I'm not entirely sure but I think Samsung got rid of their FAB leaving LG as the only maker of monitors with a direct line to their own LCD PANEL FAB, which is probably why there is a bewildering variety of LG monitors.

 

Too tired at this point to review the Samsung product line....

 

(I don't see how Samsung could have sold a Panel FAB since they have a unique LCD process with their PMA panels... Need to dig that out for the tiny bit it is worth referencing...)

 

 

Thanks for the list @DevTech I really like the LG, and for the price it seems like a good choice, I am torn between the LG 27UL500 and the BenQ, obviously the price difference between the LG and BenQ is a fair amount, but I agree with you about the monitor being a worthy investment!

36 minutes ago, jnelsoninjax said:

So I was about to order the LG, and I found an Asus VP28UQG 28" for $300, and it checks all the boxes I need, and on top of everything else it will be here tomorrow!

Sweet, dude! Well, if you don't like it, you can always refund it :)

 

3 hours ago, jnelsoninjax said:

So I was about to order the LG, and I found an Asus VP28UQG 28" for $300, and it checks all the boxes I need, and on top of everything else it will be here tomorrow!

"What is Dead, may never Die..."

 

It appears in 2019 as if TN Panels can still leach out a life on the borders and shadows like a Zombie existence for digital garbage...

 

I don't know why you bothered to ask for advice and then turn around and buy a piece of junk. That is an obsolete monitor with a TN panel! TN Panels should have died in the previous millennium, but manufacturers keep resurrecting them from the dead to save a few pennies to sell product to the ignorant, the clueless, and the undead?

 

Apparently in trying to take many posts and with the help of @adrenilineto explain to @Mindovermasterhow the LCD Panel inside determines just about everything about the monitor's quality and the Brand on the outside says almost nothing about the quality, this seemingly simple tech factoid is still not understandable by the readers of this thread!

 

 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • OpenClaw now has native mobile apps on iOS and Android by Karthik Mudaliar OpenClaw, the viral open-source personal AI agent, now has its own mobile app, available on both Android and iOS. Users can pair the app with an existing OpenClaw gateway and can start using new mobile-native features that are now available on the app. The app supports all the existing features you'd already have seen on OpenClaw's TUI, as well as some more, such as real-time and background Talk mode, action approvals, sharing from iOS, and optional access to device capabilities such as camera, screen, location, photos, contacts, calendar, and reminders. These features are available on both the Android and iOS versions of the app. What's important with these apps is that they don't run OpenClaw on your phone, but are actually just companion apps that require a running OpenClaw Gateway on an existing device, on macOS, Linux, or Windows via WSL2. To pair the app with your existing OpenClaw gateway, users need to run the command "/pair qr" on the TUI or existing chat interface, which brings up a QR code. Users can then scan this QR code to pair it up with the mobile app. There's also an option to manually pair the app by entering the host and a port. Previously, OpenClaw had been available on phones via WhatsApp, Telegram, Slack, Discord, Microsoft Teams, Matrix, and others. Now, with a native mobile app, the interface is much cleaner and more focused on just the OpenClaw, of course, with the added support for camera, screen, location, and more. It's important to note that OpenClaw comes with its own security warnings. There's always a chance of prompt injection with these tools, so users are recommended to double-check authentication, tool policy, sandboxing, and execution approvals rather than prompts alone. For users well-versed with the AI harness, a native mobile app makes it easier to approve an automation, share a link, use voice, or let an agent react to phone-side context.
    • Google pitches Spanner as one database for all AI agents with these new featues by Karthik Mudaliar Google Cloud is introducing new features within Spanner, its distributed database, as a place where enterprises should keep their data, using which AI agents could make smarter and better decisions. In a detailed blog post, Google highlighted quite a few features coming to Spanner, including relational data, graph relationships, vector search, key-value access, full-text search, and operational analytics together in one database architecture. Google says that today's systems aren't well-made for AI agents. There could be data that is present in one system, search indexes in another, embeddings in a vector database, and relationship data in a graph database. This fragmentation isn't great for AI agents to do their jobs because they don't have access to all of this data in one place. This is where Google is positioning Spanner as a solution. Spanner is already a globally distributed relational database with strong consistency, and Google wants its customers to see it as a broader data layer for AI applications. The company introduced something called Spanner Graph, along with integrated vector search, full-text search, a Cassandra-compatible key-value endpoint, and a columnar engine for analytical queries on operational data. Google also added that its ScaNN-powered vector search can support indexes with more than 10 billion vectors, while the columnar engine can make some analytical scans up to 200 times faster. All of this isn't just exclusive to the Google Cloud Platform, and there's support for multi-cloud as well. This comes via Spanner Omni, which Google says is a downloadable, containerized version of Spanner that can run on Kubernetes and in environments outside Google Cloud, including Microsoft Azure and AWS, and even on-premises infrastructure as well as edge deployments. Google says that customers who are interested in the full-featured edition should contact the company, and there's no word on commercial availability or separate pricing. Those interested can read the full blog by Google Cloud, which details these features individually.
    • Kalmuri 4.2.5 by Razvan Serea Kalmuri is your all-in-one, portable screen capture and recording solution designed for speed, simplicity, and flexibility. Whether you need a full-screen snapshot, a custom area, a scrolling webpage, or smooth video recording, Kalmuri delivers with ease. Capture text instantly from images with built-in OCR, keep floating images on top for quick reference, and use the precise color picker for perfect design matching. Customize hotkeys to work your way and share results instantly with built-in upload options. Kalmuri runs without installation, making it ideal for USB use, and offers an intuitive interface that’s easy to learn. Kalmuri key features: Video recording support (designation of whole screen and area) Whole screen, active program, window control, area application Extract text from images using optical character recognition (OCR). Support for PNG, JPG, WEBP, BMP, GIF file formats MP4 video recording powered by FFmpeg for high-quality results Full web page capture Share the captured image on the web Color extraction function Printer output Hotkey settings Adjustable via keyboard for area capture (Arrow key, Ctrl+Arrow key, Shift+Arrow key) File name format (sequential, datetime) Free to use it at work, at home, in government offices, at school, etc. Using Kalmuri portable for video recording Kalmuri’s portable version doesn’t include FFmpeg, which is required for video recording. Without it, you’ll get an “error FFmpeg.exe not found” message. To fix this, download FFmpeg from the provided link, extract it, and place FFmpeg.exe in Kalmuri’s folder. Kalmuri will then recognize it automatically, allowing you to start recording in high quality instantly. Kalmuri 4.2.5 changelog: Fixed an intermittent crash when using Area Capture Improved stability for Area Capture and screen recording Resolved a capture issue that could occur right after startup Download: Kalmuri 4.2.5 | 24.2 MB (Freeware) Download: Kalmuri Portable 4.2.5 | 2.1 MB View: Kalmuri Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Juan Dela earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Collagen Project earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      Wakeen1966 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      516
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      273
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      143
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      54
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!