Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Jim K said:

Just going out there with the cooler discussion.  The original cooler in the OP is a fine cooler ... even under load ... and very quiet.  In might not keep the CPU as cool as an AIO (depending on brand/model) ... but it certainly isn't going to be a cause of concern for CPU temps.  One could also argue that a traditional CPU cooler helps cool the surrounding motherboard components better.

 

The main reason, IMO, in choosing an AIO is for overclocking plus ease to work around (like accessing the RAM slots).  However, I believe the NH-D9L is fairly memory slot friendly.  Noise, between the Noctua NH-D9L and an AIO is going to be minimal ... with the Noctua probably being even quieter under normal loads.  You'll also have less things to fail ... not saying that your AIO will fail ... but with a traditional cooler you just have to worry about the fan.  Whereas with an AIO you have the fans, pump and coolant.

 

I have two HTPC's with traditional coolers ... only my gaming desktop has an AIO.

 

Anyway, just my opinion.  :) 

Good description.

 

Even when air coolers "benchmark" better, the amazing ability of water coolers to just "clamp" the temperature and not vary at all is missed out. This hard to measure ability makes the water cooler a far better choice in ALL situations.

 

The one negative is that you no longer have air blowing on the high current motherboard regulators, so a fan must be aimed in that direction.

 

Also, for the quietest operation cool outside air should be the intake for the water radiators, which sometimes means reversing the fans and blowing hot air inside the case (which doesn't matter if there is a fan on the motherboard and cool air is arranged for the GPU)

 

3 hours ago, Jim K said:

Your original memory configuration is fine. Z390 (and the other various "mainstream" chipsets) are *only* dual channel. You do not need to populate all 4 slots at this time (plus your original config will leave room to add more if needed in the future).

 

Just a quick drive by suggestion (on the phone)

@Mindovermasteris correct here. A modern motherboard will take advantage of all 4 slots and interleave the DRAM access to increase overall throughput.

 

It is a minor boost however, and the value of empty slots to add 2 x 16 or 2 x 32 etc later on is probably worth keeping.

 

5 hours ago, Mindovermaster said:

Fractal has good fans out of the box. I used several of them and never had an issue when I set the fan controller to low.

 

You don't want to AIO water cool that CPU? IMO, it will cool better.

 

Personally, I would do 4x 8GB RAM. It allows for data to run faster between the 4 chips versus the 2. Just my 2 cents.

 

Anyone else want to say more?

You are right. The interleave will be a perf boost. But not a lot.

 

Since it's a "server" and VMs are involved - space for more RAM is a good thing...

 

3 hours ago, Haggis said:

This was my thoughts  the Dockers and vm are just for me playing about. The main use of this is for storage and plex

 

I play around with aws and ansible which is not taxing really. Play with new linux distros 

Fee Dockers running all the time. Vm for me to play with but just turned on when i am playing. Anything I can do with docker rsther than a full on vm will be done in docker

The whole Xeon thing is just a matter of whatever extra perf you would get out of the extra cache and the answer is "not enough to justify the price increase"

 

The main Xeon reason is ECC RAM and again not worth it outside the world of 5-9's

 

So, the tricky VM thing these days is to properly simulate a "real" Kubernetes Cluster which has become the defacto method for deploying Docker containers.

 

The "miniKube" method is close to stupid, so you need to simulate a minimum Kube cluster of 3 computers. That's where a Dual or Quad CPU mobo would be handy but by clever core Affinity control a single CPU with a ton of cores can be a "poor man's cluster"

 

So with 3 VMs you can get a Kube control, the Etcd node and the actual 1st Node that can host a max 512 Docker containers

 

I know you are just playing around, but once you set that up right, the incredible beauty of Kubernetes is that it then scales out infinitely. In fact Google has Docker deployments with over a billion containers.

 

So it is well worth your while if you are fooling with Docker at all to make sure your new "server" makes playing with Kubernetes smooth and easy...

 

19 minutes ago, DevTech said:

@Mindovermasteris correct here. A modern motherboard will take advantage of all 4 slots and interleave the DRAM access to increase overall throughput.

 

It is a minor boost however, and the value of empty slots to add 2 x 16 or 2 x 32 etc later on is probably worth keeping.

 

I mean .. not really.  You possibly will see increased numbers on synthetic benchmarks ... but real world use (Plex, VM, everyday-usage, etc.) you aren't going to know the difference.  The performance "hit" certainly isn't worth sacrificing all memory slots.

 

Do you have any real world benchmarks to show otherwise?

7 hours ago, Haggis said:

Decent Powered PSU as may add a GPU later for hardware transcoding in Plex

Another growing huge trend is exposing GPUs to Docker Containers for parallel GPU computing

 

The NVIDIA RTX series is designed for that.(amoung other design objectives of course)

 

Just now, Jim K said:

I mean .. not really.  You possibly will see increased numbers on synthetic benchmarks ... but real world use (Plex, VM, everyday-usage, etc.) you aren't going to know the difference.  The performance "hit" certainly isn't worth sacrificing all memory slots.

 

Do you have any real world benchmarks to show otherwise?

You have just applied different words to exactly what I said!

 

"It is a minor boost however, and the value of empty slots to add 2 x 16 or 2 x 32 etc later on is probably worth keeping"

 

I agree with you completely!

Ok so after doing more reading etc last night ( i am glad i started this thread its been very helpful)

 

I have limited the coolers down to three in the same sort of price range

 

Both have good reviews and user reviews

 

BE QUIET Dark Rock Pro 4 - £67.77

https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B07BY6F8D9/?coliid=I2Y4R7504TYWA3&colid=1TPACZGE9ZPCJ&psc=0&ref_=lv_ov_lig_dp_it

 

Noctua NH-D15S - £68.95

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Noctua-nh-d15s-Processor-2011-V3-300-RPM/dp/B00Y7928CS/ref=sr_1_2?keywords=noctua+d15s&qid=1556695389&s=computers&sr=1-2

 

Corsair Hydro H100 x 240 mm Radiator Dual 120 mm PWM Fans Liquid CPU Cooler - £72.09

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Corsair-Hydro-Radiator-Liquid-Cooler/dp/B07B68T46Q/ref=sr_1_21?crid=8PZWEGX6AHZ5&keywords=noctua+nh-d15&qid=1556694407&s=computers&sprefix=noctua%2Ccomputers%2C149&sr=1-21

 

In regards to the Water Cooling one these are my dimensions

 

PSU 15 x 14 x 8.6 cm

H100 15 x 22 x 31 cm

 

Case

Water cooling compatibility

Front – 360, 280, 240, 140 and 120 mm radiators of all thicknesses (requires removal of drive bays)

Top – 420, 360, 280, 240, 140 and 120 mm radiators. (A thickness limitation of 55mm for both radiator + fan applies on 420, 280 and 140 mm radiators) (420 and 360 mm radiators require removal of the ODD bay)

Bottom – 120 or 240 mm radiator (Use of radiators in the bottom position limits the PSU length to 165 mm)

Rear – 120 or 140 mm radiator

 

Now the case will be sitting on its side where it is so all top, bottom, rear and side fan locations are available

 

So what i am thinking is

 

Air Cooled Cooler

2 Fans on Front of the case pulling cold air in

The CPU cooler

2 Fans on rear of case pulling hot ait out

 

 

Water Cooled

the H100 Radiator on the botton of the Case (which as the case is on its side will be on its side open to the air) (also PSU is less than 165mm in length)

Two fans on front, pulling cold air i and two on back pulling hot air out

 

 

Does that make sense?

 

 

 

 

The main things that put me off water cooling is, i read a lot about pumps failing or tubes leaking, the fans are double the noise of the two air coolers

So i have settled on the following

 

Noctua NH-D15S - £68.95

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Noctua-nh-d15s-Processor-2011-V3-300-RPM/dp/B00Y7928CS/ref=sr_1_2?keywords=noctua+d15s&qid=1556695389&s=computers&sr=1-2

 

It has the option of adding an extra fan too if i wanted to

 

So the build now looks like this

 

 

CPU: Intel - Core i7-8700 3.2 GHz 6-Core Processor
CPU Cooler: Noctua - NH-D15S 82.52 CFM CPU Cooler
Motherboard: ASRock - Z390 Extreme4 ATX LGA1151 Motherboard
Memory: Corsair - Vengeance LPX 32 GB (2 x 16 GB) DDR4-3000 Memory
Case: Fractal Design - Define R5 Blackout Edition ATX Mid Tower Case
Power Supply: Corsair - TXM Gold 750 W 80+ Gold Certified Semi-Modular ATX Power Supply


 

  • Like 2

I honestly can't think of anything to change (it would just nitpicking). The cooler is compatible with your config, the memory and CPU check out.  Your config should meet/exceed your usage requirements.

 

I think you're good.

18 hours ago, Brandon H said:

most closed circuit coolers you never have to touch once installed and work great and quiet

Latest LTT suggests that Noctua coolers can run cooler and quieter than AIO liquid.

  • Like 3
1 hour ago, Haggis said:

So i have settled on the following

 

Noctua NH-D15S - £68.95

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Noctua-nh-d15s-Processor-2011-V3-300-RPM/dp/B00Y7928CS/ref=sr_1_2?keywords=noctua+d15s&qid=1556695389&s=computers&sr=1-2

 

It has the option of adding an extra fan too if i wanted to

 

So the build now looks like this

 

 


CPU: Intel - Core i7-8700 3.2 GHz 6-Core Processor
CPU Cooler: Noctua - NH-D15S 82.52 CFM CPU Cooler
Motherboard: ASRock - Z390 Extreme4 ATX LGA1151 Motherboard
Memory: Corsair - Vengeance LPX 32 GB (2 x 16 GB) DDR4-3000 Memory
Case: Fractal Design - Define R5 Blackout Edition ATX Mid Tower Case
Power Supply: Corsair - TXM Gold 750 W 80+ Gold Certified Semi-Modular ATX Power Supply


 

1. I would suggest a lot more CPU cores somehow or the option to get move via an empty CPU socket. For servers more cores are far more useful than more Ghz

 

2. Speed and latency of RAM is simply not critical so it might be possible to investigate cheaper RAM to free up budget for cores etc.

 

3. I would strongly suggest a better PSU that contains either SuperFlower or Seasonic internals.

12 minutes ago, DevTech said:

1. I would suggest a lot more CPU cores somehow or the option to get move via an empty CPU socket. For servers more cores are far more useful than more Ghz

 

2. Speed and latency of RAM is simply not critical so it might be possible to investigate cheaper RAM to free up budget for cores etc.

 

3. I would strongly suggest a better PSU that contains either SuperFlower or Seasonic internals.

Disagree on all of that, except #2. Their specs are fine.

 

----

 

I'm in the process of moving toward containers on my setup, however as it stands:

 

Home Server Setup: Firewall/pfSense VM, File Server, Web Server, VPN/Project Server, Windows 10 VM. My 6 core i5-8400 barely breaks a sweat, and I'm never wondering why, or regretting only getting an i5 six core proc.

 

Before last year I was running everything below on an intel i5 nuc (skylake). Only reason I upgraded was because I wanted quad nics, which resulted in a new build.

 

I need to bump up my RAM though to 32GB. Limiting some projects.

 

141.PNG

1311.PNG

Edited by shockz

How to find out which PSU OEM Brand and Model is being used by the major PSU "re-packagers" such as Corsair and EVGA:

 

http://www.orionpsudb.com/corsair

 

http://www.orionpsudb.com/evga

 

The best PSU are made by SuperFlower and Seasonic so you just need to scan down the list to find out which model line in Corsair or EVGA is using the "good stuff"

 

2 minutes ago, DevTech said:

How to find out which PSU OEM Brand and Model is being used by the major PSU "re-packagers" such as Corsair and EVGA:

 

http://www.orionpsudb.com/corsair

 

http://www.orionpsudb.com/evga

 

The best PSU are made by SuperFlower and Seasonic so you just need to scan down the list to find out which model line in Corsair or EVGA is using the "good stuff"

 

Who says he needs the greatest PSU?

8 minutes ago, shockz said:

Disagree on all of that, except #2. Their specs are fine.

 

----

 

I'm in the process of moving toward containers on my setup, however as it stands:

 

Home Server Setup: Firewall/pfSense VM, File Server, Web Server, VPN/Project Server, Windows 10 VM. My 6 core i5-8400 barely breaks a sweat.

 

I need to bump up my RAM though to 32GB. Limiting some projects.

 

141.PNG

1311.PNG

#1 - EVERYTHING Docker is moving to Kubernetes and IMHO a proper Kubernetes simulation needs more dedicated cores. So you have discovered you need more RAM and that was very predictable! Eventually you will go with the rest of humanity and adopt Kubernetes and then you will discover a new very predictable expansion need...

 

#3 - That Corsair model uses a Chanel Well PSU which is not in the same league as a Super Flower. Why not get decent stuff once you know the difference. The cost differential is minimal...

 

2 minutes ago, Mindovermaster said:

Who says he needs the greatest PSU?

Due Diligence.

 

We cannot look at somebody's specs and then refuse to point out the obvious. What he then does with the information is his business.

 

Corsair makes a larger profit when they borrow on their reputation to source a lessor PSU. The cost differential to get a better PSU is not much and could easily be recouped by getting one with a Bronze rating perhaps.

 

The Bronze/Silver/Gold/Platinum ratings are not that important compared to the BASIC quality of PSU design.

 

The actual percentage of Voltage Regulation requirement that is super critical happens in the PSU of the Motherboard and you control that by examining the PSU specs on the Motherboard where companies like ASUS list the number of phases on-board which corresponds to the Power Regulator circuits...

 

 

 

3 minutes ago, Human.Online said:

Nobody has said "he needs the greatest PSU" but on a server, thus powered 24/7 I would at least go with a reputable company.

The way Dev is saying it, it sounds that way...

15 minutes ago, Mindovermaster said:

Who says he needs the greatest PSU?

To expand a bit, Chanel Well does not make horrible supplies. So it is not the end of the world if he had already bought a Chanel Well, but scanning down the Corsair list yields the AX760 and Ax860 which use Seasonic, a nice improvement!

 

Looking at the EVGA list shows far more opportunities to get an equal cost footprint Super Flower or Seasonic. So EVGA is probably making a little less profit than Coarsair and delivering much more value to the consumer with more premium quality options for the same price as what is still a high quality option with Corsair 

 

15 minutes ago, Mindovermaster said:

The way Dev is saying it, it sounds that way...

Take a deep breath, young grasshopper...

 

Power Supplies are very tricky and represent a strong need for Analog knowledge mixed into a Digital world.

 

The internet is a vast array of information noise and it is hard to sort it out, and it helps to build up a collection of useful "indicators" that hint at the quality of the information source.

 

So for Power Supplies, whenever you hear statements like Corsair or EVGA or "well known brand" from anyone that says that line has a good reputation etc, a little red flag goes up and you know right away they don't know what they are talking about.

 

All those brands just re-package the REAL PSU units from various sources and the quality varies a lot depending on the OEM source. The better re-packagers like Corsair and EVGA don't change OEMs midstream for a particular model line so you have the advantage of being able to dig down and find out what you are getting when you part with your hard earned money!

 

If you poke around in this website, you will get an idea of the wide variety of OEMs that get sourced. http://www.orionpsudb.com

 

Armed with a little knowledge, you can then buy a MUCH BETTER power supply for the SAME MONEY and what can be bad about that?

 

Also, when you look at people that review Power Supplies check their Test Equipment:

 

"The latter one had a particularly good reviewer whose knowledge, equipment (including a very expensive Chroma 8000 loader), and testing methodology rivalled even the best PSU websites" http://www.orionpsudb.com/news/experienced-reviewer-from-expreview-starts-his-own-website

 

 

1 hour ago, Human.Online said:

Latest LTT suggests that Noctua coolers can run cooler and quieter than AIO liquid.

good to know. I just have a basic fan in my PC currently as I'm a bit restricted with a low-profile case. Will definitely think about going Noctua for my eventual upgrade though :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
    • Usually the bigger ones with many fixes/changes take a few, theyre an exception to the rule most likely
    • If you don’t get lucky with Valve’s Steam Machine reservation system, you can make your own Steam Machine instead. Valve says that “starting with the SteamOS 3.8 release, you can put together your own Steam Machine using whatever PC parts you want.” SteamOS 3.8.10 launched last week with a slew of updates, including “improved compatibility with recent Intel and AMD platforms.” Alongside that improved compatibility, Valve is giving gamers the green light to install SteamOS on their own desktops. In an interview with The Verge, Valve’s Pierre-Loup Griffais said Valve has been “rolling out improvements to [SteamOS] so it’s more compatible with desktop hardware,” including eventual support for Nvidia graphics. Griffais says Valve has “a growing team” working on Nvidia driver support for SteamOS, adding, “We’re collaborating with Nvidia very closely.” While he mentioned that Nvidia support might not come this year, Griffais emphasized that “it’s certainly something that we’re working on in the background.”     Subscription not needed: https://archive.fo/Tssfc Subscription needed: https://www.theverge.com/games/953411/valve-steamos-desktop-nvidia
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!