• 0

Need better backup software for PC to external hard drive.


Question

I'm looking for the best backup software when using external hard drives.  Currently I have a PC that has multiple internal drives and I have two Seagate external drives backing everything up (8TB & 6TB respectively). However I'm using the Seagate Toolkit software included with them and I'm finding that while it does backup data successfully, it's HORRIBLY slow, freezes up, and is limited on options.

 

What are other backup software options I can use to replace this with?  I'd like to have continuous backup options and scheduled backup options for other files.  Something that is reasonably fast and isn't eating up 1+gb of ram just opening and accessing the drives.

 

Thanks!

11 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  On 11/05/2019 at 13:59, modem said:

I'm looking for the best backup software when using external hard drives.  Currently I have a PC that has multiple internal drives and I have two Seagate external drives backing everything up (8TB & 6TB respectively). However I'm using the Seagate Toolkit software included with them and I'm finding that while it does backup data successfully, it's HORRIBLY slow, freezes up, and is limited on options.

 

What are other backup software options I can use to replace this with?  I'd like to have continuous backup options and scheduled backup options for other files.  Something that is reasonably fast and isn't eating up 1+gb of ram just opening and accessing the drives.

 

Thanks!

Expand  

Drives read and write at the speed that they can. No software can make it faster/slower (that I know of)

 

You using USB2? USB3 has better transfer speeds.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USB

 

Both ends have to be USB3 to gain that speed.

  • 0

Thanks for the reply.  I should have clarified better.  It's not the data transfer that is slow, it's the operation of the Seagate Toolkit program that is slow and freezing (without it being in the midst of a data backup).  Sorry for the confusion.  I'm referencing the program itself is the core of the issue.

 

  • 0
  On 11/05/2019 at 14:39, modem said:

Thanks for the reply.  I should have clarified better.  It's not the data transfer that is slow, it's the operation of the Seagate Toolkit program that is slow and freezing (without it being in the midst of a data backup).  Sorry for the confusion.  I'm referencing the program itself is the core of the issue.

 

Expand  

Oh, OK, that makes sense now ;)

  • 0

I find myself using Macrium's solutions lately, you could give Reflect a try:  https://www.macrium.com

 

There's a free version, but something other than that ought to fit better because of what they call rapid delta, plus their CBT could prove useful as well.

 

Seagate Tools were Acronis based right? Like those Western Digital provides?

  • Like 1
  • 0

If it's just files, have you considered going very simple and just doing something like a robocopy? Once you have the appropriate script down covering the source and destination directories you could schedule that command with Task Scheduler. You'll remove a lot of inefficiencies by software and can do this regularly without thought or manually kick it off if there is a need. 

  • 0

I suggest Macrium Reflect too.

 

I must say that I myself have tested or used many backup apps in the past, including:

  • Acronis True Image: Has the largest number of features, but I stopped using it when I discovered that its backup volumes could easily break. Acronis reassures me that they have fixed this issue since 2017, but it was five years too late. I had moved on. Also, this one is the most expensive.
  • SuperEasy 1-Click Backup: Pretentious name, but it was the only backup app that supported reverse incremental backup in VMDK format. Plus, its backup operations could survive a power outage or deliberate restart. I loved it but its company went out of business. One day, I lost the recovery disk and could not download it again. I had to say goodbye and move on.
  • Veeam Agent for Windows: Solid functionality. Very stable. The free version's feature set is too restrictive. It has a premium version too, but its company's constant incessant talk of "virtual machines" and "business continuity" will drive you away.
  • AOMEI Backupper Pro: I just used this one for a while because I won a free license. Otherwise, one must know better than using an app whose name has "backupper" in it. Made in China. I have nothing against China, but the Chinese do not understand our needs. It has a free standard version too.
  • Paragon Backup & Recovery: Performed better than most items in this list, but it was a back-stabbing traitor. Every time Windows 10 was upgraded (1607, 1703, 1709) it got silently deactivated. It means it did not create backups on the schedule and failed to generate appropriate notifications. One time I lost a file and ran the app to restore it, but there was no backup to speak of.

Also, stay away from any backup product coming from Microsoft.

  • Like 3
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Never use an in-browser password manager. It creates a barrier to using any other web browser.
    • I have always wondered if there is any difference between .BAT and .CMD files!
    • I will confirm the Vista hate was ridiculous. They had a point before SP1 and too many didn't use newer components at launch, misleading some to believe it was bad. It really wasn't (after SP1.) The jump from 98/ME to XP didn't get a bad reaction at all from what I remember. 8 was awful. 10 for the most part ran pretty well but people disliked the telemetry and standard MS shenanigans, but 11 is definitely worse in some ways.
    • What I can confirm to not be exaggerations or misinformation is the slowness of the standard right click menus and the Task Manager in Windows 11, even on brand spanking new bare installs.
    • Linux 6.16-rc2: Smaller than usual, but with notable network and bcachefs tweaks by Paul Hill Linus Torvalds, the creator of the Linux kernel, has just released the second release candidate of Linux 6.16. Following the release of Linux 6.15, developers submitted their new features to be merged with Linux 6.16. These release candidates are focused on polishing the kernel before release, following the merging of new features. In his weekly mailing list post, Torvalds noticed that things were pretty quiet this week and that this could be due to developers taking a summer vacation or just taking a break following a large merge window a few weeks ago. This isn’t uncommon at this point in the cycle and Torvalds expects more activity next week. Networking and bcachefs dominate changes The second release candidate, despite being small, still brings some notable changes, namely network drivers, Bluetooth drivers, and bcachefs, a copy-on-write filesystem for Linux. The improvements to network drivers have a direct impact on end users, it means that newer networking hardware works out of the box when you install Linux and existing problematic drivers get fixed. There were also improvements made to the Rust infrastructure and core networking changes. Implementing Rust in the kernel is good for users as it has memory safety built in, leaving hackers less to attack in Linux systems. Rust has received backlash by some opinionated Linux developers who don’t want to learn a new language, but it doesn’t look like it’s going anywhere. Under the hood: specific fixes This week, a diverse set of developers have contributed fixes to the kernel that improve kernel stability, Bluetooth connectivity, file sharing over SMB, and virtualization performance. Some specific changes this week include: Fixes for CPU burning, firmware stats, and use-after-free (UAF) issues with the ath11k and ath12k Wi-Fi drivers. Various fixes for UAF, NULL pointer differences and advertising issues in Bluetooth drivers. Improvements to Server Message Block (SMB) related to directory cache reuse and a fix for performance regression with deferred closes. In KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine), there are fixes for SEV-SNP support, memory pre-faulting, and ARM64 selftests. The SMB fixes are notable because it's an important protocol in networked Windows environments. It helps with file sharing, printer sharing, and Active Directory integration. By improving Linux’s support for this protocol, readers using SMB in Linux to talk to Windows machines will have a smoother experience. Ongoing development Linux 6.16 is due to get seven or eight release candidates over the cycle so there are now five or six weeks until the stable version arrives. Even when it is out, most people’s first use of this kernel will be when distributions decide to ship it, as they can be tricky to install manually. Stay tuned each week as we bring you all the new changes which each new release candidate.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Explorer
      Legend20 went up a rank
      Explorer
    • One Month Later
      jezzzy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      CSpera earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      MIR JOHNNY BLAZE earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Apprentice
      Wireless wookie went up a rank
      Apprentice
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      625
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      276
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      178
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      152
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      115
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!