Recommended Posts

I am going to do a brave project

 

Aim: Home server mainly for Nextcloud as my first priority in addition to NAS , plex 4k (DirectPlay), Adblock server

 

I hope I can get SBC doing this with the minimal specs of USB3 and true Gigabit LAN (RPI 4 check)

And of course NO Spectre or meltdown vulnerability, (RPI 4 fail)

The only one I could find is the Rock64 as far as I searched.

 

I am open to the possibility of a miniPC with 2.5 inch bay for storage or even USB3.Yet should have No spectre or meltdown vulnerability

 

I am curious what the options can be..

 

So you plan on running multi tenant VMs on this "nas"... I think you should really do a bit more research on the details of meltdown and Spectre and how they could be exploited.  Before you concern yourself with you place too much concern on them to your "nas"

 

How exactly do you feel those exploits could be exploited on your nas??

 

What code would you be executing on your "nas" where it could use these exploits to "steal" info?  The only thing that runs on my nas is the nas software..  And a few "trusted" packages from secure locations, etc.  Its not a pc where you willy nilly go exe code because you were the 1million visitor to site xyz...

  • Like 3
4 hours ago, BudMan said:

So you plan on running multi tenant VMs on this "nas"... I think you should really do a bit more research on the details of meltdown and Spectre and how they could be exploited.  Before you concern yourself with you place too much concern on them to your "nas"

 

How exactly do you feel those exploits could be exploited on your nas??

 

What code would you be executing on your "nas" where it could use these exploits to "steal" info?  The only thing that runs on my nas is the nas software..  And a few "trusted" packages from secure locations, etc.  Its not a pc where you willy nilly go exe code because you were the 1million visitor to site xyz...

IIRC, you only run your NAS on your guest network. It won't go on the internet. So would that count out meltdown?

Im just a loss to why anyone would be worried about those issues on a "nas"  Are you giving access to other users running code?  Is your pc that could get infected by you running some untrusted code, or even getting hit with some drive by sort of infection?

 

You do not browse from your "nas" atleast not normally.. The only code running on it should be some packages from the maker of the nas from their secured stuff.  Or at worse some VMs you run on it for something - again should be trusted code running on it, etc.. Are you planning on running some VM on it that your going to use for XYZ that maybe could get infected?

 

But currently - good luck trying to find some cpu that is not open to these sorts of exploits..  And while its not a bad idea to get something that is not susceptible to such code... I don't see it as such an issue that you wouldn't get xyz nas box because of it..  But then again you have not given the full details of you are going to use this nas.. I can just comment on how nas is normally used..

 

And then again any major "nas" maker has supplied mitigation - for example here is synology page on the issues

https://www.synology.com/en-us/security/advisory/Synology_SA_18_01

DSM 6.2ModerateUpgrade to 6.2.2-24922 or above.

 

Here is best advice

Synology rates the overall severity as Moderate because these vulnerabilities can only be exploited via local malicious programs. To secure customers' products against the attacks, we recommend you only install trusted packages.

  • Like 3

Something must have been misunderstood.

 

My main goal is to de-googlify my world, using nextcloud storage, calender, contacts, chat (Preferably installed over NAS control panel).May add adblock, pfsense later.

I plan on accessing nextcloud from my cellphone ,so it should be open to the internet.

You are right, I wont brose internet from my NAS. It is a dedicated thing.I will definitely install nextcloud plugin and may be some to follow later

 

Lastly: Am I over worried about spectre and meltdown for nextcloud server?

6 hours ago, Mindovermaster said:

IIRC, you only run your NAS on your guest network. It won't go on the internet. So would that count out meltdown?

I would connect to the internet at some time later.If so, should be concerned about meltdown Only?...If yes, some AMD CPUs are not vulnerable to meltdown, in contrast to spectre

4 hours ago, medhunter said:

Am I over worried about spectre and meltdown for nextcloud server?

Yes!!!

 

Unless you think the nextcloud code your downloading from nextcloud is compromised and spying on you using those exploits.

  • 2 weeks later...

You have not called out anywhere near enough design considerations and budget constraints to be honest. Yeah sure you can use a pi as a cheap nas.. Will it meet your performance needs??

 

Pi 4 is pretty cheap option.. Yeah it could be a nas, yeah it could also serve up plex - 4k direct might be possible.  That would also depend on what your clients are going to be.  And for sure it could run say pihole.

 

They also sell off the shelf ready to plug in and go devices as well that can do all of that. Say something like

https://www.synology.com/en-us/products/DS118

 

Or even the ds119j might work or you.. Your at like 99 for that model.. Which would be same sort of price you would be spending on a pi4 with all the things you need to make it work. Case, power supply, microsd etc.. Cables.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Just pull a 4Chan and ignore the UK gov, or better troll them. It's not like they can enforce the fine across border.
    • It has NEVER been shown that all these overreaching creepy methods of surveillance have ever saved a child or prevented a terrorist attack. Not a single one. It's the kind of people like you who just wave it away as "paranoid conspiracy" that makes big tech and governments this creepy mass data hoarding entities. Not only that, 3/4 of these surveillance ideas undermine the very foundations of safe online communication because they always want to have a backdoor in everything "just in case" they might need it to... checks the notes "save the children". If you put a backdoor into encryption chain there is no encryption chain anymore. You know what encryption keeps safe? Your medical records, your online shopping and credit card during payment, your photos in the cloud, your emails, your passwords, everything. There is ZERO guarantee only the good guys will use it. And if you think police suddenly can't apprehend child abusers because of encryption, Epstein was running his entire sex trafficking ring using GMail which is not even encrypted end to end. Or to make matters even worse, USA has a **** and a good buddy of Epstein as a president. Absolutely NOTHING has been done to address it. Maxwell just got a better "hotel" room as a reward. This clearly shows how they absolutely don't really care about the children but they care about the absolute control over all of us. And you're defending them here. Good grief. On top of constant attempts to insert backdoors into encryption chain, the entire age verification nonsense is again entirely over reaching, creepy, invades everyone's privacy with premise of yet again "protecting the children" instead of demanding device makers to provide simple and powerful tools for PARENTS to control how their children use devices and what they do on them. THIS would be the way, not the stupid age verification for everyone. Imagine if government would be dictating companies how their phones work and not the company's IT department. The parents should be the IT department to their children. And for everyone excusing "they are not knowledgeable enough" buuuuuulsheat. We live in a digital age, if you have children now, you absolutely are well versed in digital everything at least to basic extent. If you're not, how do you even function in these times then? Reality is that parents are just lazy and don't want to deal with this. They want government to raise their kids because they are too busy scrolling stupid Instagram and Tiktok or some bs.
    • You could make the argument that K should not be included, but FC, the fried chicken, is not the framework, it's the product. It's the Paint in Paint.NET. A closer analogy is if KFC included the name of the deep fryer they used. HennyPennyFC.
    • Flying as the central point eh... As a massive Spyro fan who has replayed the Reignited Trilogy three times and the originals 4 times... I have some doubts, but maybe...
    • Apple is expanding Private Cloud Compute beyond its own data centers by Pradeep Viswanathan At WWDC 2026, as part of the improved Apple Intelligence capabilities, Apple today announced that it is expanding Private Cloud Compute (PCC), its privacy-focused cloud infrastructure for Apple Intelligence, beyond its own data centers for the first time. Private Cloud Compute was designed to handle Apple Intelligence requests that are too complex to run fully on-device. The PCC system does not store user data and does not allow Apple or anyone else to access user requests. Last year, Apple also expanded its Security Bounty program with rewards of up to $1 million for researchers who could find serious vulnerabilities in PCC. Until now, Apple's PCC data centers were using Apple's own silicon. As part of the expansion, Apple is working with Google and NVIDIA to run new Apple Intelligence workloads on Google Cloud systems powered by NVIDIA GPUs. Apple will be using this new infrastructure to execute more demanding AI tasks while maintaining the same privacy and security guarantees of PCC. The new implementation uses NVIDIA Confidential Computing with NVIDIA GPUs, Intel CPUs with TDX, and Google’s Titan chip. Apple says it has worked with Google to build additional protections beyond a traditional confidential computing deployment. Despite the expansion to third-party data centers, Apple claims that its core PCC requirements remain unchanged, including stateless computation, no privileged runtime access, non-targetability, and verifiable transparency. The company highlighted that it will continue to control the PCC software stack, and Apple devices will only trust PCC software that has been cryptographically approved by Apple. To take security to the next level, Apple mentioned that it is maintaining an append-only ledger of Google Cloud hardware that is part of the PCC fleet. The company claims this will help reduce the risk of supply chain attacks. In addition to AI infrastructure, Apple also worked with Google to use technologies behind the Gemini family of models to build the next generation of Apple Foundation Models to power Apple Intelligence features across on-device and cloud workloads. As expected, for more demanding AI tasks like agentic tool use and complex reasoning, Apple will rely on the expanded PCC infrastructure running on Google Cloud. The expansion of PCC on Google Cloud will gradually ramp toward the full set of protections during the summer preview period. As before, Apple will also publish binaries for public inspection, provide research tooling, and give researchers access to live PCC nodes in research mode through the Apple Security Bounty Program.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      222
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      92
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      86
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!