Recommended Posts

I have a ASUS WL-520gU router (running FreshTomato 2019.2 firmware) and I suspect it's semi-dead because earlier the internet was flaky and what I further noticed is not being able to access the built-in web page at the usual 192.168.1.1 address. so I pulled the power cord from the router, wait a few seconds, powered it back up and at this point I could then access the 192.168.1.1 page but it was not long before it got out of whack again. so I tried erasing the NVRAM option in the FreshTomato 2019.2 firmware, which wipes the router and puts it back to it's defaults, and after the reset, the same thing occurred.

 

so I figured just to test some things... I got my older Linksys WRT54GS v1.1, which I also have FreshTomato 2019.2 firmware on it, and connected that and configured it to my liking and I no longer have that issue and things seem stable now.

 

so given that info... that seems to suggest that ASUS WL-520gU router is pretty much shot, correct? ; but assuming it is semi-shot... could it possibly be a bad power supply etc? ; because I heard capacitors can go bad (either in the router itself or the power supply for the router) and make things unstable. I am just seeing if I can possibly get the router working again. but if I got to put much $ into it, I probably won't bother given the old Linksys works and it's got more RAM to (although I do miss the USB port on the ASUS router since it used it occasionally to power a 120mm USB fan since I got a external hard drive sitting on the desktop which helps cool it if I leave it on any length of time etc).

 

p.s. I am probably going to see what I can do now that the ASUS router has been powered down for some hours as I might try connecting it to another computer I have and try wiping the NVRAM again and after a reboot let the router run for a while to see if the 192.168.1.1 page is still accessible or not.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1385066-router-gone-bad/
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, ThaCrip said:

the same thing occurred.

Same what?  flaky is not a term that describes what is actually happening to your internet connection..  Unless your describing baked goods?  Those biscuits sure were flaky ;)

@BudMan

 

Same thing occurred in that the issue never went away as the internet was flaky* and more importantly the 192.168.1.1 address did not work.

 

the ASUS router was working fine until about 12 hours ago.

 

*flaky as in Google would load(at least sometimes), but a lot of other sites would not etc. basically the internet was unstable and I know my internet was not out at the time either. plus, like I already mentioned the 192.168.1.1 issue went away when I switched to the Linksys router and the internet was stable again. that's why I am leaning towards the ASUS router is semi-shot.

5 minutes ago, ThaCrip said:

192.168.1.1 address did not work. 

If you can not get to the web gui, via IP and you sure your on good cable and have IP on the same 192.168.1 network..  Then yeah points to a problem with it.

 

This is wired or wireless your trying to access it?  Did you change to a different port on the routers lan ports?

 

That is  G only router?  Time to have gotten something newer was a long time ago ;)

 

@BudMan

 

I disabled wireless access to the 192.168.1.1 page (more secure that way to). so it's all done through a wired connection and the same wires were used when I changed over to the Linksys from the ASUS. also, I have a static IP setup on my primary PC (i.e. 192.168.1.98)

 

but, like I was saying in my initial post, when I can't access the 192.168.1.1 page, which it should be able to, I can power off the router and power it back on, wait a little and then I can get access to the 192.168.1.1 page for a little while before it goes out again and the unstable internet kicks in along with that issue.

 

but assuming the ASUS router is shot... I just wonder whether you think it's the router itself or a unstable power supply that's making the router unstable as if it's a power supply issue I might be able to find something around the house to fix it etc. but if it's the router itself... that's probably the end of it. but I hear capacitors could be the issue which if that's the case maybe I could fix it but then again if the cost is not very minimal I am probably best off moving on.

 

p.s. basically I have the ASUS (well now Linksys) router connected to my ISP's modem and use the 'IP passthrough' stuff to the ASUS (currently Linksys) router does everything.

Doesn't matter if power supply or gremlins in it.. If its failing - ie can not get to its web gui.. Then get a new one.. That thing is only g and 10/100.. you can pick up a AC wifi router with gig ports for like 20$  To be honest its not even worth dicking with..

  • Like 2
Just now, Jim K said:

Can you load the original ASUS firmware just to see if it works?

Possibly. but I doubt that's the problem because I was using the original Tomato firmware on it for years (i.e. https://www.polarcloud.com/tomato ) then roughly a couple years ago switched to Toastman (which is based on the original Tomato firmware but more updated as the build I was running of that I think was from the year 2014) and that was rock solid (I could easily get over a year of uptime on that) and then not long ago switched to FreshTomato 2019.2 firmware which was released in April 2019 and I installed it (more specifically... "freshtomato-K26_RT-MIPSR1-2019.2-Mini") roughly a month or two ago and it was fine until about 12 hours ago.

 

you still think it's worth attempting the original firmware?

 

p.s. I am sure I could run DD-WRT on it but I tend to prefer Tomato variations a bit more.

1 minute ago, BudMan said:

you can pick up a AC wifi router with gig ports for like 20$  To be honest its not even worth dicking with

 

Good point. but if I do get another more modern router for around $20 I definitely want something that can run Tomato or DD-WRT firmware.

 

because if I can get a noticeably better router for only $20 or so it would be hard to argue against it as if I had to pay like $50-ish or more it's probably not worth it given my internet is not all that fast anyways. but around $20, it would be difficult for me to complain ;)

Sure you could find something that will run dd-wrt that in the <30$ for AC, or for SURE atleast N for that price range..

 

How fast is your internet?  Not always comes down to internet, if you use things that talk to each other over your local network..

 

You understand a G is only like 21-3 mbps tops...  Your internet is that slow?

 

@BudMan

 

My internet is actually quite slow for high speed standards... 400-420KB/s MAX for download speed. so as you can see it's pretty weak. could be worse, but could be better. although what I do like about it, no data cap with my current stuff.

 

that's my general wired computer (my main PC) and I only got a couple of wireless things that use it for basic internet here and there. but I guess it would not hurt having a bit better wireless speed in case I do a transfer over the local network etc and I guess even from a wired perspective it would not hurt to get something that can go beyond the 10-11MB/s limit of my current routers.

Similar to you I've had the Linksys WRT54G, ASUS WL-520GU then an ASUS RT-N16 all running the Tomato Firmware.

 

The issue you described I actually had a few times with the ASUS RT-N16, I re flashed the firmware, erasing the NVRAM in the process and the router would be fine for a few months, then the same would randomly happen again. The router was however fine for years before this occurred. It's almost like the on board flash was gradually corrupting over time.

 

I'm now running pfSense in a Virtual Machine as my router, certainly coming from the Tomato Firmware you'd very much like the pfSense web ui.

 

Something like the SG-1100 might a nice upgrade from a router flashed with third party firmware if you thought it was worth spending the money on it.

@InsaneNutter

 

Thanks. it's nice to know someone experienced the same issue I have and seems to pretty much confirm the router is basically shot (or at least not reliable enough to use for any length of time).

 

on a side note... looking around online it seems you can find some routers noticeably better than what I have for $30 tops. but I suspect ill just wait a while until my Linksys WRT54GS v1.1 dies as I even have another older Belkin router (it's not as good as the Linksys but I suspect will get me by) I can use if this one acts up in the future but that one can only run DD-WRT micro since it's only got 2MB flash and 8MB of RAM where as the Linksys I am using has 8MB flash and 32MB of RAM which is a lot for the older wireless G routers.

 

but thanks for the link to SD-1100 but for around $159 is a little to steep as I am looking more in the $30 range. but like I mentioned above, ill probably use the Linksys I mentioned above for as long as I can before it dies as by then ill be able to get a even better router for around $30 or so.

 

p.s. thanks for everyones help as it appears we pretty much sorted it out.

You are correct added some extra 000 in there ;) 

 

That is some slow ass internet.. You would be better off just using your phone for internet, hehehe

 

Who would even provide such slow internet - slowest internet package from say infinity is 25mbps..  for $20 a month.. What do you pay for such a connection, that is like low end of a 3G wireless connection.

3 hours ago, BudMan said:

that is like low end of a 3G wireless connection.

In India, the average 4G speed is about that much! 🤣😑

 

The fastest speed you can get is only around 10 times that. 😖

@ThaCrip Yeah, your router is most likely at the end of its life. Just get a new AC router. Or if you have an old PC lying around, stick another NIC in it and run pfSense. Even a 10 year old PC with pfSense will sweep the floor with most consumer routers. The power consumption of an old PC is going to be a lot higher than a tiny basic router though. And you will need Access Points or an old router configured as an AP for wireless. But if you're willing to overlook those points, pfSense is way more feature rich and powerful compared to any 3rd party firmware!

Pfsense is NOT something you would use for any wifi to your network ;)  Sticking a card in the pc wouldn't be a good idea, nor does freebsd even have any ac support.

 

But if his internet is really that slow, then such a cheap router is all he would need for internet.. But doesn't he move stuff around internally?  10/100 would be almost as bad as G wireless.. I don't have any G devices on my network even..   Even the cheapest IOT device these days do N, they might not do N on 5.. But they don't do G ;)

 

But sure if he had an old PC around to run pfsense on, and then use the $20 AC router as just an AP..

7 hours ago, BudMan said:

Pfsense is NOT something you would use for any wifi to your network ;)  Sticking a card in the pc wouldn't be a good idea, nor does freebsd even have any ac support.

But sure if he had an old PC around to run pfsense on, and then use the $20 AC router as just an AP..

Yes, that is what I actually meant, just didn't explain it better. The 2nd NIC would be for ethernet which would connect to a switch. And then all AP's or old routers as AP's to that switch. 🙂

Hello,

 

Given the age of the device (about eight year old or so), I would assume that one of the hotter-running components on the board has gone bad (the PHY, processor, power circuitty or wireless radio).  Most, if not all of these, are going to be surface-mounted or perhaps even BGA-mounted components and not replaceable without a rework station for reflowing the solder.  Given the length of time the device was in service, I would just recommend looking for a replacement device, as @BudMan suggested.

 

Regards,

 

Aryeh Goretsky

 

@goretsky

 

Yeah, I figured the ASUS router is pretty much shot.

 

but last night I basically plugged it back in, cleared NVRAM, rebooted and just sitting there with a basic cat5 cable connected to a laptop, so it's offline, it seemed to be okay in the brief time I tested it, which was about 5-10min, and the 192.168.1.1 page was still accessible. so it appears it's working, but given what happened it's hard to say if it still stay working for long especially given the comments above by InsaneNutter. because if it's only going to be okay for maybe a few months before acting up again I am better off not using it. so ill probably stick with the Linksys WRT54GS v1.1 (8MB flash/32MB RAM) for now.

 

thanks again for everyones time ;)

Not sure how anyone could possible find G ok... Do you not do anything on your local network, no streaming of movies or anything.. I take it your internet is slow and G is capable of handling it.. But wow how can you actually do anything with such connection... The files I move over to my nas in 30 seconds would take hours..

 

Are you out in the middle of the boonies or something that your internet is so slow?  What does its cost - is it like $5 a month or something?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • So size is the ONLY selling point????? People have been plugging in PC's to TV's in living rooms for 20+ years. I would take a bigger box for more peformance. Also lot and lots of SFF/Mini ITX build guides out there.
    • My point is, if you buying this instead of a console for TV purposes, that you need to understand that you will not be able to play the most popular MP games with Steam OS. Now if you are not into those games, and into some of the perputual alpha/beta games on Steam then this is an option. I would argue a gaming PC would be the better route, more expensive but take the 1k -1.4k you are about to spend on this thing and build a better one. Because it is running Linux you can overide its 1080p settings. However The Verge complained about its 1080p cap and how you would have to get around it at the CLI, so someone buying this instead of a PS5 or Xbox might have a challege on their hands.
    • A review of Synology's BeeCamera software for the BeeStation Plus by Christopher White Synology is leaning into the BeeStation and the BeeStation Plus, and it's easy to understand why. While power users will want something more customizable, the BeeStation and its more powerful sibling, the BeeStation Plus, are great for those who want a device they can simply plug in, click a few buttons, and have it work as their own personal cloud. Until recently, the device was mostly used for the storage of files, photos, and videos, and with the Plus model, you could install and stream media through Plex. Synology recently released a new free application for the BeeStation Plus called BeeCamera, which is basically a stripped-down version of Surveillance Station. First, let's get the confusing naming out of the way. While you might initially think that BeeCamera is a physical device, perhaps a camera that Synology created specifically for the BeeStation Plus, that would be incorrect. BeeCamera is simply the name for the application that runs on the NAS and on your mobile device. I think the marketing team missed the mark here, but it does fit the other naming on the device, like BeePhotos and BeeFiles, I guess. Camera Support As of right now, only Synology-branded cameras are supported, which many will see as a callback to the drive locking the company implemented and then backtracked on. That said, while I 100% disagree on drive locking, I agree that camera locking for a device made to simply plug and play is the right decision. The whole point of the BeeStation line is simplicity. There are currently three camera model lines available, a wireless device for indoor use, and two PoE models for external use. CC400W (Wi-Fi): Plug it into power using the included power adapter, and connect it to your wireless network. This camera is rated only for indoor use and is the one I was provided to review the BeeCamera. $198.36, in line with the Unifi G6 Compact. BC510 (PoE): A bullet-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. TC510 (PoE): A dome-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. Although this isn't a review of the actual Synology camera, I did want to note that a positive for the Synology CC400W is that it uses a magnetic base. This means you can mount it on any magnetic surface, which is pretty handy. However, a downside to the camera is that it's powered by a built-in USB cable that's about six and a half feet (two meters) long. This means that the cable will probably be either too long or too short, but more importantly, if the cable is damaged at all, you'll likely need to buy an entirely new camera because there doesn't appear to be a way to replace it, unlike many competitors, like the Unifi G6 Instant. Hopefully, this is something Synology addresses in a future revision of the hardware. The BeeStation Plus supports up to four cameras. Setup The setup of BeeCamera is, like everything in the BeeStation family, very straightforward. Simply make sure you're on at least version 1.5 of the BeeStation OS, and BeeCamera is automatically installed on the device. BeeCamera Setup Screenshots Setting up the CC400W was just as easy. Plug it in, open up the BeeCamera app, and follow the on-screen steps to add the camera. During this process, you'll configure the camera name and how many days of retention you want to keep. The system will also automatically update the firmware for you. The whole thing took only a couple of minutes, excluding the time it took for the camera to update the firmware. Once the camera is connected to the BeeStation Plus, you can manage the various camera settings within the app, although there aren't many to choose from. You're able to configure whether the microphone will record audio (some privacy laws may preclude you from recording it), select what codec to use (H.264 or H.265), configure the color and exposure of the camera, and determine what data you want to overlay onto the video. Finally, you can set up AI detections so that BeeCamera will alert you if it sees certain things. These are all of the common detections you would expect in a camera system, such as people, pets, and vehicles. Under people and vehicles, you can also add extra monitoring for lingering and congestion detection, although pets are currently in "Lab" and therefore have no extra features yet. Recording in 4K using H.265 for 30 days will take roughly 300 GB of storage, which is very reasonable for most regular households, as the BeeStation Plus has 8TB of native storage. If you want to set up detection zones, you can. These are areas that BeeCamera will look at for the various detections, and are helpful if, for example, there's a tree in your frame and you don't want to be notified each time the wind makes the branches move around in the frame. Finally, you can also schedule when the camera should and should not be recording, which is a very useful feature. For example, you may want to record only at night when you're sleeping, but not during the day when you're up and about the house, so you can easily shut the camera off between 8 am and 10 pm. Each hour of each day can be configured to record continuously, only upon a detection event, or disabled completely. You can't fine-tune to record at a specific time, though, only hourly blocks on the hour. Daily Use The best part of BeeCamera is that it's easy and just works. If you only care about being notified when things happen, the mobile app sends those notifications and lets you click the button to bring up the video and see what's going on. For example, when I went out of town and had the camera pointed at the cat tower in our hallway, it was nice to be able to drop in and check that my furry friends were doing okay without me. Initiating the remote connection to the BeeStation Plus through the app is very responsive, but this will heavily depend on your ISP. In my case, using Xfinity, I'm able to go from starting the app to seeing live video in roughly three seconds, which is about the same amount of time it takes to connect to my Unifi UNVR system that costs much more. If you want to see footage from a specific day and time, you can do so using the calendar icon. You can also scroll through the timeline, looking for detections that are labeled in blue (vs. the normal gray when there's nothing of interest). There are buttons that let you go to the last/next detection on the timeline, which is helpful if you missed the notification on your mobile device. That's where the ease of use stops, though. While you can download clips that are flagged by detection, there's apparently no way to select generic time frames you're interested in, and the only place to download is to your phone. In addition, sharing a video shares the actual video, not just a link back to your BeeStation Plus. While that's good from a security and privacy perspective, it's a little awkward for sharing large videos. Limitations While the ease of implementation is great, there are some things that are lacking from BeeCamera. The most obvious is that there is no way to view the footage on the desktop. You can log in to the BeeStation Plus to see how much storage BeeCamera is using, but unlike BeePhotos and BeeFiles, there is no BeeCamera on the web console to manage or view footage. This means you'll be viewing all of your security footage on your mobile device, which is pretty limiting. In addition, there's no way to download the video to your PC without first using your phone as the intermediary. The one exception to this is that you can use BeeFiles to see the raw MP4 files. They're saved in 5-minute increments, and it's just raw data with no detection information or any other way to identify what any of them are. The lack of a way to interact with BeeCamera on the desktop also makes configuration of the cameras more difficult. For example, trying to set up detection zones using a tiny screen and your finger to draw boxes is more cumbersome than it needs to be. This reinforces the idea that BeeCamera is not made for power users. It's also missing some of the more advanced functionality of Surveillance Station. For example, I couldn't find a way to say, "Alert me if the thing in this zone is no longer there." Another major deficiency with BeeCamera, and a feature I suspect may come out in the future, is that while it can detect generic people, there is no specific facial recognition yet. This is an interesting omission, given the fact that other Synology tools can detect specific individuals, and competitors such as Unifi Protect also do it. This is probably a software limitation, so we will have to wait and see if this feature is added in the future. Conclusion If you need a security guard to monitor surveillance cameras to make sure your property is secure, then BeeCamera is not the solution for you. That said, you probably wouldn't be using a BeeStation Plus as the brains behind the system either. BeeCamera (and BeeStation in general) is clearly aimed at households that want to avoid sending personal data to Google and Amazon, and now want to add some cameras to keep an eye on their home and their pets while they're away. BeeCamera excels at doing this. The target market isn't interested in creating cases, tying multiple views together in a single pane of glass, or the like, and for the intended use case, the system works great. Where it starts to fall apart a bit is with more advanced features. Not being able to use a desktop app is a major compromise in my opinion, and having to do all of the configuration on a mobile device is annoying, but not impossible. If you don't want to have a full-fledged NAS device in your home, but still want control over your data (or maybe want an easy way to backup your data for World Backup Day), and want to add a couple of cameras to keep an eye on your house and your pets, this is a great, cheap, and easy way to go, and I suspect more functionality will come over time. If Synology releases a desktop app or at least a way to configure cameras and view footage on a desktop browser, this would be a near-perfect solution for a general home user. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I forgot to add on my comment that when robots will take physical jobs, it's when they become more cheaper to manufacture and sell. That will be the starting point of the end to lanscaping, trash pickup, factory jobs, etc.
    • How many people can actually use a 2.5gig ethernet port? Most people do not have more than a 1gig internet connection, heck most have less than that. Most people at home do not have a switch that has multiple 2.5gig ports either.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      neufuse
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!