• 0

working with Micropython - which ecosystem to choose - ESP 8266 or ESP 32?


Question

 

dear community 

 

working with Micropython - which ecosystem to choose - ESP 8266 or ESP 32?


I work with Kids.  I'm always looking for economical platforms to build intriguing projects. 

there are systematical decisions: in earlier times i use Arduino and Raspberry Pi for the projects because the eco-sytems of Arduino and Raspi support rich options  to combine.

While Arduino clones are cheap, it uses the C/C++ language.  that kids are not familiar with. and - yes it doesn't have a built-in WiFi-support. But that is pretty important for me.

WiFi-Support is a must for all the IoT projects i am interested in.  On the other hand, while Raspberry Pi has WIFI and kids can program it using Python, it is still an pretty expensive platform to  just control few GPIO ports to 


1. turn devices on and off. 
2. run a little RC-Car 
3. have a look in the birds house that is in the garden


I need something in between that has both WIFI and Python capabilities. It appears that I found my answer in MicroPython flashed 
onto a cheap ESP8266-based board - and yes - now we also can use ESP32 too. 


What is Micropython?
According to its website, MicroPython is a lean and efficient implementation of the Python 3 programming languages.
And Python is one of the most widespread and well known language - also my kids have access to a lean python introduction.
In other words: Python is much easiser to learn than C /C++ - Python does not have all those pitfalls.
 
Micropython 
that includes a small subset of the Python standard library and the good thing; Micropython is optimized to run on 
microcontrollers and in constrained environment (such as ESP8266). 
It's essentially Python IDE on a chip. One major benefit is that you can create code and change it on the fly using 
a web-browser client called Webrepl. (Try to do that in Arduino.) You can also see sensor data in real-time on 
Webrepl instead of rely on data logging or an LED screen in Arduino.


What is ESP8266?
In short, think of it as an Arduino with built-in network capability. You can use the Arduino IDE to program ESP8266 boards in C/C++ or 
you can flash it with NodeMCU or MicroPython. In this project, I'll be flashing MicroPython onto an ESP8266 board.
I decided to get a WEMOS D1 which is based on ESP8266-12EX for this simple project where I'll be navigating a 2WD car using a web browser.
 There are other boards that are designed for MicroPython but I wanted something cheap that I could throw away 
if it didn't meet my criteria. As expected, it met all my requirements and most likely I'll be incorporating WeMos and Micropython into 
future projects. 

among them are ...
a. creating rc-cars
b. other IoT projects


which ESP would you decide ?

- NodeMcu Lua WIFI Internet Development Board based on ESP-12E CP2102
- Adafruit Assembled Feather HUZZAH w ESP8266 WiFi With Stacking Headers
- ESP8266 ESP-13 Web Sever WIFI Wireless Shield for Arduino UNO R3


which one would you take?

or would you choose the ESP 32 !?


love to hear from you


 

1 answer to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

hello again 

well i think that i should use adafruit's "circuit python" because I 
think they have superior  tutorials and controller-oriented libraries... 
Probably with esp32 huzah feathers, because of the feather wings available, if I could afford them.

(But I don't believe that CircuitPython requires an Adafruit board...)  
Adafruit is like... mind-reading evangelists with teaching skills! Librarian skills, too:  https://github.com/adafruit/awesome-circuitpython


the other thing is:  In choosing between ESP8266 and ESP32 the main factor is code size. 
If we can anticipate writing programs longer than, say, 200 lines of code (LOC)  we may find that we need to 
cross-compile the code. Larger programs may require us to freeze the bytecode on ESP8266. 

This involves re-compiling the source and installing the resultant build. We can then run programs 
in the high hundreds of LOC. It's hard to be precise about these figures as they depend on what the code actually does.
ESP32 has much more headroom. If we use boards with SPIRAM then we can run seriously large programs. 

furthermore: There is also the Pyboard D series but that is outside my price range.

hope to hear from you


 

Edited by tarifa
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Darwin Mach Kernel/ BSD. Which is both open source.
    • You mean BSD. The UNIX kernel is not open source.
    • I have been on Linux Mint full-time since Jan 2019. while there is a learning curve, it's worth it if you can make the switch, which I can. I mainly browse web, play some games (generally Lutris(Windows games), or through emulators (MAME/Mesen/Flycast etc) etc), and use a small amount of Windows programs (Foobar2000/7-zip/WinRAR/ImgBurn etc) etc. it's nice to dodge the bloat/BS of Windows as you can really feel Linux is all around faster, especially certain things. p.s. recently I enabled NTSync for games since Linux Mint recently offered the 6.14 kernel, which has NTSync support (it's not enabled by default though but you can enable it temporarily for your current boot of the OS through 'sudo modprobe ntsync')
    • A rotten article full of handwaving of anti-consumer practices. Aside from the fact that no, not even close to every piece of major software collects information about its users, ethical developers make such telemetry opt-in and allow it to be completely disabled. To use KDE Plasma as an example, you're shown a greeter upon first boot that gives users the option to send the developers telemetry, with the default being off and 'off' actually meaning off. Windows 10 has never offered that capability - only a promise that Microsoft will slurp up less of your data if you spend time tweaking 50 different privacy settings. There is still absolutely no way to completely opt out of sending Microsoft telemetry in any version of Windows 10 (or 11, naturally). Even using group policy in Enterprise editions only allows you to reduce telemetry to the bare minimum. Home-focused editions don't even get that option. Articles like this dismissing user privacy concerns as "FUD" are a part of the reason Microsoft felt confident enough to go so much further with Windows 11. I guess you get what you deserve in that respect. Personally, I finally made the move to Linux after 15 years or so of dabbling with it, but never really considering a permanent switch. Enjoy your bright, shiny Windows future. You asked for it, after all.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      smileyhead earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      K V earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      K V earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      CarlosABC earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      solidox earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      638
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      240
    3. 3
      Xenon
      172
    4. 4
      neufuse
      155
    5. 5
      +FloatingFatMan
      122
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!