Recommended Posts

Date: January 11, 2020

Time: TBA, but likely in the AM

 

Doing this from the top of a screaming booster rocket at MaxQ - the highest launch loads,

 

 

NASA....

 


KENNEDY SPACE CENTER, Fla. (NASA PR)  NASA and SpaceX are targeting no earlier than Jan. 11, 2020, for a critical In-Flight Abort Test of the Crew Dragon spacecraft from Launch Complex 39A at the Kennedy Space Center, Florida, pending U.S. Air Force Eastern Range approval.

As part of the test, SpaceX will configure Crew Dragon to trigger a launch escape shortly after liftoff and demonstrate Crew Dragons capability to safely separate from the Falcon 9 rocket in the unlikely event of an in-flight emergency. The demonstration also will provide valuable data toward NASA certifying SpaceXs crew transportation system for carrying astronauts to and from the International Space Station.

The demonstration of Crew Dragons launch escape system is part of NASAs Commercial Crew Program and is one of the final major tests for the company before NASA astronauts will fly aboard the spacecraft.

The In-Flight Abort Test follows a series of static fire engine tests of the spacecraft conducted Nov. 13 near SpaceXs Landing Zone 1 on Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida. SpaceX will also conduct a static fire test of its Falcon 9 rocket ahead of the In-Flight Abort Test.

  • Like 1
7 hours ago, FloatingFatMan said:

Ridiculous.  Dragon 2 should be using it's SuperDraco's to LAND as well as escape the pad... Parachute should just be there as yet another backup...

 

I completely agree but NASA made the certification process so expensive, requiring several orbital test launches and reentries, SpaceX decided to put those funds into Starship.

 

Background,

 

When SpaceX proposed propulsive landings in the 2011 concept video NASA never thought SpaceX would follow through. Next thing NASA knows Crew Dragon is doing hover tests & landing boosters and it's "OH, S**T! They're actually going to do it!!." In comes the expensive test program to "discourage" SpaceX from using propulsive in Commercial Crew.

 

NASA got the desired result, but now SpaceX is far more willing to develop Starship and future vehicles without NASA strings. They'll do like Falcon Heavy; develop it, fly it publicly with a big splash - gathering tons of telemetry, then slap it on the table and take orders.

  • Like 2
  • 3 weeks later...
2 hours ago, anthdci said:

how far down range is it likely to get before separation? you can normally eyeball it at max q can't you? We will therefore have a good view of it weather depending.

 

The abort should happen at or about T+58 seconds, which is when DM-1 hit MaxQ. Crew Dragon's planned touchdown is about 31km down range.

 

 

On 1/7/2020 at 10:26 AM, anthdci said:

how far down range is it likely to get before separation? you can normally eyeball it at max q can't you? We will therefore have a good view of it weather depending.

Been reading T+88 ... which I believe is around 14km or so up (though I believe it will launching on an ISS trajectory).

Animation

 

 

So from that... looks like 90 seconds after launch, at an altitude of ~21km and a downrange distance of ~3km, the fun happens. Dragon will reach an apogee of ~40km and splashdown ~32km downrange.

 

 

 

The test appears to be all successful.  

 

RIP B1046 (from reddit)... 

Quote

B1046 is the first Block 5 Falcon 9 booster. It features a bolted octaweb (as opposed to welded), SpaceX proprietary heat shielding on inconel mountings, titanium grid fins, retractable black landing legs, man-rated Merlin 1D engines (boasting a ~10% thrust increase over previous versions), COPV 2.0, and a black interstage. The upgrade allows Falcon 9 man-rating while affording a performance boost. It is hoped that the block 5 upgrades will enable rapid and routine reusability of Falcon 9 1st stages. On August 7, 2018, B1046 became the first-ever Falcon 9 booster to fly two consecutive GTO missions. On December 3, 2018, B1046 became the first-ever Falcon 9 booster to fly a third time (SSO-A mission). In April 2019, the booster was first mentioned as being manifested to fly the Crew Dragon In-Flight Abort Test, which was previously slated to fly on B1048. Booster recovery has been deemed impractical for the abort test, which will mark B1046's fourth and final flight.

 

Also, to me it looks like they remote detonated it (vs. it breaking up).  Would be nice if that was confirmed. (Edit: Nope, it was not detonated...it broke apart as planned)

 

 

Capture.thumb.PNG.5f13248b305f3433073226bd8164c59d.PNG

They kept mentioning that the computers determine the best time for the Dragon to abort after it hits Max Q, but in a real life situation it wouldn't have to wait until it hit Max Q correct?  They were just looking for the worse case scenario and were making sure it would pass that test?

It can escape anytime from pad throughout ascent ... this test was conducted when the vehicle was under max stress: 

 

"SpaceX has configured Crew Dragon to intentionally trigger a launch escape after Max Q, the moment of peak mechanical stress on the rocket."  SpaceX Press Kit

  • Thanks 1

Now that we have a successful test (after boeings failures) NASA can start planning the Crew launch.

 

We should now see how many articles we can find over the next few days trying to make out that the explosion was a bad thing or that the test was a failure. I've already seen a couple with misleading titles, but correctish content.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
    • Windows 11 gets new audio improvements in the latest builds by Taras Buria Today's Experimental builds (26H1 and Future Platforms, formerly Canary) pack several audio-related improvements. If your device is enrolled in the Experimental Channel (26H1), you can download build 28120.2315, while those in the Future Platforms version have build 29613.1000 to try. Here is what is new in build 29613.1000: [Audio] Following up on our previous improvements, we’re making some more adjustments to Settings > System > Sounds based on your feedback. Namely, we’ve updated the “All sound devices” page so: You now have the ability to change default devices from this page. Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. We’ve adjusted the page design slightly so now you can filter whether you’re viewing input or output devices. We’ve added toggles so you can choose if you want to hide or show disabled, disconnected, and unplugged devices on this page. We’ve also updated the input and output audio properties page for devices in Settings to now include jack information for those that need it. And here is the changelog for build 28120.2315: This update includes a small number of minor bug fixes and improvements. [Accessibility] This update improves caption style responsiveness by redrawing captions immediately for caption style changes. If no current caption is visible, a sample caption string is displayed. [Audio] This update improves the reliability of the inbox HD Audio driver. You can find the official release notes for build 28120.2315 here and for build 29613.1000 here.
    • I agree with what I think you are saying, just not in the way you are saying it. Like any tool, the amount it represents your work is perorational to the effort you put into it. It is similar to why 2nd grade math students learning to add and subtract are not allowed to use calculators, but a high-school calculous student is. For the 2nd grader, that tool would completely replace the work they are doing, for the calculous student the same tool allows them to work far more effectively while in no way replacing their effort or knowable. If you spend 30 seconds writing a prompt, then the image that comes out is no more "yours" than if you found the same image with a Google Image search. However, many of these generative tools also support highly iterative processes that allow back and forth, and merging generated images with photos or human created images. I am sure you would agree that a human spending hours of time working on a project, even if AI was involved in the process, still reflects that human's work.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      575
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      189
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!