Recommended Posts

I should be getting gigabit speeds, when I test with speedtest I get around ~140mbps, fast.com shows 300ish, sometimes 400.

My NIC is set to 1.0 gbps, my network card is not the issue.

I tried a new windows installation on a spare SSD drive, the speeds were instantly 1gbps without problems. This is an issue with something in my windows.

I don't want a new windows installation unless it's 100% needed.

If you need any other info, let me know.

I feel that this is 100% a problem within my windows installation.
I feel like it's throttling, as the tests are very stable and feel like they don't want to go over a certain speed.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1390842-windows-10-throttling-speed/
Share on other sites

As your saying the internet is full speed on a clean install of Windows i'm wondering what antivirus do you have installed on your main Windows install? and is this installed on your clean install?

 

Reason I ask is the web filtering functionality on Sophos Endpoint can cause exactly this, for example here is a speedtest i've just done.


With Sophos web filtering:

 

8928563548.png

 

Without Sophos web filtering:

 

1380ea8f-c153-4d16-80db-7f3c5e07d86b.png

 

As you can see Sophos web filtering pretty much cuts in half the max speed of my internet connection (500Mbps).

 

I also presume you have the same NIC drivers installed on each Windows install?

5 minutes ago, Riva said:

Get kaspersky instead :p

Or Windows Defender. It's now the best, integrated in the OS, robust full featured AV/AM.

5 hours ago, Exoo said:

I should be getting gigabit speeds, when I test with speedtest I get around ~140mbps, fast.com shows 300ish, sometimes 400.

My NIC is set to 1.0 gbps, my network card is not the issue.

I tried a new windows installation on a spare SSD drive, the speeds were instantly 1gbps without problems. This is an issue with something in my windows.

I don't want a new windows installation unless it's 100% needed.

If you need any other info, let me know.

I feel that this is 100% a problem within my windows installation.
I feel like it's throttling, as the tests are very stable and feel like they don't want to go over a certain speed.

Try the SG TCP Optimizer. I've been using it for years. Run it as admin.

 

Also, you can do a repair install. It keeps all your apps and personal files in place while only replacing Windows as new.

https://www.tenforums.com/tutorials/16397-repair-install-windows-10-place-upgrade.html

 

https://www.techsupportforum.com/forums/f31/windows-throttling-ethernet-speeds-1239916.html  <---Let us know what you find out here.

8 hours ago, xrobwx71 said:

Try the SG TCP Optimizer. I've been using it for years. Run it as admin.

 

Also, you can do a repair install. It keeps all your apps and personal files in place while only replacing Windows as new.

https://www.tenforums.com/tutorials/16397-repair-install-windows-10-place-upgrade.html

 

https://www.techsupportforum.com/forums/f31/windows-throttling-ethernet-speeds-1239916.html  <---Let us know what you find out here.

Hey, thank you so much.

 

I remember using the SG TCP Optimizer long ago (when my speeds were 150/15), I reset to default settings and now my speed tests immediately hit 900 :)

Thank you again!

3 hours ago, Exoo said:

Hey, thank you so much.

 

I remember using the SG TCP Optimizer long ago (when my speeds were 150/15), I reset to default settings and now my speed tests immediately hit 900 :)

Thank you again!

So you removed the old settings and now it works?

13 hours ago, xrobwx71 said:

Try the SG TCP Optimizer. I've been using it for years. Run it as admin.

 

Also, you can do a repair install. It keeps all your apps and personal files in place while only replacing Windows as new.

https://www.tenforums.com/tutorials/16397-repair-install-windows-10-place-upgrade.html

 

https://www.techsupportforum.com/forums/f31/windows-throttling-ethernet-speeds-1239916.html  <---Let us know what you find out here.

That app still works for Windows 10? Thought it died after Windows XP?

It was specifically  "netsh int tcp set global autotuninglevel=normal" that fixed it.

autotuninglevel was set to disabled, which is what was causing the problems for me.

Now that it's set to normal, i get 1.0gbps no issues.

 

 

The app actually has some useful tweaks, which I set back to what they were before.

2 hours ago, cork1958 said:

That app still works for Windows 10? Thought it died after Windows XP?

It still exists, but in general it causes more problems than it solves (from what I've noticed.)

 

I'd still use cFosSpeed for best throughput at all times, but even that is unnecessary most of the time.

Edited by LostCat
10 hours ago, LostCat said:

It still exists, but in general it causes more problems than it solves (from what I've noticed.)

 

I'd still use cFosSpeed for best throughput at all times, but even that is unnecessary most of the time.

Actually, that's what most people said about it back when it was a thing, from what I remember.

2 hours ago, cork1958 said:

Actually, that's what most people said about it back when it was a thing, from what I remember.

Depends on your connection.  I had fantastic results with cFosSpeed on 3G and DSL.  I still love it.  I have fiber now and it's still good, I just don't need it.

On 1/9/2020 at 8:07 PM, cork1958 said:

That app still works for Windows 10? Thought it died after Windows XP?

Check the site. It works very well.  It utilizes Powershell netsh commands in the background.  It fixed the OP's issue.  ---> 

Quote

t was specifically  "netsh int tcp set global autotuninglevel=normal" that fixed it.

autotuninglevel was set to disabled, which is what was causing the problems for me.

Now that it's set to normal, i get 1.0gbps no issues.

 

 

The app actually has some useful tweaks, which I set back to what they were before.

 

 

On 1/9/2020 at 8:07 PM, cork1958 said:

That app still works for Windows 10? Thought it died after Windows XP?

https://www.techsupportforum.com/forums/f31/windows-throttling-ethernet-speeds-1239916.html#post7763258

4 hours ago, xrobwx71 said:

Check the site. It works very well.  It utilizes Powershell netsh commands in the background.  It fixed the OP's issue.  ---> 

More like undoing its useless tweaks fixed his issue :p

 

(Though I don't think it does that anymore, who knows though.)

On 1/9/2020 at 9:03 PM, Exoo said:

autotuninglevel was set to disabled, which is what was causing the problems for me.

Yeah that would prevent scaling of the recv window size - with for sure could limit speed..

2 minutes ago, OldGuru said:

Networking in Windows 10 is broken in one or another form.

how so? I have not had any networking issues and know many others that haven't either.

 

I'm guessing driver related in some cases

I have zero issues with networking with 10 as well.

 

edit:  Take that back - I do/did have some issues with the built in nic in this box.. Where it would work great for X amount of time, and then all of sudden not work at all.. It was like the nic was gone.. No ip.. I just added a dual port card an no issues since then.. Never figured out what the problem was - but found others having the same issue with with this dell model.. The new dual port card allows me to do smb3 multichannel so was really a win in the long run ;)

 

That was multiple versions of 10 ago, so maybe its working now??  Have had no need to re-enable that built in nic since the addon card works fine..

 

But in general have had no issues, I put that down to some sort of driver/hardware issue to be honest.. The box is getting a bit long in the tooth.. So never know - the box didn't ship with 10, etc.

 

But I wouldn't say there is anything inherently wrong with networking in 10 if that is what your saying.

  • 11 months later...

This topic was automatically locked because it did not receive any replies for a year. If you want to have this topic reopened

  • please contact any staff moderator or
  • report the first post of the topic with the reason why it should be reopened.

Thank you.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I don't understand the vision. Do people really want to buy a new computer from Dell with 6 browsers installed? We all keep asking for Microsoft to stop having so much junk on their OS, and adding a bunch of browsers seems to go against that. Ideally, we would just be asked what browser we want during OOBE but Google is just going to pay Dell a bunch of money to include Chrome. Additionally, would you want your phones to start including all the browsers too when you get them? The only thing I ever wanted was to be able to uninstall IE or edge and I believe you are now able to. I do agree that microsoft needs to chill with their "are you sure you don't want to try edge before you install chrome" ads when going to download chrome.
    • The funny thing here is that like 70% or so of the web browser users use 'Google Chrome' as web browser. What I don't understand is that why on earth would ANYONE choose 'Google Chrome' on Windows when 'Microsoft Edge' is not just better in most things, but it's already there right out of the box for the Windows users. Microsoft Edge has less data collection (yes, that's a fact), less RAM usage and is more optimized for Windows (as it's a Microsoft product) right out of the box. I'm sure you will come with the argument of bloat in Microsoft Edge. Sure, but most of that can be fixed with a simple tool (there are many good ones out there for this). Yes, that require a couple of clicks in the same way as it requires several clicks to install 'Google Chrome'. And I'm sure you really love the 4 GB of AI-slop 'Google Chrome' is downloading without you agreeing to it. Fun right? Sure, the way Microsoft is pushing Microsoft Edge on users might not be the best way of doing it and might need to change. But I would never choose 'Google Chrome' over 'Microsoft Edge' today anyways. I'm sure there was a period back in the days when 'Google Chrome' actually was better in most things, but that period is not today.
    • JetBrains rolls out IntelliJ IDEA update with Markdown preview fixes and more by David Uzondu Image via JetBrains IntelliJ 2026.1.3 from JetBrains has landed, bringing several highly requested bug fixes that target common UI glitches and terminal rendering issues. If you run tmux inside the integrated terminal, the IDE no longer renders the cursor above the active line. The Markdown preview bug, which was fixed in this release, had annoyed developers for quite some time, as the preview pane failed to render images saved outside the project directory. Instead of displaying the actual image, the IDE simply showed a broken image icon, a problem that stuck around for two years before this update. Over on Windows, developers running WSL can now use wsl.exe to spin up their environments without losing terminal functionality. In previous builds, launching a terminal shell with something like wsl.exe -d ubuntu inside a Windows-based project broke both shell integration and active process detection. Other bug fixes in this release include: An issue where Gradle sync incorrectly reported success as a failure on WSL when using Gradle 9.5.0. A syntax highlighting bug that flagged valid Java for-loop initialization blocks with multiple statements as incorrect. A warning bug that triggered a false non-null local variable alert when using JSpecify annotations. A database generation bug that hid the option to use a DELETE statement instead of a TRUNCATE checkbox. A Kotlin highlighting failure where an assertion error in the Gradle redundant library inspection broke error highlighting. A UI bug where the ComboBox popup lacked a maximum height restriction. A Snowflake syntax error where DataGrip failed to support the "create temp" command. A Svelte syntax parsing failure that incorrectly flagged quotes inside inline expressions. A VCS repository manager deadlock that triggered thread pool exhaustion. A memory leak where the LazyTree component kept all previous versions of a tree in memory. IntelliJ 2026.1.3 is the third bug fix release for the IntelliJ 2026.1 series. The first one landed back in April with a fix for the WSL Python interpreter freeze, another fix for guest participants using Emmet abbreviations, and corrected WildFly server deployment errors.
    • That stupid annoying Sign in with Google on all these sites now... get the fk outta here
    • I was just being silly based on David Uzondu's comment ☺️
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      469
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      243
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      73
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!