Looking for a smartphone, that has a functional version of OneNote (functional search)


Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I've stumbled on the above-mentioned thread, when googling "Best phone for OneNote search", and thought I might as well give it a try. I'm looking for a smartphone (not iOS), on which a functional version of OneNote, is available.

 

I have an iPhone 5, where the OneNote app works alright, but it's major, and for me most crucial 'shortcoming' in its functionality, is that it simply doesn't have a working search function whatsoever. It takes forever for the search to show relevant results and from my experience, it just never happens. So in other words, on iPhone 5, it is completely and entirely broken, making the app close to absolutely useless for me. Don't know what Microsoft was thinking when they put it out, but Microsoft, eh?

 

So thus, I'm looking for an (extra) smartphone, with Android OS I presume (never used Android before), that has a 'fully' functional OneNote counterpart. Particularly, and most important for me, with a working search function, that doesn't take forever.

 

I have a quite big OneNote (as in many sections, subsections pages, etc.) in general which I use very often, so it would be super helpful, to have it with me here and there and have it work

 

Hopefully someone out there has some experience with this, and could share their thoughts. Perhaps the OneNote search function is also not working on Android? Or perhaps it's just the limitation of iPhone 5, where other iPhone iterations have a fixed search function (many apps on iPhone 5, can only be updated, up to a point)? It's certainly not something I seem to be able to google any answers for...

 

As for the phone itself, I really don't much care if it has a fancy camera or anything else fancy. The only thing I would be getting it for, is for a functional version of OneNote, which isn't slow and has a working search function that actually displays the results, unlike the abhorrent iPhone 5, OneNote version. Other than that it would be nice if it wouldn't be too expensive and such. Something budget-tier would be really nice.

 

Kind regards,

David

What I do is use Telegram Messenger's "Saved Messages" functionality to post notes, images - something I need to search quickly later. It's like a notebook in chat conversation format. The search is also extremely fast.

IMO the search functionality of OneNote on Android (actually, the mobile app in general) is pretty much dumb as a stick. I haven't seen any issues with the search finding things, but the way it presents the results:

 

You run a search (for examine, in my notebooks I pull up 70+ instances of a string). OneNote displays a list of section titles and locations but it doesn't tell you what the context/content of the search result is - you need to tap on the search result to go view it. If the result isn't what you're looking for, then you hit back, and instead of remembering your list of results, it runs the entire search over again.

 

Meanwhile the people working on real Office programs figured all this out and display a preview thumbnail with the search term highlighted so you can see what the surrounding content is before you go click and jump to the result (in Word, at least). Not sure where the app developers were aiming with this, but it wasn't very high. :/

On 1/12/2020 at 7:04 PM, Microsoft BOB™ 10 said:

What I do is use Telegram Messenger's "Saved Messages" functionality to post notes, images - something I need to search quickly later. It's like a notebook in chat conversation format. The search is also extremely fast.

Thanks for the reply. I am aware of that function, however, it unfortunately wouldn't suit the fairly random stream of searches that I often like to do...

22 hours ago, zhangm said:

IMO the search functionality of OneNote on Android (actually, the mobile app in general) is pretty much dumb as a stick. I haven't seen any issues with the search finding things, but the way it presents the results:

 

You run a search (for examine, in my notebooks I pull up 70+ instances of a string). OneNote displays a list of section titles and locations but it doesn't tell you what the context/content of the search result is - you need to tap on the search result to go view it. If the result isn't what you're looking for, then you hit back, and instead of remembering your list of results, it runs the entire search over again.

 

Meanwhile the people working on real Office programs figured all this out and display a preview thumbnail with the search term highlighted so you can see what the surrounding content is before you go click and jump to the result (in Word, at least). Not sure where the app developers were aiming with this, but it wasn't very high. :/

This is very helpful to me, thanks! Would love to see how it works first person, perhaps I'll try getting in touch with someone. But just to be sure, for example if say you search for 'Anamnesis', and that term is only present in the page 'Philosophy', the first result (and supposedly the only one?) would be the page 'Philosophy', no? 

 

If yes, then do you perhaps know if it is possible to do a focused search? For example in OneNote 2010, you can do a "humans possess innate" search, and it will only show a page that has this exact text piece and nothing else. Where if it's not there exactly as in the quotes, it will return nothing 

I think I was wrong about the search repeating in my last reply. I opened a few older notebooks (each one is a year's worth) to test the behavior of searching through a bunch of text and sections (and pages) - maybe the phone just needed time to build a local index, but now, if I select a result in the search results list to view the page, then hit Back, the results list doesn't reload from scratch.

 

2 hours ago, David2234 said:

This is very helpful to me, thanks! Would love to see how it works first person, perhaps I'll try getting in touch with someone. But just to be sure, for example if say you search for 'Anamnesis', and that term is only present in the page 'Philosophy', the first result (and supposedly the only one?) would be the page 'Philosophy', no? 

This is correct. If you find a unique result, the title of the page will be displayed as the only hit in the results panel.

 

2 hours ago, David2234 said:

If yes, then do you perhaps know if it is possible to do a focused search? For example in OneNote 2010, you can do a "humans possess innate" search, and it will only show a page that has this exact text piece and nothing else. Where if it's not there exactly as in the quotes, it will return nothing 

It appears that this true. A search for "pipet 5 mL" (with quotes) returns a different number of results than pipet 5 mL (w/o quotes). The latter results list is every page containing ANY string in the search that is separated by a space, e.g. it will highlight 5, or pipet.

 

I think that if you tend to generate many pages with little content in each page, then the search would serve well. In cases where you have few pages with a lot of content on each, and perhaps with many instances of a single search string on each page, then there are some shortcomings in how the search results don't help you more than just highlighting the hits when you view the result (for example it gives you the # pages where a string occurs, but doesn't tell you how many times a search string appears on a given page).

On 1/14/2020 at 12:49 AM, zhangm said:

I think I was wrong about the search repeating in my last reply. I opened a few older notebooks (each one is a year's worth) to test the behavior of searching through a bunch of text and sections (and pages) - maybe the phone just needed time to build a local index, but now, if I select a result in the search results list to view the page, then hit Back, the results list doesn't reload from scratch.

 

This is correct. If you find a unique result, the title of the page will be displayed as the only hit in the results panel.

 

It appears that this true. A search for "pipet 5 mL" (with quotes) returns a different number of results than pipet 5 mL (w/o quotes). The latter results list is every page containing ANY string in the search that is separated by a space, e.g. it will highlight 5, or pipet.

 

I think that if you tend to generate many pages with little content in each page, then the search would serve well. In cases where you have few pages with a lot of content on each, and perhaps with many instances of a single search string on each page, then there are some shortcomings in how the search results don't help you more than just highlighting the hits when you view the result (for example it gives you the # pages where a string occurs, but doesn't tell you how many times a search string appears on a given page).

I see. Thanks for confirming! This all sounds very well indeed, I shall be looking for an Android phone sometime in the near future then 

  • 11 months later...

This topic was automatically locked because it did not receive any replies for a year. If you want to have this topic reopened

  • please contact any staff moderator or
  • report the first post of the topic with the reason why it should be reopened.

Thank you.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!