Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I recently got an email from Comcast insisting I upgrade my modem to better support new speeds. I had tried this before about a year ago and could never get the new equipment to work. i even had a tech come in and he could not get me connected with even 2 different modem. I am disabled and these days I am not to sharp about these things. The modem I have is this: 

 

AR TG862G

Voice and Data Modem

 

And they say the modem I will get is this:

 

Wireless Gateway

Voice and Data Modem.

 

And that's all the info they gave me.

 

I have no idea if it is worth trying. The only problem I ever have with my connection is it drops out the further away I get from the modem.

 

Is this something I want to try again? My current speeds are 250mbps/6mpps

 

Thanks for any info

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1390995-comcasts-insisting-on-an-upgrade/
Share on other sites

Do you own the current modem? I own mine and am on the 300 Mbs plan with no issues. This is the one that I have, it's selling for $50, which is a major savings from leasing one of Comcast's gateways, at $12 /month

In my experience, modems, routers and gateways wear out. I'd go for it unless like jnelsoninjax mentions above, you own the current modem or are looking into buying one.

 

Mine, (WOW owned) recently started dropping internet periodically so I requested a replacement. The replacement also moved me from  DOCSIS 3.0 to 3.1 and fixed my issues. Alas, DOCSIS 4.0 is out although the tech has not rolled out everywhere. 

So your renting their equipment.. And they want to upgrade your device... Then have them come out and do it.. I am unclear on the issue here?

 

I personally hate all in one devices.. And for $12 a month in a year or so you would pay for your own equipment for sure... Even with buying a kick ass modem and router.. 2 Different devices..

30 minutes ago, BudMan said:

So your renting their equipment.. And they want to upgrade your device... Then have them come out and do it.. I am unclear on the issue here?

 

I personally hate all in one devices.. And for $12 a month in a year or so you would pay for your own equipment for sure... Even with buying a kick ass modem and router.. 2 Different devices..

THIS! It's the first thing I did when my GF got cable internet. Contacted them and verified the modem I was getting would work, and then pulled the trigger. Then brought a router, in this case Linksys AC1900AC running OpenWRT. It's so nice having just a modem and just a router and not both in 1 box.

 

She only gets 300 gigs per month. so I also installed YAMon usage monitor on the router. Such an Amazing tool for anyone with a bandwidth cap.

17 minutes ago, warwagon said:

THIS! It's the first thing I did when my GF got cable internet. Contacted them and verified the modem I was getting would work, and then pulled the trigger. Then brought a router, in this case Linksys AC1900AC running OpenWRT. It's so nice having just a modem and just a router and not both in 1 box.

 

She only gets 300 gigs per month. so I also installed YAMon usage monitor on the router. Such an Amazing tool for anyone with a bandwidth cap.

I hate them as well - and I'm glad that they are no longer required for telephony - AND that you can now purchase your own telephony modem.  (I'm also a Comcast customer, and have been for two decades.)  On the telephony side, my recommendation is the Motorola MT7711 - the only 24x8 DOCSIS 3.1 telephony cable modem that is both Comcast-approved AND customer-purchaseable (https://www.amazon.com/MOTOROLA-MT7711-Gigabit-Comcast-Internet/dp/B07GX2ZQXG/).

Don't need telephony support?  There's the ARRIS SurfBoard SB8200 (https://www.amazon.com/ARRIS-SURFboard-Approved-SB8200-Frustration/).

 

The latter has the same issue that all the DOCSIS 3.x ARRIS Surfboards have had - excessively bright blue LED lights on their fronts.  (I call them "Blue Thunder" - as in the movie of the same name.)  More importantly, neither has the Intel Puma6 cable modem chipset that has had issues in cable modem deployments; both instead use Broadcom chipsets.  (As hated as Broadcom is, their chipsets get the job done when they need to,)

2 hours ago, jnelsoninjax said:

Do you own the current modem? I own mine and am on the 300 Mbs plan with no issues. This is the one that I have, it's selling for $50, which is a major savings from leasing one of Comcast's gateways, at $12 /month

No I pay a $2.00 rental fee per pay period

1 hour ago, BudMan said:

So your renting their equipment.. And they want to upgrade your device... Then have them come out and do it.. I am unclear on the issue here?

 

I personally hate all in one devices.. And for $12 a month in a year or so you would pay for your own equipment for sure... Even with buying a kick ass modem and router.. 2 Different devices..

Yes I rent and the question is what is an upgrade going to do for me? I am already getting about the specified speed of 200mpbs and everything else is working ok. 

If the page I was looking at is correct, it said that modem is only an 8x4 modem. Definitely worth upgrading it in that case. What more channels on a different modem would do is basically increase reliability on the connection. It says the max through put is only 300mbps also and with you being a 250 plan, I'd definitely want more channels.

 

Comcast still only gives you 6mbps upload on that plan? Sheesh, cheapskates!! :(

Edited by cork1958
4 minutes ago, cork1958 said:

If the page I was looking at is correct, it said that modem is only an 8x4 modem. Definitely worth upgrading it in that case. What more channels on a different modem would do is basically increase reliability on the connection. It says the max through put is only 300mbps also and with you being a 250 plan, I'd definitely want more channels.

Hmm, I will have to ask if they can send a tech. even as little as a year ago I could do it myself but I would not trust myself now, I have a service plan that should cover it. I also use the voice service so it would have to support that as well.

8 minutes ago, cork1958 said:

If the page I was looking at is correct, it said that modem is only an 8x4 modem. Definitely worth upgrading it in that case. What more channels on a different modem would do is basically increase reliability on the connection. It says the max through put is only 300mbps also and with you being a 250 plan, I'd definitely want more channels.

What does 8x4 mean? And by channels are you talking tv?

5 minutes ago, devnulllore said:

Hmm, I will have to ask if they can send a tech. even as little as a year ago I could do it myself but I would not trust myself now, I have a service plan that should cover it. I also use the voice service so it would have to support that as well.

What does 8x4 mean? And by channels are you talking tv?

Channels are what the modem uses to connect to internet, I guess is the easiest way to explain it. The more channels, the more reliable the connection, usually. An 8x4 modem is ancient now a days. Nothing to do with tv.

 

All you should have to do to connect new modem, if it's from Comcast, is plug it in and connect to internet. It should automatically go to a page that will automatically register modem.

No he is talking about docsis channels... The more you have the less likely for a specific channel to get congested while causing you a slow down - say in prime time where everyone in your area using the internet.  Also I take it that old N wifi aspect of their device will be updated to AC..

 

While you 8 channels might be able to get you the speed your paying for - more channels allow for higher speeds if they update that plan to higher speeds.

7 hours ago, warwagon said:

THIS! It's the first thing I did when my GF got cable internet. Contacted them and verified the modem I was getting would work, and then pulled the trigger. Then brought a router, in this case Linksys AC1900AC running OpenWRT. It's so nice having just a modem and just a router and not both in 1 box.

 

She only gets 300 gigs per month. so I also installed YAMon usage monitor on the router. Such an Amazing tool for anyone with a bandwidth cap.

How do you like the OpenWRT? 

Hello,

 

The ARRIS Touchstone TG862G is a residential broadband gateway and router with an integrated 802.11n wireless access point (2.4GHz only, though) as well as telephony adapter (for two separate phone lines) and four-port Ethernet (10/100/1GbE) switch.

 

This particular model is branded by ARRIS for Xfinity (aka Comcast) and was, as best as I can tell, released in 2015, so it is now about five (5)  years old, and is compliant with the DOCSIS 3.0 standard.

 

My best guess is that Comcast must be upgrading the CMTS (cable modem termination system)  at their end (aka the "head-end") that your cable modem connects to from DOCSIS 3.0 to DOCSIS 3.1, and is requesting all DOCSIS 3.0 users to upgrade to a modem compliant with the newer standard.  The reason for this upgrade is that the technology used in 3.1 to transfer data makes more efficient use of the channels/spectrum on the wire, and having to support the older 3.0 device slows down the throughput of their cable network.  Upgrading to a newer modem allows them to provide service to more users at higher speeds, as they no longer have to support the older means of communicating performed by your 3.0 modem.

 

At least, that's my basic understanding of how things work.   So, yes, there is a legitimate reason for your cable ISP to ask you to upgrade your modem.

 

The main thing I would suggest is that you make darn sure everything works before the cable technician leaves, including Wi-Fi access as well as your telephone lines.

 

Regards,

 

Aryeh Goretsky

 

  • Like 2
  • 3 months later...
On 1/15/2020 at 3:30 AM, goretsky said:

Hello,

 

The ARRIS Touchstone TG862G is a residential broadband gateway and router with an integrated 802.11n wireless access point (2.4GHz only, though) as well as telephony adapter (for two separate phone lines) and four-port Ethernet (10/100/1GbE) switch.

 

This particular model is branded by ARRIS for Xfinity (aka Comcast) and was, as best as I can tell, released in 2015, so it is now about five (5)  years old, and is compliant with the DOCSIS 3.0 standard.

 

My best guess is that Comcast must be upgrading the CMTS (cable modem termination system)  at their end (aka the "head-end") that your cable modem connects to from DOCSIS 3.0 to DOCSIS 3.1, and is requesting all DOCSIS 3.0 users to upgrade to a modem compliant with the newer standard.  The reason for this upgrade is that the technology used in 3.1 to transfer data makes more efficient use of the channels/spectrum on the wire, and having to support the older 3.0 device slows down the throughput of their cable network.  Upgrading to a newer modem allows them to provide service to more users at higher speeds, as they no longer have to support the older means of communicating performed by your 3.0 modem.

 

At least, that's my basic understanding of how things work.   So, yes, there is a legitimate reason for your cable ISP to ask you to upgrade your modem.

 

The main thing I would suggest is that you make darn sure everything works before the cable technician leaves, including Wi-Fi access as well as your telephone lines.

 

Regards,

 

Aryeh Goretsky

 

As of now, Comcast has been requiring that DOCSIS 3.0 and earlier cable AND telephony modems be replaced with DOCSIS 3.1 gear since 1 January 2020; this includes their own telephony modems.  While I have an ARRIS SB-6183 cable modem - we also have a leased (from Comcast) telephony modem; that is the next planned replacement; hence my interest in the Motorola MT-7711.  The problem is that the price of the MT-7711 increased - largely due to the COVID-19 shutdown.  (And I wish I were kidding; look at the price merely on Amazon since 1 January of 2020.)  The SB-6183 AKA "Blue Thunder" is not only still running like a steel trap, Comcast actually bumped up the throughput on the cable modem side (from Performance Pro to Blast) at an extra cost of none (COVID-19 again).

  • Like 2
  • 9 months later...
On 01/05/2020 at 16:49, PGHammer said:

As of now, Comcast has been requiring that DOCSIS 3.0 and earlier cable AND telephony modems be replaced with DOCSIS 3.1 gear since 1 January 2020; this includes their own telephony modems.  While I have an ARRIS SB-6183 cable modem - we also have a leased (from Comcast) telephony modem; that is the next planned replacement; hence my interest in the Motorola MT-7711.  The problem is that the price of the MT-7711 increased - largely due to the COVID-19 shutdown.  (And I wish I were kidding; look at the price merely on Amazon since 1 January of 2020.)  The SB-6183 AKA "Blue Thunder" is not only still running like a steel trap, Comcast actually bumped up the throughput on the cable modem side (from Performance Pro to Blast) at an extra cost of none (COVID-19 again).

FOLLOWUP - the MT-7711 I posted on is returning to pricing sanity - $199.99 (Prime); I'm pulling the trigger when President Biden sends my next bribe (Covid-19 stimulus check).  (My criticism of the payments is *not* due to President Biden; I had the same opinion - low - of the same policy under Bush the Elder.)

17 hours ago, PGHammer said:

FOLLOWUP - the MT-7711 I posted on is returning to pricing sanity - $199.99 (Prime); I'm pulling the trigger when President Biden sends my next bribe (Covid-19 stimulus check).  (My criticism of the payments is *not* due to President Biden; I had the same opinion - low - of the same policy under Bush the Elder.)

https://www.amazon.com/Docsis-3-1-Xfinity-Modem-Voice/dp/B07MGPPNZD

6 hours ago, xrobwx71 said:

Thanks for the heads-up - the T25 was not available when I chose the MT-7711.

 

Also, I flat-out love my SB-6183; as I stated, the darn thing is a *tank*.

 

(The two DOCSIS 3.x modems that we have had (one leased, then the SB-6183) have been from ARRIS - and have been Broadcom-powered.)

 

The T25 has one flaw - no wireless support; our current telephony modem does have that.  However, there IS an ARRIS wireless telephony modem that checks all the boxes - the ARRIS SVG-2482AC. ( https://www.amazon.com/dp/B06XDGWKSB/ref=emc_b_5_t)

 

 

Edited by PGHammer
17 minutes ago, PGHammer said:

The T25 has one flaw - no wireless support

generally it's better to have a separate router for WiFi anyway as modems and modem/router combo devices generally are horrible about getting updates for very long if at all which is bad if security flaws are found

  • Like 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!