New Computer?


Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, Mockingbird said:

...and why is that relevant?

 

Yes, I do know that.

 

What's your point?

Why did I say price? I meant performance, dum me...

 

Why were you comparing workstation and consumer cards?

38 minutes ago, Mindovermaster said:

Why did I say price? I meant performance, dum me...

...and what are you using to determine performance?

 

38 minutes ago, Mindovermaster said:

Why were you comparing workstation and consumer cards?

...because Jim K brought it up

2 minutes ago, Mockingbird said:

...and what are you using to measure performance?

 

doing the same thing you are? Looking it up at different benchmark sites to compare and using what I know of a 580, which I own myself. And a 580 is not what you would call a high grade card. Maybe this is all he needs, I do not know. As Jim says, we don't yet know his purpose.

2 minutes ago, Mockingbird said:

...because Jim K brought it up

And you throw it at my face right handed. Nice, very nice. /S

53 minutes ago, Mindovermaster said:

doing the same thing you are? Looking it up at different benchmark sites to compare and using what I know of a 580, which I own myself. And a 580 is not what you would call a high grade card. Maybe this is all he needs, I do not know. As Jim says, we don't yet know his purpose.

Would you link a few?

 

Please point out which specific parts that you are talking about.

11 minutes ago, Mockingbird said:

Would you link a few?

 

Please point out which specific parts that you are talking about.

I'm not pointing out a specific card, dude... There are 100s of cards better than the 580. Does he need them, wth knows?

20 minutes ago, Mockingbird said:

provide some sources (for example: graphs, charts, etc.)

 

 

Benchmarks:

https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/

https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/

https://www.gpucheck.com/gpu-benchmark-graphics-card-comparison-chart

 

Use this to compare video cards: 

https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-750-Ti-vs-AMD-RX-580/2187vs3923

 

Edit: And use this, too...

 

1p25q3.jpg

5 hours ago, Mindovermaster said:

good gaming cards ≠ good workstation cards

 

Nowhere did the OP said that the PC is for gaming

 

Furthermore, userbenchmark is a joke

 

Edited by Mockingbird
3 hours ago, Mockingbird said:

good gaming cards ≠ good workstation cards

 

Nowhere did the OP said that the PC is for gaming

 

Furthermore, userbenchmark is a joke

 

Umm, OP never  said anything about workstation video cards. That was all Jim.

 

OP did NOT say about gaming, BUT a better consumer gfx card will be cheaper, and better.

 

Is it a joke? I look at several benchmarks. I don't just look at one. I look at severals and converse.

7 minutes ago, NinjaGinger said:

When I got my M2. I have a spare 3.5 SSD if you want it, better just on a shelf doing nothing. It only 240 gigs but better than nothing. An old Vertex 4 that's not been used in a while.

Think you meant 2.5 ;)

 

But, that sound like bit dated SSD. I'd rather he gets the M.2...

Wow, this has gone completely off the rails - I use Autocad and a 580 will be more than enough, I wish some people would stop trolling and please make decent suggestions instead of tearing people down. If you dont think something will work well enough, give a suggestion as to what will and leave it there.

1 hour ago, forster said:

Wow, this has gone completely off the rails - I use Autocad and a 580 will be more than enough, I wish some people would stop trolling and please make decent suggestions instead of tearing people down. If you dont think something will work well enough, give a suggestion as to what will and leave it there.

Agreed. I'm no expert on AutoCAD, but MockingBird is giving me no discreet information.

 

OP, just get the stuff you posted... LOL...

  • 11 months later...

This topic was automatically locked because it did not receive any replies for a year. If you want to have this topic reopened

  • please contact any staff moderator or
  • report the first post of the topic with the reason why it should be reopened.

Thank you.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft's aggressive roadmap to deliver a commercial quantum supercomputer by 2029 has now hit a bit of a snag, and it's not because of a complex sub-zero dilution refrigerator, but rather because of a few lines of basic Python code. A new critique published in the scientific journal Nature argues that simple software errors effectively manufactured the breakthrough that Microsoft's foundational research claimed back in 2025 into Majorana-based topological qubits. Topological quantum computing, the path that Microsoft chose for its research, relies on creating and controlling "Majorana zero modes." These are exotic quasiparticles that theoretically offer vastly superior error resistance compared to the highly sensitive superconducting qubits currently being championed by rivals like Google and IBM. However, physically proving you have created these particles requires sifting through massive amounts of complex electrical conductance data to isolate a specific "topological gap." Because of the sheer volume of data, physicists rely heavily on custom software pipelines to process the results. This is where the Python scripts come in. Now, according to the critique, Microsoft’s data processing software contained fundamental programming errors that ultimately skewed the published results. By mishandling data arrays or deploying incorrect logic within the Python script, the software supposedly discarded "noisy" or contradictory data. Which is why it only highlighted the specific electrical measurements that supported the topological-gap claim. The researchers behind the critique argued that this makes the findings invalid, suggesting the heralded "quantum leap" was actually a false positive generated by bad code and not a product of groundbreaking physics. However, Microsoft is pushing back hard against these allegations. The Redmond giant has formally rejected the criticism, saying that it's just a minor anomaly rather than a fatal flaw. According to the company, while there may have been a minor oversight in the data parsing scripts, it does not alter the fundamental reality of their physical experiment. Just weeks ago, Microsoft unveiled the Majorana 2 quantum processor, a milestone so significant that the company boldly accelerated its timeline for a commercial quantum supercomputer from 2035 down to 2029. But the new software allegations reopen an old wound. Microsoft's quantum division faced a remarkably similar crisis when a landmark 2018 paper on Majorana particles was famously retracted in 2021 after independent physicists discovered the data had been inappropriately cropped. That historical baggage makes the current Python-related allegations particularly sensitive. If the foundational math and data processing for the 2025 breakthrough are genuinely flawed, the highly anticipated 2029 commercial timeline could easily be delayed or, worse, cancelled.
    • Because of what they have done to VMware I will never buy anything Broadcom again.
    • AMD releases hotfix for driver install issues on Windows 10 PCs by Taras Buria Earlier this week, AMD released an important graphics driver update. Version 26.6.2 brought AMD FSR 4.1 support to the previous-gen Radeon lineup, the RX 7000 series, giving users better upscaling tech that was previously locked to the newest GPUs. However, the driver turned out to be a little buggy, with users reporting installation issues on systems still running Windows 10. AMD quickly acknowledged the bug and today released a hotfix to resolve the problem. The AMD 26.6.3 Hotfix update is now available for download from the official website. Given that it is a hotfix release, it has only one change in its release notes: AMD announced the update on its official X account and added that a WHQL driver update with the necessary fixes would be released next week. Meanwhile, users can apply the hotfix or roll back to the previous driver using the official AMD Cleanup Utility. You can download AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.3 Hotfix Preview Driver from the official website here. It is compatible with all currently supported graphics cards and 64-bit Windows 10 and 11. Full release notes are available on the same page.
    • With Microsoft now listening to its core audience and acting upon received feedback, fans can finally expect a much better version of Windows 11 than what was available five years ago. Here is to five more years, Windows 11! I guess we all need a good laugh now and again...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      465
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!