Recommended Posts

So I'm a networking scrub - I have my main PC and my Freenas server. I'm considering two of these to speed up transfer speeds. And some cable to link them together. However, do I need a 10gb switch inbetween, or can I connect these directly to each other and have 10gbe? Where's the DHCP coming from? I guess I might be missing something. I'm also drunk and cant focus correctly. Forgive me.

 

Thanks :shifty:

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1393041-home-10gb-switch/
Share on other sites

https://www.amazon.com/MikroTik-CRS305-1G-4S-Gigabit-Ethernet-RouterOS/dp/B07LFKGP1L

 

It's cheap, it has SFP+'s for Fiber or RJ45 10GbE and it supports multi-gig 2.5,6,10gbit

 

SFP+'s you'd need though

 

https://www.amazon.com/Mikrotik-S-RJ10-MikroTik/dp/B078SNK1MY

UK based is this one, I really should probably watch some YT videos on the whole thing, I'm not going to pull the trigger while the room is spinning, but I am very grateful for your advice dude. Cheers :)

:rofl: drunken research is sometimes the best research lol

 

 

on topic though; technically you can use a cross-over cable to plug the 2 devices directly together and set a static IP to both but having a device in between to act as a gateway/DHCP makes things overall easier (Y)

  • Like 3

So the barrier to entry, cost wise, in the UK anyway for two cables, two cards and a switch is £418 - as a thought experiment it's been worthwhile.

 

Id do the crossover thing, but I think I'd rather buy something a bit more robust for future proofing, but this is way above budget and way above my needs for transferring porn files.

 

Thanks for the input, 1gb is getting annoyingly slow, I think Ill just wait and see what happens technology wise. I could aggregate 1gb connections, but part of me feels that there's something more future-proof just around the corner!

 

Cheers guys.

20 minutes ago, forster said:

So I'm a networking scrub - I have my main PC and my Freenas server. I'm considering two of these to speed up transfer speeds. And some cable to link them together. However, do I need a 10gb switch inbetween, or can I connect these directly to each other and have 10gbe? Where's the DHCP coming from? I guess I might be missing something. I'm also drunk and cant focus correctly. Forgive me.

 

Thanks :shifty:

The cable you've linked to won't work with the card you've linked to.

The cable is has SFP+ termination whereas the card has RJ45.

1 minute ago, Fahim S. said:

The cable you've linked to won't work with the card you've linked to.

The cable is has SFP+ termination whereas the card has RJ45.

Im a total noob, forgive me for probably asking something stupid - but Cat7 is 10gb compatible, would that work fine instead of the SFP+?

2 minutes ago, Fahim S. said:

The cable you've linked to won't work with the card you've linked to.

The cable is has SFP+ termination whereas the card has RJ45.

ah good catch. yeah it would be a Cat7 ethernet cable OP would want for 10gb support

 

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Veetop-Ethernet-Network-Shielded-Connector/dp/B00XU1MXH4/

Just now, forster said:

Im a total noob, forgive me for probably asking something stupid - but Cat7 is 10gb compatible, would that work fine instead of the SFP+?

jynx :)

Just now, Brandon H said:

ah good catch. yeah it would be a Cat7 ethernet cable OP would want for 10gb support

 

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Veetop-Ethernet-Network-Shielded-Connector/dp/B00XU1MXH4/

jynx :)

Hurray, Im not a total moron afterall!! Haha

1 minute ago, Brandon H said:

ah good catch. yeah it would be a Cat7 ethernet cable OP would want for 10gb support

 

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Veetop-Ethernet-Network-Shielded-Connector/dp/B00XU1MXH4/

jynx :)

 

Cat5e can handle 10GbE at a short enough distance.  Certainly good enough for most (UK) houses

  • Like 2
Just now, Fahim S. said:

 

Cat5e can handle 10GbE at a short enough distance.  Certainly good enough for most (UK) houses

Hmm, I have Cat6 on my local connections, I just dont want to have that 'oh crap' moment if I picked up all the expensive bits then forgot about the ties that bind them together!

Just now, Fahim S. said:

 

Cat5e can handle 10GbE at a short enough distance.  Certainly good enough for most (UK) houses

yeah but ethernet cables are cheap (especially if you just buy the cable and do the ends yourself) so may as well go for the full guaranteed support IMO :)

2 minutes ago, neufuse said:

if you got systems that close together I'd go with the 10GbE cross over and static them together... that or get two SFP+ 10GbE cards and do a DAC connection

Yeah Im looking at the crossover solution right now, so we have two of these cards, and one of these cables - its not a crossover, but this is a crossover and its listed as 1gb, not 10gb so Im kind of confused.

 

On the flipside, we have this SFP+ card, and an SFP+ cable - is there such thing as an SFP+ crossover, for no middle-man switch (manually assigning IPs) or would the listed cable here work fine?

 

Thanks for continued support, its very much appreciated.

You don't need a crossover cable - anything that's 1gig or more will support auto-crossover (it's part of the spec). If you're getting an SFP DAC cable, there's no such thing as a crossover.

 

So yes, you should be fine with either the SFP or ethernet options you've listed

  • Thanks 2
4 hours ago, DaveLegg said:

You don't need a crossover cable - anything that's 1gig or more will support auto-crossover (it's part of the spec). If you're getting an SFP DAC cable, there's no such thing as a crossover.

 

So yes, you should be fine with either the SFP or ethernet options you've listed

You're my hero, thank you :) I resisted the urge to pull the trigger last night, will see how things go over the next few weeks and see how much I need to invest in face masks, toilet rolls and hand sanitizer and go from there!

6 hours ago, DaveLegg said:

You don't need a crossover cable - anything that's 1gig or more will support auto-crossover (it's part of the spec). If you're getting an SFP DAC cable, there's no such thing as a crossover.

 

So yes, you should be fine with either the SFP or ethernet options you've listed

good point; I keep forgetting auto-crossover is a thing with gig+ as I haven't worked with gig setups much personally (Y)

15 minutes ago, Brandon H said:

good point; I keep forgetting auto-crossover is a thing with gig+ as I haven't worked with gig setups much personally (Y)

I still call them a cross over cable because that is technically what they are doing still just not at the physical cable level😆

Sata 3 4tb drives aren’t really going to fly I’d guess, even if raided. And I don’t have bulk pcie storage? It’s going to bottle neck pretty hard right? Again, super noob so bear with me :) 

5 minutes ago, forster said:

Sata 3 4tb drives aren’t really going to fly I’d guess, even if raided. And I don’t have bulk pcie storage? It’s going to bottle neck pretty hard right? Again, super noob so bear with me :) 

SATA3 I think would be fine; the bigger bottle neck I think would be depending on if they're HDDs or SSDs

2 minutes ago, Brandon H said:

SATA3 I think would be fine; the bigger bottle neck I think would be depending on if they're HDDs or SSDs

For 10Gb, I would want pcie/nvme drives. 1Gb can top out at 123MB/s. Sata3 SSDs usually peak at what, 540MB/s?

4 minutes ago, adrynalyne said:

For 10Gb, I would want pcie/nvme drives. 1Gb can top out at 123MB/s. Sata3 SSDs usually peak at what, 540MB/s?

Yeah its a 6g/sec connection at SATA3 - hmmm.... the plot thickens, thank you both for verifying :) 

5 minutes ago, adrynalyne said:

For 10Gb, I would want pcie/nvme drives. 1Gb can top out at 123MB/s. Sata3 SSDs usually peak at what, 540MB/s?

good to know

 

how much difference is there in potential speeds between SATA3 and PCIE? I've heard PCIE drives can be a bit faster but I've never looked into how much.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!