Recommended Posts

So I'm a networking scrub - I have my main PC and my Freenas server. I'm considering two of these to speed up transfer speeds. And some cable to link them together. However, do I need a 10gb switch inbetween, or can I connect these directly to each other and have 10gbe? Where's the DHCP coming from? I guess I might be missing something. I'm also drunk and cant focus correctly. Forgive me.

 

Thanks :shifty:

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1393041-home-10gb-switch/
Share on other sites

https://www.amazon.com/MikroTik-CRS305-1G-4S-Gigabit-Ethernet-RouterOS/dp/B07LFKGP1L

 

It's cheap, it has SFP+'s for Fiber or RJ45 10GbE and it supports multi-gig 2.5,6,10gbit

 

SFP+'s you'd need though

 

https://www.amazon.com/Mikrotik-S-RJ10-MikroTik/dp/B078SNK1MY

UK based is this one, I really should probably watch some YT videos on the whole thing, I'm not going to pull the trigger while the room is spinning, but I am very grateful for your advice dude. Cheers :)

:rofl: drunken research is sometimes the best research lol

 

 

on topic though; technically you can use a cross-over cable to plug the 2 devices directly together and set a static IP to both but having a device in between to act as a gateway/DHCP makes things overall easier (Y)

  • Like 3

So the barrier to entry, cost wise, in the UK anyway for two cables, two cards and a switch is £418 - as a thought experiment it's been worthwhile.

 

Id do the crossover thing, but I think I'd rather buy something a bit more robust for future proofing, but this is way above budget and way above my needs for transferring porn files.

 

Thanks for the input, 1gb is getting annoyingly slow, I think Ill just wait and see what happens technology wise. I could aggregate 1gb connections, but part of me feels that there's something more future-proof just around the corner!

 

Cheers guys.

20 minutes ago, forster said:

So I'm a networking scrub - I have my main PC and my Freenas server. I'm considering two of these to speed up transfer speeds. And some cable to link them together. However, do I need a 10gb switch inbetween, or can I connect these directly to each other and have 10gbe? Where's the DHCP coming from? I guess I might be missing something. I'm also drunk and cant focus correctly. Forgive me.

 

Thanks :shifty:

The cable you've linked to won't work with the card you've linked to.

The cable is has SFP+ termination whereas the card has RJ45.

1 minute ago, Fahim S. said:

The cable you've linked to won't work with the card you've linked to.

The cable is has SFP+ termination whereas the card has RJ45.

Im a total noob, forgive me for probably asking something stupid - but Cat7 is 10gb compatible, would that work fine instead of the SFP+?

2 minutes ago, Fahim S. said:

The cable you've linked to won't work with the card you've linked to.

The cable is has SFP+ termination whereas the card has RJ45.

ah good catch. yeah it would be a Cat7 ethernet cable OP would want for 10gb support

 

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Veetop-Ethernet-Network-Shielded-Connector/dp/B00XU1MXH4/

Just now, forster said:

Im a total noob, forgive me for probably asking something stupid - but Cat7 is 10gb compatible, would that work fine instead of the SFP+?

jynx :)

Just now, Brandon H said:

ah good catch. yeah it would be a Cat7 ethernet cable OP would want for 10gb support

 

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Veetop-Ethernet-Network-Shielded-Connector/dp/B00XU1MXH4/

jynx :)

Hurray, Im not a total moron afterall!! Haha

1 minute ago, Brandon H said:

ah good catch. yeah it would be a Cat7 ethernet cable OP would want for 10gb support

 

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Veetop-Ethernet-Network-Shielded-Connector/dp/B00XU1MXH4/

jynx :)

 

Cat5e can handle 10GbE at a short enough distance.  Certainly good enough for most (UK) houses

  • Like 2
Just now, Fahim S. said:

 

Cat5e can handle 10GbE at a short enough distance.  Certainly good enough for most (UK) houses

Hmm, I have Cat6 on my local connections, I just dont want to have that 'oh crap' moment if I picked up all the expensive bits then forgot about the ties that bind them together!

Just now, Fahim S. said:

 

Cat5e can handle 10GbE at a short enough distance.  Certainly good enough for most (UK) houses

yeah but ethernet cables are cheap (especially if you just buy the cable and do the ends yourself) so may as well go for the full guaranteed support IMO :)

2 minutes ago, neufuse said:

if you got systems that close together I'd go with the 10GbE cross over and static them together... that or get two SFP+ 10GbE cards and do a DAC connection

Yeah Im looking at the crossover solution right now, so we have two of these cards, and one of these cables - its not a crossover, but this is a crossover and its listed as 1gb, not 10gb so Im kind of confused.

 

On the flipside, we have this SFP+ card, and an SFP+ cable - is there such thing as an SFP+ crossover, for no middle-man switch (manually assigning IPs) or would the listed cable here work fine?

 

Thanks for continued support, its very much appreciated.

You don't need a crossover cable - anything that's 1gig or more will support auto-crossover (it's part of the spec). If you're getting an SFP DAC cable, there's no such thing as a crossover.

 

So yes, you should be fine with either the SFP or ethernet options you've listed

  • Thanks 2
4 hours ago, DaveLegg said:

You don't need a crossover cable - anything that's 1gig or more will support auto-crossover (it's part of the spec). If you're getting an SFP DAC cable, there's no such thing as a crossover.

 

So yes, you should be fine with either the SFP or ethernet options you've listed

You're my hero, thank you :) I resisted the urge to pull the trigger last night, will see how things go over the next few weeks and see how much I need to invest in face masks, toilet rolls and hand sanitizer and go from there!

6 hours ago, DaveLegg said:

You don't need a crossover cable - anything that's 1gig or more will support auto-crossover (it's part of the spec). If you're getting an SFP DAC cable, there's no such thing as a crossover.

 

So yes, you should be fine with either the SFP or ethernet options you've listed

good point; I keep forgetting auto-crossover is a thing with gig+ as I haven't worked with gig setups much personally (Y)

15 minutes ago, Brandon H said:

good point; I keep forgetting auto-crossover is a thing with gig+ as I haven't worked with gig setups much personally (Y)

I still call them a cross over cable because that is technically what they are doing still just not at the physical cable level😆

Sata 3 4tb drives aren’t really going to fly I’d guess, even if raided. And I don’t have bulk pcie storage? It’s going to bottle neck pretty hard right? Again, super noob so bear with me :) 

5 minutes ago, forster said:

Sata 3 4tb drives aren’t really going to fly I’d guess, even if raided. And I don’t have bulk pcie storage? It’s going to bottle neck pretty hard right? Again, super noob so bear with me :) 

SATA3 I think would be fine; the bigger bottle neck I think would be depending on if they're HDDs or SSDs

2 minutes ago, Brandon H said:

SATA3 I think would be fine; the bigger bottle neck I think would be depending on if they're HDDs or SSDs

For 10Gb, I would want pcie/nvme drives. 1Gb can top out at 123MB/s. Sata3 SSDs usually peak at what, 540MB/s?

4 minutes ago, adrynalyne said:

For 10Gb, I would want pcie/nvme drives. 1Gb can top out at 123MB/s. Sata3 SSDs usually peak at what, 540MB/s?

Yeah its a 6g/sec connection at SATA3 - hmmm.... the plot thickens, thank you both for verifying :) 

5 minutes ago, adrynalyne said:

For 10Gb, I would want pcie/nvme drives. 1Gb can top out at 123MB/s. Sata3 SSDs usually peak at what, 540MB/s?

good to know

 

how much difference is there in potential speeds between SATA3 and PCIE? I've heard PCIE drives can be a bit faster but I've never looked into how much.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • But building your own.. what? You can't build anything like the Steam Machine yourself. Even trying to get close costs a good deal more. Even just the CPU cooler in their price comparison is as big as the entire Steam Machine. If you want a regular gaming PC, then by all means, build that. If you want a a small console-like PC for the living room that is good for gaming, I'm not sure what else is a better deal. In the GN review, they only mentioned a small form factor Dell, which is like twice the size and hundreds of dollars more expensive.
    • Those are some popular multiplayer games. But hardly "all". Just those that don't work on Linux currently due to specific anti-cheat implementations. I think it's also fair to point out the literally thousands of games that don't work on the PS5. And it's not locked at 1080p. That's the default, which you can change.
    • Ubuntu Livepatch arrives on Arm64 to eliminate system reboots for kernel updates by Paul Hill Canonical has just announced that its Livepatch service now supports computers with Arm64 processors. For those who are not familiar, Livepatch allows users to apply important kernel updates without any service interruption or rebooting. While home users will benefit from this, it’s even more important for critical machines that absolutely should not be going offline at all. The feature is available as part of Ubuntu Core 26 for Arm64 and Ubuntu Core 20 and onwards for AMD64. According to Canonical, this will improve the security of systems that aren’t security-maintained daily or weekly, and it helps organizations work towards Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) compliance. If you are familiar with Ubuntu, you probably know that most packages can be updated without having to restart the system. There is one big exception to this, and that’s the kernel; it typically requires you to reload the system to boot into the new kernel. With Livepatch, Canonical has done something so that you don’t need to restart to begin using the new kernel. Aside from Ubuntu Core 26, users with Arm64 chips running Ubuntu 26.04 LTS can also use Livepatch. If you want to learn more about Livepatch, check out its product page. There, you can also find a button to join Ubuntu Pro (it’s free for several home devices) so that you can enable Livepatch. By linking your computer to Ubuntu Pro, you will also extend the life of your Ubuntu install from five years to ten years. If you are running Ubuntu, let us know in the comments if you have been looking forward to this feature on your ARM-based computer. If you’ve had a compatible AMD64 machine for a while and never used this feature, let us know why in the comments!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      500
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      206
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      97
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      89
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!