Recommended Posts

So I'm a networking scrub - I have my main PC and my Freenas server. I'm considering two of these to speed up transfer speeds. And some cable to link them together. However, do I need a 10gb switch inbetween, or can I connect these directly to each other and have 10gbe? Where's the DHCP coming from? I guess I might be missing something. I'm also drunk and cant focus correctly. Forgive me.

 

Thanks :shifty:

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1393041-home-10gb-switch/
Share on other sites

https://www.amazon.com/MikroTik-CRS305-1G-4S-Gigabit-Ethernet-RouterOS/dp/B07LFKGP1L

 

It's cheap, it has SFP+'s for Fiber or RJ45 10GbE and it supports multi-gig 2.5,6,10gbit

 

SFP+'s you'd need though

 

https://www.amazon.com/Mikrotik-S-RJ10-MikroTik/dp/B078SNK1MY

UK based is this one, I really should probably watch some YT videos on the whole thing, I'm not going to pull the trigger while the room is spinning, but I am very grateful for your advice dude. Cheers :)

:rofl: drunken research is sometimes the best research lol

 

 

on topic though; technically you can use a cross-over cable to plug the 2 devices directly together and set a static IP to both but having a device in between to act as a gateway/DHCP makes things overall easier (Y)

  • Like 3

So the barrier to entry, cost wise, in the UK anyway for two cables, two cards and a switch is £418 - as a thought experiment it's been worthwhile.

 

Id do the crossover thing, but I think I'd rather buy something a bit more robust for future proofing, but this is way above budget and way above my needs for transferring porn files.

 

Thanks for the input, 1gb is getting annoyingly slow, I think Ill just wait and see what happens technology wise. I could aggregate 1gb connections, but part of me feels that there's something more future-proof just around the corner!

 

Cheers guys.

20 minutes ago, forster said:

So I'm a networking scrub - I have my main PC and my Freenas server. I'm considering two of these to speed up transfer speeds. And some cable to link them together. However, do I need a 10gb switch inbetween, or can I connect these directly to each other and have 10gbe? Where's the DHCP coming from? I guess I might be missing something. I'm also drunk and cant focus correctly. Forgive me.

 

Thanks :shifty:

The cable you've linked to won't work with the card you've linked to.

The cable is has SFP+ termination whereas the card has RJ45.

1 minute ago, Fahim S. said:

The cable you've linked to won't work with the card you've linked to.

The cable is has SFP+ termination whereas the card has RJ45.

Im a total noob, forgive me for probably asking something stupid - but Cat7 is 10gb compatible, would that work fine instead of the SFP+?

2 minutes ago, Fahim S. said:

The cable you've linked to won't work with the card you've linked to.

The cable is has SFP+ termination whereas the card has RJ45.

ah good catch. yeah it would be a Cat7 ethernet cable OP would want for 10gb support

 

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Veetop-Ethernet-Network-Shielded-Connector/dp/B00XU1MXH4/

Just now, forster said:

Im a total noob, forgive me for probably asking something stupid - but Cat7 is 10gb compatible, would that work fine instead of the SFP+?

jynx :)

Just now, Brandon H said:

ah good catch. yeah it would be a Cat7 ethernet cable OP would want for 10gb support

 

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Veetop-Ethernet-Network-Shielded-Connector/dp/B00XU1MXH4/

jynx :)

Hurray, Im not a total moron afterall!! Haha

1 minute ago, Brandon H said:

ah good catch. yeah it would be a Cat7 ethernet cable OP would want for 10gb support

 

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Veetop-Ethernet-Network-Shielded-Connector/dp/B00XU1MXH4/

jynx :)

 

Cat5e can handle 10GbE at a short enough distance.  Certainly good enough for most (UK) houses

  • Like 2
Just now, Fahim S. said:

 

Cat5e can handle 10GbE at a short enough distance.  Certainly good enough for most (UK) houses

Hmm, I have Cat6 on my local connections, I just dont want to have that 'oh crap' moment if I picked up all the expensive bits then forgot about the ties that bind them together!

Just now, Fahim S. said:

 

Cat5e can handle 10GbE at a short enough distance.  Certainly good enough for most (UK) houses

yeah but ethernet cables are cheap (especially if you just buy the cable and do the ends yourself) so may as well go for the full guaranteed support IMO :)

2 minutes ago, neufuse said:

if you got systems that close together I'd go with the 10GbE cross over and static them together... that or get two SFP+ 10GbE cards and do a DAC connection

Yeah Im looking at the crossover solution right now, so we have two of these cards, and one of these cables - its not a crossover, but this is a crossover and its listed as 1gb, not 10gb so Im kind of confused.

 

On the flipside, we have this SFP+ card, and an SFP+ cable - is there such thing as an SFP+ crossover, for no middle-man switch (manually assigning IPs) or would the listed cable here work fine?

 

Thanks for continued support, its very much appreciated.

You don't need a crossover cable - anything that's 1gig or more will support auto-crossover (it's part of the spec). If you're getting an SFP DAC cable, there's no such thing as a crossover.

 

So yes, you should be fine with either the SFP or ethernet options you've listed

  • Thanks 2
4 hours ago, DaveLegg said:

You don't need a crossover cable - anything that's 1gig or more will support auto-crossover (it's part of the spec). If you're getting an SFP DAC cable, there's no such thing as a crossover.

 

So yes, you should be fine with either the SFP or ethernet options you've listed

You're my hero, thank you :) I resisted the urge to pull the trigger last night, will see how things go over the next few weeks and see how much I need to invest in face masks, toilet rolls and hand sanitizer and go from there!

6 hours ago, DaveLegg said:

You don't need a crossover cable - anything that's 1gig or more will support auto-crossover (it's part of the spec). If you're getting an SFP DAC cable, there's no such thing as a crossover.

 

So yes, you should be fine with either the SFP or ethernet options you've listed

good point; I keep forgetting auto-crossover is a thing with gig+ as I haven't worked with gig setups much personally (Y)

15 minutes ago, Brandon H said:

good point; I keep forgetting auto-crossover is a thing with gig+ as I haven't worked with gig setups much personally (Y)

I still call them a cross over cable because that is technically what they are doing still just not at the physical cable level😆

Sata 3 4tb drives aren’t really going to fly I’d guess, even if raided. And I don’t have bulk pcie storage? It’s going to bottle neck pretty hard right? Again, super noob so bear with me :) 

5 minutes ago, forster said:

Sata 3 4tb drives aren’t really going to fly I’d guess, even if raided. And I don’t have bulk pcie storage? It’s going to bottle neck pretty hard right? Again, super noob so bear with me :) 

SATA3 I think would be fine; the bigger bottle neck I think would be depending on if they're HDDs or SSDs

2 minutes ago, Brandon H said:

SATA3 I think would be fine; the bigger bottle neck I think would be depending on if they're HDDs or SSDs

For 10Gb, I would want pcie/nvme drives. 1Gb can top out at 123MB/s. Sata3 SSDs usually peak at what, 540MB/s?

4 minutes ago, adrynalyne said:

For 10Gb, I would want pcie/nvme drives. 1Gb can top out at 123MB/s. Sata3 SSDs usually peak at what, 540MB/s?

Yeah its a 6g/sec connection at SATA3 - hmmm.... the plot thickens, thank you both for verifying :) 

5 minutes ago, adrynalyne said:

For 10Gb, I would want pcie/nvme drives. 1Gb can top out at 123MB/s. Sata3 SSDs usually peak at what, 540MB/s?

good to know

 

how much difference is there in potential speeds between SATA3 and PCIE? I've heard PCIE drives can be a bit faster but I've never looked into how much.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Sounds like the debloated build you are running is missing some components that the Photos app and Snipping Tool rely on.
    • Apparently, Microsoft doesn't use water in their taps, washrooms or clean their facility. /sarc
    • Wow, throwback.  VERY VERY briefly - but realised that it wasn't the language I needed for the tasks I was taking on.
    • Apple and Tesla trade secrets reportedly exposed following a Tata Electronics cyberattack by Hamid Ganji Image via Depositphotos.com Tata Electronics has confirmed that it detected a cybersecurity incident in some of its systems. The Indian company is a manufacturing partner of both Apple and Tesla, and the incident may have exposed some trade secrets belonging to the two American companies. The World Leaks ransomware group is said to be behind the attack, and it has reportedly posted up to 200,000 files on the dark web, including component designs and specification documents related to Apple and Tesla products. Tata Electronics told Reuters that its response protocols were deployed immediately and that the “incident has had no impact on our operations across businesses, which remain unaffected.” The ransomware group reportedly sent a ransom demand to Tata Electronics, while Apple has launched an investigation into the incident. World Leaks claims it stole more than 200,000 files totaling over 630GB from Tata Electronics. Some database files on the ransomware group’s website are titled "com.apple.factorydata," which could refer to Apple’s iPhone production operations in India. Moreover, some documents reportedly contain material specifications and quality inspection standards for iPhone circuit board components. However, Apple is not the only affected company. A folder found in the World Leaks database is titled "NV36 Chargeport Controller - North America," which may refer to Tesla Model Y components. Additionally, other files in the database reportedly contain drawings related to Tesla’s Project Highland, the internal codename for the EV maker’s updated Model 3 sedan. To support the authenticity of the stolen files, World Leaks has published documents containing footers that read: "This document contains proprietary and confidential information of Apple Inc." and "information contained herein is deemed confidential, proprietary, and a trade secret of Tesla Inc." Cybersecurity researcher Rajshekhar Rajaharia told Reuters that the database also contains emails, event logs spanning several years, and passport copies of employees, including foreign nationals. Both Tesla and Apple have declined to comment on the scale of the incident.
    • Last time I used Pascal was in college about 40 yrs ago, programmed an inventory database for my exam.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      487
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      204
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      95
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      91
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!