Is it worth buying a new router for faster internet speed?


Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, sava700 said:

Wow....   This is like going into a auto parts supplier and saying "I need brakes for my car" 

Not really the same thing. It's like going to an auto parts store and telling them you know for a fact your car can only go 65 mph but are wondering if it's worth it to get a new car so you can do at least 80 on the interstate.

 

He says he knows his router can only do 100, and if that's all the information he wants to give then the 100 meg router would to be replaced to get the new speeds. He was just wondering if the extra 55 in speed is worth it.

1 hour ago, Mindovermaster said:

Question, what router does he have if it only has a limit of 100gbps? Plus, where is he getting this said info?

 

Most all routers since 2010 are all 1 gig... 10/100/1000...

Maybe he's still rocking a WRT54G :D  ...  Never mind he said it was neat gear

In short... No. because it's 100mbps (i.e. 12.5MB/s) vs 155mbps (i.e. 19.4MB/s). like others mentioned... you would need a gigabit LAN connection to get more than about 10-11MB/s anyways. still, worst case for you would be 10-11MB/s and that's still plenty fast.

 

personally I would not bother shelling out extra $ for a router as your already benefiting from the $20 less per month and it's not like going from 12.5MB/s to 19.4MB/s will be THAT much of a difference unless your downloading really large files and probably fairly often to.

 

p.s. hell, I still use a older Linksys WRT54GS v1.1 router with FreshTomato 2020.1 firmware (I recently changed the power supply which seems to have cured it's uptime issues). on this it's basically not really possible to exceed 10-11MB/s on the wired connection and the wireless would probably top out around 6.7MB/s and could easily be lower depending on signal quality etc.

Edited by ThaCrip
15 minutes ago, ThaCrip said:

p.s. hell, I still use a older Linksys WRT54GS v1.1 router with FreshTomato 2020.1 firmware.

And we have already determined that you don't have a clue to what real internet is.. You don't stream, you don't do anything... You might as well still be on dialup with your AOL CD...

 

You don't need spend 100$ to get 155mbps... A $30 router can do that...

https://www.amazon.com/Belkin-AC1200-Wireless-Router-F9K1123/dp/B008982LD4

 

$30, gig router - supports 867 PHY 5ghz.. So sure it should be able to do 155 without any issues... If your client can do AC, and or your wired at gig..

 

So your saving 20$ a month... So in less than 2 months you have paid for the new router... Or even if you spend $100 in 5 months you have paid for it...  If your current router is only 100mbps interfaces, then your not doing 100 even, your something less than 100..   As to a 50% in speed not being noticeable - is either high, clueless or not actually using the freaking internet..

 

Here is the big question.. If it was on the ISP that you were playing for 150 and only getting 100, would you be bitching to them - hey!!  WTF!!! So why are you not concerned because its on you that your not getting what your paying for...   So if you go out for a beer, and says 16 oz pour, and they only pour you 12.. Do you complain?  Hey suppose to be 10 oz steak - but this is only 7 at best... Do you just ah oh well...

 

I would for sure invest a few months of your new cheaper plan into a current router that can support the speeds your suppose to have... If you were on a 100mbps plan, and your only seeing 95 because hey your router only has 100mbps interface that would be one thing... But your talking 50% increase in speed..  So why would you not speed a couple of bucks... Its not like its $2K  Its literally $30, you could prob find something for even $20 that could do it..

  • Like 2
Just now, BudMan said:

And we have already determined that you don't have a clue to what real internet is.. You don't stream, you don't do anything... You might as well still be on dialup with your AOL CD

 

You got to let that go.

 

for the record... the only streaming I do is pretty much some YouTube videos which my internet line works fine for. for movies I tend to download etc.

 

1 minute ago, BudMan said:

As to a 50% in speed not being noticeable - is either high, clueless or not actually using the freaking internet..

 

Depends on what a person is doing. like I said once a person reaches a certain level of speed they are easily 'good enough', that's just a hard fact. besides general internet browsing and most downloads is not going to be that big of a deal as if someone is downloading large files fairly often then it will be noticeable. but like I was saying even 10MB/s or so is pretty fast to download anything 1080p or less as it's not like one is going to wait forever. people who complain about that speed are flat out spoiled, especially if it's a individual user (or thereabouts) like is the case with the OP.

33 minutes ago, warwagon said:

Not really the same thing. It's like going to an auto parts store and telling them you know for a fact your car can only go 65 mph but are wondering if it's worth it to get a new car so you can do at least 80 on the interstate.

 

He says he knows his router can only do 100, and if that's all the information he wants to give then the 100 meg router would to be replaced to get the new speeds. He was just wondering if the extra 55 in speed is worth it.

 

Ok, I apologize for getting so upset. The reason I was getting upset is because people were refusing to answer my question until I revealed all my equipment information, which was irrelevant to the question. Like you said, if a person were to start a thread and ask if buying a new car that can go as fast as X mph is worth the expense, and then people are like, "well what car do you currently have? what kind of tires does it have? What kind of battery does your car have?" None that is relevant to the question, which is frustrated me very much.

 

Anyways, my current router is a Netgear AC1000, which only has a 10/100 LAN & WAN ports, so yeah. It only goes up to 100 mbps. I just bought this a few months ago and I admit, I was negligent with my shopping. I just would've never imagine that a brand like Netgear would sell a product in 2020 with such ancient specs. And they did make the product misleading by advertising that the WiFI capability is 1 gbps, but how the heck can the Wi-Fi go up to 1 gbps if the WAN port is only 10/100?? Very sneaky of them!

 

So my goal would be to buy a new router with 10/100/1000 LAN & WAN ports, so not only will it support my 155 mbps internet, it will also future-proof me in the event my speed increases even more down the road.

 

But then again, if the cost for that new router isn't worth it, then I probably shouldn't bother. And that's my reason for starting this thread.

34 minutes ago, DaDude said:

 

Ok, I apologize for getting so upset. The reason I was getting upset is because people were refusing to answer my question until I revealed all my equipment information, which was irrelevant to the question. Like you said, if a person were to start a thread and ask if buying a new car that can go as fast as X mph is worth the expense, and then people are like, "well what car do you currently have? what kind of tires does it have? What kind of battery does your car have?" None that is relevant to the question, which is frustrated me very much.

 

Anyways, my current router is a Netgear AC1000, which only has a 10/100 LAN & WAN ports, so yeah. It only goes up to 100 mbps. I just bought this a few months ago and I admit, I was negligent with my shopping. I just would've never imagine that a brand like Netgear would sell a product in 2020 with such ancient specs. And they did make the product misleading by advertising that the WiFI capability is 1 gbps, but how the heck can the Wi-Fi go up to 1 gbps if the WAN port is only 10/100?? Very sneaky of them!

 

So my goal would be to buy a new router with 10/100/1000 LAN & WAN ports, so not only will it support my 155 mbps internet, it will also future-proof me in the event my speed increases even more down the road.

 

But then again, if the cost for that new router isn't worth it, then I probably shouldn't bother. And that's my reason for starting this thread.

Wow, that's kind of mind boggling, the thing was first sold in 2017. I'm embarrassed for netgear. Damn, had I bought that router, I would not have even thought of checking if it had gig ethernet, I would have just assumed. I looked up the product spec sheet and yep, only 10/100Mbps

 

image.thumb.png.19b08c616d8f113ec403e6169b6a4b01.png 

2 hours ago, DaDude said:

 

Like you said, if a person were to start a thread and ask if buying a new car that can go as fast as X mph is worth the expense, and then people are like, "well what car do you currently have? what kind of tires does it have? What kind of battery does your car have?" None that is relevant to the question, which is frustrated me very much.

HA! To be Fair all they wanted to know is the make and model of the car you drive to check the Max speed and to make sure your current car wasn't just running like crap! :D

13 minutes ago, warwagon said:

HA! To be Fair all they wanted to know is the make and model of the car you drive to check the Max speed and to make sure your current car wasn't just running like crap! :D

LOL, that's the thing. I just showed you the model of my current router and it is indeed only capable of 100 mbps. That's what I was saying all along, which is why I was so baffled about the confusion of my question.

16 minutes ago, DaDude said:

LOL, that's the thing. I just showed you the model of my current router and it is indeed only capable of 100 mbps. That's what I was saying all along, which is why I was so baffled about the confusion of my question.

They just thought it couldn't possibly be the case that your router only supports 100 meg, and after looking at the specs, of the router, I still thought that LOL ... then I slapped myself back to reality.

31 minutes ago, DaDude said:

LOL, that's the thing. I just showed you the model of my current router and it is indeed only capable of 100 mbps. That's what I was saying all along, which is why I was so baffled about the confusion of my question.

We didn't know that. We needed solid proof, not just your word.

1 hour ago, warwagon said:

They just thought it couldn't possibly be the case that your router only supports 100 meg, and after looking at the specs, of the router, I still thought that LOL ... then I slapped myself back to reality.

Oh believe me, I felt the same way, which is why I just grabbed this router without studying it further, which was silly on my part. But I wasn't looking for anything top of the line, just something basic and you would think in this day and age, ANY router (particularly one with the Netgear name slapped onto it) would be capable of 155 mbps speed. But I guess not.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This looks awesome, I will request access via Steam later this afternoon!
    • Personally, I’ve found that it’s usually worth investing in the infrastructure you don’t want to replace later, especially cabling. Running Cat6A (or better, depending on your needs) during an upgrade is relatively inexpensive compared to having to re-cable a few years down the road. For switches I try to balance current specs with realistic growth. If my budget allows it Ill choose switches with higher uplink speeds which leaves room for expanding later on, but I don’t necessarily overspend on access ports if the endpoints won’t benefit from them anytime soon. One lesson I’ve learned is that planning for scalability pays off. It’s much easier to add devices, VLANs, or higher-bandwidth workloads when your network infrastructure already supports it than to replace hardware later.  What is your budget like?
    • I hate the term, "future-proof." We saw it back in the 90's / 2000's, if not before. You cannot future-proof anything, since there is no definition of how far into the future you plan on prepping for. Best idea is to tell us what you currently have and what its use is at the moment, and we can then offer ideas about some areas that might need an upgrade and other areas that can be left alone.
    • I can agree that it is being used in a small capacity. I worked for a company where their engineers still used XP, and when asked why it was because their sensor software wasn't compatible with newer operating systems and the software was discontinued so they couldn't upgrade the software. Given that the sensors were still in use by companies, they had to continue using XP to support the sensor, otherwise the price to the company would have gone into the millions or billions. Our response was simple: Ok, you can keep the XP machine. But we're removing it from the network. "But then it can't access the Internet or folder shares!" Yup, kinda the point. If someone wants to continue using an unsecure OS they can do, I have no problem with that. But it should be isolated. Simple. I had a fight with a guy in the engineering department for weeks before he finally relented. But we digress.   What do I plan on doing to commemorate the anniversary? Nothing. I have fond memories of the OS, but at the end of the day it's just an OS. If I had some time I might see if I could install it on my Raspberry Pi for a laugh. But my reflex memory with today's OS ideas would probably get me frustrated and I'd uninstall it after 5 mins.
    • Shutter Encoder 20.2 by Razvan Serea Shutter Encoder is one of the best video converter software and image, audio available today. It has been designed by video editors in order to be as accessible and efficient as possible. It is one of the few free professional tools. Based on FFmpeg, it has the largest codec library available. You can thus convert your files into many different formats. Complete settings for the most advanced Shutter Encoder has a panel containing a large number of settings, in order to define your own choices based on your files and perfect your video or audio output. Well-thought-out settings, with parameters predefined to create files quickly and easily. List of functions Without conversion: Cut without re-encoding, Replace audio, Rewrap, Conform, Merge, Extract, Subtitling, Video inserts Sound conversions: WAV, AIFF, FLAC, MP3, AAC, AC3, OPUS, OGG Editing codecs: DNxHD, DNxHR, Apple ProRes, QT Animation, GoPro CineForm, Uncompressed YUV Output codecs: H.264, H.265, VP9, AV1, OGV Broadcast codecs XDCAM HD422, AVC-Intra 100, XAVC, HAP....and much more. Shutter Encoder 20.2 changelog: Added "Intel Quick Sync" hardware acceleration for Linux Added 'Identify speakers' option for "Audio transcription" function Improved installer package Improved video player performance Improved timecode display with drop-frame videos Improved naming convention for surround audio files Fixed splash screen freeze Fixed bug with file hanging Fixed bugs with presets loading Fixed bugs with video player's buffer Fixed bug with 'Total length of file' option Fixed bugs with 'Record screen/device' option Fixed bug with "XAVC" & "XAVC Long GOP" functions Rollback to XPDF tool for PDF conversion Removed unused binary architecture for Mac Various corrections Various improvements Download: Shutter Encoder 20.2 | 166.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Shutter Encoder Portable | 185.0 MB Links: Shutter Encoder Home Page | FAQ / Tips | macOS | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      534
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      265
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!