Is it worth buying a new router for faster internet speed?


Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, sava700 said:

Wow....   This is like going into a auto parts supplier and saying "I need brakes for my car" 

Not really the same thing. It's like going to an auto parts store and telling them you know for a fact your car can only go 65 mph but are wondering if it's worth it to get a new car so you can do at least 80 on the interstate.

 

He says he knows his router can only do 100, and if that's all the information he wants to give then the 100 meg router would to be replaced to get the new speeds. He was just wondering if the extra 55 in speed is worth it.

1 hour ago, Mindovermaster said:

Question, what router does he have if it only has a limit of 100gbps? Plus, where is he getting this said info?

 

Most all routers since 2010 are all 1 gig... 10/100/1000...

Maybe he's still rocking a WRT54G :D  ...  Never mind he said it was neat gear

In short... No. because it's 100mbps (i.e. 12.5MB/s) vs 155mbps (i.e. 19.4MB/s). like others mentioned... you would need a gigabit LAN connection to get more than about 10-11MB/s anyways. still, worst case for you would be 10-11MB/s and that's still plenty fast.

 

personally I would not bother shelling out extra $ for a router as your already benefiting from the $20 less per month and it's not like going from 12.5MB/s to 19.4MB/s will be THAT much of a difference unless your downloading really large files and probably fairly often to.

 

p.s. hell, I still use a older Linksys WRT54GS v1.1 router with FreshTomato 2020.1 firmware (I recently changed the power supply which seems to have cured it's uptime issues). on this it's basically not really possible to exceed 10-11MB/s on the wired connection and the wireless would probably top out around 6.7MB/s and could easily be lower depending on signal quality etc.

Edited by ThaCrip
15 minutes ago, ThaCrip said:

p.s. hell, I still use a older Linksys WRT54GS v1.1 router with FreshTomato 2020.1 firmware.

And we have already determined that you don't have a clue to what real internet is.. You don't stream, you don't do anything... You might as well still be on dialup with your AOL CD...

 

You don't need spend 100$ to get 155mbps... A $30 router can do that...

https://www.amazon.com/Belkin-AC1200-Wireless-Router-F9K1123/dp/B008982LD4

 

$30, gig router - supports 867 PHY 5ghz.. So sure it should be able to do 155 without any issues... If your client can do AC, and or your wired at gig..

 

So your saving 20$ a month... So in less than 2 months you have paid for the new router... Or even if you spend $100 in 5 months you have paid for it...  If your current router is only 100mbps interfaces, then your not doing 100 even, your something less than 100..   As to a 50% in speed not being noticeable - is either high, clueless or not actually using the freaking internet..

 

Here is the big question.. If it was on the ISP that you were playing for 150 and only getting 100, would you be bitching to them - hey!!  WTF!!! So why are you not concerned because its on you that your not getting what your paying for...   So if you go out for a beer, and says 16 oz pour, and they only pour you 12.. Do you complain?  Hey suppose to be 10 oz steak - but this is only 7 at best... Do you just ah oh well...

 

I would for sure invest a few months of your new cheaper plan into a current router that can support the speeds your suppose to have... If you were on a 100mbps plan, and your only seeing 95 because hey your router only has 100mbps interface that would be one thing... But your talking 50% increase in speed..  So why would you not speed a couple of bucks... Its not like its $2K  Its literally $30, you could prob find something for even $20 that could do it..

  • Like 2
Just now, BudMan said:

And we have already determined that you don't have a clue to what real internet is.. You don't stream, you don't do anything... You might as well still be on dialup with your AOL CD

 

You got to let that go.

 

for the record... the only streaming I do is pretty much some YouTube videos which my internet line works fine for. for movies I tend to download etc.

 

1 minute ago, BudMan said:

As to a 50% in speed not being noticeable - is either high, clueless or not actually using the freaking internet..

 

Depends on what a person is doing. like I said once a person reaches a certain level of speed they are easily 'good enough', that's just a hard fact. besides general internet browsing and most downloads is not going to be that big of a deal as if someone is downloading large files fairly often then it will be noticeable. but like I was saying even 10MB/s or so is pretty fast to download anything 1080p or less as it's not like one is going to wait forever. people who complain about that speed are flat out spoiled, especially if it's a individual user (or thereabouts) like is the case with the OP.

33 minutes ago, warwagon said:

Not really the same thing. It's like going to an auto parts store and telling them you know for a fact your car can only go 65 mph but are wondering if it's worth it to get a new car so you can do at least 80 on the interstate.

 

He says he knows his router can only do 100, and if that's all the information he wants to give then the 100 meg router would to be replaced to get the new speeds. He was just wondering if the extra 55 in speed is worth it.

 

Ok, I apologize for getting so upset. The reason I was getting upset is because people were refusing to answer my question until I revealed all my equipment information, which was irrelevant to the question. Like you said, if a person were to start a thread and ask if buying a new car that can go as fast as X mph is worth the expense, and then people are like, "well what car do you currently have? what kind of tires does it have? What kind of battery does your car have?" None that is relevant to the question, which is frustrated me very much.

 

Anyways, my current router is a Netgear AC1000, which only has a 10/100 LAN & WAN ports, so yeah. It only goes up to 100 mbps. I just bought this a few months ago and I admit, I was negligent with my shopping. I just would've never imagine that a brand like Netgear would sell a product in 2020 with such ancient specs. And they did make the product misleading by advertising that the WiFI capability is 1 gbps, but how the heck can the Wi-Fi go up to 1 gbps if the WAN port is only 10/100?? Very sneaky of them!

 

So my goal would be to buy a new router with 10/100/1000 LAN & WAN ports, so not only will it support my 155 mbps internet, it will also future-proof me in the event my speed increases even more down the road.

 

But then again, if the cost for that new router isn't worth it, then I probably shouldn't bother. And that's my reason for starting this thread.

34 minutes ago, DaDude said:

 

Ok, I apologize for getting so upset. The reason I was getting upset is because people were refusing to answer my question until I revealed all my equipment information, which was irrelevant to the question. Like you said, if a person were to start a thread and ask if buying a new car that can go as fast as X mph is worth the expense, and then people are like, "well what car do you currently have? what kind of tires does it have? What kind of battery does your car have?" None that is relevant to the question, which is frustrated me very much.

 

Anyways, my current router is a Netgear AC1000, which only has a 10/100 LAN & WAN ports, so yeah. It only goes up to 100 mbps. I just bought this a few months ago and I admit, I was negligent with my shopping. I just would've never imagine that a brand like Netgear would sell a product in 2020 with such ancient specs. And they did make the product misleading by advertising that the WiFI capability is 1 gbps, but how the heck can the Wi-Fi go up to 1 gbps if the WAN port is only 10/100?? Very sneaky of them!

 

So my goal would be to buy a new router with 10/100/1000 LAN & WAN ports, so not only will it support my 155 mbps internet, it will also future-proof me in the event my speed increases even more down the road.

 

But then again, if the cost for that new router isn't worth it, then I probably shouldn't bother. And that's my reason for starting this thread.

Wow, that's kind of mind boggling, the thing was first sold in 2017. I'm embarrassed for netgear. Damn, had I bought that router, I would not have even thought of checking if it had gig ethernet, I would have just assumed. I looked up the product spec sheet and yep, only 10/100Mbps

 

image.thumb.png.19b08c616d8f113ec403e6169b6a4b01.png 

2 hours ago, DaDude said:

 

Like you said, if a person were to start a thread and ask if buying a new car that can go as fast as X mph is worth the expense, and then people are like, "well what car do you currently have? what kind of tires does it have? What kind of battery does your car have?" None that is relevant to the question, which is frustrated me very much.

HA! To be Fair all they wanted to know is the make and model of the car you drive to check the Max speed and to make sure your current car wasn't just running like crap! :D

13 minutes ago, warwagon said:

HA! To be Fair all they wanted to know is the make and model of the car you drive to check the Max speed and to make sure your current car wasn't just running like crap! :D

LOL, that's the thing. I just showed you the model of my current router and it is indeed only capable of 100 mbps. That's what I was saying all along, which is why I was so baffled about the confusion of my question.

16 minutes ago, DaDude said:

LOL, that's the thing. I just showed you the model of my current router and it is indeed only capable of 100 mbps. That's what I was saying all along, which is why I was so baffled about the confusion of my question.

They just thought it couldn't possibly be the case that your router only supports 100 meg, and after looking at the specs, of the router, I still thought that LOL ... then I slapped myself back to reality.

31 minutes ago, DaDude said:

LOL, that's the thing. I just showed you the model of my current router and it is indeed only capable of 100 mbps. That's what I was saying all along, which is why I was so baffled about the confusion of my question.

We didn't know that. We needed solid proof, not just your word.

1 hour ago, warwagon said:

They just thought it couldn't possibly be the case that your router only supports 100 meg, and after looking at the specs, of the router, I still thought that LOL ... then I slapped myself back to reality.

Oh believe me, I felt the same way, which is why I just grabbed this router without studying it further, which was silly on my part. But I wasn't looking for anything top of the line, just something basic and you would think in this day and age, ANY router (particularly one with the Netgear name slapped onto it) would be capable of 155 mbps speed. But I guess not.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview by Razvan Serea WACUP (WinAmp Community Update Project) is a modern, enhanced version of the classic Winamp music player, designed for better stability, performance, and compatibility. Built for Windows, WACUP retains the familiar Winamp interface while adding 64-bit support, bug fixes, and new features like improved audio format support, customizable skins, and optimized playlist management. Unlike bloated alternatives, WACUP focuses on lightweight performance and regular updates, making it the best choice for fans of the classic Winamp experience. Basically, if you miss the good old days of Winamp and want a modern upgrade that doesn’t mess things up, WACUP is for you! WACUP key features: Classic Winamp Feel – Keeps the familiar interface and functionality. Bug Fixes & Stability – Fixes old Winamp issues and improves performance. 64-Bit Support – Works better on modern systems. More Formats & Plugins – Supports additional audio formats and third-party plugins. Customizable UI – Skins and tweaks for a personalized look. Better Library Management – Improved playlists, media organization, and search. No Bloat – Focuses on performance without unnecessary extras. Regular Updates – Community-driven development with new features and fixes. WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview changelog: Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when doing some of the drag + drop actions within the media library window Fixed a loading crash seen related to a problem with some of the artwork cache image files being restored which should now be better handled allowing for the bad image to be removed without it failing Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when the internal metadata cache clearing is triggered which could block the main ui thread for too long with this now being moved to a background thread Fixed some performance issues with some of the methods related to determining artwork support which mainly affected the local library import / refresh (this is still slower for some compared to other players because there's more data & artwork aspects being checked for which means doing more processing on a single file despite the best of attempts to reduce duplicate / heavy processing where possible) Fixed a crash with the JTFE based missing files hotkey which no one seems to have used for an age for this to appear (maybe it's time to seriously consider stripping out features that aren't being used) Fixed how some of the file types which use extra information to reference their sub-songs is handled which was preventing some from being correctly resolved back to their base file (noticed fixing above) Fixed an issue with the handling of files with underscores in their filepath which wasn't being correctly handled causing some of the filename to be lost when shown as the title if title reading is delayed Fixed a few things that might be behind NotSoDirect not being stable for some setups though am still not certain that the changes done for this are going to fully resolve the problem from the crash reports Fixed the OS toast handling when there's no prior shortcut in the OS start menu to now create the shortcut (needed to allow the yes/no buttons for the new build / post-release toast) to be done as a hidden one so it's less likely to cause annoyance for those not wanting to see it whilst still allowing this less than ideal OS api implementation requirement to be met to avoid toasts without the needed buttons Fixed a regression when moving from taglib1 to taglib2 which broke some of the handling in place to allow for external programs to still access files when wacup has a held open cached instance of the file Everything else Updated cppwinrt (gen_win10shell.dll) to 3.0.260520.1 (26 May 2026) Updated libcurl (libcurl.dll) to 8.2.1 (24 Jun 2026) Updated Monkey's Audio (in_ape.dll) to 13.15 (28 Jun 2026) Updated mpg123 (mpg123.dll) to 1.33.6 (6 Jun 2026) Updated OpenSSL (libcurl.dll) to 3.5.7 (9 Jun 2026) Updated pugixml to 1.16 (16 Jun 2026) Updated taglib (tag2.dll) to 2.3.0 (11 May 2026) Updated vgmstream (in_vgmstream.dll) to the latest Git commit from 28 Jun 2026 Download: WACUP 64-bit | 9.6 MB (Freeware) Download: WACUP 32-bit View: WACUP Website | Screenshots Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • "over a thousand engineering hours" and started selling it but could not take a couple of minuets to send an AI email to ask permission. What an expensive lesson.
    • just tested it yesterday, a simple page with autoloading ADS takes 60mb....just 1 page for 60 megabytes.   poor people with a limited internet never will visit neolose
    • Tor Browser 15.0.17 by Razvan Serea Protect your privacy. Defend yourself against network surveillance and traffic analysis. Tor is a network of virtual tunnels that allows people and groups to improve their privacy and security on the Internet. The Tor software protects you by bouncing your communications around a distributed network of relays run by volunteers all around the world: it prevents somebody from watching your Internet connection and learning what sites you visit, it prevents the sites you visit from learning your physical location, and it lets you access sites which are blocked. The Tor Browser Bundle lets you use Tor on Windows, Mac OS X, or Linux without needing to install any software. It can run off a USB flash drive, comes with a pre-configured web browser to protect your anonymity, and is self-contained. Tor Browser 15.0.17 changelog: All Platforms Updated Tor to 0.4.9.11 Updated NoScript to 13.6.25.1984 Build System / All Platforms Bug tor-browser-build#41821: Update gpg subkeys for boklm Bug tor-browser-build#41827: Update morgan's keychain with renewed key Download: Tor Browser (64-bit) | Tor Browser (32-bit) | 109.0 MB (Open Source) View: Tor Browser Website | Other Operating Systems Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      Wakeen1966 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      530
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      56
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!