• 0

comparison: GitHub and Bitbucket: which offers private repos?


Question

dear fellows, 

 

 

well i like to have private repos - which is a  a true top-feature

 

 

Both GitHub and Atlassian’s Bitbucket offer paying customers - but afaik only BitBucket offers an (unlimited) amount of private (!!) and public repositories. What distinguishes them isn’t their core hosting function. It’s how they affect our projects 

 

If we have a closer look at the most basic and fundamental difference between GitHub and Bitbucket, some say that: GitHub is focused around public code, and Bitbucket is for private. Basically, GitHub has a huge open-source community, and Bitbucket tends to have mostly enterprise and business users.

 

But some mentioned that we now also can have private repos at github too!?  Is this true!? 

 

 

i have had a quick view on the page here with the overview - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_source-code-hosting_facilities

but i was not able to find out what is true - doese Github offer private repos too!? 

 

 

regarding the feature-set i found out that: 

 

GitHub: GitHub has approx 100 third-party integrations available, many of which are GitHub-exclusive. 

For example, QuantifiedCode scans for issues in your code, notifies you of any problems, and automatically offers a fix for you to approve. GitHub’s integrations are all third-party. It even integrates with popular Atlassian apps, like JIRA. As a stand-alone product that relies solely on outside developers for extensions, GitHub doesn’t offer the unifying  compatibility of a product suite. 

 

Bitbucket; Bitbucket seamlessly integrates with other Atlassian software like JIRA, HipChat, and Bamboo and Trello  besides tht it has a distinct quantitative advantage over GitHub — the Atlassian Marketplace. Users can choose from nearly 2,300 apps — made by Atlassian, third-party developers, and individuals. 

 

Other features are:

Unlimited private repos: a true top-feature

bug tracking, issue tracking, service desks and project management. 

Pull requests and code reviews and of course Branch comparison and commit history

Bitbucket Mac and Windows client called SourceTree; Android app called BitBeaker -  a great thing!

Integration with tools like Jira, Crucible, Bamboo, Jenkins, HipChat and deep integration with Trello, 

Bitbucket lets you restrict access to a single branch. This aweseome feature helps you alot: it prevents nightmare situations such as an accidental master push,

Bitbucket Snippets allow you to create and manage multi-file snippets of all kinds.

 

 

Github-features:

An integrated issue tracker right within your project

Milestones and labels within projects and of course Branch comparison views

Native applications for Windows and Mac desktops, and also an Android app - a great thing!

Support for over 200 programming languages and data formats

Security such as use of SSL, SSH and/or https for all data transmission, and two-factor authentication for login

API integration for easy integration of 3rd-party tools, and integration with a large number of other tools and platforms. Some examples are Asana and Zendesk for issue/ bug tracking; CloudBees, Travis 

 

 

Well - the question is : does Bitbucket has the distinct qualitative advantage over GitHub  - to offer private repos? Or does Github also have these too - in these days? 

 

Love to hear from you 

 

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I agree, but that's the popular online opinion about them, so I followed it. I do think they have their point, no matter how combative they sound most of the time.
    • M$ can bring whatever the hell it wants, and then guess what's not installed in my Mac.
    • Windows 11's big performance boost is finally available for all by Taras Buria Over the last few months, Microsoft has been very busy fixing Windows 11 with features that users have been asking the company for a long time. An upgraded Start menu, the ability to change the taskbar position, new Windows Update features, and plenty more. However, not all changes are visible on the surface. Some exciting upgrades happened under the hood, and one of those upgrades is now available to all Windows 11 users. The so-called "Low Latency Profile" is a special performance mode that aims to make Windows 11 snappier and more responsive. It boosts the processor clock speed to its maximum for a brief moment when rendering user interface elements or launching apps. As such, apps launch faster, and things like the Start menu or quick settings appear on the screen faster, although some are sceptical about it. Microsoft is not sharing many details about the new profile. The official release notes do not even mention it, with Microsoft only saying that the update "accelerates app launch and core shell experiences such as Start menu, Search, and Action Center." Also, you may need to enable it manually, as new features are rolling out gradually. Here is how to do it: Download ViVeTool from GitHub and unpack wherever convenient. Navigate to the folder containing the ViveTool files with the CD command. For example, if you have placed ViveTool in C:\Vive, type CD C:\Vive. Type vivetool /enable /id:58989092 and press Enter. Restart your computer. After restarting your computer, launch Task Manager or any other hardware-monitoring software and check the processor clocks when opening the Start menu, Action Center, and more. Your processor should spike to its highest possible speed and then return to lower clocks. In addition to Low Latency Mode, the June 2026 Patch Tuesday update delivers additional features, such as multi-camera mode for apps (several apps can use a single camera stream), shared Bluetooth audio, improved Task Manager, and more.
    • I agree, especially with newer versions of MS Office supporting ODF documents, there isn't even a compatibility argument to be made. It should default to ODF on a clean install, with admin configurable options to make MS Office the default if that is desired.
    • Are they on crack at M$? Surely living on an alternative reality? A good dump of mine would run faster down the toilet if I did not flush it. But still looks better than this pile of slop. By the way, did they also comment on what's the next "functionality added"? Maybe you can improve it if you add even more stuff to this vomitware.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      Jim Dugan earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Tommi118 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      488
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      196
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      155
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!