File encryption software recommendations


Recommended Posts

Hello. I've been looking into encrypting my files, which are stored in the cloud. So far I've been thinking between NordLocker and Cryptomator. I even noticed that the first one has a bounty campaign, I've never seen something like this before. Does that mean that they have better security? Or maybe that they're really trying to improve their service via the help of freelance hackers? In any case I would like to hear your thoughts on using file encryption and if it's even necessary.

  On 22/04/2020 at 07:41, CriticMunde37 said:

if it's even necessary.

Expand  

That all depends - what are you storing in the cloud?  And the other big question is where?  And how.. Are these files you specifically upload?  Are they files that are sync'd up there like dropbox?

 

If they are video's of your cat - kind of hard to justify encryption.. Now if they are private videos of you and your loved one expressing your love - might be another story, etc.  Or if its a spreadsheet holding the nuke launch codes for India arsenal?

 

Here is one thing I will say about encryption, more often than not its not justified in the least.. And more times than not it will lock the user out of their own files more often than actually provide protection from others viewing them.

 

example:  I store copies of my audio books in the cloud (dropbox which already uses encryption).. I also store util type software that I might need in one place.. I use it to sync some info between machines.. You know notes on how to do xyz or something.. I have a txt file with some commands in them, so don't have to look them up if need to do them on another machine.

 

I am not storing passwords in a clear text, or in anything on there.  I am not storing any personal info on there.  I am not storing any sort of media that could be of issue if leaked to the public or someone other than me saw, etc..

 

With such use - how could anyone justify the added overhead of use, even if free cost money wise any sort of 3rd party encryption?  The most likely outcome in doing such a thing would be frustration in use/access of my own stuff.. Having to reauth with some other password or OTP or 2fa to get access.. And worse case actual loss of access to said data - because lost the password/key or something went wrong in the encryption/decryption... Which most often would happen exactly at the time that I wanted/needed access to said file the most ;)

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
  On 22/04/2020 at 11:58, BudMan said:

Or if its a spreadsheet holding the nuke launch codes for India arsenal?

Expand  

I laughed so hard at that...

 

Encryption depends on what you want hidden. Like BudMan said.

 

Most cloud services are already encrypted when you upload files. You can set them as shareable or not. You can also password protect Zip/Rar files on the fly.

  • 3 weeks later...

Can’t speak for Nordlocker as I’ve not used it however I’ve been using Cryptomator for several years and have to say it’s excellent; as Budman says don’t encrypt stuff you don’t need to but I keep a small 1gb crypt backed up on both OneDrive and Dropbox which has certain documents and backups of some of my keys in. Cryptomator is open source so I trust that the community has vetted it, but they’ve also had it audited.

@stereopixels

 

Thanks for the Cryptomator suggestion as it sounds like a solid choice for all around ease-of-use paired with good security.

 

I also plan on uploading something online (my password managers database file) semi-soon but I tend to go with the more paranoid encryption route. sort of a double encryption with two different passwords. like the password manager file put inside a VeraCrypt container (which the VeraCrypt container uses some keyfiles) and then put the VeraCrypt container file inside a .7z file. so someone would have to break through the .7z first, then VeraCrypt and then the password manager database file in order to get to the sensitive info and I got the keyfiles for the VeraCrypt container stored on a different account/site of which I put multiple keyfiles inside so even if someone got a hold of the keyfiles (which are password protected (so they would also have to crack this)) they would not know which ones are used for the VeraCrypt container and I got a plenty strong password on it straight up. so the odds of them guessing the VeraCrypt password are pretty slim but with the keyfiles should be that much harder.

 

I realize what I am doing is a decent amount of work, which some might consider overkill, but it's better peace of mind and it's not something ill have to update much as it's obvious Cryptomator is much simpler but I prefer the paranoid route since I am not relying on one encryption program which should further lower the chances of someone breaking it and the entropy of the passwords I am using (which is guaranteed since it's truly random) should be plenty high enough for the foreseeable future.

 

hell, who knows... maybe ill pair Cryptomator with the stuff I am using as then someone would have to break through a total of four encryption schemes before they could access the data. but then again maybe not as the more stuff I wrap it in, it could be a issue in the future when retrieving that data since we need to make sure the programs are still around to access the data if I need to etc. but I figure with what I am using, it should satisfy the more paranoid types unless someone thinks 7z and VeraCrypt is crap security.

  • 3 months later...
  On 22/04/2020 at 11:58, BudMan said:

I store copies of my audio books in the cloud (dropbox which already uses encryption)..

Expand  

Dropbox has a backdoor to the encryption, staff can access your data if they want to and they give access to third parties.

 

10. What categories of personal information are included in the information Dropbox collects and discloses to trusted third parties?

 

“Your stuff” is what you decide to store in your Dropbox account.

 

https://help.dropbox.com/accounts-billing/security/privacy-policy-faq

find Linus Tech Tips video on yt when he made home cloud storage with sync on other device too. it worth it

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
  On 07/09/2020 at 20:27, DramaInc said:

Be wary of Cryptomator on OneDrive. OneDrive will think it’s ransomware. No fix is available atm. 

Expand  

No offense, but OneDrive sucks anyways. I like pCloud myself. Super fast, no ads. 10GB free. 500GB for $4.99 a month and Cryptomator works like a charm with it.

  On 14/09/2020 at 13:43, spacelordmaster said:

No offense, but OneDrive sucks anyways. I like pCloud myself. Super fast, no ads. 10GB free. 500GB for $4.99 a month and Cryptomator works like a charm with it.

Expand  

Oh yeah I’d never use OneDrive.  But someone was discussing using it while also with CM and thats a Nono.  

I use NextCloud right now, but I do want to move to something I dont have to maintain.  

  • Like 1

You might want to look into Veracrypt. It's a fork from the old TrueCrypt, and can be used to create encrypted volumes to store files in. So while it doesn't encrypt individual files (maybe it can do that, I haven't looked), it's easy to make a "folder" for encryption. I've been using TrueCrypt or Veracrypt for probably 10+ years and it works well.

 

https://www.veracrypt.fr/code/VeraCrypt/

  On 18/09/2020 at 01:13, Fezmid said:

You might want to look into Veracrypt. It's a fork from the old TrueCrypt, and can be used to create encrypted volumes to store files in. So while it doesn't encrypt individual files (maybe it can do that, I haven't looked), it's easy to make a "folder" for encryption. I've been using TrueCrypt or Veracrypt for probably 10+ years and it works well.

 

https://www.veracrypt.fr/code/VeraCrypt/

Expand  

Veracrypt is great stuff, but they do not have an iOS app unfortunately.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AnyDesk 9.5.7 by Razvan Serea AnyDesk is a fast remote desktop system and enables users to access their data, images, videos and applications from anywhere and at any time, and also to share it with others. AnyDesk is the first remote desktop software that doesn't require you to think about what you can do. CAD, video editing or simply working comfortably with an office suite for hours are just a few examples. AnyDesk is designed for modern multi-core CPUs. Most of AnyDesk's image processing is done con­currently. This way, AnyDesk can utilize up to 90% of modern CPUs. AnyDesk works across multiple platforms and operating systems: Windows, Linux, Free BSD, Mac OS, iOS and Android. Just five megabytes - downloaded in a glimpse, sent via email, or fired up from your USB drive, AnyDesk will turn any desktop into your desktop in se­conds. No administrative privileges or installation needed. AnyDesk 9.5.7 changelog: Fixed Bugs Fixed deadlock when updating chat server Fixed crashes caused by exceptions in internal communication layer Fixed crash when opening new monitor in Session in a new window Fixed crash on shutdown Fixed bug that allowed naming Permission Profiles identical to predefined Profiles Fixed bug that could cause licensed remote clients to show up as free Fixed visual bug that caused Set-Password button to show up when Unattended Access was disabled Fixed bug that lead to selecting the wrong initial resolution for webcams New Features Added command line option --record-screen to start a Screen Recording Other Changes Improved visual consistency in some list views Download: AnyDesk 9.5.7 | macOS ~14.0 MB (Free for private use, paid upgrade available) Links: AnyDesk Home Page | Other platforms | Release History | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • WUT?! Tell us you've never built desktop software without telling us you've never built desktop software... The chromium rendering engine is the content-rendering engine for "chromium-based browsers," but that does NOT mean there's a full-on UI underneath that is somehow bloating these products. The bloat is from the additional UI components that the browser vendor (Vivaldi) is adding atop the base package. Most chromium browsers customize the default skin/theme of the overall package so there's absolutely zero added overhead; it's really just a different CSS-based theme pack. Vivaldi, however, adds more than just a different skin; they add built-in extensions (that are managed by other built-in extensions), add other customization modules, and all kinds of other bloat -- and these add-ons are EXACTLY where the resource-hogging stems from. The mere fact it's a chromium-based browser has no impact on the matter. Lastly, power users literally DO notice resource-intensive applications -- they'll even be familiar with tools and widgets that expose those measurements the way only a power-user would! General consumers, however, would simply remark that their rig is sluggish and probably outdated and blindly upgrade to whatever the salespeople are hawking at the local computer store. General consumers wouldn't even upgrade their existing computer cuz they wouldn't know how to!
    • Nope, they just removed the game from sales.
    • Welcome to Neowin! Please enjoy your stay!
    • WTF is this title? It reads like I'm having a stroke.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Celilo earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Year In
      K.I.S.S. earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      solidox earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      solidox earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Devesh Beri earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      439
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      165
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      149
    4. 4
      Nick H.
      66
    5. 5
      +thexfile
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!