Recommended Posts

Anybody ever heard of and/or used this browser? I  came across it yesterday and downloaded it, but not to much info about it any where? Appears to be 2 different versions of it when searching for it. The first link below is the version I'm trying out, but when searching specifically for it, most links go to the second link below. Installing from that second link is a version that doesn't have the same settings page and I am unable to install ublock origin in it. Doesn't use Chrome web store. I can use Chrome web store and install ublock origin using the version from first link.

 

https://www.malavida.com/en/soft/superbird/

 

http://superbird-browser.com/index.php

 

Didn't pick up any malware or anything with either version, but I did remove the version from that second link from computer.

Never heard of it. Taking a look, the first thing that pops out is the lack of information. The second link 'looks' like the actual site however there is almost no information about who is creating this browser. To say there is no malware is misleading.  How could anyone know if its just not tracking and grabbing everything you do on the web. Without looking at the source, you just have to trust it. Now that said, we do normally trust the popular alternative chromium based browsers because they have demonstrated their claims. Brave, Vivaldi, Opera and even the new Edge are all secure and chromium based but none are created by an unknown source.  

 

Personally I'd skip this one.

I hadn't heard about it until you mentioned it, but there are a couple of things that make me wary. The first would be your mention of there being different versions depending on where you download it from. Are they just different version numbers, or is there something else going on there?

The second thing that concerns me is the website. There are errors in the language, there is a section that says "video placeholder," and there is their boast that no information is sent to Google and it is protected against PRISM. That is all well and good, but from a quick look I have no idea where the information is sent.

After playing with it for a day and trying to check any traffic in and out of the browser, I didn't notice any weird activity, but I do believe I will now pass on this browser as suggested. FWIW, they do also make a version for Linux, if that really means anything?

 

Browser was actually pretty snappy.

 

Thanks for the replies :)

Hi, since you are looking for alternative browser i suggest to check this one, i always have Coc Coc installed as well Chrome and Firefox, though recently I replaced chrome with Brave on home pcs.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cốc_Cốc

 

This is a great fast browser with an interesting media download feature build in - i was able to download media for offline viewing that was not easily accessible in other browsers.  and multi thread downloads.  Media download works better and more reliably then many plugins designed to do the same in chrome.  24 million users in Vietnam, and a LOT of fans across the world.

 

 

Cốc Cốc is able to find media content (audio, video) on most streaming websites and save it to the computer for viewing or listening offline, by one click on an icon on toolbar.[10] Except for several premium websites, all popular streaming websites, for example, YouTube and Dailymotion and Vimeo, are downloadable on the browser.

 

Files are downloaded in multiple streams, which under certain conditions can accelerate download speeds by up to eight times, depending on the bandwidth of the Internet connections and the speed at which the server sends files.[10] At present, an option to increase or decrease the downloading speed is not provided.

 

Unlike Google Chrome and most other browsers based on Chromium, which removes and cancels all pending downloads when the browser is closed, Cốc Cốc is able to save and resume partial downloads (assuming that the server hosting the file supports this feature).

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brave_(web_browser)

 

Very fast and private.

 

Brave browser overview

  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
    • You could disable this "functionality/feature/whatever" with 2 registry keys, ages ago.
    • My Photos app is version 2026.11050.1001.0 and it remembers the window size and position. My Snipping Tool is version 11.2602.49.0 and it can capture the taskbar.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      185
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!